Anger,

 

A long time ago, I had one very pleasant skype conversation with the famous neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp. I had studied his book “Affective Neuroscience” and I felt compelled, to get in touch with him. Unlike so many other people, I had tried in vain to contact, I was surprised, to get to talk with him. I remember him saying, at the end of our wonderful conversation: “Keep raking the fields of Affective Neuroscience.”

 

Panksepp agreed, that his views about primary emotional systems, perfectly dovetailed with my description of the great difference between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL). These two cross-species ways of expressing affect, contain our negative and positive emotions. These negative and positive feelings, are, of course, audible in the sound of our voice while we speak. Thus, if we listen, we can hear what someone is feeling. Naturally, we can also fake our feelings, but we can detect that too.

 

The big difference between our DL and our EL, is that in DL, we don’t listen to ourselves, while we speak, that is, we just don't want or like to hear it, but during EL, we listen to ourselves, while we speak, because we like and want to hear it. Our autonomic nervous system responds very differently, when we experience negative or positive emotions. During episodes, in which we experience RAGE/Anger, FEAR/Anxiety or PANIC/Sadness, our body has what is known as a fight/flight/freeze response, but when we have positive affect, such as SEEKING/Expectancy, CARE/Nurturing, PLAY/Social Joy and LUST, these evolutionary mobilization responses to a threat are absent and we are in the ideal state to communicate.

 

The word emotion comes from Latin “emovere”, which means, to move. Therefore, to feel, is to do something, because our emotions motivate us into action, to both survive and thrive. Since we are predominantly engaging in DL, however, we are almost permanently busy with surviving, with negative affect, but seldom with thriving, with EL, with positive emotions. We can only thrive and experience meaningful interaction or EL, in which we listen to ourselves – and, therefore, to each other – in the absence of any threat.

 

Simply stated, anger is a biological response, which prepares us to fight. The big mistake inevitably made, by people, who don’t know anything about the difference between DL and EL, is in DL, we believe, we can fight injustice by changing the laws or by enforcing new norms. However, all our endless arguments, discussions, debates or disputes prevent EL and will have to be stopped entirely, before we can finally have ongoing EL.

 

Honoring our anger – by taking the time, to talk  out loud, alone, with ourselves; by describing to our best ability, what it is that is demanding our attention; by listening to the sound of our own voice; by switching from DL to EL – is important for our health and wellbeing. There are so many things, we can become angry about, but with our unconscious DL, we never fully understand, why we keep being so angry. Only if we stop our DL – since we really don’t like to hear the sound of our own voice – our anger subsides, because we consciously decrease our involvement in DL and deliberately increase our involvement in EL.

 

Due to my discovery of the difference between my own DL and EL, I have found, that the most difficult thing about dealing with my anger was, that because of my mechanical involvement in DL, I felt angry, upset and anxious about being angry. In DL, we are always shamed for our anger. Once we begin to have ongoing EL, however, we realize, we have – in DL – always been punished for being angry. In EL, we come to grips with our anger, as we realize, that it was justified and necessary. While it may have been troubling, our anger was and is blessing in disguise, a form of protection. Moreover, with EL, we don’t find inner, but outer peace, as our relations change, in that, we only engage with those with whom we can have EL.

 Lying Joe Biden,

 

In Disembodied Language (DL) – which is our usual way of talking – everyone is constantly lying. We may be able to easily recognize this in others, for instance in Joe Biden, but we don’t realize, we are doing it ourselves. Since we are all conditioned to lie and don’t know, that, we need to listen to ourselves, while we speak, in order to be able to be truthful and engage in Embodied Language (EL), we, inadvertently, keep blaming others for what we do ourselves.

