Without,

 

Let’s assume, you’ve never read any of my writings. This is the first time, you read what I have written. I know you are there and I want you to know, what I write is as new to me, as it is to you. My Embodied Language (EL) is always new, but your Disembodied Language (DL) is unable to accept that. Supposedly, everything has already been said or done. It is often said, there is nothing new under the sun. However, EL takes newness to a whole new level. Without EL, you are bound to live in a world of make-belief.

 

The claim on newness, originality, naturalness, fun, truth, authenticity and intelligence, is made in DL all the time, yet, it is empty talk, only pretentiousness. We fake it, until we make it. Who cares if you make it, when all you ever do is fake it? You have been sold – hook, line and sinker – on the false notion, that your usual way of talking – DL – is acceptable, necessary and inevitable, but once you find out about EL, you are stunned by the realization, that you have been betrayed by everyone, who has DL with you. You also have DL with yourself and you harm yourself constantly with your own DL and the only way to stop doing that, is to hear how horrible you sound. Yes, you sound absolutely awful with DL, but you sound so calm, relaxed and confident in EL.

 

Without DL, you are a different person, as you no longer feel stressed, fearful, confused, anxious or agitated. Moreover, you live a different life, because by stopping your DL, you realize, that how you deal with your language, determines everything you do. Only without your mechanical, but usual way of talking –  in which you aren’t even allowed to be yourself – can you begin to have some EL and feel  truly happy. Although it may take some time, to get done with your conditioning history with DL – and, realistically, you are never completely done with it – once you begin to have a few moments of EL, you have put DL in its place, as you are on your way. Life just keeps on getting better and better, as you have begun to sense your Language Enlightenment (LE).

 

Every time you will succeed by having some more EL by yourself – because you will take more and more time, to explore the expression of your LE with your EL – you will cherish and nourish the experience of being without language. Your EL is like pure magic, because you speak, but without words, you hear, but without words, you write, but without words and you read, but without words. How can this be?

 

Each instance of EL – initially, there are only a few, but they will become more and more, as you keep on exploring, what it is like, to listen to yourself, while you speak, out loud, alone, with yourself, about your own experiences – is a dismantling, a dissolvement, a transcendence of what you have called your thinking or your mind. Only without DL, can and will you start to have delightful EL, in which your problematic thinking effortlessly disappears.

 

It is so fascinating, beautiful and rejuvenating, to experience yourself without words, yes, without language and, yet, to have the EL, which makes this possible. The freedom, you feel, is the liberation from what you know, which is your DL, but the excitement and anticipation you have, while you engage in EL, is the whole-hearted faith in the positive outcomes, which keep accumulating. In DL,  problems keep piling up, but in EL, you will reap the fruits of your actions. As you listen to what you say and read what you are writing, you’ll notice,  your language evaporates, while you are filled with bliss.

 

In spite of education and scientific progress, many people still believe – superstitiously, unintelligently, catastrophically and stubbornly – in some higher power or in something, their own mini-deity, their mind, which, presumably, is more important, than how they use their own language. In effect, all their energy goes to their deity or to the goal or purpose, their language makes them believe they have. With EL all that energy will come back to you. This is not a promise, but a fact, which, without your verification, is meaningless. DL is the language of meaninglessness and you are better off without it. EL gives real meaning to your life, as you know for sure, you will have more and more, as it is so good.     

 

Right,  

 

Yesterday, I wrote in Dutch, about being wrong, but today, I want to write, in English, about being right. Of course, right or wrong are verbal constructs, we apply to our behavior, in the idle hope this results in behavioral control, but nothing is further from the truth. This falsehood is a product of Disembodied Language (DL), which is our common way of talking. Behavioral control requires a novel way of dealing with our language. Only if the right behavior is being produced, can we say: our language was effective.

 

When we engage in Embodied Language (EL) – by talking out loud with ourselves and by listening to the sound of our voice – we get everything right, what we got wrong with our DL. It is such delight to be right in this way, as one is only busy with oneself. Although one is inclined to talk about it with others, those who engage in DL never accept someone with EL is right. To the contrary, they always claim to be right, while someone with EL doesn’t give a damn.

