Others,

 

Since I have found one person, who is truly interested in her own Embodied Language (EL) and wants to talk with me about ongoing EL, my interest in others has completely disappeared.

 

It is astonishing to me, nobody is interested in the EL, which I talk about on my videos, on my You Tube channels (maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp) and on this blog. We simply cannot be happy with our Disembodied Language (DL). Being ourselves requires EL.  

 

I felt troubled about how I grew up. My wife Bonnie and I decided not to have children, as I wasn’t too sure about myself. I didn’t feel stable enough, to raise a family. However, we stayed together and EL emerged from our relationship.

 

My Chinese American wife and I had met in a therapy group. After I had told her, I wasn’t into having children, for a long time, I continued to feel unworthy, as I was trying to find my true self. Somehow things worked out between us.

 

At some point, because of our arguments and disagreements, it seemed we would split up, but we stayed together. Thus, EL was born, in my early twenties. You could say, EL saved our relationship, which has blossomed ever since.

 

I recently came into my own, at age sixty-five. My Dutch friend AnnaMieke and I talk weekly on Skype, about our discoveries with our EL. It is awesome that we have become enlightened together. Before that, when I was still working, I was still often busy with others. I may still work for another year or two, but in these last couple of months, I have felt so comfortable, because I have nothing to do with others anymore.

 

I am still recovering from the treacherous DL of others, who don’t want to have EL with me. On my own, I always have EL, but, for a long time, I remained preoccupied with others, in the hope, they would join me. I am glad to be where I am today. I don’t care about others anymore, and, sadly, this includes the family I grew up in. I am the oldest son and have two younger brothers and two older sisters and one younger sister.

 

I am still amazed, none of my siblings want to have EL with me. I guess, it is a matter of pride. They don’t want to surrender and be open to their brother, who was always the black sheep of the family. My parents are still alive and live in a senior home, but I haven’t talked with them for many years. I was only able to continue with my EL, after I decided to stop all my attempts to have contact with my family. I never would have believed that I would make such a decision, but I did it and I am happy to be able to say: I don’t regret it.     

 

I used to feel really upset, that nobody wanted to be with me and wondered for years, why this was so, but now I know and accept, nobody is interested in exploring their own EL. Looking back, I realize, I always wanted to have ongoing EL, so that I could be myself and experience my Language Enlightenment (LE), as I do right now.

You can also hear me speak about what I address in this writing on my You Tube Channels 1) Maximus Peperkamp and 2) maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw

 

Uiteraard,

 

Uiteraard is het gezegde, op z’n zachts gezegd, niet hetzelfde, als in het Engels, to say the least. Wanneer wij zachter spreken, omdat wij naar onszelf luisteren en wellicht Belichaamde Taal (BT) gaan hebben – in plaats van schreeuwerige Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) – dan zeggen wij meer, door waarschijnlijk minder te zeggen. Een veel betere vertaling van, op z’n zachts gezegd, is to put it mildly, want met BT spreken wij uiteraard op een kalme, aangename, hartelijke manier.

 

To say the least, past bij onze niets-zeggende OT, want in onze gebruikelijke manier van praten zeggen we, dus uiteraard helemaal niets. OT is uiteraard niet eens een kwestie van weinig of minder zeggen, maar slechts van doen alsof we iets zeggen. Waar het uiteraard op aankomt, in OT, is dat de spreker de luisteraar onder duim weet te houden. Uiteraard, doet hij of zij dit, door de luisteraar allerlei flauwe kul door de strot te duwen. Ja, het is, uiteraard, geen mooi plaatje, indien je gaat beluisteren, wat er in OT gebeurd. Sprekers onderdrukken de luisteraars, die uiteraard nooit aan het woord komen en iedereen vindt dat heel normaal, omdat wij nou eenmaal allemaal zo zijn geconditioneerd.

 

Als men zegt, dat de sanitaire voorzieningen, op z’n zachts gezegd, nogal gedateerd zijn, dan is men in feite confronterend, omdat die oude, lekkende, looie pijpen, uiteraard, hoog nodig, zouden moeten worden vervangen. Hetzelfde is uiteraard het geval met onze onbewuste, starre,  gebruikelijke manier van spreken. Zodra wij het verschil bemerken tussen OT en BT, dan willen wij, uiteraard alleen nog maar BT, want OT heeft ons enorm veel problemen gegeven. Het is, op z’n zachts gezegd, pijnlijk, dat iedereen, over de gehele wereld, dag in dag uit, zonder er erg in te hebben, OT heeft, maar wanneer wij BT gaan hebben, dan kunnen wij er niet langer doekjes om winden, dat OT uiteraard catastrofaal is.  

