Pseudo Intellectuals,

 

Real intellectuals – like me and my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke – have Embodied Language (EL), but pseudo-intellectuals, always engage in Disembodied Language (DL), in which speakers demand - childishly - the listener’s attention. This forceful DL is the antithesis of reasoning, because listeners, albeit, mostly unconsciously, are coerced into accepting what the my-way-or-the-highway, pretentious, domineering speakers are saying.

 

In DL, any bombastic, arrogant, manipulative speaker, supposedly, is right, because he or she says so. There is absolutely no feed-back in DL, therefore, speakers get away with their bullshit, because, presumably, it is disrespectful to hold these mother-fuckers accountable. Everyone in power should be transparent, but in DL this is never the case. Preferably, those who claim to know, don’t answer any questions about their preposterous opinions they continuously push on others. This is the case with everyone, who is involved in DL. Therefore, this involvement in DL, is not limited to those very few people, who rise to leadership positions in society, but it involves everyone, from the bottom to the top.

 

People with DL always pretend to have a lot of intelligence and knowledge, but they are talking out of their ass. Even if, factually, they are more informed about certain topics than other, their knowledge serves as a cover up for their hubris. Their dangerous, excessive and pathetic pride, over-confidence, self-importance or arrogance, goes hand in hand with a sense of complacency. They believe they are special, but they are full of shit. If you question them, they get agitated and hostile, as they don’t tolerate any criticism.

 

Why would anyone, who talks about matters which are presumably important, engage in the exact same, stupid, unconscious, unnatural way of talking, everyone else is involved in? It is a fact, that people still engage in blunt, forceful, dumb DL, regardless of their level of education. Moreover, pseudo-intellectualism always wins from real intellectualism, as someone with EL, is isn’t going to have meaningless arguments with someone who is automatically engaged in DL.   

 

The often-heard, ridiculous saying, pick your own battles, supposedly, allows the presumably intelligent person to choose, which conflicts are worth their time and energy, rather than attempting to fight every perceived wrong. Anyone with EL, however, knows all conflicts are a waste time and energy. Moreover, anyone with ongoing EL, is, of course, against every perceived wrong, that is committed by our endless involvement in DL. Furthermore, the notion, anyone would have their preferred conflict, is a justification for their DL.

 

When we know about the difference between DL and EL, we acknowledge, it was DL, which introduced us to the false notion, there can be such a thing as over-confidence. This crazy idea, that we can have too much confidence, means: we have no confidence, that is why we pretend. Pseudo-intellectuals claim – with their DL – that over-confidence is one of the largest and most ubiquitous biases to which human judgement is vulnerable, but in EL, we realize, it was our common way of talking, DL, that clouded our judgement. Over-confidence is a product of our DL, the way of talking, in which we don’t listen to ourselves.

 

You are not really knowledgeable, as long as you, unconsciously, engage in superstitious DL. If I follow the definition, which, as I have stated, derives from DL, I myself am a classic example of a pseudo-intellectual. After all, the devious pseudo-intellectual, according cowards, who are not sincere enough to engage in EL, is a person exhibiting intellectual pretentions, that have no basis in sound scholarship. Everyone will have to discover the difference between DL and EL by themselves. This great difference isn’t determined by pseudo-intellectual scholarship. I don’t care about scholarship grounded in DL, as I speak on my own authority about my EL.

 

With my ongoing EL, I am the real intellectual, who doesn’t try to prove anything. Those who claim to prove, whatever it is they say, engage in DL and all of them are pseudo-intellectuals. I was naïve to believe, that academia and science would be open to experience and would acknowledge the important distinction between our DL and EL. I have no hesitation to admit, I feel deeply disappointed in academia and science, as I have spend many years of my life in psychology. It is a great relief to be away from it all and to do my own thing, but in this writing, I’ve made clear, who is the pseudo-intellectual. Let me give one example, why everyone with DL is really dumb. Everyone with DL believes in private speech, in thought, in inner language, but there are, of course, no words to be found anywhere inside of the human body. DL has been pushing and exploiting, forever, the illusion of the mind.    

