Moral Clarity?

 

Where the hell is the moral clarity, in the communist-left-wing-Biden-government, which brands anyone, who doesn’t agree with them, as a threat to national security or democracy, who scream fascism, racism, white privilege, etc., but, who, cowardly, don’t say anything, to strongly condemn the virulent antisemitic, anti-Israel, anti-American storm, that is going on at university campuses around the country? All of this, because Democrats pander to those – in the United States – who are in favor of Hamas!

 

Our usual way of talking, which, unbeknownst to everyone, is Disembodied Language (DL), is a struggle for attention, in which power, that is, the ends, always, supposedly, justify the means. No matter what moral high ground we claim to have, our morals, our ideas about what is right and wrong, are all based on our unconscious participation in and condonement of DL. Sadly, we don’t know anything about the difference between our DL and Embodied Language (EL).

 

If we knew about the difference between DL and EL, we would realize, once and for all, a meaningful notion about right and wrong can only emerge from the correct way of using our language. DL – in which we are not in touch with ourselves and treat our language, as if it involuntarily happens to us – is, simply stated, an incorrect way of using our language. Therefore, listening to the sound of our voice, as we speak and engaging in EL, or not listening to ourselves, while we speak and engaging, without realizing it, in DL, signifies the real difference between right and wrong.

 

Moral clarity is said to be foremostly about the facts. However, the facts, which we are capable of considering with our insensitive, automatic, tense and forceful DL are, of course, completely different from those, we only become aware of in our intelligent, natural, relaxed, conscious EL. I have tried to address this ever since I began to study psychology, but nobody in academia has been willing to explore the DL/LE distinction.

 

During our EL, we all go through the same kind of exploration. Not only do we encounter the same facts, but we also draw the same conclusions. This means, our morality is not determined by someone else, but by our own experience. In DL morality is determined for us by others, by the group, society or culture, but in EL, our morality emerges from our own individuality, from our freedom to be and express who we truly are.

 

Since we always, in DL, give preference to group behavior over individual behavior, we can’t be moral about what is good for ourselves. Surely, if we can’t even decide what is right or wrong for ourselves, how can we determine what is right or wrong for others? The fact is, our DL, inevitably causes endless moral dilemmas, conflicts between what is expected from us by the group and what we, as individuals, would like to do. Freud’s reality-and pleasure-principle map onto what is supposedly moral or immoral.  

 

Someone argued the presumably meaningful words: but fear cannot be a substitute for moral clarity. As long as we are, unknowingly, engaged in DL, fear and moral clarity are the same. Look at what is happening today. If you disagree with the absurd-communist-woke-left-narrative, you are punished, demonized and cancelled. Surely, moral clarity and fear are as mutually exclusive, as DL and EL. Left-wing politics is the absence of moral clarity and the inability for individuals to say to themselves and to hear themselves what is right and wrong. Right-wing politics, however, still stands for freedom of speech, in which we are allowed to have opposing opinions, in which we freely determine what is right for ourselves.

 

Punitive, zealous, superstitious people – who are more often found on the right than on the left – always told those, who don’t believe what they believe, that they lack the moral clarity to judge, but someone like me, who knows about the enormous difference between DL and EL, only decides for himself or herself and insists, everyone will have to decide for themselves. I have lived like this since my early twenties, and I am now sixty-five and I feel very satisfied about that.      

Big Deal,

 

The paradox with Embodied Language (EL) is, it really is a big deal, but the moment you make a big deal about it – as I certainly have – it is no longer EL, but Disembodied Language (DL).  

 

With DL, we make a big deal about so many things, which are totally unimportant, once we can have EL. Ironically, my name is Maximus, which means: the biggest. Perhaps, this is why I was for so long inclined to make a big deal about EL, although, it never made any sense.

 

Nobody can make a big deal about EL, even when it makes them realize their Language Enlightenment (LE), which it will. People usually view me as someone, who makes a big deal out of nothing. Storm in a cup of tea, is what we used to say, in The Netherlands, the country where I grew up.

