Valt mee,

 

Als je eenmaal eindelijk wat voortgaande Belichaamde Taal (BT) begint te hebben, dan krijg je door, dat het allemaal wel mee valt en dat er, ofschoon er wel degelijk echte ellende uit voorkomt, vanwege Ontlichaamde Taal (OT), heel wat drukte wordt gemaakt, over storm in een kop thee. Het is merkwaardig, om om al die afgrijzelijke toestanden onbeschaamd te kunnen lachen en de opluchting te voelen, dat je er niets aan hoeft te doen, kan doen of wil doen. Het valt gelukkig zogezegd allemaal wel mee, afgezien van alle tragische misstanden, die door onze gebruikelijke, onbewuste OT worden veroorzaakt en in stand worden gehouden.

 

Ook al zei ons moeder – nadat wij ons, als kind,  huilend hadden bezeerd, omdat wij van onze step waren gevallen – geruststellend, dat het, zo te zien allemaal wel mee viel, dat het enkel een schrammetje was en dat, met een kusje of snoepje erop, de pijn weer over was, toch was er met onze gewone wijze van praten altijd iets helemaal verkeerd. Ook al werd er gezegd, zo te horen valt het allemaal wel mee, dit was niet waar, want er werd helemaal niet geluisterd.

 

Achteraf gezien, luisterde ik, als kind, maar ook als volwassen, heel vaak niet naar wat er werd zogezegd, omdat ik het niet wilde horen. Ik kon het heus wel horen, maar ik vond het niet mee vallen, hoe men tegen mij en met elkaar sprak. Als men het doet voorkomen – wat iedereen dus dag in dag uit doet – dat het allemaal wel mee valt, met onze geaccepteerde, gemaakte,  ongevoelige wijze van communiceren, dan stuit mij dat tegen de borst, want – ook al had er vroeger niet de woorden voor, die ik er nu voor heb – ik heb altijd al het verschil gevoeld tussen OT en BT. Het viel niet mee, om daar altijd voor gestrafd te worden. Ik ben blij, dat ik nu volledig kan begrijpen, dat er niets verkeerd met mij is.  

 

De OT, die ik overal hoor, vind ik niet om aan te horen. Iedereen die het onderscheid kan maken tussen zijn of haar OT en BT, is daartoe alleen in staat, omdat hij of zij – net als ik – de klank van de stem, van iemand die OT heeft, niet om aan te horen vindt. Ik hoor het verschil en jij, die dit leest, kan dit verschil ook horen, als je er eens op zou letten. Als het ooit zover mocht komen, dan zou jij er ook achter komen, dat het echt niet mee valt, om OT te hebben of om ernaar te moeten luisteren. We hebben allemaal geleden.  

 

Van allerlei ongemakken zegt men vaak, er valt mee te leven, maar wanneer men dat zegt, dan is dat, omdat er geen andere keuze is. Iedereen heeft, zonder daar echt erg in te hebben OT en doet alsof het heel normaal is, maar zodra wij het verschil erkennen, tussen OT en BT, is er geen ontkomen meer aan, want dan pas gaan wij beseffen, dat er met OT eigenlijk absoluut niet te leven was. Het is heel pijnlijk en het valt niet mee, om aan onszelf toe te geven, dat wij vanuit onze onwetendheid en het gebrek aan vaardigheid, zolang met OT bezig zijn gebleven.

 

In OT is altijd sprake van een vorm van vallen, van falen, van schaamte en van verdriet. Mij zei  vroeger vaak over mij: met hem valt geen land te bezeilen en ik werd steevast uitgesloten en vermeden. Ik heb alleen kunnen leren van hen, die gevoelig naar mij waren. Het viel beslist niet mee, om te erkennen, dat iedereen OT heeft en daardoor niet in staat is, om mij te ontmoeten, waar ik ben. Jarenlang verkeerde ik, in de met OT ontvangen veronderstelling, dat er iets niet in orde met mij zou zijn, maar met mijn BT ben ik gaan begrijpen, dat ik niet meer aan mijzelf hoefde te werken. Zolang ik met OT bezig was faalde ik. Ik viel, keer op keer, maar ik viel niet mee. Nee, ik viel door de mand van mijn OT, want hoe ik ook probeerde om, net als iedereen OT te hebben, het lukte mij eenvoudigweg niet.

 

Voor iemand die nog nooit gehoord heeft van OT en BT, klinkt het misschien heel ingewikkeld, maar het valt allemaal wel mee, als je eenmaal met jezelf gaat praten en naar de aangename  klank van je eigen stem gaat luisteren, die jou vertelt, wat je nog nooit eerder aan jezelf heb kunnen zeggen. Met OT zou men zeggen, het valt echter te bezien of jij dit gaat doen, maar ik heb BT, omdat ik hoor of jij het doet of niet.