 Always New,

 

Since I have Embodied Language (EL), every day, I am always new. With Disembodied Language (DL), we only act according to our conditioning history, because our language doesn’t refer to what is happening with us, in the moment, that we are speaking. In EL, you listen to your voice, while you speak, and you will experience the wellbeing of your body. My newness is because each time I speak or write, my EL effortlessly unfolds in what it is and can be, in that very moment.

 

There is no imaginary language going on, inside of me, because of which I, presumably, plan, say or write the way I do. The EL, I express, at this moment, was never expressed like this and will never be expressed like this again. If you read my writings on my blog or watch my You Tube channels (Maximus Peperkamp or maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw), you will notice, there is a constant renewal. The same is true for my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke (her blog is called Stiller Ervaren.: Klanken. (klompanna.blogspot.com)  and her You Tube channel is called Luisterend Spreken). Her work is in Dutch. I highly recommend her. We would love to have you join us in our weekly skype conversation, on Sunday morning at 4:30 Pacific Standard Time. Skypename: limbicease.

 

When you start to listen to yourself, you are not going to say anything, which everyone else says. And, you are also not going to say again you have already said. You are surprised, that even someone like you is able to say something new. Moreover, even one moment of EL, already clearly shows EL always renews, rejuvenates and reinvigorates you. Whenever people, with their DL, talk about the new, they are always talking about the latest fad. Surely, the latest craze or trend has nothing to do with EL, but it gives us a sense of change, while, in reality, we stay the same. It was our DL which has produced the saying: the more things change, the more they are the same. Presumably, timeless wisdom speaks of the cyclical nature of life and the underlying unity of all things. Taoism, the reality-denying, oppressive Chinese philosophy, which puts words, like interconnected, in our mouth, with its wonderful Ying and Yang, that creates a self-perpetuating cycle, is nothing else than the justification for our DL. Millions of women were brutally tortured and had their feet bound or, in recent times, involuntarily, had their babies aborted.

 

Nobody ever talks about the tremendous harm that was done in the name of the philosophy known as Existentialism. Surely, it was an attempt to get to EL, but it utterly failed, as our DL was never properly addressed. Sarte heard the sound of the bell, but, like everyone with DL, he didn’t know where the clapper was hanging. He said there is no exit, but our EL is the exit or our freedom. Indeed, hell is other people, but what we describe in DL as other, is our perception of them. Thus, these so-called other people, is our superficial DL, but we never talked about stopping our horrible DL.

 

We’ve heard so many supposedly new theories, but none of them have ever captured the difference between our DL and EL. The reason our DL has been going on for so long, is that the group always condemns the individual. This is the issue: DL is the language of the group, but EL, is the language of the individual. The two have always been at odds with each other and the group has always won from the individual. This is why DL endured. However, now that the DL/EL distinction is known, DL is outdated, a thing of the past and EL is really our only future.  

 

EL is based on the fact that - of course - there are fundamental aspects of human nature, that remain constant throughout time: we want to feel safe. Yet, during DL, we never felt safe. We merely believed, we were safe with DL, because when we engage in EL, we recognize, only our EL can make us feel safe. DL is based on the assumption that it is true, wonderful and necessary. Despite ever-changing external circumstances, we will do whatever it takes, to give us that sense of security, because without it, we simply cannot function. We have invented all these theories, in an attempt to provide ourselves safety, so that we could go on living. We have survived, but surviving wasn’t enough. Our DL always kept us at survival level.

 

In EL, we leave our survival behavior behind, as it is no longer needed. We are safe, but we not only want to continue to live, we want to thrive. If you go to my You Tube channel, you can hear me sing a song about this. I have known various people, who committed suicide and all of them have let me down. I don’t feel pity for them and I resent the fact, that I have talked with them and felt so affected by their untimely death.  

