Practice,

 

I have come to the unexpected conclusion, that this writing is the only way, in which you are ever going to find out about Embodied Language (EL). When I first discovered EL, forty years ago, I abhorred the idea of writing about it, as I felt convinced, it could only be acquired by talking about it. At this point of my life, after talking about it and after teaching psychology classes for many years, I want to come at your Disembodied Language (DL) from a different angle, as there is no way my EL and your DL mix.

 

Finding your way to this blog and reading about EL, is the only chance, to begin the practice of listening to yourself while you speak, as there is no one, who writes about EL as I do. I write like this, because you are either going to do it or you don’t. I’m quite sure, that, most likely, you are not going to do as I say. If you do as I say, stop reading, right now, and start again from the beginning, but this time, read it out loud and listen to the sound of your voice. To be able to grasp EL, you have to hear yourself speak.

 

This writing is the bridge to EL, as it presents the opportunity, to not only read about it, but to do it yourself and to know, instantly, that EL is, of course, entirely different from your usual DL. You know you have never, deliberately, spoken like that, because in your habitual way of talking, you don’t listen to your own voice while you speak, as your attention is always either drawn to listening to others or to your own attempts to get others to listen to you. In each case, the other, not you, is the most important.

 

In EL, you are the most important. This has nothing to do with narcissism, self-centeredness or egotism, but with a new way of talking, which only becomes possible, if you actually begin to do it. Although it is absolutely true, in DL, you don’t listen to yourself while you speak, you can now recognize, that you didn’t even know, it is possible to listen to yourself.

 

Your ignorance about EL is your biggest problem and once you begin to tell yourself what it is, all your problems begin to disappear. It is not your fault, that you never bothered about listening to yourself and never had any interest in how you use your language, as DL didn’t and couldn’t allow you to become interested. Your usual way of talking will discard anything, that brings your attention to it.

 

Once you know about EL, you have discovered, your DL can be ended. You didn’t even know this, before you read this text, as you have never heard yourself saying this or felt yourself experiencing this. There is no doubt about it, whatsoever, that when you have EL, your usual DL has ended. Is it happening now, or isn’t it? If it is, you feel victorious and proud, as you have accomplished something, your conditioning history tells you isn’t even possible. The newness of this experience refutes everything you believed in, due to your almost constant involvement in DL.

 

As you read these sentences, you can also wonder about the possibility, why your EL isn’t happening? What does it mean to stop your DL? How do you do that? These words or the so-called guidance from anyone, haven’t helped you at all, to stop DL and to acquire EL and you are still in doubt about how to do it. People have said, that it is good to doubt and to remain skeptical, but to doubt EL, is a bad thing.

 

In EL, you never doubt, and, therefore, if you doubt, you don’t have EL, but DL. Surely, you will perceive things very differently, as continue to have EL, as the newness of your language keeps revealing more and more about your Language Enlightenment (LE), but, the point here is: you never doubt that you are having EL. I write that doubting EL is a bad thing, to let you know, that you are not having EL, but DL.

 

You’ll never have EL, as long as you keep sitting on the fence and don’t give yourself to it completely. To have ongoing EL, you can’t hold back, but your DL-tendency is to hold back. This tendency has to be stopped. Are you stopping it now? You must do it, as no one else can do it for you. I assume, you do it, because you keep reading about what happens next. You already know what it is, but you want to deny that it is happening. You would like this writing to confirm your belief, but that belief has nothing to do with your EL. Without your belief, you don’t know what is happening and to have EL, you don’t know and, yet, you feel perfectly okay, not knowing.  

 

With EL, you no longer predetermine what you are going to say. It emerges by itself, but only if you let it and this writing can allow you to feel encouraged, to do that. This brings us to an important aspect of EL: there is no leader. I am not your leader, but you are not your own leader either. In EL there really is nobody in charge and that’s the beauty of it. You speak without any sense of self or authorship.