 

Ook al is er door OT heel wat leed veroorzaakt, het valt mee en de schade kan worden hersteld. Het valt echter vies tegen, hoe weinig mensen er zijn geinteresseerd in BT, maar het is precies juist daardoor, dat iemand er toch mee verder wil gaan, omdat het zo enorm de moeite waard is. Wanneer jij die prachtige, betekenisvolle, ontroerende, verrijkende resultaten ervaart van je BT, dan blijkt het toch allemaal wel weer mee te vallen. Met BT valt er altijd wel een mouw aan – ieder zogenaamd probleem – te passen en ben je dus altijd positief. Dit blijkt vooral, als je aan jezelf gaat zeggen en gaat luisteren naar wat jij geloofd te denken. Het valt wel mee, dat het niet waar is en dat er geen denken bestaat.     

 Dissociation,

 

Whoever reads this must somehow know, that being busy with these words, is different from reading what is usually read. This text is a result of my daily involvement in Embodied Language (EL). Everything that is written elsewhere – yes, this is a big claim, but I am convinced it is true – is based on Disembodied Language (DL), our usual way of talking, in which we, as speakers, don’t listen to ourselves and dissociate from our body. Since we don’t experience our body in DL, we are out of touch with the reality, but once we express again, what we feel in our own body, we find, we listen to ourselves and we engage in Embodied Language (EL). Dissociation or detaching from the reality, is common, as we engage mechanically in senseless DL each day.

 

Psychologists explain dissociation as a feeling of daydreaming or being intensely focused, as well as the distressing and depressing experience of being disconnected from the reality. It should be immediately obvious, they – like everyone else – firmly believe in the fantasy of inner language, private speech, the mind or thinking, which is created by DL, in which we can never express, let alone be, ourselves. Therefore, they inadvertently refer to dissociation, as the disintegration of imaginary, inner, verbal stuff, such as consciousness, identity, memory or perception. Each of these concepts derive from our dissociative DL. Moreover, we have never talked about DL with EL, we have never spoken about dissociation in a non-dissociative manner.

 

During our usual, unintelligent, insensitive DL, we remain preoccupied with what is known as speaking truth to power. Whoever wins the battle for attention, which is the basis of our repetitive, problematic, unnatural, effortful DL, gets to do most of the talking, and, therefore, will gain power. With EL, however, we finally admit, that this intensely-focused, obsessive, inherently-deceitful activity, takes us further and further away from what we experience.

 

Due to DL, dissociation is associated with stress or trauma, but the unaddressed reality is, our habitual way of talking – in which we don’t talk with ourselves, in order to be able to listen to ourselves and only talk with others and listen to others or try to make them listen to us – causes this disconnect from our sensory experiences. Surely, once we have EL, we awaken from the dissociation, which was kept going by our DL. To be more specific, in DL, the speaker disconnects from and dominates the listener, but in EL, the speaker connects and regularly takes turns with the listener, who becomes the speaker, while the former speaker then becomes the listener.  

 

In DL, we remain – even if we are educated in chemistry, biology or physics – unaware about the, in EL, properly communicated fact, that dissociation is not a metaphorical reference about neuronal stuff, in our brains, but a natural phenomenon. In chemistry, dissociation is a chemical reaction, in which a molecule or compound breaks into smaller pieces, such as ions, atoms and radicals. Hydrochloric acid (HCI) dissociates in water, forming the H+ and the CI- ions. Usually, chemical dissociation is a reversable process. The reverse of chemical dissociation is association and recombination.

 

When we apply this knowledge of chemistry to what is really happening, psychologically or communicatively, we will find, ongoing EL, in which we listen to ourselves while we speak, separates DL – our unscientific, superstitious, phony way of talking, in which we pretend to be superior or inferior to each other – from our EL. This separation – as clear as the separation of water and oil, because oil is less dense than water – is needed to finally end our history of conditioning with DL, which burdened us with a metaphoric, inaccurate use of language. We are able with our EL, to realistically and effectively break down what is happening and we can put Humpty Dumpty back on the wall, so to speak.

 

We can also bring in some physics, to solve the problems of human interaction, which, with DL, always escalate into conflict and chaos. Let us consider the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is roughly based on the notion, that heat always flows from hotter to colder regions or ‘downhill’ in the temperature gradient. Clearly, once we know the difference between DL and EL, we naturally want to stay away from DL.

