Perspective,

 

Since I have discovered my Language Enlightenment (LE) – because I began to acknowledge the immense difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and our Embodied Language (EL) – I have developed my own intolerant perspective, on everything which pertains to DL. Certainly, I write in this way, because those who have DL, neither understand nor respect the fact, that I prefer to have EL. I insist, they would prefer EL as well, had they known the difference between their usual, unintelligent way of talking and the way of talking, which I, to protect myself, rather keep to myself or only share with those, who are able to appreciate it. I admit, I am what they call bigoted, but I don’t care, as I live my own way of life and to me, individualism is the essence of America.   

 

I am never going to tell you this in your face, but only in writings as these, that your usual, deceitful, coercive, phony, draining and superstitious way of talking, completely denies and constantly rejects, who I am. However, your DL, of course, doesn’t allow you to be yourself either. Since you believe, you already know everything there is to know about speaking, listening, reading and writing, you make it seem, as if there’s something wrong with me and my language, when in fact, there is something wrong with anyone, who doesn’t know any better, than to engage in mechanical, insensitive, dull DL.

 

I have no problem with my white skin color nor with the color of others. Those, who try to convince me, something is wrong with me, because I happen to be white, engage in DL. I hate all the race-baiters and fear-mongers. And, this is not hate-speech, but  EL, which represents my LE. I also hate many other things and it is totally healthy to do so. I couldn’t live a healthy, happy life, if I didn’t hate and verbally express, what makes such a life impossible. Those who tell me, it is wrong to hate, always pretend to be holier-than-me. Fuck them. To know me, is to engage in EL and to recognize goodness in yourself.    

 

I am unashamed to say, I hate the horrible sound of leaf-blowers or rap or reggae music. I am perfectly okay, with my disgust for rotten apples, cigarette or marijuana smoke; people, who beat each other up to win a price or just because they themselves are frustrated; people, who believe in a non-existent, personal, higher power; people, who don’t take responsibility for their own actions; people, who endlessly play the victim card. I also hate people, who try intimidate others with their appearance, with their tattoos, blue hair, fake eye-lashes, creepy plastic nails, botox-lips, uniforms, crosses, stars, turbans, scarfs and dresses. I just hate it, when aggressive people play their horrific noisy music in their cars so loud, that you can hear it from one block away. I hate cars with exhaust-pipes, which make roaring sounds. I hate the by DL-perpetuated inhuman stupidity, that only more weapons, more war and more military, instead of sensible EL or real communication, can secure mankind’s future. I hate to see industries destroy the natural environment, but also hate to see homeless people and junkies trash our town, parks and creeks. I believe, stopping our own DL, will stop all that nonsense and more… 

 

With EL, we accept everyone as they truly are and this means: we fully acknowledge and explain why so many people are fucked up. In our technology dependent societies, we can’t keep dancing around the real and, therefore, increasingly urgent issue, that unscientific DL still dominates every culture. Science is the standard, which has yet to be applied to how we communicate. How can we speak and listen, if we keep feeling threatened and fearful? We are only able to pretend to be talking and to be listening, as long as we keep engaging in DL.

 

Among teen-agers depression and suicide is on the rise. Crime numbers are going through the roof and the overrated call for reform of the justice system has undermined any respect for law-enforcement, our last line of defense against total chaos. People are addicted to alcohol and drugs and fail to create, let alone maintain, the stable family-environments, in which healthy, happy, confident, capable children can grow up. In the name of equity, a lowering of standards has eroded and disparaged intellectual pursuits, because, presumably, computer-games, social-media, sports events or so-called spirituality, that is, instant gratification, is more important. In EL, we surely admit self-reinforcement is important, as our interest in how we use our own language, would make us conscious and allow us to be social in ways, which we have never before experienced.

 

When people are said to have gender-dysphoria, they presumably express discomfort about feeling that their emotional or psychological identity is at variance with their birth sex. It would, however, be much more to the point, to simply state, that they are uncomfortable with the way in which people are talking with them. That is why heterosexuals  are being told by the so-called LGBTQ community, which is not a community at all, to address them in the way, that they want to be addressed. They tell other people how to talk. However, anyone who knows about the great difference between DL and EL, instantly recognizes, they are actually trying to claim, albeit unconsciously, that they have EL, while in fact they punish, confront, argue, claim, pretend and, like all the so-called straight people, attempt to dominate and oppress others, with their form of DL.