 

Being right with EL is having the right words, but also the right way of speaking, listening and writing like this and reading it, in such a manner, that the language is created, even though it is already there. When we read from our DL perspective, it seems as if we must understand what is written, but when we read from our experience of being right with our EL, we know, only our own interpretation of it, is the right one. Writings, which demand from the reader, that he or she takes on the writer’s perspective, are not the kind of writings someone with EL wants to read. In the same way, that the speaker with EL would like to have EL with another speaker, he or she also wants to read the EL from another writer.  

 

What is right for me, as an individual, has nothing to do with what is inadvertently expected from me, as a member from some group. One cannot be right by considering oneself as part of a family, belonging to a church, voting left or right, identifying with one’s profession, imagining as a man, one is a woman, sharing the same hatred, truth or being a victim. Group-behavior always excludes individual behavior, in the exactly same way, that our other-listening excludes our self-listening, but our self-listening includes our other-listening, while our individual behavior excludes our group-behavior. It isn’t right for someone with EL, to participate in any kind of group-behavior and as long as this, because of our old conditioning, continues, our EL stops again.

 

It took me a long time, to discern right from wrong, according to the continuation of my EL. Of course, also speaking the same language is belonging to a group, but this is where EL is so fascinating, as we speak our own language, with our own language. We know that we are right when we do that and we are wrong, if we don’t. In other words, being right depends entirely on us and allows us to condemn the whole world as wrong, because we are the only ones, who engage in EL. Moreover, we know from our experience, the suffering involved in DL and so, we consider it absolutely wrong, everyone keeps  inflicting so much pain and trouble, for themselves as well as for others, with their DL. It is astonishing to us, that DL – a form of acting – is accepted as normal and is praised, as if it is something great.

 

When we for the first time begin to listen to our own EL, we are taking a bath in our own joy and truth. Everything we say fits and is advantageous to us. We are right, because we are rigorous, precise, honest and exact. It is an enormous contrast with the great mess we are, in due to our involvement in DL.  Once the difference between our DL and EL gets clear, we can’t help but conclude, DL is unsuitable, inappropriate, but also unintelligent, insensitive and  harmful. Furthermore, our DL is corrupt, criminal, unfair, immoral and unethical, while our EL – the right way of using language – is completely ignored.

 

Right now, you don’t talk with me, but the fact is, you also don’t talk with yourself. You would have EL right away, if you talked with me, because with me you can talk with yourself. I am not some therapist, I am someone, who is right, because he has EL and if you would talk with me, you would have to admit, that you were wrong, so very wrong, with your DL. I feel, everyone has the right to know about the great difference between DL and EL. It is because of your DL, the world is going to hell in a hand-basket, but everything is going to be all right, once you engage in EL. Your language will come out right, when you take time to feel good about your embodied sound.                

 

Fout,

 

Ik heb mezelf heel vaak tevergeefs afgevraagd, waarom ik iets weer helemaal fout en verkeerd had gedaan, terwijl ik toch zo hard mijn best deed, om het goed te doen? Waarom vergat ik iets, wat ik had moeten meenemen? Waarom schreef ik iets niet op, zodat ik het me later kon herinneren? Waarom had de twijfel over de juistheid van mijn handelen, bijna altijd tot gevolg, dat ik – tot mijn eigen grote onsteltenis, spijt en schaamte – precies nou juist datgene deed, wat ik niet had moeten doen?

 

Ofschoon ik, als kind, altijd wel probeerde, om, zogezegd, na te denken over het katte-kwaad wat ik had uitgehaald – omdat ik wilde voorkomen, dat ik voor de zoveelste keer, met veel geschreeuw en fysiek geweld zou worden afgestraft – begreep ik nooit, wat men nou eigenlijk bedoelde, als men honderden keren op dwangmatige, kwade wijze tegen mij zei, dat ik maar eens moest leren, om beter na te denken.

 

Als ik weer in de fout was gegaan, dan kwam de waarheid altijd wel boven de tafel en ik was nooit in staat, om te doen zoals iedereen doet en om dus mijn fouten te verbergen. Het zat mij altijd dwars, als ik iets fout had gedaan en ik ben dan ook lange tijd bezig gebleven, mezelf omlaag te halen, door te proberen het goed te maken of het goed te doen.