 

We might as well also take note of the physical Law of Entropy, which states, that in a closed system – a human being with DL – disorder always increases. Since we don’t need to waste any more time, trying to re-invent the wheel again, let’s add some Evolutionary Theory and acknowledge that evolution, which is based on selection by consequences, always selects for anti-entropic adaptations, which expend energy in order to maintain homeo-stasis. If we simply follow our nature, we effortlessly achieve EL. A stable, robust language-behavior – like EL – can and must be understood as an anti-entropic adaptation, which directs energy to maintaining bio-psycho-social order, a wholesome, peaceful, enjoyable recombination of all the disparate, disjointed and meaningless fragments, we are conflicted about and struggle with, due to our DL.  

 

If you put your food in the micro-wave and turn on that machine, you heat up your food, but if you take it out and let is stand, it will cool off. The heat-energy, given by the microwave, is lost once the food is again outside the microwave. However, food cannot magically heat itself, you will have to first put it into the microwave and then turn it on. These are conscious acts. In dissociation, you turn on the microwave, walk away, but you come back too late and your food has cooled off again. Such is the Law of Entropy. There are only a few ways, to heat up food, but there are many ways, it will remain unheated. Likewise, there are only a limited number of ways to build a sand-castle, but there are infinite ways, in which sand will be dispersed.

 

To put it squarely, only our EL creates order, but our DL creates disorder. Moreover, DL creates disorder, because we dissociate from reality. Furthermore, selection of EL and extinction of DL, is an ultimately evolutionary process, which is already happening, but we haven’t woken up to it yet. On the one hand, we are still in denial about evolutionary theory, because there is no end-goal and we can’t stand the spirituality-denying fact, that we, like everyone else, at some point, will just die, on the other hand, we haven’t experienced the possibility of what it is like, to have EL, in which we are not trying to ward off chaos, but in which we live in order. ...You can hear me read this text on my You Tube channel maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw or you reach me on skype: limbicease or send me an email at mpeperkamp@sbcglobal.net  

 Oud Nieuws,

 

Wanneer je eindelijk eerst Belichaamde Taal (BT) met jezelf gaat hebben en daarna met anderen, dan is alle Ontlichaamde Taal (OT), van zowel jezelf, als van anderen, oud nieuws. Men zegt wel, in OT, dat geen nieuws, goed nieuws is, maar in BT gelden er hele andere omstandigheden. In BT is er altijd nieuws en geen nieuws betekent dus OT. De afwezigheid van OT is echter een enorme opluchting. Men zegt dat geen nieuws goed nieuws is, want zolang je niets hoort is alles zogenaamd goed, maar het hele punt van BT is natuurlijk, dat je wel iets hoort en dat jou BT door anderen wordt opgepakt. Indien jou BT tot gevolg heeft, dat je niets meer van anderen hoort, omdat je  schijnbaar geen BT met anderen kunt hebben, dan is waar jij mee bezig bent geen BT, maar OT. In dat geval, ben je toch ingemerkt bezig gebleven met oud nieuws.

 

Het toegeven aan jezelf, dat je het allemaal al hebt gehoord, dat alles wat je zegt herhaling is, is de enige manier, om je OT te stoppen. In OT, doet wat je zegt zich ongemerkt voor alsof het nieuw is, maar het hele zogenaamde begrip van oud nieuws is natuurlijk belachelijk. Nieuws is uiteraard gewoon altijd nieuws en oud nieuws bestaat niet. Nieuws is niet eerst nieuw en daarna oud. BT is nieuw en OT is ouwe koek, die niet te vreten is. Ouwe koek is geen zoete koek, want je gaat echt helemaal over je nek van OT. Je walging van OT is wat je ermee doet stoppen.

 

Met OT, ervaart iedereen eenzaamheid en is er een voortdurend, onuitgesproken, knagend gevoel, dat anderen ons te kort doen en weer in de steek laten. Omdat men het contact heeft verloren, zegt men, dat geen nieuws goed nieuws zou zijn, omdat, zogezegd, geen tijding een goede tijding is. Het is iets droevigs, als men van zijn verwanten in de vreemde niets meer hoort - dat het dan goed met ze zou gaan - want alleen als er droevige dingen voorvallen, verneemt men in de regel iets. In BT, horen wij altijd weer van elkaar, omdat wij van onszelf horen. Wij zeggen niet, dat geen nieuws, slecht nieuws is, want geen nieuws is geen nieuws en het is heel duidelijk OT. Ook is degene, die, zogezegd, niets meer van zich laat horen, natuurlijk degene die OT achter zich liet en is degene, die schijnbaar op iets nieuws zat te wachten van die ander, bezig gebleven met die ander – en niet met zichzelf – en is hij of zij dus degene, die OT is blijven houden.  