 

Indien wij van iemand zeggen, dat hij of zij, op  z’n zachts gezegd, een controversieel persoon is, dan zeggen wij, uiteraard, waar het op staat, want wij geven toe, dat hij of zij een omstreden figuur is. En wanneer onze zogenaamde vriend het, op z’n zachts gezegd, laat afweten en niet komt op dagen voor de afspraak die wij hadden, dan is hij of zij uiteraard niet echt een vriend.

 

Wij spreken dan wel, op z’n zacht’s gezegd, over schermutselingen met de politie, tijdens een uit de hand gelopen demonstratie, maar uiteraard hebben we het over steeds vaker voorkomende geweldadigheden, die schijnbaar door iedereen tegenwoordig als normaal worden beschouwd. Men heeft het ook steeds vaker over fascisme en antisemitisme, maar niemand heeft in de gaten, dat dit uiteraard samengaat met OT, onze als normaal-geaccepteerde wijze van spreken.

 

Uiteraard is het de linkse, op z’n zachts gezegd, communistische, vrijheid-van-menings-uiting hatende, anti-Westerse, autocratische politiek, die de overal oplaaiende, anti-Israel mentaliteit en dus de Joden-haat heeft opgehitst. Er valt met deze gefrustreerde, aggressive, fanatieke, opdringerige mensen absoluut niet te praten en ik vermoed, met mijn kennis, van het verschil tussen OT en BT, dat ons nog vele afgrijzelijke, mens-onterende toestanden te wachten staat.

 

Uiteraard zijn wij niet alleen getuige, maar ook actief deelnemer en ongemerkt toestemmer – vanwege onze nog altijd onbesproken gebleven, krampachtige, onintelligente, onbewuste OT – aan de zinloze, verwoestende confrontaties, die zich, vooralsnog, op z’n zachts gezegd, ver van ons bed afspelen. Het is hoog tijd, dat ieder van ons het recht in eigen handen gaat nemen, om het verschil tussen OT en BT te gaan ontdekken.   

 

Zolang als dat wij met OT bezig blijven, doen zich uiteraard allerlei misstanden voor, omdat wij onze taal, op z’n zachts gezegd, verkeerd gebruiken. In OT gaat het uiteraard altijd om het zogenaamde verschil van mening, omdat wij vastgebakken zitten aan allerlei woorden. Ik zag daarnet een lach-wekkende aankondiging van een You Tube video – die ik natuurlijk niet ben gaan zien of beluisteren – van een idiote, snel-pratende, zogenaamde expert, die met een of ander dik zwaar boek stond te zwaaien, want daarin stonden, volgens hem, op de door hem genoemde, uitvergrootte bladzijdes, precies de dingen, die wij allemaal nodig zouden hebben.  

 

Of het nou hebben over het Hindoeisme, Islam, Christendom of Boedhisme, uiteraard is ieder geloof, in essentie, een geloof in het geschreven woord, dat te vinden is een zogenaamd heilig book. De wereld-wijde overwaardering voor leesbare taal, vastgelegd in wetten van allerlei maatschappijen, gaat uiteraard, altijd, hand in hand, met de verarming, verwaarlozing en ontkenning van het belang van gesproken taal.

 

Wat ik hier zeg, daar valt niet om heen te gaan. Uiteraard zou iedereen het volledig met mij mee eens moeten zijn. Wij zouden als rationeel mens moeten erkennen, dat wij volledig de weg zijn kwijtgeraakt vanwege onze OT. Daardoor blijven wij vasthouden aan woorden, waarvan wij ook nog eens fantaseren, dat die woorden in ons zouden zitten. Ook al geloven velen mensen in dezelfde klink-klare onzin, het is uiteraard niet waar, dat er taal in ons hoofd zou zitten.