 

In yesterday’s interview with Left-wing-windbag Lester Holt, who always speaks with a forceful, draining, emphatic, phony voice, Joe Biden got very testy, because the interviewer dared to ask him some questions, he didn’t like to answer. Discussing the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, Joe Biden was asked, if he found it acceptable, he still had not heard, publicly, from the Secret Service Director? He answered: “Oh, I’ve heard of him.” However, the Secret Service Director, Kimberly Cheatle, is a woman. Lester Holt, in vain, then tried to save his white master’s flabby ass, by rephrasing the question and asked him “Have you heard from her publicly?” Joe Biden instantly looked troubled, as if he had pooped in his pants. He knew he had embarrassed himself, but, like Poopy Goldberg, who is really full of shit, no way, he was going to admit that, so he said: “Publicly, I’ve sat down in the Situation Room downstairs – the Secret Service, the FBI, the national security agencies, Homeland Security – all the major elements.” It would be quite a story, that Joe Biden doesn’t even know the director of the Secret Service is a woman, but slavish morons, like Lester Holt, are only on TV to enable and deceive, but not to inform. Surely, Lester Holt could have said to Joe Biden: “But, what do you mean, Mister President, you heard from him? The director is a woman?” Do you get the picture, we are all in it together, in DL? And this is just one of the many lies, we keep telling each other and ourselves. Hilarious shit, isn’t it?

 

Another funny example of someone, who, like Joe Biden, also has problems getting older and uglier, is the hairless, fully painted, pretending to be a white woman, Joy Reed from MSNBC. She doesn’t even seem to realize, that she and her twisted-clown-sisters, Rachel Maddow and Jen Psaki, were, of course, only invited to the Republican National Convention (RNC), to expose themselves, for the frauds they really are and to entertain the audience. These three despicable women are the purveyors of violence on the Left, by calling for the elimination of Donald Trump. They are as good as anyone with DL, who blames someone else’s DL. This is what everyone does, whether they know it or not, admit it or not or, are aware of it or not.

 

Remember, reader, this writing is not about Joe Biden or Donald Trump or the Left or the Right. It is about you, with your DL. You haven’t listened to yourself, while you spoke and discovered your EL. If you had done that, you would talk with me or with other people, who have EL, but where the hell are they? Everyone engages, unknowingly, in DL. Even Joy Reed reads from a script, but if she steps out of line and would actually say what she would like to say, she will lose her job. Cancel culture is haunting this old hag and she probably has sleep paralysis. They call this Old-Hag-Syndrome, when a terrified person wakes up without being able to move or speak. All she can do is anxiously hang onto the script she wrote, to make it seem as if she knows. In EL, such fear is non-existent. To the contrary, in EL, we, voluntarily, become quiet, as we have said what we wanted to say. In DL, by contrast, we are involuntary, unconsciously, effortfully and unnaturally forcing ourselves to say things – if we would listen to how we sound – we don’t like to hear and don’t want to say.

 

In closing, it should be very clear – thank you, my favorite rag-doll, with funny-dismissive voice and nodding-and-turning bobble-head, Karine Jean-Pierre, for making me so happy, every time I use that word – that if you want to have EL, you will have to give up on all the lies that are promoted by Left-wing political idiots. Unless you begin to see yourself as a free, responsible, accountable individual, there is only going to be the outdated group-behavior, called DL for you. EL fits with the Right, but not with the Left. EL is about the future of mankind, in which everyone is true to themselves, because our language fits with our behavior and our experiences.             

 Different Tone,

 

In response to the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, Joe Biden gave a fake-campaign speech. He read another meaningless text, which was written for him - not by him - from the teleprompter. Bottom-line is, Joe Biden, of course, knows damn well, he bears responsibility for this escalation, which he has helped to create. Now his hateful adds have suddenly been stopped.  

 

Instead of calling Donald Trump a dictator and a fascist or telling the nation – as he did the other day – “We’re done talking about the debate. It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye”, we are now supposed to believe “it’s time to cool it down.” What demented Joe Biden, who makes things up, even while reading something from a piece of paper, clearly meant to say was “It’s time to put Trump in the cross-hears”, which means visible in one’s gunsight. Oddly, the correct expression is hitting the bullseye, which means hitting the center of a target.

 

Naturally, Joe Biden is relieved, attention is no longer going to his malfunctioning presidency. His handlers let him read from a script, in which he downplays the attack on Donald Trump and distracts the audience’s attention, by rambling on about attacks on other political figures. And, then he says “In America we resolve our differences at the battle box” instead of the ballot-box.