 

Iets wat reeds lange tijd bekend is, wordt ook wel oudbakken nieuws genoemd. Als brood of koek niet meer vers is, dan is het oud brood of droge koek. Het zich eindeloos herhalende, leugenachtige, domme verhaal van OT, is niet om aan te horen. De aggressieve, afgrijzelijk-klinkende Michelle Obama – met haar intimiderende, drakonische haarstukje – is een een goed voorbeeld. Gedurende OT preekt men altijd weer over hoop en is men fel tegen angst, verdeeldheid en zogenaamde klein-zieligheid. Haar toespraak, ter ondersteuning van de al even afgezaagde, haat-dragende Kamala Harris, was meer van hetzelfde. Het feit, dat zovelen dit niet horen, is omdat men niet in de gaten heeft, dat OT onze alledaagse wijze van spreken is. Als mensen beweren, dat een zogenaamd speciaal iemand de belichaaming zou zijn, van alle verhalen, die wij aan onszelf vertellen, over het land waarin wij wonen, omdat haar ophitsende, arrogante, ge-acteerde, zeik-verhaal, appeleert aan ons eigen geklaag en gekanker, dan weten we, dat wij zo samen onze hel van OT in stand zullen blijven houden.  

 

Men heeft het, in OT, altijd over het zogenaamde branden van nieuwsgierigheid. Het gaat meestal om een spiritueel verlangen en over de zogenaamde overdracht van geestelijke gewaarwoordingen. Zij, die zich voordoen als geestelijke, morele leiders, doen veel moeite, om iedereen te laten weten, dat zij met vlammend hart, vol passie spreken en dat zij de harten van anderen kunnen doen ontvlammen, ontsteken of ontbranden. Dit alles is pure fantasie, want het gaat wederom over de voortzetting van ons aloude groeps-gedrag: OT. Elke keer wordt ons weer voorgehouden, dat wij de hoop zouden zijn verloren en dat wij daardoor niets meer doen, om de situatie te verbeteren. Wij gaan alleen dan pas echt doen wat goed is - voor onszelf - als wij BT hebben en ons niet meer met anderen bezig houden. Hoop is helemaal niet nodig voor het hebben BT, maar het herkennen van de achterhaalde flauwe kul van OT, is van het allergrootste groot belang.      

 Reasoning,

 

The reason people don’t and can’t reason, is their common way of talking. In our usual way of talking, which is Disembodied Language (DL), we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak. Using our language effectively, is not a matter of so-called thought – because thinking or having a mind, is the inevitable fantasy of having inner language or private speech, which, of course, is created and maintained by our unconscious, effortful, involuntary involvement in DL – but a matter of speaking with and listening to ourselves, while we speak. Only when we hear our own voice, while we speak, can and will we engage in Embodied Language (EL) and are we capable of speaking rationally, coherently, effectively and joyfully, about our own experiences. Only our EL allows us to finish our sentences and, therefore, we act on how we instructed ourselves. In DL, by contrast, we say one thing, but we do something that contradicts what we are saying. In EL, we are congruent, but in DL, we are incongruent, fragmented, conflicted and dumb.

 

Your Language Enlightenment (LE) is simply the continuation of your EL. Once you have ongoing EL, everything is in place and there is nothing to do or to say. Enjoying your LE is not a matter of having EL, since your EL has subsided. Although you have used your intelligence optimally – due to your EL – you now reap the fruits of your EL and your intelligence. In other words, your LE is the result of your reasoning. You have created order with EL and now you live in that reality. You are neither happy nor sad, as these experiences, at this point, do not matter anymore. Stated differently, because you have followed your own EL to its ultimate rational conclusion, you are happy with nothing. This nothingness, however, is very different from the negative nothingness you experienced with DL.

 

The nothingness, which is experienced, but never acknowledged, by those who engage in DL, is the absence of wellbeing, but the nothingness of EL, is – you can’t miss it – the presence of wellbeing. A nice word to describe your LE is grace. EL makes you graceful and grateful. Also, the nothingness of DL is a sense of permanent restlessness, but nothingness of EL is a notion of timelessness, which was accomplished with great patience, as you have been capable of saying what you were able and willing to say. Elaborate, full expression of your EL took time, but brought you in touch with eternity. Your LE is the nothingness from whence you have come and became who you are today and into which you will certainly one day dissolve again, at the moment of your death. There’s nothing to say about death, as there’s only something to say about life. What has been said about death by people with DL, is a bunch of nonsense.