 

Although, because I have EL, I accept everyone and respect the fact, that they were, like me, inevitably conditioned by the circumstances, in which they grew up, I write this text, to let the reader know, that people like me, never receive any respect for the fact, that they have outgrown and transcended their history of conditioning. People always insist on respect for the existing culture. Generally speaking, nobody seems to take any note of the important fact that traditions, have always conditioned people to develop and value group-oriented behavior, instead of individual-oriented behavior. It is often said that different cultures enrich society, but the way this works, is that when we come in contact with other cultures, we inevitably are less insistent on our own traditions, and, therefore, we become  more and more an individual. Human beings have always lived and survived in groups, but we have to  face the fact, that group-behavior is on its deathbed and mankind’s only future is true individualism.   

 

Anyone, who can continue with EL, instead of only having a few accidental moments of it, agrees that the current wave of transgenderism is, of course, a social phenomenon. Moreover, it is, like many other trends, a reaction against our ubiquitous DL, which nevertheless remains unaddressed. Presumably, we become individual, but reality is, we are anxiously trying to adhere to another so-called group-think.   

 

As the institutions of information, of what could have been a healthy democratic government, have been corrupted and distorted, we are left to our own so-called critical thinking skills, but what are those overrated thinking skills, if we don’t talk with ourselves, so that we can hear, what we have to say about our own individual perspective of our reality? It is clear to anyone with EL, that the general denial of EL, inadvertently, results in a lowering of once painstakingly enforced empirical standards, because our common way of talking itself is unscientific. As a result, society is becoming more and more chaotic and people are literally becoming crazier, day by day, although nobody knows, why this is occurring.

 

As a white, heterosexual, conservative, middleclass, super-sensitive, intellectual, well-travelled, artistic, humoristic, atheist American, there is something I want to get off my chest, because I certainly win the pitty-party contest. I am the biggest victim, because I have EL. Moreover, unlike everyone else, I know how to have EL and the future of mankind depends on me. You would feel this way too, if you managed to stop your stupid DL and engage in EL with me, but to be that responsible, turns you off, as you’d rather be entertained. However, if you muster the courage to face the facts, you will admit that everything, yes, absolutely everything, depends on you and this has nothing to do with imagining yourself to be more important than you really are. With DL, you are not even important to yourself and that is why you wish to be important in the eyes of others, but in EL, you really matter to yourself, although in the eyes of others, you probably remain totally unimportant.

 

As someone, who was sexually molested as a child – who couldn’t connect with his abusive, authoritarian, catholic father, but who for many years struggled with the fact, that he kept being involved with gay men, who always took a liking in him, although he felt that he wasn’t gay – I have a hard time, feeling emphatic towards confused, but vocal men, who don’t know how to honestly deal with their feelings, but go so far in their deranged fantasy, that they believe to be a woman in a men’s body and that surgery will solve all their problems.

 

I have no acceptance for women, who want to look like men and have themselves mutilated by doctors, who make a living off of this mania. Also, therapists, psychologists, teachers and, of course, parents, are complicit in facilitating this tragedy. Transgendered people are mentally disturbed and that is why they demand from all straight people, they must not only accept, but even celebrate their views. Analogously, everyone with DL always finds fault with those who have EL and never allow EL of others to continue. It is quite apparent to me, that men, who believe to be women, are always sickly interested in children or in other vulnerable people and that is why, they are so activist-adamant, that their perspectives are taught as early as possible. Moreover, anyone with EL can see and say, there is a blatant revengeful aspect about men, who pretend to be women, who compete with and win from women, in sports. Yet,  there are no women, claiming to be men, who want to compete with men, because they simply cannot win. However, women believing to be men, have their own ax to grind, as they prefer to intimidate and boss around cis-gender males. In conclusion, the way in which we commonly talk, that is, our DL, has remained unaddressed and there is definitely a lot of suffering involved in this. However, nobody knows about EL, let alone about LE and that is why, supposedly, it is okay, that all this woke bullshit is being pushed down the throat of ordinary people, by fanatic, virtue-signaling, academic, political inquisitors, who wrongly believe to benefit from it. Our real challenge is to stop our DL and to engage in EL. This is the issue of our time from which we keep being distracted. Talk with me and find out more.                                  

 

Normal,

 

In this writing, I share my experience of language with you, the reader. I find our common way of talking, which sets the stage for how we deal with our language, abnormal. We speak in an absurd and unintelligent way, because, instead of expressing our freedom, we keep producing more struggle and fear. Our accepted way of talking determines, that, although we may be educated, although we may be supposedly, successful, professionally, although we may have written many books, we can’t distinguish between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL). We still engage, unconsciously, in DL  all the time, yet it is possible and very necessary to have EL, but we simply don’t know how to do this.