 

In your EL, you find to your own big surprise, again and again, that you are free. Your freedom has to do with how you deal with your language, that is, with your EL, you express your LE. This is a fantastic revelation. Yes, you are enlightened and there is nothing to claim or achieve, yet you are full of this magnificent energy and totally aware of yourself.

 

These written words can be read again, if what is described didn’t happen the first time. Perhaps, you need to or want to read them again, but, perhaps you never want to read them again, as you have got it what I was trying to convey. It is also possible, that you want to give your own description of your LE and write your own piece about your EL. I would like to read it, hear you say it and speak with you, no money involved, so you can experience what EL is like. I look forward to talking with you. Send me an email or skype message to set up a time to talk.   

Email: mpeperkamp@sbcglobal.net

Skype: limbicease           

 

Individualism,

 

To me, it has become as clear as day, that Embodied Language (EL) is the language of true individualism and, therefore, of consciousness and humility, but Disembodied Language (DL), is the language of collectivism, sentimentality, superstition, pretense and cowardice. Sadly, the latter is the rule in every society. I write about EL in contrast to DL, so you can get a sense of what EL is. Individualism has taken its foothold in many countries, but it has yet to result in EL. Since it hasn’t done that – and couldn’t do that – there is no clarity of vision, as to where people are going with their so-called freedom. It is as true for Amerika, as for any other country, that escalation of chaos and conflict are the inevitable outcomes of our common way of talking, which has remained unaddressed.

 

Surely, there is false individualism, in which we are trying to have our way, at any cost. Generally, what people do, is to re-enact their punitive conditioning history in an unconscious attempt to understand. Of course, this always goes hand in hand, with the way of talking, which, presumably, we shouldn’t even be talking about. People feel very aggressive, when you point out their DL and will do anything to stop you. It is such a great taboo, to address DL, head on, as  everyone is, unknowingly, involved in it, every day. The divisiveness between left-wing and right-wing politics is explained by the fact, that the members of both views engage in DL, but pretend to have EL.

 

Politics is the inevitable, so-called group-think, that any country gets stuck with, as long as our way of talking hasn’t been properly addressed. Simply stated, DL is coercive speech, in which the speaker dominates the listener. This is the unintelligent way of talking, which is happening everywhere. With EL, however, we cannot force anything on anyone, not even on ourselves, but with DL, we force things on each other, but also on ourselves. When you, at long last, discover the difference between your DL and EL, you will have to admit to yourself, that you were doing many things, you didn’t want to do.

 

People get angry, irritated, distracted, depressed, frustrated, defensive, paranoid and confused all the time, but because of DL, they can’t talk and know about their own emotions. In EL, on the other hand, we express what we experience in the moment and we realize, that in our usual way of talking (DL), we are not allowing ourselves or each other to do that. In other words, the difference between DL and EL, is the fact that we are able to talk about our feelings.

 

Certainly, in the countries, where individualism has become embedded in the culture, a lot of talking about feelings has been going on, but none of all that emotional drama has ever resulted in EL. To the contrary, we have unknowingly become more emotionally manipulative, with our language and this has brought us to where we are today. Today’s fight for safe-space, equity or intersectionality, like the call for law and order or peace and justice, can’t address EL, our subtle way of dealing with language.

 

We’ve got to stop talking with each other, so that we can talk with ourselves. Then, and only then, can we talk with each other, in the same way, as we talk with ourselves. The so-called, golden rule “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” only applies, if we knew, how to treat ourselves, but as this typical Christian saying illustrates, it is all about the other, but never actually about how we interact with ourselves. Rules as these, are the biggest stand in the way for EL, as they create the impression, we already know about EL, but in reality, we have been conditioned by our common way of talking, by DL, to move and stay away from our own experiences. 