 

With your DL, you cannot even talk about your own experiences correctly, let alone about your own death. Obviously, you fear the end of your life, as long as you engage in DL, but you will no longer be in denial of your mortality with your EL. You already die, while you are still alive with your EL and your let go of your EL provides you with a sense of deathlessness. To us, who have faith in our own EL, there is no death, as we are the master over our life and our death. Our LE is a transitoriness or wisdom, which was afforded to us by the fluidity of our EL. In DL, everything is stuck, and our words sound like one big failure.

 

Our LE is as much about animals and things, as it is about other people. Here too, the latter makes the former possible and our care about animals, trees, streams and mountains makes us compassionate about the suffering we hear and see in those, who have DL. Furthermore, our forgiveness is our understanding, that those who have DL, cannot understand what they are going through. Moreover, we have – with our EL – no longer any urge, to intervene or help, as our interference would prevent others from discovering their own salvation with their EL. Surely, we can only have EL, if we have had enough of our own DL. No one is able to decide for others, when it has been enough. Likewise, no one with DL is able to divert me from my EL.  

 

I can leave people alone, because I am alone with my LE and no one with DL can appreciate or acknowledge my aloneness. Only someone with EL is able to do this, as they have their own experience of their LE with ongoing EL. No matter how briefly your EL continues, it always indicates your LE, immediately. Brevity of EL stimulates you to stay with it longer, as you experience your participation in DL as a lost opportunity. Simply stated, your EL shows you, you have been wasting your life with DL. In that sense, EL is shocking, as you can’t escape the far-reaching implications of this conclusion.

 

One of your stunning realizations with EL will be, that others can’t help you, as they, unknowingly, engage in DL. Those who have EL, will tell you to figure it out yourself. Each time, you turn to others, your DL is affirmed and turning away from them, doesn’t necessarily result in turning to yourself. Once you recognize and stop your DL, you will attend to yourself with your ongoing EL and instruct yourself very differently.

 

DL of others is irrelevant. You must only pay attention to your own DL. You can only have EL, if you acknowledge your conditioning history with DL. Everyone – in DL – pretends, like you, their DL isn’t all that bad, but you experience this every day, the tragic consequences of your DL are devastating. Perhaps, this is one of the most difficult aspects about DL. You have to admit how ever-present its terrible consequences are, in yourself and others. It is more disturbing to admit your own catastrophes, then to complain about the foolishness of others. Only if you hear – even though you don’t want to – your DL, it stops. You carry on with EL, while everyone goes on with DL. It is possible for you, as you bravely keep doing whatever it takes, to be able to have ongoing EL.           

 Opportunity,

 

If you are fortunate enough, to live in a Western Democratic country, you have the freedom, the opportunity, to engage in Embodied Language (EL), instead of Disembodied Language (DL). Although this opportunity exists, DL rules, even in so-called free societies. Those who have the chance to be individuals, for the most part, waste this opportunity, because they refuse to do the work, to acquire the language, needed to be an individual. They rather immaturely, irresponsibly, irrationally scream and whine about freedom, than seriously talk about it, with EL.

 

There has always been a lot of phony talk going on – in DL – about the presumed possibility of turning a crisis into an opportunity. Instead of calling a spade a spade, we spin it, keep going on with stupid DL and make it seem, as if it is great. Moreover, we are so used to going from one crisis to the next, it seems, as if crises are needed, to create opportunity. This sick gaslighting bullshit is the essence of DL.

 

With insidious, manipulative, unnatural DL, we are constantly told – and this is why we keep telling this to ourselves – we can reframe how we view the unfolding of the crisis. Yes, we can magically take advantage of it, provided – and here is the catch – we learn to stop resisting unwanted change. In DL, we are supposed to welcome these unwanted things, struggle and fight and get out of our so-called comfort-zones – which, of course, weren’t comfortable anyway – and that, supposedly, will make us better. This is such horseshit.  

 

We can only create our own opportunity, to be an individual and to live like an individual, after we have stopped listening to the DL of others and ourselves and started talking with ourselves and listening to ourselves and engaging in EL. A crisis – everyone repeats what everyone else has said – can become a turning-point? Toward where are we turning? Not to ourselves, not to our use of language and not to our intelligence. The real tipping-point only occurs, due to our deliberate switch from DL to EL, which can and will only happen, when we are not in a crisis, and are feeling safe and at ease. The sad fact is, with DL, we never felt that way. So, our opportunity to be who we are only reveals itself, if we turn away from DL. We must, at all costs, avoid it. Moreover, our active avoidance of DL, will have to be the largest proportion of our behavioral repertoire, let’s say 75%. This leaves 25% for two other types of behaviors.   