 

Omdat ik maar niet kon begrijpen, waarom ik niet in staat was om mijn wan-gedrag te voorkomen, was ik  mij er al op jonge leeftijd pijnlijk van bewust, dat de fout niet bij mij lag, maar bij anderen, die, zo scheen het mij toe, leken te wachten op mijn fouten, zodat zij mij weer konden straffen en hun gelijk bewijzen. Men zei dan heel geirriteerd tegen mij: en ik had je nog zo gezegd, dat je zus of zo moest doen en wat gebeurt er dan? Je doet nooit wat er gezegd wordt.

 

Op vierenzestigste leeftijd, weet ik heel zeker, dat het begaan van mijn vele fouten, altijd een bewijs was van mijn gelijk. Ook al heb ik mijzelf eigenlijk nooit echt kunnen of willen bewijzen, toch is mijn falen, voor mij, het bewijs, dat het goed was, dat ik het keer op keer fout deed. Elke keer als ik hierover, trachtte na te denken, kon ik nergens op komen en dwaalde ik af naar zaken, die mij afleiden van wat er aan de hand was. Mij werd verweten, dat ik totaal geen realiteit’s besef of bewustzijn zou hebben.

 

Van jongst af aan al, was ik niet in staat om te doen zoals de anderen deden en wilde ik ook eigenlijk helemaal niet doen zoals de anderen. Waarom zou ik mij intereseren voor dit onbelangrijke, schijnbaar onmogelijke, onaangename en altijd veroordelende nadenken? Al werd ik hiervoor vele malen gestraft, ik had heimelijk altijd al de gewaarwoording, dat ik me heel goed kon redden, zonder na te denken.

 

Ik besef nu, dat denken niet eens bestaat en dat de oplossing, die ik vond voor mijn dilemma, altijd te maken had, met wat ik hardop tegen mijzelf zei en daarom dus kon horen. Eveneens was het schrijven aan mijzelf – over dit praten met en dit luisteren naar mijzelf – een gedrag, dat een nieuw perspectief  opende, aangezien ik hierdoor zelf-verzekerd begon te handelen vanuit de instructies, die ik mijzelf had gegeven. Zonder dit schrijven en zonder het lezen van wat ik aan mijzelf had geschreven, bleef ik nog steeds vele schadelijke dingen doen, waarvan ik eigenlijk al vele jaren tegen mijzelf zei, dat ik dat niet zou moeten doen. Zonder het lezen van wat ik aan mijzelf en voor mijzelf had geschreven, leek ik nog steeds niet volledig te vertrouwen, wat ik aan mijzelf met mijn Belichaamde Taal (BT) had gezegd.

 

Wanneer men volledige aandacht heeft voor het feit, dat men, over het algemeen, wat is geschreven als veel belangrijker beschouwd, dan wat is gezegd, dan is het ineens ook niet zo merkwaardig, dat mijn schrijven aan mijzelf, over het praten met mijzelf en het luisteren naar mijzelf, van zo’n doorslaggevend karakter was. Het is heel opmerkelijk, dat schrijven aan mijzelf, pas goed op gang is gekomen, nadat ik was opgehouden, om anderen te instrueren over psychologie en BT. Met andere woorden, ik kon mijn taal pas werkelijk op mijzelf gaan richten – zowel in het spreken, luisteren, schrijven en lezen – nadat ik mij niet langer meer met anderen bezig hield.  

 

Mijn taal is levendiger dan ooit tevoren en iedere dag heb ik prachtige inzichten en openen zich weer nieuwe perspectieven, die met mijn Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) onmogelijk waren. De volledigheid van onze taal is afhankelijk van de tijd en aandacht, die wij spenderen aan ons spreken met onszelf, het luisteren naar onszelf, het schrijven over, waarom dit spreken met onszelf en luisteren naar wat wij aan onszelf te zeggen hebben, zo belangrijk is en het lezen van wat daadwerkelijk voor ons zwart op wit is komen te staan, omdat wij het hebben geschreven. 