 

Everyone can listen to the sound, which they make, while they speak, however, the big deal is, nobody does this. We either want others to listen to us or we try to listen to others, but we don’t listen to ourselves. We make it seem as if this is normal, but it is a big deal that nobody is listening to themselves, because DL creates and maintains all our problems. Our in violence and chaos escalating problems, are a big deal, which we can longer deny. However, your problems have endlessly distracted from paying attention to the DL/EL distinction. Unless that becomes a big deal to you, they get bigger and bigger. So, minimizing the importance of how you use your language, is a big deal, as it sets the stage for all your other behaviors. Surely, all behavior that is associated with DL, turns out to be problematic.

 

We don’t want to rock the boat, we don’t want to make a big deal about anything, as we fear social ostracization. We make such a big deal about being accepted, being recognized, fitting in or being understood, because we fear being alone. With ongoing EL, we stop being fearful. Interestingly, just because we realize, that EL, truly is a big deal, it is no longer a big deal to us.  

 

When we are able to have EL, we acknowledge, that everyone, unconsciously, always makes a big fricking deal about their dumb, demanding, energy-draining DL, because it is impossible to make a big deal about our delightful, lively EL.

 

We have all heard the question: what is the big deal? The big deal is always DL. Nothing is going to be a big deal anymore, when we are going to have EL. You can’t believe, it is possible, to not make a big deal about anything, because you were conditioned to have DL. So, you have to make a big deal about your DL, because it isn’t going to stop, unless you pay attention to it.

 

Although it seems that way, it is never a person, who is making a big deal about something, but how we use our language. Hilariously, we don’t want to make a big deal about the elephant in the room: how we communicate with each other. We rather go to war and kill each other, than to pay close attention to how we actually interact. Our own DL isn’t anything we like to bring our attention to, as it is nothing but negativity.

 

Once you have explored the difference between DL and EL, you can no longer turn away from it, as it determines everything. The fact that we all unknowingly engage in DL, indicates we haven’t even begun to explore the immense difference between our DL and EL. Simply stated, our lives are either based on our participation in DL or in EL. In the former, we live – although we pretend otherwise – unhappy lives, but in the latter, we are happy, as DL is no longer a big deal to us.       

 

Naturally,

 

Naturally, you feel annoyed with me, because I expose your unhappy, pretentious, unnatural Disembodied Language (DL), while I, without you, continue with my effortless, meaningful, satisfying Embodied Language (EL). Naturally, you feel envious, as you would like to make it seem, as if you are better or smarter than me, but, with me, there is no way to keep up this lie.

 

You can’t naturally, meaning, habitually, have DL around me, that is why you will, unconsciously, do whatever you can to avoid me. You can’t naturally fly either, that is why we make airplanes. Likewise, you make up verbal constructs, metaphorical airplanes, which make it seem as if you are free, but freedom isn’t a matter manipulative, pacifying, poetic, political, dogmatic, spiritual, Sadsatguru-DeepShitChopra-BullshitheartTole-PatheticBiden-SickDalaiLama-CowardDrPhil-DumbWhoopiGoldberg-language.

 

Naturally, the truth about ongoing EL, is neither made possible by Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism or Judaism. As a matter of fact, they have all perpetuated DL, although, chances we will be having some EL, are much bigger in Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism than in Islam. Similarly, right-wing politics is more conducive to EL, than left-wing politics. I didn’t decide this, this is just my observation. Furthermore, if we were to pay attention to science, naturally, we would accept it is true, we don't listen to ourselves, while we engage in DL and explore why this is so. EL is, above all, a scientific account of how we talk.   

 

We would naturally not be interested in religion or politics, if we knew how to have EL. Surely, to have EL, we would first need to acknowledge, understand and stop our DL. Naturally, stopping our DL, would be our priority, instead of all the nonsense which distracts our attention from DL. Naturally, once we have stopped our DL and are able to have EL, we fully recognize and remind each other, that everything, which prevented us from paying attention, to the great importance of the DL/EL distinction, was a waste of our time.  