 

EL is normal, but nobody with DL can appreciate its normality. While you are reading this writing, you can begin to do that, because you are reading my words, which come from my EL and, therefore, you encounter a piece of writing, you couldn’t have read before, since such a writing didn’t previously exist. I want you to acknowledge, at least, as long as your eyes follow and understand these sentences, that your DL is temporarily stopped, not because I have stopped it, but because you have stopped it, as you tentatively accept, that it may actually be true, what I convey. However, you will still have to determine for yourself, if the difference between your usual way of talking and EL makes any sense to you.

 

Presumably, normality is the essence of psychology, but the rates and the kinds of behaviors, that can be found, one standard deviation from the mean, that is, the behaviors which most people are involved in, every day, aren’t natural, as they don’t and can’t produce any comfort, well-being, understanding, confidence, trust, silence, relaxation, happiness or satisfaction. I want you to consider the important fact, that the meaning of these beautiful words, depends on how live your life. Your mechanical DL not only fails to produce them, even if you would produce them, they have lost their meaning, as you are not in the habit of creating and maintaining, for yourself, the circumstances in which there is a match between these words and your experiences.

 

Of course, it would be normal for you or for anyone, to be able to produce a sound, which you would like and which you, therefore would and could hear and enjoy. Hearing ourselves talk is the essence of EL, as our voice expresses what we say with our positive emotions, but in DL, we don’t like what we say and, thus, we don’t listen to ourselves, our voice sounds dreadful, stressed out or demanding, because, unknowingly, we speak with negative emotions. It is normal to sound horrible, when you don’t feel good or to sound loveable, when you are truly happy.

 

This morning, as I returned from doing my delivery in Paradise, I drove back down, with the big truck, over the Skyway and I could see the whole valley in front of me. As I was cruising down the hill, I was suddenly struck by the vastness and beauty of this land. There were no words to describe this, only tears of joy. I am so grateful my EL allows me to be without words, as it keeps revealing my Language Enlightenment (LE). You too, dear reader, can put everything in its place with your EL. As you listen to your energizing voice while you speak, you will say what you need to say, to create order in your life.    

 

Normaal,

 

In dit schrijven deel ik mijn taalervaring met u, de lezer. Ik vind onze gewone manier van praten, die de toon zet voor hoe we omgaan met onze taal, abnormaal. We spreken eigenlijk op een absurde en onintelligente manier, omdat we, in plaats van onze vrijheid uit te drukken, steeds meer strijd en angst veroorzaken. Onze geaccepteerde manier van praten bepaalt dat, hoewel we misschien geschoold zijn, hoewel we zogenaamd professioneel succesvol zijn,  hoewel we veel boeken hebben gelezen en geschreven, we nog steeds geen onderscheid kunnen maken tussen Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) en Belichaamde Taal (BT) . Het is zo primitief, dat we  onbewust met OT bezig blijven, terwijl het toch echt mogelijk en noodzakelijk is, om BT te hebben, maar we weten gewoon niet hoe we dit moeten doen.

 

BT is heel normaal, maar niemand met OT kan die normaliteit waarderen. Terwijl je dit schrijven leest, kun je daarmee beginnen. Omdat je mijn woorden leest, die van mijn BT komen, ben je geconfronteerd met objectief verbaal gedrag, dat je niet eerder hebt kunnen lezen, aangezien zo'n tekst nog niet bestond voorheen. Ik wil dat je erkent, tenminste, zolang je ogen deze zinnen volgen, dat je kunt begrijpen, dat je OT tijdelijk is gestopt, omdat jij het hebt gestopt, omdat je tijdelijk accepteert, dat het daadwerkelijk kan, wat ik overbreng. Je zult, los van deze woorden, voor jezelf moeten bepalen of het verschil tussen je  gebruikelijke manier van praten en BT zinvol is.