 

Er is geen enkele twijfel aan de waarneming, dat onze eigen taal, onze BT, alleen werkzaam is, als wij er bewust mee bezig zijn, door te spreken, te luisteren, te schrijven en te lezen. Bovendien zijn de vele positieve gevolgen van deze gewaarwording van taal zeer verstrekkend, omdat het niet valt te ontkennen, dat taal volledig afwezig is, als wij ons niet bezighouden met spreken, luisteren, schrijven of lezen. De afwezigheid van taal is een extatisch gebeuren, aangezien de aanwezigheid van BT een bewuste aangelegenheid was. Met OT komen wij nooit tot het weldadige besef van de afwezigheid van taal, omdat we in OT onbewust met onze taal omgaan.

 

De afwezigheid van BT is net zo verkwikkend als de aanwezigheid ervan. BT is onze eigen taal, maar OT is de taal van anderen, waarin wij het contact met onszelf ongemerkt verloren. In OT is onze omgang met taal automatisch, omdat wij niet naar onszelf luisteren terwijl wij spreken. Bijgevolg is al het schrijven en het lezen, over hoe wij gewend zijn te spreken, een voortzetting van de desastreuze wijze waarop onze taal ons van onze taal doet afkeren.

 

OT heeft een dissociatieve werking en ofschoon dit effect ons in staat stelt om te overleven – zoals ik al eerder beschreef – blijven wij in OT spreken vanuit angst, strijd, conflict, vlucht of afleiding. OT is altijd reactief, maar dit wil echter niet zeggen, dat BT bedachtzaam is. Wij noemen het zo, omdat wij nog niet hebben erkend, dat er niets te denken valt als wij volledige aandacht hebben voor ons spreken, luisteren, schrijven en lezen. BT stelt ons daartoe in staat, aangezien wij niet langer vastlopen in de door OT in stand-gehouden illusie, dat wij iets denken.

 

Wanneer wij ons tegoed hebben gedaan aan BT, dan zijn we stil zonder taal. Ik weet, dat ik kort geleden zei, dat ik stilte preferer, die vanuit de taal mogelijk is en dat ik die zogenaamde  stilte, die dus altijd de ontkenning van onze eigen taal inhoudt, verafschuw, maar vandaag zeg ik, dat de stilte, die tot stand komt, omdat wij weten, dat taal altijd samenhangt met spreken, luisteren, schrijven en lezen, een hele andere stilte is, dan de stilte, die wordt gecreerd door BT. Je zou dus ook kunnen zeggen, dat die stilte niet wordt gecreerd en alleen wordt waargenomen in de afwezigheid van taal, wat dus inhoudt, dat wij nog spreken, nog luisteren, nog schrijven of lezen.

 

Stilzijn zonder taal, is niet stilzijn voorbij de taal. Er is geen taal en wij gaan niet voorbij taal, in de stilte van BT. Er valt niets over die stilte te zeggen of te schrijven en er is ook niets over te schrijven of te lezen. In stilte zonder taal zijn wij dus ook niet meer over Taal Verlichting (TV) aan het praten. Het is zalig om deze stilte te ervaren en te beseffen, dat alles in deze ruimte wordt losgelaten. Wij kunnen de ogen sluiten of openhouden, het maakt helemaal niet uit. Ook kunnen wij hierover toch weer verder praten, luisteren, schrijven en lezen. Deze transformerende gewaarwording maakt dat wij ons heel anders gaan gedragen, dan voordat wij tot dit inzicht kwamen. Eigenlijk maakt het helemaal niets meer voor ons uit, wat we doen of niet doen en het idee, dat we het iets fout deden verdwijnt.    

 

Only,

 

Only because I have Embodied Language (EL), can I acknowledge the catastrophic lies, created by our Disembodied Language (DL), which set the stage for how we use our language. Only in EL, do we have a realistic experience of our language, because in DL, we fabricate and fantasize without even knowing it.

 

Only if you listen to the sound of your voice, while you speak out loud with yourself, will you be able to make the blissful discovery, that language is only happening, is only existing and is only noticeable, when you say, hear, write or read something. There is no language, if you don’t do any one of these four.

 

What people have called the mind and thinking, is a product of DL, our habitual way of talking, in which we don’t listen to ourselves, as listening to others, as well as being listened to by others, is considered to be more important, than listening to ourselves. The fact that we, unknowingly, don’t hear ourselves in our usual way of talking, is deeply problematic.