 

When you, finally, take your first steps, in your EL, you will realize, naturally, why it becomes more and more interesting and beneficial for you, to do whatever it takes, to go on with it. Moreover, with EL, human destiny isn’t set in stone, because history is only repeated because of your DL. Naturally, everyone’s participation in DL always results in war, conflict, chaos and more problems. Naturally, if someone is holding a gun to our head, we feel threatened and do whatever it takes to survive. In DL, our usual way of talking, we are constantly afraid, and this is why what is actually unnatural seems natural and why we perceive an unsafe environment as safe, while we consider a safe environment as unsafe. This is the devastating, self-defeating, learned-helplessness-consequence of our long, tragic conditioning history with DL. 

 

Naturally, we still praise and have, unknowingly, always have praised the wrong kind of leaders. No leaders have ever stimulated us, to have EL instead DL. Naturally, such leaders don’t exist, because in EL there are no leaders, as everyone is responsible for him or herself. Naturally, this isn’t an idealistic idea, but reality, that can only be properly addressed with ongoing EL.

 

You have – with your dull, mechanical, forceful, DL – no idea, how your EL will naturally bring an end to all our problems. It is because with your EL, you will be able to view your problems in a new light. You can hear in your own voice a different sound, which liberates you instantly from your DL. You never believed this was possible. Naturally, it was always your DL, which was bothering you.

 

The word ‘naturally’ has been endlessly abused by your rigid, blunt, arrogant DL. Naturally, you have always justified your DL, and this is why it never stopped. Naturally, your DL will only stop when you take responsibility for it and become aware about how it has affected you. Naturally, if you speak, day in, day out, without listening to yourself, you are not in touch with yourself.

 

Naturally, if you read this text out loud, so you can hear you own voice, this text makes much more sense to you. To talk naturally, is to tune into the sound of your wellbeing and to express what you are able to say with the sound of your silence, your peacefulness or your truth. Once you continue with your EL, you will naturally stumble upon your own Language Enlightenment (LE).          

 

Mental Illness?

 

There is no such a thing as mental illness. Due to our unintelligent, mechanical, unconscious, unaddressed, involuntary, careless involvement in Disembodied Language (DL), we speak about certain behaviors as mental illness, addiction or criminal, but these categories aren’t helpful, as we are simply referring to negative behaviors, which need to be reduced or, ideally, stopped.

 

It is common, in communistic countries, such as China or Russia, to consider anyone mentally ill, who opposes the propaganda of the oppressive regime. Although – because we all unknowingly engage in DL – it may not be so obvious, a very similar thing is happening in Western psychiatry or psychology, where everyone still believes in the myth of a chemical imbalance in the brain, which can be remediated with medications. The pharmaceutical lobby is as authoritarian as any autocratic government and only someone, who has ongoing Embodied Language (EL), knows what an insidious crime is being committed.

 

The term Anti-Psychiatry (AP) is more relevant than ever, because, nobody has been willing to acknowledge the difference between DL and EL and, consequently, everything we claim to know about human behavior is grounded in our inability to stop our own stupid, insensitive DL. Only EL can be in favor of AP, as it debunks the false notion, that there is language inside of us (please, also read my other writings or listen to my two You Tube channels, Maximus Peperkamp or maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw).

 

The big problem with the construct of mental illness, isn’t necessarily, that it is falsely based on a medical model or on a disease model, but that there exists no such a process as what we call our mind or thoughts. What we consider to be mental, is as much a fantasy, as psychosis or dreams, but it is only once we are able to have EL instead of DL, that we can acknowledge this.

 

If we are ever going to fully explore and understand the great difference between DL and EL, this is not going to come about, due to another, idiotic, convoluted, contentious debate, about whether to fix or completely overthrow the way in which we talk about and then, supposedly, treat, this fabricated, so-called mental illness. To be able to have EL, we must end DL and all the lies we were told with it. Psychologists, psychiatrists or therapists, will be shocked once they have EL.