 

Men zegt wel eens dat normaliteit de basis is van de psychologie, maar de intensiteit en het soort gedrag dat kan worden gevonden, één standaarddeviatie van het gemiddelde, dat wil zeggen, het gedrag waar de meeste mensen dagelijks mee bezig zijn, is niet natuurlijk, omdat het geen eenvoud, welzijn, begrip, vertrouwen, eenheid, stilte, ontspanning, geluk of voldoening produceert. Neem het feit maar eens in overweging, dat de betekenis van al deze mooie woorden afhangt van hoe jij je gedraagd en leeft. Je mechanische OT produceerd die woorden niet meer en zelfs als je ze zou produceren, dan hebben ze hun betekenis verloren, omdat je niet de gewoonte hebt om voor jezelf de omstandigheden te creëren en te onderhouden, waarin er een overeenkomst is tussen deze prachtige woorden en jouw ervaringen.

 

Natuurlijk zou het voor jou of voor wie dan ook normaal zijn om een ​​geluid te produceren, dat je aangenaam zou vinden, dat je daarom zou kunnen horen en genieten van je eigen taal. Onszelf horen praten is de essentie van BT, aangezien onze stem uitdrukt wat we zeggen met onze positieve emoties, maar in OT houden we niet van wat we zeggen en daarom luisteren we niet naar onszelf. Onze stem klinkt vreselijk, gestrest of veeleisend, omdat we onbewust met negatieve emoties spreken. Het is normaal om vreselijk te klinken, als je je niet goed voelt of om liefdevol klinken, als je gelukkig bent.

 

Vanmorgen, toen ik terugkwam van mijn bezorging in Paradise, reed ik terug naar beneden, met de grote vrachtwagen, over de Skyway en ik kon de hele vallei voor me zien. Terwijl ik de heuvel afdaalde, werd ik plotseling getroffen door de uitgestrektheid en schoonheid van dit land. Er waren geen woorden om dit te beschrijven, alleen tranen van vreugde. Ik ben zo dankbaar dat mijn BT me toestaat om zonder woorden te kunnen zijn, omdat mijn Taal Verlichting (TV) zich zo blijft onthullen. Ook jij kunt met BT alles op zijn plaats laten komen. Terwijl je luistert naar je aangename stem, terwijl je spreekt, zeg je precies, aan jezelf, wat je moet zeggen om orde te scheppen in je leven.

 

Know,

 

If we know what we can know, because we say what we can say, then we do not express our thinking, but our Embodied Language (EL), which of course can also be written and read. Our so-called thinking - that imaginary famous inner process, which occurs because we say over and over again (if you keep repeating the same outrageous propagandic lie, which sets us up against ourselves, people eventually start to believe it), that we can have an inaudible conversation with ourselves without saying a single word - keeps us from saying to ourselves what we can say and from knowing what we can know. Disembodied Language (DL) is therefore the language in which we linger in our so-called thinking, which is also called our mind.

 

 This writing is the clarification of why I, with EL, can enjoy my Language Enlightenment (LE) and why others don't or apparently can't. If you read this, because you, like me, have mastered English language, you will know immediately, that I am not concerned about you, but with myself and that I can therefore make it clear to you, why you have not yet really dealt with yourself. You are still unaware of your own LE, because you have never explored and experienced what can and will happen to you, if you keep speaking alone, only to yourself, in exactly the beautiful way you prefer to sound and like to hear.

 

The change from your DL to EL entails that your attitude to language – and thus to what you are reading here, about what I have written here – lets you know that another reality is possible, namely, the one you can consciously create. In DL you can never live in your own reality, because you have not yet created it with your own language. As long as you have DL, you remain trapped in the so-called reality, which is dictated by others, who, like you, by talking and by remaining preoccupied with others, keep themselves from really talking to themselves.

 

Even though I speak in English every day, because I live in United States since 1999, I still find it very valuable to say and write what I know in Dutch. I am concerned here with my own reasoning and interpretation of the language, which has set the tone for who I am today. I haven't believed in that so-called thinking for years, but I am convinced that our language is the reason that we are aware of who we are or not. In EL we are aware of ourselves, but in DL we remain unconscious and so we talk like a headless chicken and believe the sheer nonsense that was written about language by writers who could not speak freely and listen to themselves.

  

I write and speak jubilantly about my EL, as I have stopped my DL. Anyone who can speak, listen, write and read can do what I have playfully accomplished, but to do so an interest in language must first be cultivated. We have never really been interested in how we actually use our language, because we have never taken the time to just talk to ourselves and listen to ourselves.  

 

I still like to write in Dutch, because when I lived 

there, about forty years ago, I discovered my EL 

and LE. Surely, I have also lost and found my EL 

and LE many times. Even though I can translate 

these Dutch words into English, it wouldn't make 

sense for me to translate them into Greek, because

 I don't know that language. In other words, becoming

 aware of our language is a matter of going back to

 our voice, to our sound, which is the origin of our

 language, our intelligence.