 

Everyone who has read a psychology book, knows that collectivist culture emphasizes the needs and goals of the group as a whole, over the needs and the desires of each individual. In such cultures relationships with other members of the group and the interconnectedness between people play a central role in each person’s identity. What you don’t hear anyone talk about, however, is that people were conditioned to be that way, which means, regardless of what they consider to be their so-called identity, they can become conscious about their conditioning history and want something else. Of course, we can change our identity, but this isn’t accomplished by superficial surgical interventions or by superstitious religious conversions, but by the necessary psychological change in our behavior from DL to EL, from relating to ourselves and each other in an emotionally reactive manner, to relating to ourselves and each other in mature, enlightened, wise, sensitive or rational manner. Also, it should be noted here, that people in collectivistic cultures are considered be good, if they are generous, helpful, dependable, and attentive to the needs of others. This contrasts with individualistic cultures, which often place a great emphasis on characteristics such as assertiveness and independence. However, in both cases, the other plays the central role in who people believe themselves to be, as DL dominates in both individualistic as well as collectivistic cultures.

 

Perspective,

 

Since I have discovered my Language Enlightenment (LE) – because I began to acknowledge the immense difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and our Embodied Language (EL) – I have developed my own intolerant perspective, on everything which pertains to DL. Certainly, I write in this way, because those who have DL, neither understand nor respect the fact, that I prefer to have EL. I insist, they would prefer EL as well, had they known the difference between their usual, unintelligent way of talking and the way of talking, which I, to protect myself, rather keep to myself or only share with those, who are able to appreciate it. I admit, I am what they call bigoted, but I don’t care, as I live my own way of life and to me, individualism is the essence of America.   

 

I am never going to tell you this in your face, but only in writings as these, that your usual, deceitful, coercive, phony, draining and superstitious way of talking, completely denies and constantly rejects, who I am. However, your DL, of course, doesn’t allow you to be yourself either. Since you believe, you already know everything there is to know about speaking, listening, reading and writing, you make it seem, as if there’s something wrong with me and my language, when in fact, there is something wrong with anyone, who doesn’t know any better, than to engage in mechanical, insensitive, dull DL.

 

I have no problem with my white skin color nor with the color of others. Those, who try to convince me, something is wrong with me, because I happen to be white, engage in DL. I hate all the race-baiters and fear-mongers. And, this is not hate-speech, but  EL, which represents my LE. I also hate many other things and it is totally healthy to do so. I couldn’t live a healthy, happy life, if I didn’t hate and verbally express, what makes such a life impossible. Those who tell me, it is wrong to hate, always pretend to be holier-than-me. Fuck them. To know me, is to engage in EL and to recognize goodness in yourself.    

 

I am unashamed to say, I hate the horrible sound of leaf-blowers or rap or reggae music. I am perfectly okay, with my disgust for rotten apples, cigarette or marijuana smoke; people, who beat each other up to win a price or just because they themselves are frustrated; people, who believe in a non-existent, personal, higher power; people, who don’t take responsibility for their own actions; people, who endlessly play the victim card. I also hate people, who try intimidate others with their appearance, with their tattoos, blue hair, fake eye-lashes, creepy plastic nails, botox-lips, uniforms, crosses, stars, turbans, scarfs and dresses. I just hate it, when aggressive people play their horrific noisy music in their cars so loud, that you can hear it from one block away. I hate cars with exhaust-pipes, which make roaring sounds. I hate the by DL-perpetuated inhuman stupidity, that only more weapons, more war and more military, instead of sensible EL or real communication, can secure mankind’s future. I hate to see industries destroy the natural environment, but also hate to see homeless people and junkies trash our town, parks and creeks. I believe, stopping our own DL, will stop all that nonsense and more… 

 

With EL, we accept everyone as they truly are and this means: we fully acknowledge and explain why so many people are fucked up. In our technology dependent societies, we can’t keep dancing around the real and, therefore, increasingly urgent issue, that unscientific DL still dominates every culture. Science is the standard, which has yet to be applied to how we communicate. How can we speak and listen, if we keep feeling threatened and fearful? We are only able to pretend to be talking and to be listening, as long as we keep engaging in DL.