 

The remaining part of our biologically-driven, innate, autonomically-determined, behavioral repertoire, consists of escape and approach behavior. As living organisms, we only want to approach what sustains us, not what threatens us and from which we must escape. In other words, we must carefully discern, with our EL, what behavior is truly supportive, what creates an opportunity, what has positive outcomes? Thus, we keep our escape-behavior – which, in the worst of circumstances, can be lethal – to a bare minimum, let’s say 5%. This leaves 20% for our approach behavior. Perhaps this is even too high, and the proportion needs adjustment. We have to individually figure this out for ourselves with our EL. We have this opportunity, but we must take it. Perhaps, it is better for us to 85% actively avoid DL, approach only 10% and escape only 5%?  

 

The great opportunity, which is certainly going to be created by our ongoing EL, is that we no longer – involuntarily – have to engage in any kind of the forced, unnatural, neurotic, stupid behaviors, which were demanded from us, by our own DL. We voluntarily, consciously engage in EL and all the behaviors, which strengthen it. We are not bothered by the utterly false notion of inner language, private speech or our so-called mind. Instead of imagining, that we can create opportunity for ourselves, with our thoughts, with mindful, inner, meditative, presumably, non-reactive contemplation, we talk out loud with ourselves, we can listen to and hear ourselves and, therefore, we act and follow through on how we have been instructing ourselves.

 

With mechanical DL, we, inadvertently, focus on the loss of opportunity, rather than on the creation of opportunity with our language. In DL, in our conditioned way of talking, we use language incorrectly, since we don’t listen to ourselves. DL is based on fear, which makes us freeze, whenever we experience or perceive the unfamiliar. We can’t talk and we don’t want to talk about the new with DL, because our ears are trained to listen to others - who threaten us - not to ourselves, with whom we have the opportunity to feel safe, with our EL. Basically, our DL symbolizes anxiety and retreat, while EL creates opportunity and growth. All talk about opportunity with DL is an empty promise, the future, which never comes, while your life goes by. With ongoing EL, you are in control of and you are in possession of your own language, which isn’t happening – as you experienced in DL – unwillingly, but which creates and achieves opportunity.        

 Don’t Miss It,

 

Read this text slowly and listen to your voice. Take a break after each sentence, to assure yourself, you have understood what you have read. When you engage in Embodied Language (EL), your words disappear, because you don’t hang on to your words, like you were used to, when you engaged in your usual Disembodied Language (DL). Consequently, you will disappear. However, this wonderful sensation – it is very pleasant, to be relieved of being who you believed to be – only occurs, because you, at some point, probably sooner than later, go back again to your habitual DL, because your conditioning history doesn’t come to an end by only one or two moments of EL.

 

Don’t miss it, what you have been missing so many times. You have already, unknowingly, switched from your dumb DL, to intelligent EL, but you weren’t really paying attention, but now that you have given a name for the use of language, in which you don’t listen to yourself, while you speak – that is DL – and when you listen to yourself, while you speak – that is EL – you connect the dots, or rather, you reinterpret everything you have been describing with DL into a new description, a new perception, a new understanding, with your ongoing EL. It is with this ongoing EL – which, of course, as of yet, is still future-music – that you will notice, that the aforementioned blissful, nourishing, energizing sensation, which – I repeat – occurred because you switched from DL to EL, no longer occurs. So, that liberating feeling, that your words, your so-called mind, who you believed to be, dissolves, will no longer happen, once you can have ongoing EL.

 

So, initially, when you change from DL to EL, it feels, as if you disappear, but once you are able to continue with EL – don’t miss it – you will no longer disappear, as you are conscious, present or awake, with your ongoing EL. In other words, instead of going back and forth between DL and EL – which is rather unpleasant, uncomfortable and troubling – you will experience a continuing awareness of how fantastic it is, to have EL and to be truly yourself and in touch with yourself. It is not – don’t miss it – that you compare what you experience in ongoing EL with what you felt when you were still having DL, when you were unconscious, conflicted, on automatic pilot and struggling, but it is a wordless intrigue, about the fact, that everything, apparently, is really what it is. Although you have heard other people or you say, probably, numerous times, in a resigned manner, it is what it is, when things were really bad, with your usual DL, you now say it with your EL. And, when everything is what it is, because of our ongoing EL, we begin to come to terms with the obvious fact, that it will always be that way. Surely, everything will always be what it is with your ongoing EL and this acceptance of how things really are, is entirely different from what you believed to be the reality.