 

LE is a knowing that can never be forgotten. It has nothing to do with others and can only be shared with those who stopped their own DL so they could continue their EL. There's no point in me talking to those who still have DL. I will continue alone with my EL if necessary. With this writing I let myself know again that this is probably the only way to stimulate others, to talk to themselves and to listen to their own blissful vibration, to surrender and to experience the real basis is of our communication.

 

Weten,

 

Als we weten, wat we kunnen weten, omdat we zeggen, wat we kunnen zeggen, dan maken wij niet ons denken kenbaar, maar onze Belichaamde Taal (BT), die natuurlijk ook geschreven en gelezen kan worden. Ons zogenaamde denken, dat vermaarde innerlijke proces – waarin wij altijd opnieuw zeggen te geloven, dat wij een onhoorbaar gesprek met onszelf zouden kunnen hebben, zonder ook maar een woord te zeggen – weerhoudt ons ervan, om te zeggen, wat we kunnen zeggen en te weten, wat we kunnen weten. Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) is dus de taal, waarin we in ons zogenaamde denken, dat ook wel onze mind wordt genoemd, blijven hangen.

 

Ook al spreek ik dagelijks in het Engels, omdat ik, sinds 1999, in Amerika woon, toch ik vind het nog steeds heel waardevol, om in het Nederlands te zeggen en te schrijven wat ik weet. Het gaat mij hier om mijn eigen redenatie en interpretatie van de taal, die de toon heeft gezet voor wie ik nu ben. Ik geloof al jarenlang niet meer in dat zogenaamde denken, maar ik ben er evenwel van overtuigd, dat taal de reden is, dat wij bewust zijn van wie we zijn of niet. In BT zijn we ons bewust van onszelf, maar in OT blijven we onbewust en praten we dus als een kip zonder kop en geloven wij de klink-klare onzin, die was geschreven over taal, omdat wij niet vrijuit konden spreken en naar onszelf konden luisteren.    

 

Ik schrijf en spreek jubelend over mijn BT, omdat ik mijn OT heb overwonnen en heb gestopt. Iedereen die kan spreken, luisteren, schrijven en lezen, kan wat ik heb klaar-gespeeld, maar om dat te kunnen, moet eerst een interesse in taal worden opgewekt. Wij zijn nog nooit werkelijk geinteresseerd geweest in hoe wij nou eigenlijk onze taal gebruiken, omdat wij nog nooit de tijd hebben genomen, om alleen met onszelf te spreken en naar onszelf te luisteren.

 

Dit schrijven is de verheldering, over waarom ik, met BT, vanuit Taal Verlichting (TV) leef en waarom anderen dit niet doen of schijnbaar niet kunnen. Als je dit leest, omdat je, net als ik, de Nederlands taal beheerst, dan weet je meteen, dat ik me niet met jou bezig hou, maar met mezelf en dat ik daarom aan jou duidelijk kan maken, waarom jij je nog niet echt met jezelf hebt bezig gehouden. Jij bent je nog onbewust van je eigen TV, omdat je nog nooit hebt onderzocht en ervaren, wat er met je kan gebeuren, als je alleen blijft spreken met jezelf, op precies die manier, die jij prefereert en mooi vind klinken.

 

De verandering van je OT naar BT, brengt met zich mee, dat je houding naar taal – en dus naar wat je hier leest, over wat ik hier heb geschreven – je laat weten dat een andere werkelijkheid mogelijk is, namelijk, degene die jij bewust kunt creeren. In OT kun je nooit in je eigen realiteit leven, omdat je die nog niet met je eigen taal hebt gecreerd. Zolang je nog OT hebt, blijf je gevangen zitten in de realiteit, die werd gedikteerd door anderen, die net als jij, door met anderen te praten en bezig te blijven, zich er van weerhouden, om echt met zichzelf te praten.

 

Ik schrijf nog steeds graag in het Nederlands, omdat ik, toen ik daar woonde, zo’n veertig jaar geleden, mijn BT en TV had ontdekt. Ik heb mijn BT en TV ook  heel vaak weer verloren en teruggevonden. Ook al kan ik deze woorden in het Engels vertalen, het zou geen zin voor mij hebben, om ze in het Grieks om te zetten, omdat ik die taal niet beheers. Met andere woorden, het bewust worden van onze taal, is een kwestie van terug gaan naar onze stem, onze klank, die de oorsprong is van onze taal, onze intelligentie.

