Accuse,
People with
Disembodied Language (DL), accuse people like me, who have Embodied Language
(EL), of forcing their language on others. My entire life, I have been accused
by people with DL, I don’t listen to them, but they have never listened to me. When
I say to them directly, that, quite frankly, I don’t feel the need to listen to
them, because they don’t listen to themselves and, therefore, they never listen
to me, they always get angry, as I expose their DL, with which they attempt to
dominate me and others. My EL doesn’t accuse anyone of DL, because everyone engages in DL, unconsciously, due to conditioning.
Since I pay
attention to my language, in a different way than anybody else, I understand
and express matters, which can only be clearly elaborated with EL. I listen to
myself, while I speak and because of that, I am always my own listener. With
EL, I am, as my own audience, more important to myself than, the audience, who,
according to me, only knows DL and doesn’t want to hear me speak about my EL.
Today, I came
across a word, I had never heard before. In philosophy, they talk about verisimilitude,
which is the notion, that some propositions are closer to being true than other
propositions. However, with our EL, we find, we are endlessly beating around
the bush, by talking in terms of being closer or further away from the truth
and by constantly accusing each other. Surely, in DL, which unfortunately still happens to be the
foundation of science, it is always ‘the’ truth, which matters, but never our
personal truth. It is only in EL, that our own experience matters and according
to me EL, ought to be the basis of science. With DL, we coerce others, to
accept our insensitive and, therefore, biased way of dealing with our language.
The so-called
truth-likeness of the former paragraph has another big problem. With verisimilitude,
there is always the problem of articulating what takes one false theory to be
closer to the truth, than another false theory. However, anyone with EL, knows
that those with DL, will never be able to get to their own truth. Surely, they always
make it seem, as if their approximations
to ‘the’ truth, are of much greater value, than their own truth and,
consequently, truth is always defined in terms of something relative. In other
words, with perception-clouding DL, they just can’t conceive of anything absolute
or permanent.
Although I can
write in clear and understandable language about it and am able to speak about
it, with an impact, which is felt and acknowledged by anyone, who cares to
listen, people with DL, accuse me – with my ongoing EL, which, of course, is my
Language Enlightenment (LE) – of being absolute. They keep falsely claiming, the
absolute truth of DL versus EL doesn’t exist and is merely a figment of my
imagination. I wonder, however, how they are able to explain the fact, that
everywhere, around the world, there are left and right-wing politics?
Since
left-wing politics emphasizes group-behavior, as it is always about governments,
deciding what is supposedly right for the people, it aligns more with DL, than
right-wing politics, which addresses above all individual freedom – which was believed
to have come from god, but which, of course, always came from man –
which aligns more with EL. Indeed, only the politics of liberty, have guaranteed
the right to express ourselves, in spite of differences. However, as I have
stated, approximations of EL won’t cut it, we either have it or we don’t. This
is why the great difference between DL and EL is the quintessential issue of
our time. Individualism has gone totally out of control in Western civilizations,
because we don’t have the language, which fits with our individuality.
While I
recognize, that both right and left endlessly accuse each other of lying and fully
acknowledge, that DL is the language of politics and power, I also am well
aware, that all our scientific theories have come about, due to previous
theories, which were, for the most part, proven to be false. What can be
learned from this struggle, in the history of science, is, superstitious beliefs
were always in opposition of real knowledge. This struggle even goes on today,
as DL is ubiquitous in every society, around the world.
Another
accusation, I have heard many times, over the years that I have been talking
and writing about DL and EL is, I make things, with EL, too simple. As anyone
with any scientific knowledge should know, it is of utmost importance to reduce
complexity into simple, coherent formulations, as this is the way in which we begin
to truly make sense of our reality. It is astonishing, in this respect, that
after all my years of studying and teaching psychology, no reputable people
have ever acknowledged the necessity of EL, as DL is inherently biased and unscientific.
I deserve a Ph.D. for writing this blog and if anyone with any academic cloud
would ever read this, let her or him invite me, to present my case and, then, all
will be revealed. I am talking about the
future of mankind.