 

Among teen-agers depression and suicide is on the rise. Crime numbers are going through the roof and the overrated call for reform of the justice system has undermined any respect for law-enforcement, our last line of defense against total chaos. People are addicted to alcohol and drugs and fail to create, let alone maintain, the stable family-environments, in which healthy, happy, confident, capable children can grow up. In the name of equity, a lowering of standards has eroded and disparaged intellectual pursuits, because, presumably, computer-games, social-media, sports events or so-called spirituality, that is, instant gratification, is more important. In EL, we surely admit self-reinforcement is important, as our interest in how we use our own language, would make us conscious and allow us to be social in ways, which we have never before experienced.

 

When people are said to have gender-dysphoria, they presumably express discomfort about feeling that their emotional or psychological identity is at variance with their birth sex. It would, however, be much more to the point, to simply state, that they are uncomfortable with the way in which people are talking with them. That is why heterosexuals  are being told by the so-called LGBTQ community, which is not a community at all, to address them in the way, that they want to be addressed. They tell other people how to talk. However, anyone who knows about the great difference between DL and EL, instantly recognizes, they are actually trying to claim, albeit unconsciously, that they have EL, while in fact they punish, confront, argue, claim, pretend and, like all the so-called straight people, attempt to dominate and oppress others, with their form of DL.

 

Although, because I have EL, I accept everyone and respect the fact, that they were, like me, inevitably conditioned by the circumstances, in which they grew up, I write this text, to let the reader know, that people like me, never receive any respect for the fact, that they have outgrown and transcended their history of conditioning. People always insist on respect for the existing culture. Generally speaking, nobody seems to take any note of the important fact that traditions, have always conditioned people to develop and value group-oriented behavior, instead of individual-oriented behavior. It is often said that different cultures enrich society, but the way this works, is that when we come in contact with other cultures, we inevitably are less insistent on our own traditions, and, therefore, we become  more and more an individual. Human beings have always lived and survived in groups, but we have to  face the fact, that group-behavior is on its deathbed and mankind’s only future is true individualism.   

 

Anyone, who can continue with EL, instead of only having a few accidental moments of it, agrees that the current wave of transgenderism is, of course, a social phenomenon. Moreover, it is, like many other trends, a reaction against our ubiquitous DL, which nevertheless remains unaddressed. Presumably, we become individual, but reality is, we are anxiously trying to adhere to another so-called group-think.   

 

As the institutions of information, of what could have been a healthy democratic government, have been corrupted and distorted, we are left to our own so-called critical thinking skills, but what are those overrated thinking skills, if we don’t talk with ourselves, so that we can hear, what we have to say about our own individual perspective of our reality? It is clear to anyone with EL, that the general denial of EL, inadvertently, results in a lowering of once painstakingly enforced empirical standards, because our common way of talking itself is unscientific. As a result, society is becoming more and more chaotic and people are literally becoming crazier, day by day, although nobody knows, why this is occurring.

 

As a white, heterosexual, conservative, middleclass, super-sensitive, intellectual, well-travelled, artistic, humoristic, atheist American, there is something I want to get off my chest, because I certainly win the pitty-party contest. I am the biggest victim, because I have EL. Moreover, unlike everyone else, I know how to have EL and the future of mankind depends on me. You would feel this way too, if you managed to stop your stupid DL and engage in EL with me, but to be that responsible, turns you off, as you’d rather be entertained. However, if you muster the courage to face the facts, you will admit that everything, yes, absolutely everything, depends on you and this has nothing to do with imagining yourself to be more important than you really are. With DL, you are not even important to yourself and that is why you wish to be important in the eyes of others, but in EL, you really matter to yourself, although in the eyes of others, you probably remain totally unimportant.

 

As someone, who was sexually molested as a child – who couldn’t connect with his abusive, authoritarian, catholic father, but who for many years struggled with the fact, that he kept being involved with gay men, who always took a liking in him, although he felt that he wasn’t gay – I have a hard time, feeling emphatic towards confused, but vocal men, who don’t know how to honestly deal with their feelings, but go so far in their deranged fantasy, that they believe to be a woman in a men’s body and that surgery will solve all their problems.