 

TV is een weten dat nooit kan worden vergeten. Het heeft niets met anderen te maken en is alleen maar te delen met hen, die hun eigen OT hebben gestopt, zodat ze hun BT konden voortzetten. Het heeft geen zin meer voor mij, om te praten met hen die nog OT hebben. Ik ga desnoods alleen met mijn BT verder. Met dit schrijven laat ik mezelf nogmaals weten, dat dit de enige manier is om anderen misschien eens te stimuleren, om eindelijk met zichzelf in gesprek te gaan en om eens te kunnen gaan luisteren naar hun eigen gelukzalige vibratie en overgave, die de enige werkelijke basis is van onze communicatie.     

 

Good,

 

Anyone who has understood something about Embodied Language (EL) will feel good, blessed and reassured to know that, because of our new language, everything can still work out. It's not about using certain words that I or others use, but about the words that suit you exactly and to speak in the way you would like.

 

Of course, everyone who has gone through the transformation from Disembodied Language (DL) to EL has a responsibility to create more EL for themselves in the first place, but also to let others know, that it is high time to stop DL, so we can finally start having some EL. This is an important moral issue we have not yet faced or able to read, because we have not yet written about what it is  like to hear ourselves when we really speak to ourselves and are therefore able, to listen to ourselves.

 

There is nothing else we can do, but try to talk to ourselves and thus hear, experience and admit, that we ourselves - and therefore everyone - can indeed recognize the great difference between DL and EL, but that we didn't have this distinction before, to be able to talk about our everyday way of speaking. There is no question about it, we usually have DL again and we rarely, if ever, get to have EL. There's something absolute about EL that can't be avoided.

 

You can only have EL after you have stopped your DL. To succeed in that, you will have to take yourself out of your own conditioning. You either do it or you don't. It is a matter of observing yourself, listening to yourself and hearing, whether you are doing one or the other. You could also say, that you misbehave in DL and you are well behaved in EL. It is very important to acknowledge both your DL and your EL. Only if you do that will your EL continue.

 

If you only want EL and don't want to admit you have DL, your conditioning to have DL continues. In other words, you suffer and you stay in trouble. You can easily give up trying to stop your own DL. You probably will, because your conditioning history is so powerful, yet there's nothing stopping you from experimenting again and experiencing the fruits of the work you've done. Everything you do to stop your DL will always, in some way, work out positively, even if those results only become visible or audible over time.

 

Of course, once you learn the difference between DL and EL, you only want to have EL, but wanting EL will frustrate you, as it implies that you are still denying your DL. When you have EL, you don't want EL at all, but you can have it, because you've done what you needed to do to have it: you’ve stopped your DL. Even if it seems very simple, there is an enormous amount of work and listening involved in stopping your DL, for your habitual way of speaking not only causes how you generally interact with your own language, but it also regulates all your other behaviors.

 

A certain behavioral pattern is associated with DL and a completely different behavioral pattern is associated with EL. Although it is revealing and interesting to have EL, we often lose ourselves in the conditioning-derived desire to want something special. Having had little or no EL, we're making EL into something, which it isn't at all. Our longing for something spiritual, for something mystical, for something new, for something we so to speak want with all our heart and soul, of which we can never seem to get enough, makes our DL repeat itself.

 

When we have EL, all kinds of unnecessary behavior disappear by itself. There is no longer any urge for anything else. The remarkable thing is that we feel reborn, because our language allows us to stay in the here and now. Even though many times we fail to stop our DL, every time we do what needs to be done, we manage to get it done, when we listen to ourselves. We can only hear ourselves if we talk to ourselves out loud. Nothing can be heard if we do not produce sound. Furthermore, there is nothing but noise and disaster to be heard as long as we continue to talk to ourselves with DL. We don't want to hear this, yet we unconsciously continue to make that nasty sound of our stress, dissatisfaction, fear, confusion, defensiveness and arrogance. We can tell ourselves, so to speak, we don't want DL, but it's not true, since we keep producing it anyway.

 

When we finally admit to ourselves, with great dismay, that we apparently prefer DL over EL, then a shift begins to take place, as we start to talk to ourselves about why this is so. Simply put, we keep having DL over and over because we obviously think of ourselves as bad, wrong, stupid, unworthy, unintelligent, or unimportant. In DL, what we say, what we can formulate, what we think – our language – is supposedly not important enough.