 

We can only begin to really listen to ourselves – or for that matter, to each other – when we completely abandon this nonsense idea that we think. Thought is an invention of our DL. The fact that everyone, all the time, everywhere, engages in DL, doesn’t make it so, that it is true, there is an inner me, who thinks or has an inner dialogue.

 

In addition, to our, unconscious, dumb, mechanical, inability to listen – to ourselves or each other – we are also incapable of having genuine interaction, as long as we remain so enthralled by our infatuation with our verbal constructs. Furthermore, since we find, what is written, more important than what is said, everything is upside down with our language.

 

Another way of formulating the aforementioned, is that our language is out of control, because we have this false, frightening, superstitious idea, that it is determined by thought, rather than by something we can see, hear, write or read. This lack of control is at least somewhat apparent, as we, presumably, always have something on our mind. However, all our attempts to quiet our illusive mind have failed.   

 

Only with our EL, can we express and, thus, realize our Language Enlightenment (LE). Language doesn’t exist inside of us, as it is always – only – said, heard, written or read. Once we calmly and repeatedly say this to ourselves – while we listen to and enjoy the sound of our own voice – we can’t help, but admit, that this falsehood is at the core of all our problems.

 

Only by logically, consistently, joyfully, confidently and patiently instructing and telling ourselves, by speaking and by writing – that we can really stop our DL, that we can boldly step out of our traumatic, tragic, troublesome history of conditioning, that we feel fortunate, intelligent and happy, to engage in EL, as it allows us to express our LE, and, therefore, be who we are – can we address and change any other self-defeating behavior, which came about and was maintained by our involvement in DL.  

 

There is only a deep and profound silence, when we don’t speak, when we don’t hear anyone, who says anything, when we also don’t speak with ourselves, when we don’t write something and when we don’t read anything. Our perception has totally changed, because, indeed, our nightmare of having a mind, is no longer created and maintained by our language.

 

The correct use of our language is revealed to us by our EL. Only by becoming involved in and familiar with our EL, can we recover from the devastating effects of our almost permanent involvement in DL. Of course, we have all experienced moments of EL, but we have never consciously, skillfully capitalized on these accidental brief instances of our verbal clarity and wellbeing. Our language only makes sense, if the speaker is listened to by a listener. However, it is so easy to forget, each speaker is also his or her own listener. Likewise, each writer is also his or her own reader. In other words, we can speak to or write for ourselves, but we will only regularly do this, after we have first experienced and become aware of the gigantic difference between our DL and EL. It is this difference which initiates us into our EL, in which we accept and explore, that talking with ourselves, is of much greater importance than talking with others.                   

 

This,

 

This writing is about my Embodied Language (EL), which always immediately, effortlessly and simply expresses my Language Enlightenment (LE). I have not arrived at this peaceful, enjoyable, interesting way of dealing with my language, because I am such a special person. In fact, I have worried about this a great deal, because I am usually not treated by anyone, as someone who is special. To the contrary, I feel mainly rejected, ignored and forgotten.

 

I am no longer puzzled about how this can be. Since I express my LE with my EL every day, in my writings, but also, whenever I talk out loud with myself EL – I still do this almost every day – I acknowledge, I am  special, because, except for my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke, no one is doing this. I always felt, I am special, as I have secretively, guiltily – without doing anything for it and, paradoxically, in spite of all my problems, stress and worries – been very happy.

 

I have felt so confused, tormented and obsessed by  this, as I couldn’t figure out, with my Disembodied Language (DL), why a trouble-maker like me, was somehow always able to toss all his dramas and traumas aside and carry on again with his language of unconcerned innocence? It wasn’t until I stopped teaching Psychology, but also, most importantly, because I gave up preaching about my EL, that my  LE began to shine – for myself – more clearly.  

 

Everyone engages, unconsciously, every day, in DL and, thus, misses out on EL, which would inform them about their LE. I didn’t make this up, but this is the reality of how most people live their entire life. For me, every day is a discovery, a blessing, a gift and I feel so grateful, I am able to say and write this and live like this. I don’t believe in anything, other than my own language and I can no longer afford to be busy with the ugly and stupid language of others.

 

While I write this, it is midnight. I went to bed at seven and look forward to sleep some more after I am done. I just opened the window and my room is filled with cool air. A helicopter flies over and makes a lot of noise, but afterwards, it is really quiet and I hear a dog bark in the distance. Here I sit, with legs folded underneath me, in front of my laptop, calmly waiting for my EL to appear. This is my greatest joy.