 

This foolish, stubborn, vindictive man - who, let's not forget, in the past, has even said, he wanted to take Donald Trump behind-the-barn, for a fistfight - now, pretends to be a mature parent, who speaks to the nation in a rare Oval Office appearance “we all have a responsibility” to tone it down, to speak in a way, which isn’t resulting in violence. Really? 

 

Surely, Joe Biden wasn’t talking about the great difference between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL), but this instance is an example of how – in DL – we deal with the problems, which are created by DL. Presumably, what Joe Biden is saying is: let’s not have any more DL, but EL, but that is not what is happening.

 

Interestingly, all fear-hate-mongering race-baiting pundits are talking now about the presumed need for a change in the tone of our 'conversation', as if they know, the difference between DL and EL, is about how we sound. Nothing is further away from the truth. People talk about DL with more of the same DL. There is no end to the conflicts and problems, unless DL stops. This is only achieved if we begin to talk with our EL about our DL.

 

Joe Biden is calling for unity, after nine years of hatred, lies and attacks. He is the arsonist, who pretends to be the fire marshal. Like Hamas, he calls for a cease fire, but he seeks to destroy. Like other Marxist leaders, Joe Biden has no qualms, about making even the people of his own party collateral damage, to keep himself in power. He views – or at least presents – himself as special, but, ironically, members of his own communist party are eager to throw him under the buss, which probably is going to happen... eventually... anyway... 

 

Anyone, who is a true American, freedom-loving patriot knows, that the so-called ‘high road’ is dead-end. It makes no sense to pretend, DL is EL. Yet, DL is identified correctly as DL only, when we can have ongoing EL. For now, the difference between our DL and EL is as unknown on the Right as on the Left, but the Right is beginning to wake up to EL, the language of our individual freedom.

 

There is no room for compromise between DL and EL, because we either engage in one or the other. I call on all the people on the Right, to talk with me about EL, so we can stop pussyfooting about DL. The Left wants to make it seem, as if the crazy shooter was a ‘republican’, to label all those who support Donald Trump as domestic terrorists. Yes, they are trying to make it seem, as if they are having EL, but they are having DL. The Left has been inciting violence, by calling all the Make America Great Again (MAGA) supporters Nazis, white supremacists, Hitler and a threat to democracy, but they have never addressed their own DL. They try to blame MAGA for their own DL.

 

Everything that has happened was preceded by our way of talking. Also, everything that is going to happen, will be determined by whether we engage in DL or in EL. Once we have ongoing EL, we know, all misery, all conflict, all atrocity, that has happened, was due to DL – which was never addressed with EL – because we have never had any ongoing, deliberate, conscious, skillful EL. While we may live in Western Democratic societies in the 20th century, millions of people have been killed – in China, USSR, Iran, North Vietnam, Cambodia, Iraq, Syria – by their own governments, who are all against the freedom of the individual. I predict that unless we learn to have ongoing EL and address our DL, the so-called ‘free’ world will turn again into tyranny...it is already happening...         

 Donald Trump Almost Got Killed,  

 

I am so relieved Donald Trump survived this almost successful assassination attempt. We need him more than ever. I can’t imagine, what would have happened, if he would have died. I am afraid, all hell would then have broken lose and we would be having some kind of civil war.

 

The incendiary, openly-hateful manner, in which so many left-wing cooks, TV presenters, actors, officials and politicians have been speaking about Trump, over the last couple months, have led up to this escalation of violence. I describe  this totally unhinged rhetoric – in which Trump is repeatedly described as and compared with Adolf Hitler – as Disembodied Language (DL).

 

You may not believe me, but DL is the way of speaking, in which you, as speaker, don’t listen to yourself, while you speak. Moreover, DL has never been properly addressed with Embodied Language (EL) – in which you, as speaker, listen to yourself, while you speak – and is, therefore, going on in every society, around the world. The difference between DL and EL reveals to us the real reason, why human beings can’t get along.