 

In DL, we can never really be ourselves and even though we write about it, our writing is a form of DL. Our writing is usually even less important than what we say, which is why we talk more often than we write. There are, of course, many writers, who believe they are writing from EL, but the fact remains that they always wrote from DL, because they have never engaged in speaking aloud to themselves and listening to the sound of their voice.

 

Once our EL increases, because we've stopped our DL - not just once or twice, but as many times as we need to, perhaps even hundred thousand times - then the importance of our writing about our EL increases, because it's the way is in which our EL stabilizes. While there is social reinforcement of our EL when we share it with others, it is not enough to allow our EL to continue. Therefore, it is necessary to enjoy EL, by writing about it, as that determines the self-reinforcing effects. Moreover, writings are objective, in that they can be read and experienced by others. Those who have never heard of EL can read about it and start their verification experiment. This writing is one of the very first writings about our new way of communicating. Once there are multiple descriptions about the huge difference between DL and EL, more and more people will read about it and start to engage in EL, because we are all enlightened and we unknowingly want to continue with our EL because of our original state, which is our Language Enlightenment (LE).

 

Goed,

 

Iedereen die iets van Belichaamde Taal (BT) heeft begrepen, voelt zich gezegend en gerustgesteld met het besef, dat alles, vanwege onze nieuwe taal, toch nog goed kan komen. Het gaat niet om het gebruik van bepaalde woorden, die ik of anderen gebruiken, maar om de woorden, die precies bij jou passen en om te spreken op de manier zoals jij dat zou willen.

 

Natuurlijk heeft iedereen, die de transformatie van  Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) naar BT heeft doorgemaakt,  een verantwoordelijkheid om, in eerste instantie, voor zichzelf meer BT te creeren, maar ook om aan   anderen te laten weten, dat het hoog tijd is, om met OT te stoppen, zodat we eindelijk eens wat BT kunnen gaan hebben. Dit is een belangrijke morele kwestie, die wij nog niet onder ogen hebben gezien of hebben kunnen lezen, omdat wij nog niet hebben geschreven, over hoe het eigenlijk is, om onszelf te horen, wanneer wij echt met onszelf spreken en daarom in staat zijn, om naar onszelf te luisteren. 

 

Er zit niets anders op, dan dat we eens proberen, om met onszelf te praten en om zo dus te horen, ervaren en toe te geven, dat wijzelf – en daarom dus iedereen – wel degelijk het verschil tussen OT en BT kan erkennen, maar dat we nog niet eerder deze benoeming hadden, om over onze dagelijkse manier van spreken te kunnen praten. Het staat  buiten kijf, dat we meestal weer OT hebben en dat we zelden of nooit aan BT toekomen. Er is iets absoluuts aan BT, waaraan niet valt te ontkomen.  

 

Je kunt alleen maar BT hebben, nadat je je eigen OT hebt gestopt. Maar, om daarin te slagen, zul je dus  jezelf uit je eigen conditionering moeten halen. Je doet het of je doet het niet. Het is een kwestie van jezelf observeren, door naar jezelf te luisteren en om te horen, of je dan wel het een of het andere doet. Je zou ook kunnen zeggen dat je je misdraagt in OT en dat je je goed gedraagt in BT. Het is van groot belang, om zowel je OT als je BT te erkennen. Alleen als je dat doet, dan gaat je BT verder.

 

Indien je alleen BT wil hebben en niet wil toe geven dat je OT hebt, dan gaat je conditionering, om OT te hebben, gewoon verder. Met andere woorden, dan lijdt je en dan blijf je in de problemen zitten. Je kan het gemakkelijk opgeven, om je OT te proberen te stoppen. Waarschijnlijk zul je dat doen, omdat je conditionering zo krachtig is, maar toch weerhoudt helemaal niets je ervan, om toch alsnog opnieuw te experimenteren en om de vruchten te ervaren van het werk dat je hebt gedaan. Alles wat je doet, om je OT te stoppen, zal altijd, op een of andere manier positief uitwerken, ook al worden die resultaten pas in de loop der tijd waarneembaar of hoorbaar.