 

Zodra wij het verschil onderscheiden tussen onze eigen OT en BT, dan willen wij uiteraard met BT verder en vindt er een herwaardering plaats van gesproken taal, omdat wij luisterend spreken. Uiteraard weten wij met BT niet van te voren wat wij gaan zeggen, omdat BT onstaat en dus niet een herhaling is, van de rol, die wij hebben geleerd. Dat laatste is uiteraard een verwijzing naar OT, waarin wij spreken vanuit onze conditionering. Met BT zijn wij nieuw en ervaren wij uiteraard een weldadige energie. Uiteraard doet zich hierbij de ervaring voor van onze Taal Verlichting (TV), die iedere vorm van spiritualiteit of religie belachelijk vindt.                                       

 

Surprised,

 

When you, at long last, begin to notice the enormous difference, between your own Disembodied Language (DL) and your Embodied Language (EL), you will not just be – a little bit –  surprised, but you are going to be absolutely shocked, about the fact, that nobody is talking about this difference. How could something so obvious, so important be completely ignored?

 

You will be surprised, you are, apparently, one in a million people, who is able to experience, again and again, this beautiful phenomenon of your own ongoing EL. It is so easy, soothing, nourishing and interesting, as you not only step out of your history of conditioning with DL, but you also recover from it. As a result of EL, you experience, energy is flowing to you, which was before drained out of you, because of your DL.

 

Although many emotions will be addressed in this process, you are surprised, you will really laugh about your own ignorance, frustration, despair, stupidity, drama, stubbornness, anger, distraction, sadness and inability, to admit, you knew, all along, what you are saying to yourself is true. Moreover, it is very clear, that you have always felt your Language Enlightenment (LE), but didn’t have the EL, to be able to express it.

 

With your ongoing EL, you are surprised to be a real person, the one you have always been, but you could never be, as you never told yourself about yourself, that this is who you are. You are much funnier than you believed yourself to be. You know more than you supposedly thought you knew. Since thinking turns out to be a hoax, you are not busy with it anymore and now, you begin to know things, because you simply say them to yourself.

 

By talking – out loud – alone, with yourself and by listening to the sound of your own voice, you will say and admit many things, which you have always felt, but never paid any attention to, as you were never taking the time, to say them to yourself. You could say them, but you never did. Nothing with EL is as you expected it to be, and this is a great surprise and relief. Although you keep anticipating, that it will be difficult, it isn’t. You discover your simplicity and innocence.

 

When you look in the mirror, while you have EL with yourself, you will not only look surprised, but you will hear surprised. While sometimes, we may say, someone is surprised, to hear what someone else is saying, we seldom, if ever, say to ourselves, we are surprised, to hear what we are saying to ourselves, what we are able to say to ourselves. Hearing we are saying something new, that we can be surprised about ourselves, is such a pleasant and comforting experience, as it means, we are alive and awake.

 

Usually, during our unconscious DL, we are only surprised, for just one brief moment and then, everything, supposedly, is again not surprising anymore. However, during EL, we keep on being surprised, that the new reveals itself to us. This delightful element of surprise and newness is our LE. Initially, when we discover our ability to continue with our EL, it is almost unbelievable, that we can be continuously fresh, aware and new, but as we keep switching back and forth between our DL and EL, we are surprised to find out, our EL is really the gift that keeps on giving.

 

Another surprising element of our EL is, that it is so elegant, calm, mature and balanced, because we say it to ourselves. Yes, we only find our EL, not by talking with others, but by talking with ourselves. Surprisingly, we discover, we can talk with others, in the exact same way, as we talk with ourselves. We want to have EL with others, but there is no one, to have EL with and, this is, surprisingly, what stimulates us, to have EL by ourselves. Once we can have EL with ourselves, we find others, who, like us, can also have EL by themselves. As our EL keeps unfolding, we are surprised about its secretive workings, as each of us is only able to understand, what he or she is ready to say and hear, from him or herself.   

You can also hear me on my two You Tube channels maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp 

 

Understanding,

 

When are we going to experience the immense difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and our Embodied Language (EL)? As long as we still try to understand this difference, we don’t allow our experience of this difference.

 

The whole issue of understanding, is, due to our involvement in Disembodied Language (DL), something that is completely misunderstood.  

 

When someone is saying something, we seem to have problems understanding what he or she is saying, because he or she engages in DL and is not connecting with what he or she is saying.

 

In EL, there is never – absolutely never – any problem understanding any speaker. How can that be? In EL, the speaker is listening to him or herself while he or she speaks. Because of this, he or she is connecting with what he or she is saying.