 

When you have EL, you will hear and see a new side yourself and of your life. New possibilities are not determined by some stupid buzz-word. All your so-called watch-words, were distracting you from your EL. With DL, you are focusing on all the problems of your future, but with EL, you will focus on all the possibilities of your future.

 

While hardly anyone with DL is interested in the new possibilities of the future, your ongoing EL will keep you interested in it, as you experience, in your own life, already these marvelous new possibilities. In effect, you embody the future, in spite of the fact, that people remain afraid of the new. You don’t care about the invention of some new word or some popular view, as words don’t have any bearing on whether we engage in DL or in EL. The new course of your life is not going to depend on what kind of words you use, but on how you are going to speak. If you listen to yourself, while you speak, you no longer care about new so-called' thoughts', but about real actions. EL is new action and your EL moves away from your DL.  

 

Let’s not get carried away by another supposedly new perspective, as EL, is the end of what you have believed. The end of your DL view of life is such a great relief. EL is not belief in a theory, but your experience of your sound and EL. Furthermore, you are not trying to convince yourself or others, but you cannot deny, you experience the bliss of your Language Enlightenment (LE), your ongoing EL. In effect, ongoing EL is a new source of energy.     

 Direction,

 

Without Embodied Language (EL), we have no direction in our lives. We are, literally, all over the place with our Disembodied Language (DL), and whatever we do, it has no meaning, as far as being true to ourselves. Stated differently, with DL, we move away from ourselves, into all sorts of activities, but with our EL, we come to and stay with, who we truly are. In other words, with ongoing EL, we look back on our history of conditioning with DL, as we face the direction from which we have come. Everything we have claimed to be – our so-called identity – is our past, but with EL, something new can emerge.

 

The word direction, comes Latin, directionem, a making straight, a straight line; directio, a directing toward something; from di-rigere, to set straight, arrange, to give a particular direction to; from dis – which means, apart + regere – which means, to direct, to guide, keep straight. We only have the capacity to direct our language during EL, as only in EL do we let our language unfold. In DL, by contrast, we repeat, that is, our negative verbal past is our future.

 

With our usual way of talking, that is, with DL, we are inevitably heading into the direction of our past. Only if we listen to ourselves while we speak and engage in EL, can we immediately, effortlessly, redirect ourselves and step out of our conditioning history with DL. However, it makes no sense, to only do this once or twice or whenever we, feel like it, as our conditioning history with DL, will only lose its grip, when we understand, by speaking, listening, writing and reading, that the direction of our EL, is always about the here and now. Therefore, we are in the here and now, because we speak and listen simultaneously. Also, we write and on our You Tube channel, we read our own writing. In other words, what we have said is documented.

 

Obviously, due to our DL, we are, unknowingly, all used to take direction from others. We like to believe, we determine our own direction, but once we identify the difference between our DL and EL, we realize, we were mechanically going in a direction, we didn’t want to go. Surely, our freedom, is to go into the direction, we want to go. However, this is not a matter of choice, but of our ability to stop our DL, so that we are able to instruct ourselves differently. As we verbally give attention, to whatever was asking our attention, our direction is fully understood, because with our ongoing EL, we are always expressing our Language Enlightenment (LE).

 

With regard to switching from DL to EL, there is no such a thing, as moving into the direction of the solution. There are no approximations of EL, you either have it or you don’t and if you have it, you know, you have it, immediately. There is no gradual movement, in the right direction and such language belongs to our DL, in which we believe to be working towards a better future.

 

Everyone who seriously explores the difference between their own DL and EL, will have admit, being alone, is necessary, to find your own direction. As long as you remain busy with others, you are bound to take directions from them. Social conditioning is such, that listening, always means, listening to the someone else. You break an ancient taboo in EL, because by listening to yourself, you go against the group. In DL, authority was someone else, but with your ongoing EL, you are our own authority.