 

Zodra je het verschil hebt leren kennen tussen OT en BT, wil je natuurlijk alleen BT hebben, maar BT willen zal je frustreren, omdat het impliceert dat je nog steeds je OT ontkent. Wanneer je BT hebt, dan wil je helemaal geen BT, maar je kan het hebben, omdat je hebt gedaan wat je nou eenmaal moet doen om BT te kunnen hebben: je hebt OT gestopt. Ook al lijkt het eenvoudig, toch komt er enorm veel bij kijken en luisteren om je OT te stoppen, want je gewone wijze van spreken veroorzaakt niet alleen hoe je in algemene zin omgaat met je eigen taal, maar het reguleert eveneens al je andere gedrag.

 

Een bepaald gedrags-patroon hangt samen met OT en een totaal ander gedrags-patroon hangt samen met BT. Ook al is het onthullend en interessant om BT te hebben, toch verliezen we onszelf weer heel vaak in het, uit onze conditionering voortgekomen, verlangen, om iets bijzonders te willen. Omdat we nauwelijks of geen BT hebben gehad, maken we er weer iets van, wat het helemaal niet is. Onze hang naar iets spiritueels, naar iets mystieks, naar iets nieuws, naar iets wat we zogezegd met hart en ziel willen, naar waar we schijnbaar nooit genoeg van kunnen krijgen, maakt dat onze OT zich herhaald.

 

Wanneer wij BT hebben, valt allerlei onnodig gedrag vanzelf weg. Er is geen enkele drang meer naar iets anders. Het merkwaardige is, dat wij ons herboren voelen, want onze taal staat ons toe, om in het hier en nu te blijven. Ook al falen vele malen, om onze OT te stoppen, toch lukt het ons elke keer, als wij doen wat nou eenmaal gedaan moet worden, om dat te bewerkstelligen, als we luisteren naar onszelf. We kunnen we alleen onszelf horen, indien we hardop met onszelf praten. Er is niets te horen, indien we geen geluid produceren. Bovendien, is er niets dan lawaai en onheil te horen, zolang we nog door blijven gaan in het praten met onszelf met OT. We willen dit natuurlijk niet horen en toch blijven we ongemerkt dat nare geluid voortbrengen van  stress, onvrede, angst, verwarring, defensiviteit en arrogantie. We kunnen onszelf dan wel, zogezegd, wijsmaken, dat we geen OT willen, maar het is niet waar, want we blijven het toch nog produceren.  

 

Wanneer wij uiteindelijk, met grote verslagenheid, aan onszelf kunnen toegeven, dat wij dus schijnbaar OT prefereren over BT, dan vindt een verschuiving plaats, omdat we met onszelf in gesprek beginnen te komen over waarom dit zo is. Simpel gezegd, we blijven keer op keer OT hebben, omdat we onszelf klaarblijkelijk slecht, verkeerd, stom, onwaardig, onintelligent of onbelangrijk vinden. In OT, is wat we zeggen, wat wij kunnen formuleren, wat wij vinden – onze taal – zogenaamd niet belangrijk.

 

In OT kunnen we nooit echt onszelf zijn en ook al schrijven we daarover, ons schrijven is een vorm van OT. Ons schrijven is meestal nog onbelangrijker dan wat we zeggen en daarom praten we vaker dan dat we schrijven. Er zijn natuurlijk tal van schrijvers, die geloven dat ze schrijven vanuit BT, maar het feit blijft, dat ze altijd vanuit OT schreven, omdat ze nog nooit bezig zijn geweest met hardop met zichzelf spreken en naar de klank van hun stem luisteren.

 

Zodra onze BT begint toe te nemen, omdat wij onze OT zijn gaan stoppen – niet een keer, maar net zo vaak als dat nodig is, misschien honderd duizend keer – dan neemt het belang van ons schrijven over onze BT toe, omdat dit de manier is waarop onze BT stabilizeerd. Ook al is er natuurlijk een bekrachtiging van onze BT, wanneer wij het met anderen kunnen delen, toch volstaat die sociale reinforcement niet om onze BT te kunnen laten voortduren. Het is dus noodzakelijk om alleen van BT te genieten, door er over te schrijven, omdat dat de zelf-bekrachtiging bepaalt, die objectief is, omdat het door anderen kan worden en kan worden meebeleefd. Zij die nog nooit van BT hebben gehoord, kunnen op deze manier erover lezen en beginnen met hun eigen verificatie experiment. Dit schrijven is een van de eerste geschriften over onze nieuwe manier van communiceren. Zodra er meerdere beschrijvingen zijn over het enorme verschil tussen OT en BT,  zullen steeds meer mensen zich gaan bezighouden met BT, omdat we allemaal verlicht zijn en vanuit onze oorspronkelijke staat willen voortgaan met BT.