 

I no longer feel I miss something. This completeness is so superb. I arrived at it, by giving my own words to it. I remember, there were times, I felt hesitant to express myself about the fullness of my emptiness. I have never felt empty – as my stillness always was and continues to be with my language – and I prefer this stillness over the so-called stillness, in which we misjudge the importance of our language. There is absolutely no need at all to go beyond our words.  

 

When we acknowledge our DL and can switch to EL, our voice changes. There are three reasons, why the sound of our voice changes. Firstly, in EL, we no longer fixate on what we say, as we pay attention to how we say it. Therefore, we experience the fluidity of our language, which wasn’t there before in DL. Secondly, we no longer struggle, as we don’t try to sound calm, peaceful, certain, interested, strong or knowledgeable. We simply express what we are capable of expressing, in the moment that we speak with ourselves and listen to ourselves. We liberate ourselves from moving away from that which is. In other words, in EL, there is no conflict between who we are and who we should be. We sound so good, when we are truly at peace with ourselves. Thirdly, our voice changes, because own EL returns all our energy to us. During DL, our energy is always getting drained, but during EL, we get energized. This is a very tangible, immediate and blissful experience.   

 

I used to call EL the language that creates space and feel so happy to be reminded of this. Surely, my EL has gone through many different phases. I want to conclude this writing, by going into this crucially important aspect of language, which is completely misunderstood. EL is the language of freedom, but this freedom can only be experienced by someone who is an individual. With DL we forget about our individuality, as our own language is, unknowingly, overtaken by predetermined beliefs. We should not call DL group-think, but group-language. Every time someone says, I think so and so, they say so and so. The freedom of language can only reveal itself, if we admit, there never was any language inside of us. I mean this literally: there are no words in our brains.            

 

Coherence,

 

Our Embodied Language (EL) always says something new, which builds on what we have already said. Anyone who reads my work, will notice the internal coherence and magnificence of what they would be inclined to consider as my system, but which to me,  it is my natural way of dealing with my language.

 

I am convinced that anyone, who begins to listen to him or herself, while he or she speaks, will discover things, which are similar to what I have discovered. EL is so enjoyable, interesting and energizing, as it is about feeling safe, peaceful and relaxed. With our Disembodied Language (DL), by contrast, we create a hostile, anxious and stressful reality for ourselves.

 

It is the lack of coherence, in DL, which determines the inevitable fragmentation of ideas, which can’t and don’t fit together, because they contradict each other. The false, ad nauseum repeated notion of complementariness is a clear indication, that we are merely trying to justify the utter chaos, the lack of safe, enjoyable, meaningful consistency and the absence of any rhyme or reason, consciousness,  truthfulness or satisfaction about our own behavior.   

 

The possibility, that our use of language can be so immensely gratifying, is continuously obliterated by the inevitable upsetting, overpowering, intimidating effects of our involvement in DL. Unknowingly, we feel humiliated, ashamed and helpless, as it is so common, to be blown away, pushed around or pressured, by someone with forceful DL. Due to the lack of passion, there is never a real confrontation, in which DL is unmasked and identified as DL, and, therefore, instantly capable of transforming into EL. 

 

In DL, everything just drags on and on. What we call our debates, arguments, conflicts and differences of opinion, never unleashes any positive energy. To the contrary, it drains the very life out of us and makes us more vindictive, fanatic and resentful. However, if our DL could change into EL, we would experience the blissfulness of new behavior, which makes us view everything from our enlightened perspective.

 

People have been doing all sorts rituals, to pretend as if all the bits and pieces of their meaningless lives somehow fit together, but only EL could accomplish this task. After many years of being stuck in DL and experiencing its negative outcomes, it is miraculous to hear, in the sound of one’s own voice, how things come together, become integrated and make sense.

 

The logical coherence of our EL can only emerge from our positive emotions, which make it possible for us to be genuine. We all know this to be true, yet, we have accepted our DL as normal, in which we are constantly fighting, fleeing and dissociating. The natural harmony of our experiences cannot be revealed by our habitual way of using our language.    