 

The DL-listener, who proclaims, that he or she is not understanding the EL-speaker, is, of course, also not connecting with this speaker, as he or she, is him or herself not used to connecting with his or her own spoken words.

 

Connecting with what we ourselves say or with what someone else is saying, is not a matter of understanding ourselves or of understanding someone else, who speaks with us.

 

Connecting with ourselves precedes our ability to connect with others – that is, if we do not connect with ourselves, we cannot connect with others – and connecting with each other, paves the way for understanding each other.   

 

Without connecting with ourselves or with each other – as we always do in DL – we never really understand each other, although we pretend, we do, and act, as if we understand each other.   

 

We keep having so many problems with each other, because we don’t connect with ourselves or with each other, but we are good, at acting, as if everything is fine, when, in reality, it is not.

 

As stated, we cannot connect with each other before we connect with ourselves. Likewise, we cannot understand each other, before we can understand ourselves.

 

Everyone – in DL – keeps trying to understand others, which prevents them from connecting with and understanding themselves.

 

Oddly, when finally – due to our experience of our ongoing EL – we stay easily connected with ourselves, understanding follows effortlessly. Moreover, since our EL unequivocally shows us, there never was or is any language inside of us, there is, in fact, nothing to understand in EL.   

 

The so-called understanding, which we were referring to during DL, was always a reference to a nonexistent, by-our-DL-imagined, verbal, inner process. In EL, by contrast, there is no need for understanding, as we know, that there really never was or is any inner language.

 

In EL, the speaker is always in touch with him or herself, and, therefore, he or she is immediately connecting with the listener, who can feel, that there is really nothing to be understood, but there is only something to be experienced.  

 

The boring, demanding, stressful emphasis – in effortful DL – on understanding, has always neglected or rejected our need for connection.

 

Once we – in EL – connect – with ourselves and each other – understanding is not an issue at all. Similarly, in DL, people always make a big deal about listening. It is ad nauseum repeated that understanding is lacking, because we are not listening or paying attention. Supposedly, we need to become better listeners and then there will be more understanding. No matter how hard we try, the DL-speaker is not listening to him or herself. It is the listener, who listens to such an attention-demanding speaker, who provides him or her with the illusion, he or she is being listened to and connected with. Surely, this so-called connection isn’t really happening, as there is no reciprocation, no turn-taking, but only admiration, respect, politeness, looking up, but also, of course, fear, resentment, humiliation and oppression.

 

The aforementioned describes how with our DL, we establish the social hierarchy, which determines, who has the power, who may talk and who is actually allowed to dominate and force others, who are below him or her. Any such a power-trip prevents understanding, as it is antithetical to having a connection. In such a DL case, because there cannot be a connection, all the emphasis is on understanding.

 

In conclusion, all that really matters in DL – our usual way of talking – is that the listener obeys the speaker, who is not the listener. And, yes, if the DL-listener – who is used to DL-speakers – is finally him or herself speaking, then he or she is forcing his or her own “listener”, as he or she is incapable of connecting with him or herself. As a result of this, our so-called understanding of ourselves – in DL – is always about what we unknowingly have forced on ourselves and what we, inadvertently, will force onto others. 

You can also hear me on my two You Tube channels maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp 

       

 

Bloodbath,

 

Since we haven’t addressed the atrocious fact, that Disembodied Language (DL) rules in every society – affluent and technologically advanced, as well as poor and underdeveloped – around the world, even if human beings aren’t literally killing each other, everyone is, unknowingly, at war with themselves, and, because of that, with each other. If we use the word bloodbath, to refer to an economic disaster, there are many bloodbaths, nobody ever wants to talk about. In spite of talk about equity, diversity or inclusion, there continues to be enormous poverty, chaos, conflict and injustice, around the world, since we haven’t addressed, how we all usually talk, without listening to ourselves, while we speak.   

 

If we refer to a bloodbath, as the slaughter of human beings, usually in the contest for power, there is currently a bloodbath going on – with between 1,000 and 10,000 deaths – in Nigeria, Somalia, Burkina Faso, Mexico, Syria, Pakistan, Mali, Haiti, Congo, Yemen, Columbia, Ethiopia, Iraq, Sudan, Afghanistan, India, South Africa and Israel. Nobody – on the left or on the right – in Free Western Democratic societies, really gives a damn, about one more bloodbath, here or there, because everyone engages, every day, mechanically, in DL. Only someone like me, who has ongoing Embodied Language (EL), is able to talk clearly about the always in violence escalating way of talking, which is our usual DL.