 

Water flows down-hill; thus, it naturally goes in a particular direction. The exact same principle applies to our language, but, of course, only, if we listen to ourselves, while we speak. With ongoing EL, we always say, without any problem, with great precision, care, understanding and joy, what we are experiencing. Moreover, our EL is majestically silent, even while it is a roaring waterfall or rapid. Our LE isn’t the ocean, in which the river ends, but the current itself. We are alive and awake, because we are natural.

 

When we visualize taking steps into the right direction, we miss out on what it is like, to say and hear, that we have found our direction. In DL, we attempt to go forcefully from point A to point B and we imagine and strive for a straight line, but in EL, we are receptive, silent, gentle, creative and moved by our positive emotions. With ongoing EL, we are home in our LE, and we aren’t going anywhere, as we are happy to be where we are.             

 Freedom,

 

We only talk about freedom, because we are not free. When you have Embodied Language (EL), like me, you are free and freedom is not an issue. Freedom is only an issue, if you engage in Disembodied Language (DL). During DL, which is your usual way of talking, you are willing to do just about anything, to, supposedly, be free, but with your DL, you are only able to create the illusion of freedom. Freedom requires EL.

 

If one has to die for one’s so-called freedom, it is not freedom, but it is merely the illusion of freedom, that one dies for. When you know the difference between DL and EL, you will naturally want to stop your idiotic DL, so you can have ongoing EL and, then, you will never want to be a martyr anymore, as you give up on all your fighting.

 

Freedom is not – as everyone with DL believes – a reaction, to what has been done to us. As long as we are still reacting, to being imprisoned, to being oppressed, humiliated, insulted, rejected, abandoned, violated, abused and traumatized, we are not free. EL, the language of freedom, is not reactive. Indeed, with EL, we don’t need to jump through any hoops, and, we don’t need to overcome anything, to have EL, as we can have our EL, effortlessly, in spite of all our problems.

 

One of the most astonishing aspects about our EL, is that, we are able to naturally, comfortably and without any practice, continue with it and then, realize our Language Enlightenment (LE), which is, who we are, once we have ongoing EL. In other words, we always have access to our ultimate state. Who we have always been and  will always be, is immediately recognized with our EL, even if we have it only for one moment.

 

There is no secret path to freedom. If you lack the courage to talk with yourself and to listen to yourself, you are simply a coward, like everyone else, who keeps engaging in DL. Your freedom doesn’t depend on your happiness, as it is your happiness and freedom doesn’t depend on your courage, because it is your courage. Likewise, your freedom is your conscious, your wellbeing, your authenticity, your motivation and your resilience. Surely, your freedom is also your self-control, your accountability and responsibility.

 

People who warn, that we can’t have freedom as well as peace, they don’t know what they are talking about. For everyone with DL, it seems as if freedom and peace are separate, but they are not. It is very clear, our so-called freedom, in which we have, unknowingly, continued with our DL, didn’t and couldn’t result in peace. It wasn’t freedom to begin with, because our mechanical DL was never addressed by our EL.

 

With DL, people say, our freedom isn’t given and, therefore, you must take it, to have it, but with our ongoing EL, we realize our freedom is neither given nor taken. During EL, freedom is received and perceived because we are open. Also, we are not – as is said with DL – as free as we want to be, because there are no degrees of freedom. Only with ongoing EL, are we going to experience and understand the total freedom of our LE. Nothing can get in the way of our EL, because we don’t participate in DL anymore.

 

Conformity isn’t the enemy of freedom, as our freedom doesn’t have any enemies. People who are used to DL, are incapable of accepting and experiencing, there can be an environment, in which there is no threat or no aversive stimuli. However, such a growth-stimulating, stable and safe environment, is created and maintained by our ongoing EL. When we finally have ongoing EL, we will for the first time be exposed to such a supportive environment and be able to say and comprehend many things, which, with our DL, previously, we couldn’t grasp or understand.