 

You hear many people, on the left, talk about the need to ‘lower-the-temperature’, but it is the left, who continues to incite violence, not the right. It is the always the left and never the right, which is instigating: raging, antisemitic, pro-Hamas, anti-America protests; George Floyd-BLM-riots; shops being looted; judges not prosecuting criminals; harassment of Supreme Court justices; anti-fascist-demonstrations, in which statues and monuments are defaced; the fact, that millions of illegals can just walk in; the nihilism, which suggests, that we cannot fix our problems in our social institutions, which need to be torn and so we can start over; law-fare or legal action, as part of a campaign against the political opponent; need for chaos, as a path to gain status and power, by  calling for the overthrow and the destruction of established order…just to name a few…

 

Although the difference between DL and EL is as unknown, on the left, as on the right side of the political spectrum, it is absolutely clear, the left – and not the right - is repeatedly willing to justify and endorse violence as a means to force their ideology. Moreover, while the right is in favor of the protection of individual freedom, merit, responsibility, accountability and family, the left is constantly on the attack, screaming, basically, like little children, demanding things to go their way. The left is against the family and supporting grooming and indoctrination of children with fake-transgender-identity. Anyone with any awareness about the difference between DL and EL can hear and see, DL fits more with the left, while EL fits with the right.

 

I obviously use this attack on the life of Trump, to let people know, we urgently need to begin to address the DL/EL distinction. Furthermore, it should be noted, DL always escalates. This is the history of mankind. DL and the wars, which are – unconsciously – justified by our usual way of talking, have continued unabated, because we haven’t addressed the quintessential issue of our time: everything we do is determined by how we talk. Once our way of talking changes, all our other behavior begins to change. This is not some spiritual, psychological, philosophical,  cultural fantasy, but a scientific phenomenon.

 

As a new American, who was fortunate to have immigrated from the Netherland in 1999, I have slowly, but surely, become politically aware. In the Netherlands, I never paid much attention to politics, but my views were mostly left leaning, determined by how I grew up and had been educated. My Catholic father, who grew up during the occupation of the Germans, was traumatized by this experience. When Holland was liberated by the Allied Forces, in 1945, he had survived, as a child, the Hunger Winter. The rebuilding of Dutch society – with the help of the Marshall plan – set the stage for his limited education, marriage, immediate employment, the creation of a family of three sons and three daughters and a labor-socialist political view. 

It wasn’t until recently, I began to make sense of politics, in terms of how it relates to DL and EL. My unequivocal conclusion is that EL is truly the language of mankind’s future, because it is the ultimate expression of individual freedom. No amount of virtue-signaling, about the need to presumably protect democracy, convinces me, that the left’s cancel-culture is in favor individual freedom, which is a core principle of the American way of life. No, it is Donald Trump and those MAGA republicans, who support him. I am proud to be one. Please also check out my videos on my two You Tube channels maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp. Hear me talk and sing.     

 Language Discrimination,

 

While reading about bilingualism – I speak and write in Dutch and English – I came across the term Language Discrimination (LD), which occurs when a person is treated differently because of that person’s native language or other characteristics of that person’s speech. Of course, such different treatment is always negative. For instance, in an employment situation, an employee may be subjected to LD if the workplace has a speak-English-only policy, but the employee’s primary language is something other than English. In this case, the employee may be a victim of LD, if he or she is treated less favorably than other employees, because he or she speaks English with an accent or if the employee is told, he or she does not qualify for a position due of a lack of English proficiency. Also, outside the work situation LD may happen when a person is denied access to business or government services because he or she doesn’t speak English. In California, where I live, LD is considered a form of discrimination, on the bases of race or national origin.

 

As I have often stated, I consider the immensely important difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL), as the difference between languages, because, in terms of acquiring EL, the same principles of learning apply. Both DL as well as EL, exist only to the extent that they are reinforced and the very reason, that DL is happening everywhere, but that EL only happens very seldom, briefly, and unconsciously, show EL isn’t reinforced. The lack of reinforcement for EL, can be justifiably viewed as a form of LD or, more bluntly: DL is the LD, which puts anyone with EL to shame.

 

When children grow up bilingually, they often – obviously, because of DL – end up speaking only one language. This glotophobia is the rejection of people for their way of speaking, writing or vocabulary, based on the dominant norms of language. Like an identity card, the language we speak and, particularly, the way in which we speak, reveals who we really are. DL and EL occur within every language, so within French, Chinese or English, people are able to engage in DL or in EL. Within every language, there is LD, because as long as DL goes on, EL is impossible.