 

I have no acceptance for women, who want to look like men and have themselves mutilated by doctors, who make a living off of this mania. Also, therapists, psychologists, teachers and, of course, parents, are complicit in facilitating this tragedy. Transgendered people are mentally disturbed and that is why they demand from all straight people, they must not only accept, but even celebrate their views. Analogously, everyone with DL always finds fault with those who have EL and never allow EL of others to continue. It is quite apparent to me, that men, who believe to be women, are always sickly interested in children or in other vulnerable people and that is why, they are so activist-adamant, that their perspectives are taught as early as possible. Moreover, anyone with EL can see and say, there is a blatant revengeful aspect about men, who pretend to be women, who compete with and win from women, in sports. Yet,  there are no women, claiming to be men, who want to compete with men, because they simply cannot win. However, women believing to be men, have their own ax to grind, as they prefer to intimidate and boss around cis-gender males. In conclusion, the way in which we commonly talk, that is, our DL, has remained unaddressed and there is definitely a lot of suffering involved in this. However, nobody knows about EL, let alone about LE and that is why, supposedly, it is okay, that all this woke bullshit is being pushed down the throat of ordinary people, by fanatic, virtue-signaling, academic, political inquisitors, who wrongly believe to benefit from it. Our real challenge is to stop our DL and to engage in EL. This is the issue of our time from which we keep being distracted. Talk with me and find out more.                                  

 

Normal,

 

In this writing, I share my experience of language with you, the reader. I find our common way of talking, which sets the stage for how we deal with our language, abnormal. We speak in an absurd and unintelligent way, because, instead of expressing our freedom, we keep producing more struggle and fear. Our accepted way of talking determines, that, although we may be educated, although we may be supposedly, successful, professionally, although we may have written many books, we can’t distinguish between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL). We still engage, unconsciously, in DL  all the time, yet it is possible and very necessary to have EL, but we simply don’t know how to do this.

 

EL is normal, but nobody with DL can appreciate its normality. While you are reading this writing, you can begin to do that, because you are reading my words, which come from my EL and, therefore, you encounter a piece of writing, you couldn’t have read before, since such a writing didn’t previously exist. I want you to acknowledge, at least, as long as your eyes follow and understand these sentences, that your DL is temporarily stopped, not because I have stopped it, but because you have stopped it, as you tentatively accept, that it may actually be true, what I convey. However, you will still have to determine for yourself, if the difference between your usual way of talking and EL makes any sense to you.

 

Presumably, normality is the essence of psychology, but the rates and the kinds of behaviors, that can be found, one standard deviation from the mean, that is, the behaviors which most people are involved in, every day, aren’t natural, as they don’t and can’t produce any comfort, well-being, understanding, confidence, trust, silence, relaxation, happiness or satisfaction. I want you to consider the important fact, that the meaning of these beautiful words, depends on how live your life. Your mechanical DL not only fails to produce them, even if you would produce them, they have lost their meaning, as you are not in the habit of creating and maintaining, for yourself, the circumstances in which there is a match between these words and your experiences.

 

Of course, it would be normal for you or for anyone, to be able to produce a sound, which you would like and which you, therefore would and could hear and enjoy. Hearing ourselves talk is the essence of EL, as our voice expresses what we say with our positive emotions, but in DL, we don’t like what we say and, thus, we don’t listen to ourselves, our voice sounds dreadful, stressed out or demanding, because, unknowingly, we speak with negative emotions. It is normal to sound horrible, when you don’t feel good or to sound loveable, when you are truly happy.

 

This morning, as I returned from doing my delivery in Paradise, I drove back down, with the big truck, over the Skyway and I could see the whole valley in front of me. As I was cruising down the hill, I was suddenly struck by the vastness and beauty of this land. There were no words to describe this, only tears of joy. I am so grateful my EL allows me to be without words, as it keeps revealing my Language Enlightenment (LE). You too, dear reader, can put everything in its place with your EL. As you listen to your energizing voice while you speak, you will say what you need to say, to create order in your life.    