 

A person’s dedication to freedom or EL, doesn’t have anything to do with patriotism. Due to our DL, we have come to equate one with the other, but freedom and ongoing EL – which accurately expresses it – is cross-cultural or universal. There is, however, absolutely no such imaginary thing as the freedom of thought, as thought was the illusion of inner language, created by our DL.

 

Freedom is the behavior, we have, when our language matches with our experience. This can only be the case in EL and DL has to be stopped before we can begin to have any EL. All our talk about freedom couldn’t result in freedom, since we haven’t recognized and stopped our DL. Any one, who explores the difference between their DL and EL, comes to acknowledge, that EL, our individual freedom, is constantly, everywhere, prevented and ignored by those, who have DL. People with DL are never free, because their DL is outdated group-behavior. Only an individual, who is free from the pressure of others, can have EL and express his or her LE, the language of freedom.   

 Real,

 

During your usual way of talking – which has set the stage for how you deal with your language and determines how you behave – you cannot be real, because you don’t listen to yourself while you speak. Your Disembodied Language (DL) doesn’t allow you to be in touch with your feelings, let alone express them in a satisfying manner. The fact, that you don’t know how to talk about your emotions with DL, makes you do many neurotic things, because you try in vain to find relief from your negative feelings.

 

The only way in which you can talk about your feelings in a positive manner, is if you listen to yourself while you speak and, thus, engage in Embodied Language (EL). Although you may still be processing the negative feelings, which you weren’t able to express and dissolve with your DL, with ongoing EL, you can talk about these familiar negative feelings, without getting again carried away. Your EL invites and allows you to address everything you weren’t able to address with DL. It is very moving to heal from your DL.

 

In DL – which, I repeat, is our common way of talking – it is not only impossible to express your feelings sensitively and calmly, but if you try, you are always made to feel, as if you are doing something wrong, which, ironically, is true. However, it is only true, from an EL point of view, but not from a DL point of view. With DL, we viciously judge our own and each other’s feelings. Moreover, since we all fail to express our emotions and our experiences correctly, in DL, we are made to feel, as if we should keep our negative as well as our positive feelings to ourselves and always speak in a non-emotional, supposedly, rational manner. Surely, in DL, we are incapable of being rational, as our negative feelings get in the way. We can only be rational, when we have positive emotions, but we need to have EL to maintain and express our positive feelings.

 

During DL, you either hear people apologizing for their feelings – but they never really mean it, because they have been made to feel guilty about what they are feeling – or you will hear people say, you should never apologize for how you feel. For people, who only know DL, being real, means the irresponsible, blunt, forceful expression of their negative emotions, without considering how this affects others. Surely, we should never apologize for being real, but being real has nothing to do, with the unconscious unloading of our negative hyped-up emotions.

 

When we finally express the inevitably negative feelings and experiences of our DL – with EL – we are mourning the great trauma, that was endured by all of mankind, since the beginning of time. When I first discovered that I could talk out loud with myself and listen to the sound of my own voice and effortlessly produce my own EL, I was overcome by a deep sense of sorrow. Each time, I took time, to talk with myself and listen to myself, I was in tears. EL makes crying easy. In EL, my tears became my biggest friends.

 

I once talked about the DL/EL distinction with someone, who taught acting. He seemed very interested, initially, but when I told him, all acting is DL, he began to argue with me. In EL, we don’t act, because we are real. While I could understand, why he would say, that acting is about being real and being honest, I would say, with my EL, that acting is a failed attempt at EL.

 

Our infatuation with acting, movies, TV, social media, amusement, books or anything we can read – which always distracts us from our own language – keeps us stuck and busy with DL, in which others, supposedly, are more important, that is, more real or, presumably, more capable or special, than we ourselves. However, those, in DL, who manage to get the attention are those who demand it and struggle for it. In EL, speakers never demand the listener’s attention, as each speaker is his or her own listener.