 

I don’t respect how you or most other people talk. Why should I? You don’t respect yourself, because you don’t listen to yourself, while you make it seem, as if listening to others or making others listen to you, is more important than listening to yourself. This is foolishness and you will reap what you have sown. You experience each day the negative consequences of your DL, while I deservedly enjoy the happy outcomes of my ongoing EL. Why should I listen to your DL, when you don’t listen to yourself? You have nothing to say to me, as long as you don’t listen to yourself, so that you can begin to have EL.

 

You even consider it entertainment, to watch or to participate in some stupid, addictive game, which might as well be called: the bloodbath. You are obsessed with sadism, violence, gore, and horror, due to DL and don’t even realize how disgusting your appetite for brutality is. I was amazed, with Black Lives Matter (BLM), there were aggressive left-wing riots, which went on for many months, but the media kept calling them peaceful demonstrations. In the struggle for what is, supposedly, justice, you shout-down, cancel or prevent anyone’s opinion who doesn’t agree with yours, because in DL, those who are most insidious, manipulative, deceitful or coercive, will win the cruel struggle for attention and dominate public discourse.   

 

There is – due to our unconscious participation in dissociative, unintelligent, unnatural DL – a general amnesia, to yesterday’s bloodbath. We haven’t learned anything from our destructive, tragic wars and conflicts. As a result, our way of talking hasn’t changed. We still consider it to be okay, that those, who are the most pretentious, forceful, incendiary and lethal, in taking out their adversaries, by any means necessary, will dominate our society. No word is heard about the peaceful, friendly, society, which can only come about with EL. I live in the United States, but there is no unity, due to everyone’s DL.

 

My whole life – also when I was still living in the Netherlands – I’ve been hearing your disgusting DL, everywhere I went. I have, with my own EL, concluded, I don’t feel any need anymore, to listen to your appalling DL. Your fanatic, ugly DL means nothing to me and that is why you don’t get my attention anymore. I am done with you, and you will have to witness the next bloodbath without me. It is your DL, which causes carnage. If you read this, but you don’t engage in EL with me, know, that I am addressing the inevitable violence of your DL and I hold you responsible. I am not a preacher, who says you are a sinner, but I know EL and I say that your DL kills people.

 

I’ve just finished reading a book. It doesn’t matter what book it was, as I’ve read many books like this. In the end, on the last pages, all the facts, presumably, came on the table and all the characters were, supposedly, finally able to figure out what had really happened. It was even mentioned, that, when it comes to talking about their own experiences, people, generally, are bad narrators, because, one moment, they describe themselves in this way, but the next moment, they say the opposite. According to the author, the only complete description of who we are can be found in a novel like hers. Of course, this is utter nonsense, but it is common to appreciate the written word more than the spoken word, as we were all conditioned by DL.

 

If we would know the difference between DL and EL and have EL instead of DL, we would be describing our experiences accurately, as they are felt, in our own words and to our heart’s content. There is no contraction or regret in our EL, because we use our language correctly. As we are having ongoing EL, it is clear to us, that in DL, we cannot express who we really are.

 

Even after we have had ongoing EL many times, if we speak with a person, who has DL, we can’t continue with our EL, as we can feel and sense, that they are not open to it. To us, it is apparent that we must stop interacting with this person, move away and stay away from them or we get involved again in DL. It always happens like this. Only after having gone through this humiliating and painful ordeal hundreds of times and after immigrating, in 1999, to the United States, I was able to stop being such a bleeding-heart liberal and shed my Dutch conditioning. This is how I came to accept and respect my own EL, my own experience and observation, that it is really no use for me, to talk with anyone, who has DL.

 

I was able to understand, why I kept engaging with those who have DL, in spite of what I already knew. People with DL can give the impression, they are open or more open than others. It is inevitable, when we discover our EL, we go to those who are, according to us, the most open to it. However, it only seems that way, that they are open, because they let us talk and listen, but I can already feel, while I am talking, they are not listening. What is more, I am not able to point out to them, that EL is not about listening to me, but about listening to ourselves. In our common DL, it is considered courteous and polite, to listen to others, but in EL, listening to others is not at all the issue.