 

The act of elocution – the skill of clear and expressive speech, especially of distinct pronunciation and articulation – should be affirmative of who we truly are, but this is not the case as long as we, unknowingly, engage in DL. Indeed, in absence of any attention for EL, our ordinary speech is an act of denunciation of who we really are. Moreover, our negative DL always happens unconsciously. Thus, with our automatic, forceful DL, we shoot ourselves in the foot, as we discriminate against ourselves, by preventing ourselves from having any EL. It is even more insidious, as we prevent ourselves and each other from having EL, because we fear, we don’t belong to the dominant group, the majority, with DL.

 

Certainly, there is the importance to diversity of languages – such as Russian, Spanish, Swedish, etc. – but, we aren’t appreciative of linguistic plurality, because our hostile, distrusting DL, which continues our LD and isn’t interested in the vitality and richness of the world and society in which we live. There is no EL and there basically cannot be any EL, because DL and LD, belittles and practically annihilates anyone who has EL. I am still alive, and I am – in spite of endless rejection and judgement – able to make it, because I talk out loud with myself, I listen to myself, and I act on what how I have instructed myself. My ability to self-stimulate was always sufficient, to find and meet the rare, courageous, honest individuals, with whom I could have mutually reinforcing EL.   

 

DL, in which speakers don’t listen to themselves while they speak, isn’t merely a dismissal of just one or two aspects of who we are, but it is the complete denial of who are as a person. In DL, we all turn our backs on our naturalness. Yes, our DL is the ultimately form of discrimination, called LD. We do this to ourselves and others, because we were conditioned to do this and not because we want to do this. Once we talk with ourselves and listen to ourselves, we find that we don’t want to have DL, but we want EL.

 

In conclusion, I claim our DL is in essence racist. With our unintelligent DL, we discriminate against the human race.  Supposedly, DL is acceptable, as it is going on everywhere, twenty-for-seven, but anyone like me, who knows the great difference between DL and EL, doesn’t accept DL, because he or she will somehow be able to manage to continue with their EL. My skill to do that, is because I hear the difference between my own DL and EL. Once you can hear the big difference between your DL and EL, you will be able to hear it in others. We engage continuously in DL because of our conditioning history, in which we were reinforced for our DL, but we were punished for our EL.       

 No longer,

 

For some time I no longer feel like being friends with AnnaMieke - with whom I have had so many pleasant, wonderful conversations on Skype - because she does not want to talk about politics.

 

Actually, I had known about her position for quite a while, but I enjoyed our contact, which was possible, as I had never so far felt a strong impetus to talk about politics.  

 

Now that it has been a while since I broke off our contact, I realize how important it was for me to take this step, to be able to continue talking about what I want to talk about. Initially, I didn't find it that objectionable, although I already knew that AnnaMieke automatically viewed politics as something that would distract from Embodied Language (EL). Since I live in the United States, where politics is something very important, which everyone talks about it day in, day out, I cannot avoid talking and writing about it with my EL.

Since I no longer speak with AnnaMieke, I have become convinced, politics plays an incredibly important role in the fact that everywhere in the world - not just in America - we do not have EL, but only Disembodied Language (DL). 

 

I simply cannot escape the impression, although DL is the basis of every culture, the opposite is also possible. In fact, I am convinced, this is precisely where the real future lies for our EL. And, it seems to me, EL is ultimately going to determine politics, because it is the language of the future.    

I'm not imagining anything, because I know all too well what the current state of affairs is. For me, it is as clear as day, that left-wing politics fits with DL, but right-wing politics aligns with EL. I find it absolutely ridiculous, that even someone like AnnaMieke still does not want to acknowledge this. It points to an unwillingness to admit, that the worldview she had with her DL still influences her and she wants to make it seem as if her EL could continue in concert with this horrible perspective. It will probably never happen that AnnaMieke admits, I am not merely expressing my opinion. This is why I no longer speak with her or anyone else who wants to continue with DL.

 

Fortunately, I have given up trying to make it clear to others, they have DL, because I believe they can and should do this themselves. I am only interested in the progress of EL and will not let anyone hinder me in this.