 

In DL, we say: seeing is believing. However, EL has nothing to do with believing, because it is about being real. Moreover, in DL, something is considered to be real, because, supposedly, it has objective independent existence. Yet, in EL, we recognize, with our novel use of language, that everything, which, presumably, exists independently from us, is, in fact, neurally-behaved by us. In other words, there is no reality and there cannot be any reality, separate from our own experience. However, we will crash to the ground, if we believe, we can fly and jump from a roof.  

After students leave school, to get a job, they are said to go and live in the real world. It is interesting, to take note of the fact, that the somewhat protected college or university environment, is, by default, depicted as unreal, while having a real job in the real world is real. Certainly, the real world, isn’t the supportive environment, contrasted with a student’s life. In other words, the real is, basically, described as if it is difficult, serious, unprotected and having nothing to do with the experience of comfort. Our notion of what is real is different whether it derives from our DL or our EL. With our dumb, unconscious DL, we falsely believe, we live in hell, but with our EL, we really live the good life.        

 Red Guards,

 

All of mankind’s problems are problems of repetition. We repeat the same Disembodied Language (DL). Our problems can be addressed and will only be solved with a different kind of language. Embodied Language (EL) is the only way in which the problems, which were caused and maintained by DL can be solved. In DL, the speakers do not listen to themselves, but in EL the speakers do listen to themselves and experience the new.

 

Obviously, history is again repeating itself with the disgustingly antisemitic campus protests. The blatant lack of leadership at universities is sickening and it is indoctrination from the Democratic Left, which has brought this about. I want the reader to know, however, that the escalation of hatred into violence, is the predictable pattern of our common DL, which goes in every society around the world.

 

Although we have been able to extend our periods of relative peace somewhat, there is, with our inherently coercive way of talking, always, eventually, an inevitable intensification of aggression. Americans, but also Europeans, should listen to Lily Tang Williams, who grew up experiencing extremely poor living conditions, food rationing, social chaos and Communist indoctrination. She survived Mao’s Zedong’s Cultural Revolution in communist China and came to America, where she is currently running for congress. Who better, to recognize, that these protesters are the same as Mao’s Red Guards, then this trained lawyer, with a master’s degree in administration and planning? She should be all over the news, but the main-stream media wouldn’t let her speak out against the insanity of the Left, because, according to the cancelling Biden administration, she is an evil MAGA Republican.

 

Since my wife’s parents have also escaped from Mao’s purge – which killed millions and millions of people – by leaving everything behind and by starting with absolutely nothing in the United States and since I have read many books about this horrific topic, I view these ignorant Marxist hordes, who have taken over all of the major educational institutions, with their contagious anti-Isael, anti-American, but, ultimately, anti-individual freedom rhetoric, as the enemy within and an imminent threat to Western civilization.

 

These screaming, righteous protesters represent DL on steroids. In case people still don’t know this, the Red Guards, in 1966, were a mass, student-led, paramilitary social movement, mobilized by Chairman Mao, until they were abolished in 1968, during the first phase of the Cultural Revolution. Mao’s ‘little generals’ had unleashed a period of ‘red terror’ and viciously persecuted teachers, lynched suspected class enemies and created an atmosphere of fear. Similarly to what happens today, radicals use propaganda to seize power by destroying ‘old’ symbols. Laws are changed and no longer enforced, statues are torn down and the Constitution, supposedly, needs to be thrown away. Traditional Chinese culture – The Four Olds: old ideas, old culture, old customs, old habits – had to be demolished according to these supposedly modern idealistic people.  

 

Nobody can deny that the same intimidation and violence is currently perpetrated – with full approval – by those, who hide behind the man, who claims to be saving democracy. All of this is the result of DL. To view what is happening in America from the perspective of someone, who is able to have ongoing EL, it is clear, we are heading for very hard times, as there are no demonstrations from the Right and practically all means of communication belong to powerful people on the Left. Sadly, there are many Republicans In Name Only (RINOS), treasonous individuals, who have given up on American sovereignty and colluded with the Democrats, to leave the border wide open. Likewise, in Europe, many countries have fallen victim to the globalist-Marxist' agenda. 

