May 4, 2015
Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Engineer
Dear Reader,
When the listener responds to the speaker’s voice, the
listener is either responding to an appetitive or to an aversive stimulus, that
is, the listener either likes or dislikes the speaker. However, the listener’s
response is a neural behavior of which he or she is either capable or
incapable. For instance, the listener must have a behavioral history with English
language, to be able to understand an English speaker. If such a history is missing,
the listener will be incapable of having appropriate responses to English
speakers. The listener’s history of reinforcement conditioned
his or her body to appropriately respond to English stimuli. Whatever the listener is capable of perceiving as appetitive or
aversive is always determined by his or her history of reinforcement.
The saying beauty is in the eye of the beholder is
factual in that the construct of an appetitive or an aversive sounding speaker is
made possible by the neural behavior of the listener, who mediates the speaker.
The listener who identifies a speaker as interesting or
uninteresting, as appetitive or aversive, is capable because his or her body was conditioned to do so, that is, auditory stimuli were repeatedly reinforced
as such. What may sound good to one, may sound bad to another. In other words, the
listener neurally or non-verbally behaves the speaker and thus provides
reinforcement.
Other than in the eye of
the beholder there is no beauty. Everything that is perceived as out there, in the external
environment, is in fact happening within the skin of each organism, who is
conditioned to do so. Since such behavioral processes happen to individual
organisms, listeners, as an audience of one, feel energized or drained
by a speaker. In the former the listener experiences the Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB) of the speaker, but in the latter the listener experiences the Noxious Verbal Behavior (NVB) of the speaker. Their body produces neural behaviors that make
them attentive or inattentive. People describe their environment or others as
something outside of themselves that is stimulating or tiring to them, but they don't realize that they refer
to their body which has been conditioned by previous circumstances to increasingly respond stimuli
in that manner. As long as they don’t listen to themselves while they
speak, as they would in SVB, they don’t realize that they sound exactly
like what they don’t want
others to sound like and that the pot is calling the kettle black.The latter is an example of NVB.
Much thanks to you for sharing this blog. This blog will enhance my insight.
ReplyDeleteBest Spoken English Institute in Chennai | Spoken English Center in Chennai
Thank you for this compliment. Sorry, I that I only just read it...If you are still around and would like to talk about SVB, which I now refer to as l Embodied Language, I would very much appreciate that. You can reach me on skype: limbicease Kind greetings, Maximus
ReplyDelete