 

Don’t miss it, that I have written this, that you have read and understood this and that you can reread it again, if you need to or want to. If you do the work, if you experiment and verify my words, you find, when you speak with yourself, listen to yourself and engage in your ongoing EL, on the one hand, everything is constantly changing, but on the other hand, you know, things will always be what they are and, in that sense, they will always be the same. Due to this realization, you will no longer be inclined to try to change anything. You have no opinion; you are neither for nor against something. Even when you say something about your experience or what you believe to be happening, there is no real involvement with what you have said, because you are no longer concerned with what you have experienced, as your attention is always with what is now and new. Moreover, what is new, is new, when it is expressed with your EL, but also when you are not busy with language, that is, when you are not speaking, listening, writing or reading. So, with EL, you experience the new, whenever you speak, but also, when you don’t speak; when you listen, but also, when you don’t listen; when you write, but also, when you don’t write; when you read, but also, when you don’t read. In DL, you can’t express the new, as you are not talking with, connecting with or listening to yourself.

 

In DL, because we can’t say the new, we also can’t hear the new – don’t miss it, this is very important, so I will repeat it again in different words – because if you don’t produce a sound with your voice, there is nothing for you to hear or to listen to. There is no inner voice and you simply imagine, due to your DL, you are hearing your so-called private speech or inner self-talk. Since there is no such a thing, as listening to yourself – without saying anything out loud, to whatever you fantasize to be within you – your natural inclination for language is, due to your DL, diverted into writing and reading. In your repetitive, insensitive, effortful, unnatural DL, you only dare to say what everybody else is saying. Presumably, there is nothing new under the sun, because everything has already been said. Furthermore, you have heard it all before.  Speaking about the new, with DL, doesn’t really convince you. However, it is impossible, for you or for anyone else, to say anything new, in DL, because we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak whenever we engage in our common DL. The point of this writing is – don’t miss it – and modern technology enhances and exploits this: you appreciate the written word more than the spoken word. Around the world, what is written takes precedence over what is being said and people grossly overestimate the importance of what has been written but underestimate the importance of what is being said. This terrible, but unaddressed, situation is created and maintained by your DL, in which you could never assert, that speaking and listening are – don’t miss it – more important to human relationship, than writing and reading.

 

We live in what I call the age of the tyranny of the written word. Hilariously, hahaha, everyone who, supposedly, has something to say, is trying to write a book. Stated differently, DL is on its deathbed and is singing its so-called swansong. DL has run its course, and it is very clear, that the group-behavior, which is DL, is going to lose from individual-behavior, which is EL. EL is the future, DL is the past. There is no future for DL, yet since you still don’t know anything about the difference between your DL and EL, you go on with DL by default, while you are, basically, digging your own grave. Your problems with DL keep piling up, they can’t be addressed, let alone, resolved. Unless, you learn to have EL, there is no solution, only the escalation of your DL into war. We have already witnessed this senseless, destructive, tragic process many times throughout mankind’s history. And pay attention to this – don’t miss it – it isn’t history that is magically repeating itself, it is your DL.

 

Whatever people say publicly today, is totally scripted, rehearsed, acted and predetermined. Those authors, who proudly speak about what they have written, remain fixated, in what they say, on what they have written, and they never deviate from their own talking points. Due to our DL, we all believe, those who have written books, have something important to say, but the fact is – don’t miss this point – they never had EL and what they have written derives from their DL. This is, of course, very clear in politics. Which brings us to the stupid, nasty Burden-Horribilis administration, which is campaigning from the basement. Empty-Suitala carries the so-called torch of democracy, by blatantly refusing to speak with we The People – don’t miss it – which is, whether you are Democrat or Republican, you. Presumably, there’s no need for someone who attempts to become the President of the United States, to explain how she is going to achieve her objectives, because we are swept off our feet by the incredible joy, that we feel in her cheap promise of free stuff for everyone.

 

The whole world can hear, how fake the empty promises are from the dumb, sad, angry, old man and the lies of his female replacement. The Democratic crowd, at least a large majority of them, is energized to gain power and to keep inventing and forcing anti-Democratic laws onto The People, who are supposed to forget they have rights, documented in the Constitution. I have said this numerous times – don’t miss it – we are experiencing the inevitable, horrendous endgame of our DL and things are going to get really ugly. Certainly, Trump and most people on the Right, are much more sincere, rational, honest, lively and accountable, than any of the race-baiters, gas-lighters, grifters, hoaxers, liars, haters, screamers, schemers, sick creeps, losers, victims, complainers, DEI-morons and attack-dogs on the Left. I say and write this – don’t miss it – as someone, who knows the difference between DL and EL. I hear, people on the Right want to talk and negotiate, but those on the Left only want to force their way. Differences between Left and Right, come down to one thing, and one thing only: individual responsibility! This is, not coincidentally, also the issue in your ability to have EL instead of DL. We have DL, as we refuse to be responsible for ourselves and EL is only possible, if we accept, what we must do, for ourselves, to have it. This issue has always been playing in the background, but now it is on full display. Do we want a society, in which we accuse others, or do we take responsibility? Are you – don’t miss it – going to have EL or will you continue to live a vicarious life with your DL? You can hear me read this text on my You Tube channel maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw also check out my other You Tube channel Maximus Peperkamp. 