 

I have a Master of Arts and a Master of Science in Clinical Psychology and almost achieved my PhD. I withdrew, because I felt betrayed by Palo Alto University, who, initially, promised, I would be able to choose my own research topic for my dissertation, but forced me, to follow along the boring research of some arrogant supervisor. I should have achieved my Ph.D. for my discovery of the DL/EL distinction, but nobody there had the integrity or the courage, to let me reveal, what is going to be the future of psychology. EL is the future, but not DL, which is accepted as normal, because people are ignorant about EL.

 

From my perspective – with ongoing EL – I want to make it unequivocally clear, that it is a crime, psychiatrists push medications on people, who have lived through challenging circumstances. Everything looks different with EL and there is potential for recovery, once our DL is stopped by us and not by someone else. Once we know the difference between our DL and EL, we want to stop our DL and go on with EL. I have studied psychology for many years. I have worked in this dysfunctional, useless, undermining and pretentious field of mental health for many years, as 1) a mental health worker, 2) crisis counselor, 3) group-home worker, 4) therapist. I have taught psychology classes, as an instructor at Butte College for many years. Anyone who reads this, should know psychology or psychiatry is a hoax.

 

Nobody recovers. Nobody gets back on their feet. People are indoctrinated and medicated, while society is wasting millions of dollars for programs, which absolutely do not work, and nobody is really checking for results. Likewise, getting people of the street and giving them homes, is supporting dependent behavior, which makes people even more demanding, than they were before. I have seen problems only getting bigger and more complicated and I claim that this is all the result of our refusal to acknowledge the difference between DL and EL.

 

Anyone with any honesty, who witnessed how many troubled people go, in vain, through this sordid, mental-health-revolving-door – which, no matter how you put it, is good for business – must admit, that things are only getting worse. There is no reason to idealistically believe that anyone is going to get better. To the contrary, the mental health business keeps on expanding, to serve more and more people, while nobody addresses, the illusion of inner language.

 

I am no longer working in the field to which I dedicated my life. I am now retired, and I am so glad, I didn’t become just another psychologist. In this writing, I let readers know, mental illness is one of the many fabrications of DL. I say on my own authority, DL, our usual way of talking, is dissociative in nature. All our problems result from our habitual, unquestioned participation in DL. A society that brands people as mentally ill, is a society in decline. Likewise, a society, who accepts as normal – do you not see these gallons of cheap whisky, or vodka at the local supermarket? Only for alcoholics! – that people may get addicted to drugs and alcohol; steal or may commit all sorts of crimes, without any consequences; scream antisemitic hatred, on university campuses, in the name of freedom of speech; or live filthy lives, in tents, trash parks,  public spaces and shit and piss on the streets; such a society is doomed, as its citizens don’t want to accept, that they have let this happen.

 

Nobody can ever accuse me, that I have never been exposed to psychotic, manic, depressed, delusional or suicidal people. I have noticed, how each of the people, who I have met, have always positively responded to my EL. The proof of EL was always in the pudding and the reason I write this, is because nothing has ever made me doubt about the validity and necessity of EL. Moreover, it has always been the professionals themselves, who didn’t want to believe me and interact to verify the difference between their own DL and EL. Mental illness is as much a myth today, as it was when, in 1961, the psychiatrist Thomas Szazs stated, the irrefutable fact, there is no medical basis for so-called mental illness. Szasz supposedly alienated himself from his field, but I say, he was 100% correct. To this day, nobody in the field has the guts to say it, as it would still get them 'alienated'.   

 

In closing, EL is not some therapeutic technique or some tool in your toolbox. EL is only going to happen for those who learn how to have it. I am convinced, anyone, who can talk and listen can engage in EL. You have already done it, but not consciously, deliberately, skillfully and most importantly, continuously. Your problems don’t prevent you from talking out loud with yourself and listening to yourself while you speak. You don’t do this, when you engage in DL, but you only do this when you engage in EL. You know when this is the case, as you suddenly feel, your problems seem to melt, like snow in the sun.  