Generally, people down-play the ongoing protests as non-violent, but in China, there were, beheadings, beatings, live burials, stonings, drownings, boilings, group slaughters, disembowelings, digging out hearts, livers, genitals, slicing of flesh, blowing up with dynamite, and more, no method remained unused by the Red Guards. Something like this is very well possible in any country, because in communist rule there is apparently not enough room at the top for everyone.

 

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rolled over its citizens - Tiananmen Square - with tanks, while here in the United States, many people are in jails with no trials and the law is turned against its own citizens. Moreover, Mao had students kill their teachers and the young kill the old, including their own family. If we – people on the right – compare what is happening in America, to the collapse of other Western Democratic countries, we should realize, that it isn’t communists, who never change or evolve and who channel and organize human evil, wherever they seize power, but it is DL.

 

All savagery and brutality deal with DL and, the only way in which our DL is ever going to stop, is if we are going to talk about the difference between our DL and our EL. Only the people who live in Western Democratic countries, have the opportunity to openly distinguish between DL and EL and acknowledge, that DL was never really communication in the first place, but the pretention that we were talking and listening. In the name of our so-called communication, we have always been dominating, manipulating, distracting, forcing, intimidating and harassing. Only when we know the difference between DL and EL, will we choose EL and base our actions on EL. Real communication is the key to solving all our problems, but we have never tried, let alone, experienced, ongoing EL.

 

Today, I also read about a courageous North Korean person, Yeonmi Park, who, in spite of a tremendous amount of suffering and torment at the hands of the Communists, managed to escape through China to America. Of course, it is no coincidence, that miss Park, like Lily Tang Williams, gravitated toward the Republican Party, because she recognizes the treacherous Communist tendencies in the Democratic Party. The biggest critics of the far Left and Biden’s Communistic regime are the real refugees from communist countries. They have good reason for it and, yet they too, don’t address the DL, that is causing this and has done so, throughout human history. DL has never been properly addressed with ongoing EL. In other words, Western Democratic countries have yet to embrace the language of individualism, which is EL.

 

An interesting, not widely known, detail about the youthful Red Guards was, that they were used by Mao, to further his agenda of Cultural Revolution – meaning forcing all of China to become communist – until they were no longer useful. They were too fanatical, too dangerous, to remain, once they had served their purpose. In their heyday, around 1966, the Red Guard reigned with chaos and violence, but by 1967 the movement had been banned and removed in the name of ‘political stability.’ By 1968, they were forcibly suppressed and liquidated in mass executions. There is an eerie similarity with all the ‘useful idiots’ – students who want to be part of some cause – who are not only yelling the Communist’, but also Jihadist’ propaganda, to, support the liberation of Hamas-Palestine.

 

Mao – who easily killed 100 million people, as the Great Famine alone already killed an estimated 40 to 80 million (numbers from demographic experts) – like any other ruthless Chinese emperor, but also like all the democrats today, wanted power and control and used any means available, to succeed. These Red Guards are just like today's Antifa, who say they are anti-Fascist, but who are ironically identical to Hitler’s Brown-shirts. Intersectionality, this magical concept straight from the Diversity-Equity-Inclusion- Indoctrination-Playbook, presumably, is the intellectual, academic - don't worry about plagiarism - term, which beautifully explains this Nazi-Marxist-Jihadist movement and, yet we still refuse to talk with each other, in order to finally acknowledge the difference between DL and EL.

 

This is getting to be a long piece, but I want the reader to know, that I have spent many years of my life, studying psychology, I have worked for many years in mental health and I have taught psychology for many years, but in the context of what is happening today, I can better understand, why millions of dollars, went to creating many new courses – for LGBTQ, BLM, DEI, White Privilege, etc. – but nobody was interested in creating a course, to have ongoing EL. Psychologist, like RINOS, were never in favor of the individual, that is why practically all of their research is based on averages. However, whether we are willing to admit this or not, our problems are created by how we, each, individually, talk. Although this is a common problem, it remains an individual problem, because in DL, we are not true to our own experience. My ongoing EL is against everything that is happening in psychology, science or academia and in retrospect I realize, I never really was part of these coward, insincere, mediocre promotors of hateful DL.   