 

Normaal,

 

In dit schrijven deel ik mijn taalervaring met u, de lezer. Ik vind onze gewone manier van praten, die de toon zet voor hoe we omgaan met onze taal, abnormaal. We spreken eigenlijk op een absurde en onintelligente manier, omdat we, in plaats van onze vrijheid uit te drukken, steeds meer strijd en angst veroorzaken. Onze geaccepteerde manier van praten bepaalt dat, hoewel we misschien geschoold zijn, hoewel we zogenaamd professioneel succesvol zijn,  hoewel we veel boeken hebben gelezen en geschreven, we nog steeds geen onderscheid kunnen maken tussen Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) en Belichaamde Taal (BT) . Het is zo primitief, dat we  onbewust met OT bezig blijven, terwijl het toch echt mogelijk en noodzakelijk is, om BT te hebben, maar we weten gewoon niet hoe we dit moeten doen.

 

BT is heel normaal, maar niemand met OT kan die normaliteit waarderen. Terwijl je dit schrijven leest, kun je daarmee beginnen. Omdat je mijn woorden leest, die van mijn BT komen, ben je geconfronteerd met objectief verbaal gedrag, dat je niet eerder hebt kunnen lezen, aangezien zo'n tekst nog niet bestond voorheen. Ik wil dat je erkent, tenminste, zolang je ogen deze zinnen volgen, dat je kunt begrijpen, dat je OT tijdelijk is gestopt, omdat jij het hebt gestopt, omdat je tijdelijk accepteert, dat het daadwerkelijk kan, wat ik overbreng. Je zult, los van deze woorden, voor jezelf moeten bepalen of het verschil tussen je  gebruikelijke manier van praten en BT zinvol is.

 

Men zegt wel eens dat normaliteit de basis is van de psychologie, maar de intensiteit en het soort gedrag dat kan worden gevonden, één standaarddeviatie van het gemiddelde, dat wil zeggen, het gedrag waar de meeste mensen dagelijks mee bezig zijn, is niet natuurlijk, omdat het geen eenvoud, welzijn, begrip, vertrouwen, eenheid, stilte, ontspanning, geluk of voldoening produceert. Neem het feit maar eens in overweging, dat de betekenis van al deze mooie woorden afhangt van hoe jij je gedraagd en leeft. Je mechanische OT produceerd die woorden niet meer en zelfs als je ze zou produceren, dan hebben ze hun betekenis verloren, omdat je niet de gewoonte hebt om voor jezelf de omstandigheden te creëren en te onderhouden, waarin er een overeenkomst is tussen deze prachtige woorden en jouw ervaringen.

 

Natuurlijk zou het voor jou of voor wie dan ook normaal zijn om een ​​geluid te produceren, dat je aangenaam zou vinden, dat je daarom zou kunnen horen en genieten van je eigen taal. Onszelf horen praten is de essentie van BT, aangezien onze stem uitdrukt wat we zeggen met onze positieve emoties, maar in OT houden we niet van wat we zeggen en daarom luisteren we niet naar onszelf. Onze stem klinkt vreselijk, gestrest of veeleisend, omdat we onbewust met negatieve emoties spreken. Het is normaal om vreselijk te klinken, als je je niet goed voelt of om liefdevol klinken, als je gelukkig bent.

 

Vanmorgen, toen ik terugkwam van mijn bezorging in Paradise, reed ik terug naar beneden, met de grote vrachtwagen, over de Skyway en ik kon de hele vallei voor me zien. Terwijl ik de heuvel afdaalde, werd ik plotseling getroffen door de uitgestrektheid en schoonheid van dit land. Er waren geen woorden om dit te beschrijven, alleen tranen van vreugde. Ik ben zo dankbaar dat mijn BT me toestaat om zonder woorden te kunnen zijn, omdat mijn Taal Verlichting (TV) zich zo blijft onthullen. Ook jij kunt met BT alles op zijn plaats laten komen. Terwijl je luistert naar je aangename stem, terwijl je spreekt, zeg je precies, aan jezelf, wat je moet zeggen om orde te scheppen in je leven.