 Oppressed,

 

In today’s divisive, political, separate universe, people, in Western-Democratic-Judeo-Christian societies are either classified as colonizers or colonized or as oppressor and oppressed. What nobody is paying attention to, however, is that there is a great difference between Embodied Language (EL) and Disembodied Language (DL) and that all politics – yes, all politics – is DL.

 

To be clear, in DL, speakers, who do not listen to themselves, actively, deliberately, coercively, yet unconsciously, dominate, manipulate or exploit the listener or the audience. In EL, on the other hand, speakers hear themselves, which means, they are their own listener. Consequently, EL speakers treat those who listen, like they treat themselves, that is, they are in touch with their audience. That connection is felt and continued,  because in EL, listeners can, at any given time, without any predetermined rule, become speakers and speakers can become listeners. In other words, in EL, communicators experience, for the first time, truly the freedom of speech.

 

Obviously, in DL, there is always an oppressor and someone else, who is feeling oppressed. And, the attention-demanding, intimidating, forceful DL-speaker, is always imposing him or herself on his or her audience. Therefore, the DL speaker – who is, supposedly, in charge of the so-called conversation, who determines what we talk about, who may say something, when and for how long – is the colonizer and those, who don’t have any power or ability to change the conversation, they are, of course, the colonized. However, regardless of whether one is colonizer or colonized, whether one is the oppressor or the oppressed, everyone is in support of DL. Nobody, who views themselves and each other with colored glasses of colonizer vs colonized or oppressor vs oppressed, will be able to have EL, in which these categories have lost their meaning. Only during EL there can be equality, but the frustrated people, who scream about equality, have yet to acknowledge this.

 

Only when we are going to have EL, instead of DL, with each other, will there be a permanent end to oppression, which was normalized due to our usual way of talking, in which everyone is fighting with each other, to get the attention. Since the beginning of time, different groups of human beings have engaged in DL – which was never properly addressed with EL – and, thus, we have, basically, verbally, always been at war with each other and, of course, with ourselves.

 

It is meaningless, deceitful and gas-lighting, to say – with DL – we stand unequivocally against hatred, on the basis of religion, ethnicity, race, national origin or other categories, as long as these so-called other categories don’t include the DL/EL distinction. Once we know about the immensely important difference between our DL and our EL, we are all on the same page, as we will all be against DL, but in favor of our EL.

 

The big unaddressed problem with Freedom of Speech, as mentioned in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, is precisely this latitude for the expression of controversial and even offensive views. In EL, we never say anything offensive, hostile, uncomfortable or even controversial to each other. The reason this is so hard to believe, is because we have never had any deliberate, ongoing EL. The justification, that if we don’t put up with it (with DL), we would chill the freedom of thought or ideas, is, of course, actually a direct endorsement of DL.  

 

Any so-called intolerance of ideas, is always an indication of DL and our increasingly polarized societies, are the outcome of our unconscious participation in our, in violence escalating, DL. It is astonishing, that no scholars, no scientists, no freedom-loving individuals, have so far had the courage, to openly recognize the validity of the DL/EL distinction. And, this imaginary freedom of thought is of no importance, because we need to be able to say it, to hear it and to write it, to read it. Moreover, there is no inner language.

 

In DL, we can never say what we really want to say. In other words, in DL, we, unknowingly, oppress ourselves. Moreover, to escape from this horrible, miserable, embarrassing reality, we seek to oppress others, even if it is with victimhood. Also, in DL, there are many experiences to which we have no access, because our DL doesn’t allow us to get in touch with our true feelings. Our EL isn’t sentimental, idealistic or romantic, but it deals with what we truly feel. Due to our history of conditioning with DL, we have become dissociated from many of our own most intimate experiences. In effect, we have many no-go-zones. With DL, we have become our own worst enemies, as we keep ourselves endlessly pre-occupied with all sorts of distractive nonsense, so that we don’t feel what we feel, let alone say it to ourselves, and listen to it, as we would do during our ongoing EL.        