 

EL also debunks the illusion, that we can begin to listen to ourselves, by listening to others. I have never met anyone, who began to listen to him or herself, after they were listening to me. There is, as of yet, only one person, who is listening to herself, while she speaks, who is writing about this marvelous process. She didn’t start to listen to herself, because she listened to me. She came to me, because she was already listening to herself and by talking with me, she recognized and was reminded of the fact, that she had always been doing this, but unconsciously. Anyone else, who would ever be able to have EL with me, would have to come from the same experience of self-respect. Talking with ourselves, so that we can listen to ourselves, is the essence of self-respect, as this is the only way to be able to continue with EL.

 

We never had any self-respect, as long as we continued with our DL. I know this is hard to believe, but I am not interested in convincing you. I know it is true and it is out of self-respect I refuse to get involved with you or anyone, who doesn’t have the ability to recognize, that they have already been listening to themselves, but they didn’t have EL, because they were not doing it consciously, deliberately, continuously. Everyone has already listened to themselves, but hardly anyone has the courage to admit it.

 

In conclusion, it is just a matter of time, before we will witness the next bloodbath, because our DL keeps setting the stage for these horrible acts. Currently, millions of people come across the border and the Biden administration isn’t at all worried, these people might be terrorists? It is astonishing to me, that bloodbaths continue to be created, in the name of a certain religion, but we shouldn’t be talking about this religion, because that would be considered hate-speech.

 

What you have yet to acknowledge, is that it is your usual way of talking – DL – which is going to justify and condone the next bloodbath. If you want order and peace, you will have to show this with your way of talking by engaging in EL. However, to be able to do that, you must be able to stop your DL. Only by stopping our DL and by engaging in EL, can we prevent the next bloodbath. As it stands, I don’t see how this is going to happen, as nobody shows any interest in, what should be called, real peace talks. Everyone who reads this knows, that they have already listened to themselves and have already had some accidental EL, but that is not enough. We need to get serious about our EL.

You can also hear me on my two You Tube channels maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp                       

 

Unhappy Humor,

 

It probably has never even occurred to you, that all humor is actually unhappy humor. Ask yourself the question: why would anyone try to be happy? Only someone who isn’t happy tries to be happy or funny, because, the fact is, they aren’t happy and they aren’t funny either.

 

I am – with Embodied Language (EL) – talking about happy humor, because I don’t try to be funny and, yet, I am funny. You see, I’m happy already and you just don’t get my enlightened humor. To understand my kind of humor, you need to experience what I’m saying, rather than only agreeing or disagreeing with it. In other words, before you can get my humor, you need to first stop your Disembodied Language (DL).

 

Happy humor doesn’t bother about whether you agree with it or not, as the person who has it, is having fun by him or herself already and doesn’t need anyone else, to continue with it. To the contrary, he or she has fun, in spite of the lack of response from everyone, who isn’t  happy, but jealous, and, therefore, cannot relate.

 

I am speaking about myself and you. I’m happy, but you miss out on enjoying what I say. I guess, it is always going to be that way, because it has always been this way and, yes, the past predicts the future. However, may be, one day, you can allow to feel, to experience, what I say, you don’t run away, but you join in my play? We’ll see and we’ll hear if and when that happens.

 

I’m not waiting for anyone, to get my happy humor. I have to remind myself, I have given up on you a long time ago. It may still seem, as if I care about you, but I don’t and – although I have said it many times – it feels so good, to say this once again and to set the record straight.

 

The issue is not – and never was – whether I’m funny or able to entertain you, but that you have been – and probably always will be – a lost cause. Yes, unless you begin to see yourself in that way, you don’t have any sense of reality.

 

Why do you expect me to care about you, if you don’t give a damn about yourself? You have DL and so, there is nothing for you to laugh about, let’s face it. With me, it is an entirely different story. I write or say this, not to talk with or reach out to you, but to express myself. I enjoy myself, without your meaningless, frustrated, dumb opinions.

 

How am I able to accomplish my relentless happiness? Shouldn’t I feel affected by your negativity? You believe I should, but I don’t owe you anything. I’m not against you, but I’m not wasting my humor on you either. This, by the way, is the meaning of being a conservative. Most conservatives are as non-appreciative of my humor as most liberals.

 

Politics isn’t a laughing matter and those who pretend that gas-lighting is funny, are hiding behind their sick jokes, suggesting everything is

hunky-dory. Apparently, you need to suffer some more, before you can acknowledge your need for relief and I am not going to praise you, for what you have been able to endure. Clearly, you have something against me, as I don’t put up with your shit. As a matter of fact, you can’t blame me, because I’m no longer volunteering to participate in this taking-the-blame-game.