 

Know,

 

If we know what we can know, because we say what we can say, then we do not express our thinking, but our Embodied Language (EL), which of course can also be written and read. Our so-called thinking - that imaginary famous inner process, which occurs because we say over and over again (if you keep repeating the same outrageous propagandic lie, which sets us up against ourselves, people eventually start to believe it), that we can have an inaudible conversation with ourselves without saying a single word - keeps us from saying to ourselves what we can say and from knowing what we can know. Disembodied Language (DL) is therefore the language in which we linger in our so-called thinking, which is also called our mind.

 

 This writing is the clarification of why I, with EL, can enjoy my Language Enlightenment (LE) and why others don't or apparently can't. If you read this, because you, like me, have mastered English language, you will know immediately, that I am not concerned about you, but with myself and that I can therefore make it clear to you, why you have not yet really dealt with yourself. You are still unaware of your own LE, because you have never explored and experienced what can and will happen to you, if you keep speaking alone, only to yourself, in exactly the beautiful way you prefer to sound and like to hear.

 

The change from your DL to EL entails that your attitude to language – and thus to what you are reading here, about what I have written here – lets you know that another reality is possible, namely, the one you can consciously create. In DL you can never live in your own reality, because you have not yet created it with your own language. As long as you have DL, you remain trapped in the so-called reality, which is dictated by others, who, like you, by talking and by remaining preoccupied with others, keep themselves from really talking to themselves.

 

Even though I speak in English every day, because I live in United States since 1999, I still find it very valuable to say and write what I know in Dutch. I am concerned here with my own reasoning and interpretation of the language, which has set the tone for who I am today. I haven't believed in that so-called thinking for years, but I am convinced that our language is the reason that we are aware of who we are or not. In EL we are aware of ourselves, but in DL we remain unconscious and so we talk like a headless chicken and believe the sheer nonsense that was written about language by writers who could not speak freely and listen to themselves.

  

I write and speak jubilantly about my EL, as I have stopped my DL. Anyone who can speak, listen, write and read can do what I have playfully accomplished, but to do so an interest in language must first be cultivated. We have never really been interested in how we actually use our language, because we have never taken the time to just talk to ourselves and listen to ourselves.  

 

I still like to write in Dutch, because when I lived 

there, about forty years ago, I discovered my EL 

and LE. Surely, I have also lost and found my EL 

and LE many times. Even though I can translate 

these Dutch words into English, it wouldn't make 

sense for me to translate them into Greek, because

 I don't know that language. In other words, becoming

 aware of our language is a matter of going back to

 our voice, to our sound, which is the origin of our

 language, our intelligence.

 

LE is a knowing that can never be forgotten. It has nothing to do with others and can only be shared with those who stopped their own DL so they could continue their EL. There's no point in me talking to those who still have DL. I will continue alone with my EL if necessary. With this writing I let myself know again that this is probably the only way to stimulate others, to talk to themselves and to listen to their own blissful vibration, to surrender and to experience the real basis is of our communication.

 

Weten,

 

Als we weten, wat we kunnen weten, omdat we zeggen, wat we kunnen zeggen, dan maken wij niet ons denken kenbaar, maar onze Belichaamde Taal (BT), die natuurlijk ook geschreven en gelezen kan worden. Ons zogenaamde denken, dat vermaarde innerlijke proces – waarin wij altijd opnieuw zeggen te geloven, dat wij een onhoorbaar gesprek met onszelf zouden kunnen hebben, zonder ook maar een woord te zeggen – weerhoudt ons ervan, om te zeggen, wat we kunnen zeggen en te weten, wat we kunnen weten. Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) is dus de taal, waarin we in ons zogenaamde denken, dat ook wel onze mind wordt genoemd, blijven hangen.