Transhuman?

 

What makes a boy want to be a girl and what makes a girl want to be a boy? Let’s talk about adults too. What makes a man want to be a woman and what makes a woman want to be man? Have you seen any movies lately? Most likely, you have seen adults, men and women, but also boys and girls, do all kinds of incredible stuff, which men, women, boys or girls can’t do. Why do audiences want to be entertained, by these childish fantasies, that they can fly, travel in time, perform magic or have super-powers?

 

Oh, yes, I get it, we want to get the attention of others, we want to be loved, accepted, adored, honored, respected, feared or avenged. Sadly, we will, unconsciously, demand all this, as long as we aren’t able to give to ourselves – with our Embodied Language (EL) – what we couldn’t receive from others, who mainly engaged in Disembodied Language (DL), because they simply didn’t know, how to have ongoing EL.

 

Did you know, there is a school of philosophy that is called transhumanism? They advocate the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies that can greatly enhance longevity, cognition, and wellbeing. Are you having already a chip implanted in your brain? It is going to happen, if you let it happen.

 

These lofty transhumanists actually study the potential benefits and dangers of emerging technologies, that could overcome fundamental human limitations, as well as the ethics of using such technologies. Sounds familiar? They even believe human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into ‘special’ beings with abilities so greatly expanded from the current undesirable condition as to merit the label posthuman beings. Well, I guess, it hasn’t really worked out as their proponents intended.

 

We all walk or sit around with our I-Phones and if you work out, at the gym, everyone wears ear plugs, to have some aural stimulation, as our DL apparently doesn’t do much for us. In fact, we need something stronger all the time, as we have become habituated to all sorts of noises and disturbances. And, have you not noticed, people driving by in cars, in which they play the music so loud, that the entire building shakes? How about the loud noises made by cars, boats or yet-skies? Why does the whole neighborhood need to hear, that you get in or out of your car? I get it, you are important. I hear and see you.

 

Why do women have plastic, claw-like nails and why do so many show off their butts, tits and, even their pussy? What’s the deal with all these tattoos, these green and blue hairstyles, these piercings and these plastic surgeries? Oh, I see, you are beautiful, awesome, wonderful. Did it make you feel any better? It doesn’t look like it.

 

Since time immemorial, out of fear of their own death, people have been in search immortality. Supposedly, you will achieve eternal youth, if you first find, then, drink (yak!) or bathe in the mythical spring called the Fountain of Youth. Ridiculous tales of such a magical fountain have been told around the world for thousands of years. Many springs are considered sacred, due to the presumed restorative powers of water. In the Middle Ages, there was this story about the elixir of life, a potion that grants the drinker eternal life and cures all diseases. Every culture has its own version of some powerful medicine, which, basically, cures everything that is wrong.

 

Once one recognizes the difference between DL and EL and one is able to go on with one’s own EL, these supposedly empowering potions are as irrelevant, as prayers, mantras or other spiritual, mystical formulas or magic voodoo spells. Nothing compares to the wholesome effects of one’s own ongoing EL, which puts an end to all the superstition, mediated by our DL.

 

It should come as no surprise, the set of beliefs and practices that aims to ‘improve’ the genetic quality of the human population, better known as eugenics, was considered – and, as we can all see, still is today – the medical path to creating and facilitating the so-called transhuman. The wish, to change all of humanity, is always a sign of one’s own inability to change oneself. With DL, one seeks to acquire power, to dominate, change and subdue others. In EL, such stupid, destructive activity is out of the question.

 

There have been many different schools of philosophy, psychology or reality, but none of them have addressed the difference between DL and EL. Actually, they have all inadvertently perpetuated DL. Every time the word ‘post’ is used, we speak about something, which comes after the previous period. Post-humanism, post-modernism, post-structuralism, etc., and we now have post-genderism. This movement didn’t arise – as claimed – from the eroding of the cultural, psychological and social role of gender, but due to increased dissatisfaction with DL.