 

It is important for me to be clear about EL's political implications, because, due to my conditioning, that clarity was not there until quite recently. So, there is no possibility of having ongoing EL and at the same time adhering to left-wing, socialist, Marxist, communist, individuality-oppressing politics. It is also impossible to have EL, if one still lives in the illusion, that one is a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu or atheist, or when one considers oneself as someone important, because of meditation, consciousness, sensitivity, creativity, education, weapons, science or economics. Who we believe to be, is always tied to the continuation of DL. I don't believe I have EL, but I have it and I know I do and that is my Language Enlightenment (LE). My EL and LE have nothing to do with faith.

 

I have nothing to say and, therefore, I can say what I really want to say. I always start with nothing and speak and write only from there. Left-wing politics is the biggest obstacle to individuality and anyone who has listened to themselves, should be able to admit, this is unquestionably true. In other words, only capitalism – and no other view – has enriched humanity and resulted in individuals being given rights in Democratic Western societies. However, all the enemies of capitalism are – always – against the freedom of the individual.

  

DL is the history of mankind, in which group behavior has repeatedly suppressed individual behavior. It is an indisputable fact that EL could only emerge from the prosperity created by capitalism. Yes, I am a product of the society in which I grew up. I foresee the possibility, with our EL, we will one day create a completely different society, based on wealth and well-being.

 

My view is simple and realistic.  Everything we created and maintained with DL will gradually disappear and be replaced by something better with our EL. Only the behavioral repertoires that fit EL remain, which means, that our lives will become increasingly simpler and more satisfying.

 

Everyone can experience and acknowledge how everything becomes more difficult and complicated. This is the inevitable consequence of our unconscious participation in and approval of DL. Especially in DL, there is pretense of simplicity and comfortable living, but these are just empty slogans, that have no support in reality. We are merely told something - by others, but also by ourselves - with the help of DL, which is not true, but we believe it, because others have believed it too. This is our historic group behavior, which, to this day, continues our devastating, unnatural DL, but this comes to a decisive end with our natural EL.

 Niet langer,

 

Ik voel mij sinds enige tijd niet langer meer bevriend met AnnaMieke – met wie ik zovele aangename, prachtige gesprekken heb gehad op skype – omdat ze niet over politiek wil praten.

 

Eigenlijk wist ik al enige tijd van haar standpunt,  maar ik genoot van ons contact, wat mogelijk was, omdat ik nog niet eerder de aanzet had gevoeld, om het toch over politiek te hebben.

 

Nu het alweer een tijdje geleden is, dat ik het contact heb verbroken, realiseer ik me, hoe belangrijk het voor mij was, om deze stap te nemen, om het te kunnen blijven hebben over waar ik het over wil hebben. Aanvankelijk vond ik het nog niet zo bezwaarlijk, ofschoon ik wel wist, dat AnnaMieke politiek automatisch beschouwd als iets wat af zou leiden van Belichaamde Taal (BT), maar, aangezien ik in de Verenigde Staten leef, waar politiek iets heel belangrijks is, waar iedereen het, dag in, dag uit, over heeft, ontkom ik er niet aan, om daar vanuit BT over te praten en te schrijven.

 

Sinds ik niet meer met AnnaMieke spreek, ben ik ervan overtuigd geraakt, dat politiek een zeer belangrijke rol speelt in het feit, dat wij overal ter wereld – niet alleen in Amerika – geen BT, maar Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) hebben.  

 

Ik kan mij eenvoudigweg niet aan de indruk onttrekken, dat ofschoon OT natuurlijk ten grondslag ligt aan iedere cultuur, ook het ongekeerde mogelijk is. Ik ben er zelfs van overtuigd, dat juist precies daar de enige reele toekomst ligt voor BT. En, het schijnt mij toe, dat BT uiteindelijk de politiek zal gaan bepalen, want BT is de taal van de toekomst en niet OT.   