 

Ook al spreek ik dagelijks in het Engels, omdat ik, sinds 1999, in Amerika woon, toch ik vind het nog steeds heel waardevol, om in het Nederlands te zeggen en te schrijven wat ik weet. Het gaat mij hier om mijn eigen redenatie en interpretatie van de taal, die de toon heeft gezet voor wie ik nu ben. Ik geloof al jarenlang niet meer in dat zogenaamde denken, maar ik ben er evenwel van overtuigd, dat taal de reden is, dat wij bewust zijn van wie we zijn of niet. In BT zijn we ons bewust van onszelf, maar in OT blijven we onbewust en praten we dus als een kip zonder kop en geloven wij de klink-klare onzin, die was geschreven over taal, omdat wij niet vrijuit konden spreken en naar onszelf konden luisteren.    

 

Ik schrijf en spreek jubelend over mijn BT, omdat ik mijn OT heb overwonnen en heb gestopt. Iedereen die kan spreken, luisteren, schrijven en lezen, kan wat ik heb klaar-gespeeld, maar om dat te kunnen, moet eerst een interesse in taal worden opgewekt. Wij zijn nog nooit werkelijk geinteresseerd geweest in hoe wij nou eigenlijk onze taal gebruiken, omdat wij nog nooit de tijd hebben genomen, om alleen met onszelf te spreken en naar onszelf te luisteren.

 

Dit schrijven is de verheldering, over waarom ik, met BT, vanuit Taal Verlichting (TV) leef en waarom anderen dit niet doen of schijnbaar niet kunnen. Als je dit leest, omdat je, net als ik, de Nederlands taal beheerst, dan weet je meteen, dat ik me niet met jou bezig hou, maar met mezelf en dat ik daarom aan jou duidelijk kan maken, waarom jij je nog niet echt met jezelf hebt bezig gehouden. Jij bent je nog onbewust van je eigen TV, omdat je nog nooit hebt onderzocht en ervaren, wat er met je kan gebeuren, als je alleen blijft spreken met jezelf, op precies die manier, die jij prefereert en mooi vind klinken.

 

De verandering van je OT naar BT, brengt met zich mee, dat je houding naar taal – en dus naar wat je hier leest, over wat ik hier heb geschreven – je laat weten dat een andere werkelijkheid mogelijk is, namelijk, degene die jij bewust kunt creeren. In OT kun je nooit in je eigen realiteit leven, omdat je die nog niet met je eigen taal hebt gecreerd. Zolang je nog OT hebt, blijf je gevangen zitten in de realiteit, die werd gedikteerd door anderen, die net als jij, door met anderen te praten en bezig te blijven, zich er van weerhouden, om echt met zichzelf te praten.

 

Ik schrijf nog steeds graag in het Nederlands, omdat ik, toen ik daar woonde, zo’n veertig jaar geleden, mijn BT en TV had ontdekt. Ik heb mijn BT en TV ook  heel vaak weer verloren en teruggevonden. Ook al kan ik deze woorden in het Engels vertalen, het zou geen zin voor mij hebben, om ze in het Grieks om te zetten, omdat ik die taal niet beheers. Met andere woorden, het bewust worden van onze taal, is een kwestie van terug gaan naar onze stem, onze klank, die de oorsprong is van onze taal, onze intelligentie.

 

TV is een weten dat nooit kan worden vergeten. Het heeft niets met anderen te maken en is alleen maar te delen met hen, die hun eigen OT hebben gestopt, zodat ze hun BT konden voortzetten. Het heeft geen zin meer voor mij, om te praten met hen die nog OT hebben. Ik ga desnoods alleen met mijn BT verder. Met dit schrijven laat ik mezelf nogmaals weten, dat dit de enige manier is om anderen misschien eens te stimuleren, om eindelijk met zichzelf in gesprek te gaan en om eens te kunnen gaan luisteren naar hun eigen gelukzalige vibratie en overgave, die de enige werkelijke basis is van onze communicatie.