 

The erosion of binary gender has never been and will never be liberatory. It assumes more freedom but does the exact opposite. It is not gender, which is an arbitrary and unnecessary limitation to human potential, but, DL, our usual, insensitive way of talking. The loosening of gender roles or the disappearance of social stratification, could not come about with DL and is only going to happen, if we can have EL.

 

With EL, no hormone-treatment is needed, as there will be no body-dysphoria. Moreover, this notion of discomfort and distress, about one’s gender identity, is caused by one’s DL, but not by one’s body. The issue is not, to create more so-called identity-groups – for political reasons, so that the democratic Biden administration can mobilize a diverse coalition of minorities – but to address and stop our DL, so we can have EL.

 

It is only with DL, that gender-identity ideology is forced on us. Moreover, people who should be busy with medicine, government, education and psychology, shouldn’t redefine sex into a meaningless multidimensional construct, with the purpose to dominate or exploit others. We will be just human with EL, but not transhuman.   

 Conscious,

 

You are conscious, when you listen to yourself while you speak. So, your Embodied Language (EL) is because you know, absolutely certain, that you have EL. Once you have had some EL, you are also conscious, that sometimes, you still have Disembodied Language (DL), because your conditioning history continues to linger, even after you have discovered, that you can have EL.

 

You are conscious of your EL and your DL, in the same way, that you are conscious, that you are walking or that you are eating. In other words, walking and eating, are two kinds of behaviors, which can be done in a conscious way or not. It isn’t nice, to engage in DL, because you are not listening to yourself, and you are disconnecting from yourself. Likewise, it isn’t nice either, to walk, without knowing, where you are going or to eat, by stuffing yourself and by getting obese.

 

Due to your DL – although it is painful, stressful, frustrating, troubling, chaotic, sad, effortful and dissatisfying – you constantly engage into many behaviors of which you are unconscious. Once you become capable of having ongoing EL, you will stop the entire behavioral repertoire, which is associated with your DL. This is a process of selection by consequences, about which you have become conscious, because you talk with yourself, and you write about your behavior.

 

As the previous paragraphs have very succinctly described, being conscious of our behavior, isn’t – as we are inclined to believe in DL – an inner process, in which we imagine, there are words or sentences inside of us, but it is a matter of using our language correctly. DL is incorrect, in the same way, that being lost or walking around in circles, is incorrect or obsessive eating and stuffing yourself with food would be incorrect.

 

Being conscious is not a moral, social issue, but a personal, individual issue. Being conscious of our behavior, we realize the difference between the by DL-conditioned group-behaviors, which don’t belong to us, and the natural, effortless, graceful behaviors, which belong to us, and always have good outcomes, as they are based on the continuation of our EL. The latter is the repertoire our Language Enlightenment (LE).  

 

In DL, we don’t want to admit, that we don’t listen to ourselves, while we speak, because we are always, unconsciously, fighting with other so-called communicators, who are, of course, in reality, our adversaries – to get them to listen to us, to attract their attention, to what we are saying, to make them accept us, respect us and acknowledge us – and we also don’t want to make it seem, as if we are having any trouble understanding, what others are saying – as we don’t want them to know, we are not listening to them, we are not obeying them, we are not interested in them, we are not respecting them, loving, adoring and praising them, by paying attention to them – as that would indicate, to those who have social authority over others, we are disobedient, unintelligent, crazy, anti-social, lazy, criminal or simply having too much fun. 

 

Being conscious is a subversive, revolutionary act, as everyone, who behaves unconsciously, immediately notices, you are not like them. In effect, they become conscious because of you. This is especially obvious, when you no longer participate in the usual DL, which is going on everywhere and when you, in spite of their DL, continue to express your LE, with your EL and with all your other behaviors. Although people behave unconsciously, due to their DL, when they are near you, something changes in them and they don’t know or can’t find out what it is, unless they begin to talk with themselves and listen to themselves and explore their own EL.