 Community Organizing,

 

I heard on TV the term community organizing (CO) and was curious to find out, how it relates to the two different patterns, which occur in every language: Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL). According to Wikipedia, CO is a process where people, who live in proximity to each other or share some common problem, come together into an organization that acts in their shared self-interest. Unlike those who promote more consensual community building, CO organizers generally assume that social change necessarily involves conflict and social struggle in order to generate collective power for the powerless. CO has as a core goal the generation of durable power for an organization representing the community, allowing it to influence key decision makers on a range of issues over time. Ideally, CO groups get a place at the table before important decisions are made. CO organizers work with and develop new local leaders, facilitating coalitions and assisting in the development of campaigns. A central goal of CO is the development of a robust, organized, local democracy bringing community members together across differences to fight together for the interest of the community. This description clearly shows how DL is perpetuated by CO.

 

The insistence of CO organizers on conflict and struggle, as a way to, supposedly, achieve social change, is aimed at achieving durable power. This Marxist-communist approach, however, will never be able to properly address our DL. To the contrary, it will make our DL even more insidious, tenacious, manipulative and lethal, than it already is. Moreover, all of this will be done, because, presumably, it is good for the community. Make no mistake, with DL, only the illusion is created, that we are coming together.

 

CO is based on the artificial division between the so-called powerless and the powerful, and,   therefore, it preaches power for the powerless. EL isn’t based on any kind of fight and the basic premise of CO appears to be, that nothing can be achieved without DL. Whatever is achieved with DL, is never the wellbeing of the individual community members. The imaginary place, at the table of decision-making, is never obtained, because DL only deals with group-behavior, not with individuals. Like so many other political movements, CO throws out the child with the bathwater, by gas-lighting and virtue-signaling.

 

The aim of CO is social reform, that is, it claims to bring a social or political system closer to the community’s ideal. It should also be noted, that the need for reform of society, is grounded in what is known as liberalism or, more precisely, in socialistic-communistic-collectivistic ideology, which, in turn, previously arose from religious concepts. A famous example of this, was the fanatic, creepy, idiot, Mahatma Gandhi with his spinning wheel. Anything that is reactionary, religious, radical, left-wing or revolutionary, that is intent on transforming, replacing or radically overthrowing, the fundamental principles of society, is against EL and, clearly, in favor of DL.  

 

The end goal, the ideal, the future, which never comes – which, as is always the case, in brutal, lying, unnatural DL, justifies the means – of distributing power and resources, more equally, between the community members and external political and social figures of power (oddly, some people are seemingly more equal than others; see China or Russia), is always at the expense of the demise of millions of people. Freedom and wealth, was never created by any forcefully-distributing-the-wealth governments.

 

Another famous CO was Barack Obama, whose anti-American views, were shaped by the social justice warrior Saul Alinsky. Surely, the entire current Biden administration, is now executing Alinsky’s radical left agenda. They ram all kinds of absurd ideas down everyone’s throats and if you have any objections, you will be cancelled, by these powerful people, who will do anything to remain in power. Their DL has destroyed the Freedom of Speech, which provides room for EL. When it comes to acknowledging the difference between DL and EL, only the conservatives and republicans don’t force their ideas on others. I am not saying, the right has EL, but, surely, they are more open to it than the left. Essentially, DL is group-behavior, but EL is individual behavior, and, thus, the right is in favor of the individual, but the left – hiding behind their CO-shtick – is quite willing to sacrifice our individual rights on the altar of social justice. It is no coincidence Hillary Clinton wrote her senior thesis on Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (1946). This is not Right-Wing paranoia, but a reflection, from a EL-perspective, on where America is today, based on where it has been. America and all free countries, need EL, the language of the individual.