 

There are two sides at the end of each tunnel. You have a choice, when this sentence will be finished. No, after the next sentence, actually. Will you laugh, not at me, but at yourself, for this very special occasion, or will you just continue as you have always done, up to now, and make it seem as if I’m not funny enough?   

 

Surrender,

 

No, you don’t have a mind or a soul, which hungers for truth or redemption. Also, it isn’t your pride or your sin, which is troubling you. You need to talk with yourself, instead of with others. And, yes, you need to listen to yourself, instead of to others and be your own authority.

 

You will never experience the true meaning of surrender, unless you recognize and stop your Disembodied Language (DL) and continue with your Embodied Language (EL). Ongoing EL is only possible for those, who surrender to their own intelligence. Everything you have read or heard about surrender was based on DL. Let me go over a couple of meanings of surrender.

 

Surrender is associated with war and giving up resistance to an enemy and submitting to their authority. One easily recognizes involuntariness and compulsion, as the main characteristic of such a surrender. Threatened by violence or death, one capitulates, gives in, concedes or submits. In our usual way of talking, we struggle to dominate each other and get the attention.

 

Those who win the war of words, maintain their power-status by threatening their competitors. This is how people communicate – with DL – in every society, around the world. We haven’t even addressed the enormously important difference between our DL and EL. The opposite of surrender also tells us about DL, as we fight back, resist or try to withstand our adversary. In other words, we argue, quarrel and compete. 

 

Surrender is a concept in spirituality or religion, which – unbeknownst to its submissive believers, because we were unable to identify and stop our DL – has taken the place of our EL. The believer gives up his or her own will and subjects all his or her thoughts, ideas and deeds to the will and teachings of a higher power or deity. Anyone who knows the difference between our DL and EL, will acknowledge, that surrender is always about our coercive, punitive way of talking, DL, which, by means of imaginary meaningless concepts – thoughts or ideas – distracts us from and confuses us about our own experiences.

 

Due to our unconscious DL, we do things, we don’t want to do, because surrender is the willful acceptance and yielding to a dominating force. The famous saying, there are no atheists in foxholes – which, of course, is another reference to war, where soldiers shoot at each other, while they are sitting in a hole in the ground – is an aphorism, which suggests, that times of extreme stress or fear can prompt the believe in a higher power. In such a dangerous situation, in which bullets are flying and death may happen at any moment, soldiers surrender and pray, in the hope to survive this battle.

 

In Christianity, one surrenders one’s own will to god’s will. Some Buddhist', thirteen-in-a-dozen guru stated, there is nothing to understand, but if there is something to understand (?), there is only one thing to understand(!), and that is surrender. The meaning of Islam is submission and believers surrender themselves to Allah. In Hinduism they read the Gita, in which Krishna says: abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender onto me. I shall deliver you from all sinful actions. Do not fear. Nobody was ever told, to surrender to what you want to say to yourself, to listen to what you would like to hear yourself say and to truly be who you want to be with your own happy language.

 

When we engage in ongoing EL, we surrender to the sound of our own wellbeing. We become important to ourselves, by identifying, avoiding and rejecting the DL with others. When we talk with ourselves, we always have EL. If we don't have EL, we don't really speak with ourselves. When we speak out loud with ourselves, we know, we can speak with others in the exact same way, as we speak with ourselves. Since we prefer our EL over our DL, we surrender to the process of overcoming our conditioning history with DL. In our devotion to EL, we discover our Language Enlightenment (LE) and we realize, it is our LE, which makes us surrender ourselves to our EL. Who we are and have always been, is revealed by our surrender to listening to ourselves while we speak.  

 

***Warning:  If we don’t explore the difference between our own DL and EL, we cannot come together as one people. Religiously, politically, culturally or scientifically, sticking to the same narrative, has never brought about any EL. To the contrary, it perpetuated DL and this is what is creating all the chaos, conflicts and problems.

 

You can see my videos and listen to me talking about DL, EL and LE on You Tube. Just type maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw or Maximus Peperkamp. My skypename is limbicease I look forward to talking with anyone who is willing to explore the difference between their DL and EL. Talking with me is about surrender to yourself.