 

Ik beeld mij niets in, want ik weet maar al te goed wat de huidige stand van zaken is. Voor mij is het echter zo klaar als een klontje, dat linkse politiek past bij OT, maar dat de rechtse politiek aansluit bij BT. Ik vind het belachelijk, dat zo’n iemand als AnnaMieke, dit niet wil erkennen. Het wijst op de onwil, om toe te geven, dat het wereld-beeld wat ze had met OT, nog steeds van invloed op haar is en het zelfs wil doen voorkomen, alsof BT zou kunnen voortgaan in samenspraak met deze afgrijzelijke opvatting. Het zal waarschijnlijk wel nooit gaan gebeuren, dat AnnaMieke toe gaat geven, dat dit zo is. Ik spreek niet meer met haar, of met wie dan ook, die, mijnsinziens, voort wil blijven gaan met OT.

 

Ik heb gelukkig opgegeven, om het aan anderen duidelijk te maken, dat ze OT hebben, want ik vind, dat ze dit zelf kunnen doen. Ik ben alleen maar geinteresseert in de voortgang van met BT en laat mij door niemand hierin belemmeren.

 

Het is van groot belang, om over de politiek van BT duidelijk te zijn, omdat die duidelijkheid, vanwege mijn conditionering, er tot voor kort nog niet was. Er bestaat dus geen mogelijkheid, om BT te hebben en om tegelijkertijd linkse, socialistische, Marxistische, communistische, het-vrije-individu-onderdrukkende-politiek aan te hangen. Eveneens is het onmogelijk om BT te hebben, als men nog in de illusie leeft, dat men een Christen, Muslim, Jood, Hindoe of atheist zou zijn, of dat men zich belangrijk waant, vanwege meditatie, bewustzijn, gevoeligheid, creativiteit, schooling, wapens, wetenschap of economie. Wie wij geloven te zijn, hangt samen met de voortgang van OT. Ik geloof niet dat ik BT heb, want ik heb het. Dat is Taal Verlichting (TV). Mijn BT heeft niets met geloof te maken.

 

Ik heb niets te zeggen en daarom kan ik zeggen wat ik echt wil zeggen. Ik begin altijd met niets en spreek en schrijft alleen daarvanuit. Linkse politiek is de grootste sta-in-de-weg voor individualiteit en iedereen, die ooit eens eventjes echt naar zichzelf heeft kunnen luisteren, zou volgens mij in staat moeten kunnen zijn, om volmondig toe te geven, dat dit zonder meer waar is. Anders gezegd, alleen het kapitalisme – geen enkele andere opvatting – heeft de mens verrijkt en heeft tot gevolg gehad, dat in Democratische Westerse maatschappijen individuen rechten hebben gekregen. Alle vijanden van het kapitalisme zijn echter – altijd – tegen de vrijheid van het individu.

 

OT is de geschiedenis van de mensheid, waarin het groep-gedrag telkens het individuele gedrag de kop heeft ingedrukt. Het is een onomstotelijk feit, dat BT alleen kon voortkomen uit de welvaart, die door het kapitalisme tot stand was gebracht. Ja, ik ben een produkt van de maatschappij waarin ik opgroeide. Ik voorzie de mogelijkheid, dat wij met onze BT een heel andere maatschappij gaan creeren, die gebaseerd is op welvaart en welzijn.

 

Mijn kijk is simpel en realistisch.  Alles wat wij met OT hebben gecreerd en in stand hebben gehouden, zal geleidelijk aan gaan verdwijnen en worden vervangen door iets beters met BT. Alleen het gedrag dat past bij BT blijft over, wat dus inhoudt, dat ons leven alsmaar eenvoudiger en genoegzamer gaat worden.

 

Iedereen ervaart aan den lijve, hoe alles alleen maar moeilijker en ingewikkelder wordt. Dit is het onvermijdelijke gevolg van onze onbewuste deelname aan en goedkeuring van OT. En, juist in OT vindt de pretentie plaats van eenvoud en gemak, maar dit zijn slechts loze kreten, die geen enkel draagvlak in de werkelijkheid hebben. Er wordt ons – door anderen, maar ook door ons zelf – met behulp van OT iets voorgehouden, wat niet waar is, maar wij geloven het, omdat anderen het ook geloven. Dit is ons historische groeps-gedrag, dat, tot op de dag van vandaag, de voortgang van onze onnatuurlijke OT bewerkstelligd, maar hieraan komt een pertinent einde met onze natuurlijke BT.