                              

 Full,

 

It is full moon today. You have probably heard the quasi-meaningful question: is the glass half empty or half full? I don’t really care. To me, what is important is, if the glass is full or empty. In other words, are you finally engaging in effective, satisfying, natural, interesting and enjoyable Embodied Language (EL) or are you still engaging in your meaningless, pretentious, retarded, forceful, unconscious, repetitive, energy-draining, involuntary Disembodied Language (DL)?

 

For those who are spiritually inclined, full moon symbolizes a time of release and completion, but few people seem to realize, spirituality is only of interest to those, who have DL, who like to believe, some full moon ceremony or some language-denying meditation, brings about EL. Anyone, who knows about the difference between DL and EL, is aware this isn’t true. No spiritual ritual has ever brought about EL. The fact, that DL is going on everywhere means all people who behave spiritually are actually full of shit.  

 

People, who are full of themselves, bother us very much. Why is that? Presumably, they are self-centered people, who demand and drain our attention. Why do we get so exhausted? It seems impossible, to have a conversation with them and any attempt to do so, felt as if we were walking through a desert. However, with DL, we are all concerned solely with our own desires, needs and interests. With DL, we are unable to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes, as it is always my way or the highway. In our insensitive DL, which is our usual way of talking, everyone, unknowingly struggles to get each other’s attention and tries to become the center of the attention. We all know about this continuous, ridiculous competition of joys and anxieties, but we never acknowledged the full picture and called it DL. Everyone with DL coercively assumes others share their values and way of seeing life. In DL, everyone is full of themselves all the time, because they are fake.  

 

When we have EL, instead of DL, we discover ourselves and we are full of surprises, as we are continuously saying new, interesting things. In DL, by contrast, we are bored with and frustrated about, ourselves, that is why we are always busy with others, but never with our selves. So, paradoxically, being full of ourselves, means, we are always preoccupied with others. DL gives rise to the false consensus effect, in which we believe – against all odds – the vast majority shares our habits, preferences and opinions. Moreover, if we find out, they don’t, we believe and say and insist, they should.

 

Another weird thing about people, who are full of themselves – while they are never truthful about themselves – is that we keep saying, they like to hear themselves talk. Fact is, they don’t hear themselves, as they don't listen to themselves while they speak and they certainly don’t like anyone who says: hey speaker, it is not what you say, but how you say it. Yet, we commonly say, with DL, they like to hear themselves, because they keep talking, without being open to signals of disinterest. Vacuous people, with automatic DL – basically everyone – are always extremely uptight about any form of feed-back or criticism. Bottom-line is with DL, we are all constantly walking on eggshells, around anyone who is more important than us. We are always walking on a tightrope around those who we consider to be superior to us, because we are inferior to them and superiority as well as inferiority go hand in hand in our usual DL.

 

With EL, conversation is full of meaning, energy and reason. No one is above or below others or forcing anyone, to listen, but not speak. Nobody gets any preferential treatment. Interestingly, in EL, we view our own behavior as fair, effortless, good and satisfying, but consider behavior of those with DL as unfair, stupid, careless and unintelligent, yet we are not self-centered. To the contrary, in EL, we are full of love, patience, laughter and understanding. Moreover, we are keenly aware, that all our successes – which deal with the continuation of our EL – are due to our own behavior and all our failures – which are due to our DL – are due to those, who don’t admit the difference between DL and EL and, therefore, force their DL on us. With EL, we are full of the truth, and we are no longer taking the blame for our DL.   

 

The full significance of EL only becomes clear, if we manage to continue with it. Of course, this means, that we must have stopped our DL. To accomplish this, we must radically move away from our tendency, to have DL with others. And, this is absolutely not a matter of introspection, because there is no language inside of us. We must detect DL, we can hear and experience and get better at avoiding getting involved. It is only necessary to notice if – according to us – someone has DL or EL. If you wish to be able to have ongoing EL and, consequently, enjoy your Language Enlightenment (LE), there is nothing else to be learned from or about others. You can never be too full of yourself, as you are no longer bamboozled by the gas-lighting of DL.