 

EL is the skillful, harmonious arrangement of your voice with your words. Nothing needs to be added, your language is good as it is, but your sound is off, as long as you still engage in DL. Once you switch to EL, you let out a sigh of great relief, as you unburden yourself from your dismal, long, until that moment, unexpressed, history of conditioning with DL.

 

The concinnity, elegance, congruity, consonancy, symmetry, balance and unity of EL is breathtaking. Why are there so many different people, animals and plants? And, why are there mountains, rivers, oceans and forests? They are simply there, just like we are there and there is no purpose to evolution. Of course, the coherence of our EL is the expression of our Language Enlightenment (LE), that is, we are not trying to improve on what comes by itself.           

 

 

Obviously,

 

Obviously, you can only be happy, if you recognize and enjoy your own energy, but your unhappiness has to do with being overtaken by energies, which have nothing to do with you. You are possessed by some belief, some theory, some explanation, some interpretation, some perception, which isn’t yours.

 

Obviously, to find out about what is really yours, you  have to describe to yourself, as often as you want to  – in your own words, in your own language, in your own rhythm, in your own voice, in your own way – what is your experience, what is your reason for being who you are, what is your modus operandi, what is your is your fashion, what is your how, what is your home, what is your manner, what is your form, what is your conviction or what is your truth.

 

Obviously, you are confused, distracted, frustrated, fearful and hopeless, because you haven’t had any prolonged, conscious, effortless, graceful, funny and interesting conversations with yourself. While you may be absolutely sure, that you are right, that you know who you are, that you are willing to sacrifice  everything for your version of the reality, as long as you engage in Disembodied Language (DL), you are unconsciously carried away by the energy of others.

 

Obviously, to engage in Embodied Language (EL), it is absolutely necessary, that you first recognize and then stop, your own DL. Obviously, since you have never done that, you feel constantly overpowered, hurt, upset, stressed out about, preoccupied with and drained by, language which isn’t yours. Only in EL, do you acknowledge the great importance of experiencing and staying true to your own energy.

 

Obviously, your Language Enlightenment (LE), which is simply your natural way of using your language, is only expressed by your EL, but never by your DL. It is because of your incorrect way of using language, because of your overrated DL, you never paid any  attention to how you mechanically, unconsciously, anxiously, reactively and superficially use language and have remained totally unaware, about the fact that you have your own way of using language.

 

Obviously, you are endlessly affected by the energy of others. You have all sorts of convoluted, idiotic,  nonsense ideas, about being stuck in your mind, of changing your mind, of improving your mind, of being re-minded of something, of getting out of your mind, of having a lot on your mind, of being mindful or even, of having a mind of your own, but it never ever occurs to you, that you don’t listen to what you are saying. Obviously, you don’t have any EL, if you don’t listen to yourself, while you speak.

 

Obviously, you don’t listen to yourself while you speak – you habitually fall into the conditioning pattern that, presumably, listening to others or being listened to by others, is more important than listening to yourself – because you are not allowed to have or express your own energy. Obviously, you never say what you really want to say, because you will get ridiculed, punished, rejected, ignored, fired, cancelled, beaten up, tortured, imprisoned or killed.

 

Obviously, there is much more to the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution, which disallows the government from infringing on the right(s) to pursue Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, which applies to all citizens of the United States regardless of gender, race, religion or age. Whether we know it or not, are aware of it or not or willing to admit it or not, with DL, we overstep our freedom, as individuals. Although we believe, we are going our own way and doing your own thing, the reality of our miserable, conflicted, chaotic, shallow lives, is that we are imprisoned by our conditioning history.

 

Obviously, it gets very annoying to read this word, obviously, again and again, but it is very clear, that the pervasiveness of DL is a gigantic problem, not only here in the United Stated, but across the world. Obviously, you keep having your problematic DL, as you don’t want to know about EL. Obviously, you are too much of coward, to talk with me and to find out that my EL is real, but your DL is total bullshit. If I would have DL with you, you would know it is DL, because I would let you know and you would know that I am correct. As a matter of fact, I have always been correct in my assessment of what is DL or EL. Obviously, once you get to your own experience of EL, you say the same thing: you have always been correct of your assessment of what is EL and DL, but you never bothered to say it out loud, to yourself, so that you could hear it and begin to act on it, as I do.