Republic Is Not Democracy,

 

As I have continued to state, in each of my writings as well as in all my You Tube videos, America, the land of the free – individual – is undermined by Disembodied Language (DL), the outdated group-behavior, which goes on unaddressed, on the Left, but also, on the Right.

 

Only with ongoing Embodied Language (EL), in which speakers listen to themselves while they speak, will “1) Life, 2) Liberty and 3) the pursuit of Happiness” – the well-known phrase of the United States Declaration of Independence, which we celebrate on Independence Day, better known as Fourth of July – truly become a reality.

 

America and other so-called free Western Democratic societies have yet to wake up to the immense importance of the difference between our DL and EL, because it is only with EL, we can and we will declare, that these three examples of unalienable rights were not given to all humans by our imaginary creator, but by us, to ourselves, as independent individuals, as we the people.  

 

If Americans – as outdated, fanatic Christians, but also more secular people, on the Right, continue to do – keep insisting, on their belief in some fictitious higher power, they will forsake their chance to be chosen to be in the government, which wasn’t chosen, to protect the rights of superstition or to promote the false notion that government is in favor of Christian religion, but which was chosen, to protect every individual.

 

While it is true, our Founding Fathers, as well as  all the people, involved in the creation of free Western so-called democratic societies, were of Judeo-Christian decent, it is very interesting to note, these presumably sacred principles, in our Declaration of Independence, are not legally binding, but are widely referenced and seen as an inspiration of for the basis of government. In other words, as people inevitably become more secular – which is happening more rapidly, on the Left, than on the Right – there is no longer any shared inspirational basis for government.

 

We must address the great difference between DL and EL, because they map onto Democracy or Republic. In the name of equality, incendiary, activist democrats are increasingly becoming more successful, in weakening the republican customs and institutions. America’s Founders tried to defend our nation from the excesses of democratic majorities. This is where we are today. Alarmingly, on university and colleges – institutions of learning – but also in media, particularly, social media, there is no freedom of speech or even the inspiration of any dialogue, about our different points of view.

 

Few people seem to know, that republicanism or the liberty it makes possible and promotes, is founded in the federalist recognition, that those who are not a majority – individuals, who only speak on their own behalf and engage in EL, are the ultimate minority – make legitimate contributions to the community’s welfare and that preserving these contributions is the hallmark of political justice.

 

“All men are created equal” is foremostly a highly problematic, religious statement in the Declaration of Independence, due to which, currently, egalitarianism, in the name of saving our democracy, undermines the careful balance produced by our mixed republic. It is, of course, inequality, which makes liberty possible, but our unconscious DL, which goes on in every section of our society, undermines our social, familial, psychological or philosophical freedom.

 

Senile Joe Biden and his Left-wing-activists, talk a great deal about protecting democracy, but they zealously, disrespectfully push many things down the throat of the American people. Since only republicans are inclined to inject reason into impassioned debates, only they are open to EL. Moreover, since only republicans resist the relentless demand for more equality, only they are truly in favor of freedom, particularly, the freedom of speech for the individual. Donald Trump is very clear – without any help from Karine Jean-Pierre – about the fact that egalitarianism, which dresses itself in drag, that is, in the garb of democracy, must be opposed, as it is threatening our republic.

 

In my understanding, America was never meant to be a democracy and the republicans should have said so all along. The Left is railing against our institutions – the Supreme Court is under attack – which are safeguards for our individual liberty, and, therefore, anti-democratic. Thomas Jefferson stated the terrifying reality, which is now playing out under the autocratic rule of Joe Biden, “a democracy is nothing more than a mob rule, where 51 percent of the people may take away the rights of the other 49.” Luckily, our anti-democratic institutions, such as the Supreme Court and Electoral College, are not so easily undone by today’s Left-wing activists, but the unaddressed difference between DL and EL, makes that we keep having DL and changing the narrative, to fit with a group, rather than talk as individuals. Simply stated, with DL, the individual is not protected by the government, because the language of the government only references minority or majority groups. Only EL, which is anti-group, can give us our individual protection and real freedom. 

When the Left-wing donors pull the plug on Joe Biden, they should consider getting in touch with me and support me in promoting the importance of the distinction between DL and EL. It will not only be good for Joe Biden, but also for the country. It should be considered an act of belated patriotism. Better late than never and, yes, we still have time to acknowledge, our individual freedom requires our individual language, which is EL. There is no time to lose on a full-blown party revolt, as that always involves more of the same DL. Too much time and energy has been wasted on DL. It is time to forget about democracy and embrace freedom with EL.        

 Biden’s Learning Style = Rock-Bottom,

 

The change from Disembodied Language (DL) to Embodied Language (EL), is a confrontation, not like anything, anyone has ever experienced. We are used to witnessing the confrontations between one person with DL, who fights with another person, who also has DL, but there is never any confrontation between someone with DL and someone with EL, because such confrontation, is a confrontation with ourselves. Moreover, it is - in EL - actually very pleasant, relieving and liberating to be confronted with ourselves. 

 

The so-called confrontation – with DL – with our ourselves, doesn’t and cannot reveal who we are. With DL, we perceive ourselves and each other to be something we are not. In EL, the confrontation with ourselves is a new sense of freedom. And our ongoing EL reveals to us our Language Enlightenment (LE). In other words, once we are able to continue with our EL, we are happily confronted, every day, with the reality, which we create and maintain with our own language. Yes, nobody can take away our own EL, as we keep speaking with ourselves in such a manner, that we want to listen and like to listen, to what we are saying to ourselves.      

 

Confrontation was always wrongly understood in DL, as something that happens between one person and another, but in EL, we finally get to the genuine confrontation with and recognition of our self-nature. LE is the awareness, grounded in ongoing EL, there never was language inside of us, there is no mind or thought. It is a great relief to know, sentences and words do not occur in our brain, but happen only, while we speak, listen, write or read. The overt nature of our EL is entirely different from our common fantasy or rather the unaddressed, ubiquitous, idiotic illusion of covert language, private speech or silent self-talk. The confrontation of this big truth is the inevitable logic or reasoning, the use of our intelligence, with which we translate everything we have come to know with DL, into what it really is, with our ongoing EL.

 

With DL, people always say, confrontation isn’t fun, but it is unavoidable. Presumably, we make many excuses, in order to avoid confrontation. Once we know the gigantic difference between  DL and EL, we find out, the real confrontation – with ourselves – was always avoided with our dissociative DL, but is unavoidable with our EL.

 

Joe Biden’s family, which, primarily, of course, is his ghastly wife, Jill Biden, has decided, the old geezer should stay in the presidential race. It is very clear – ask Karine Jean-Pierre – Joe Biden’s learning style is to hit rock-bottom. Surely, this is true for everyone, who engages in DL. Only if we can truly say, enough is enough, will our DL stop and can we whole-heartedly engage in EL.

 

According to DL, the way of speaking in which we all speak every day, in which we don’t listen to ourselves – but remain busy with making others listen to us or listening to others – we avoid confrontation – with others – out of 1) fear of loss, 2) fear of causing pain, 3) fear of strain or 4) fear of failure. Obviously, it is always fear, which keeps our unintelligent, insensitive, unnatural DL going. It doesn’t matter whether you are the president or someone unimportant, we all engage, every day, in DL, in which we fear to hear, what we would say, to ourselves, in our own words, about what is going on in our lives.  

 

People with DL, treat fear as a great motivator, because everyone wants to naturally avoid any kind of pain. Our EL, on the other hand, doesn’t have anything to do with fear. EL only happens in the absence of aversive stimuli. The flip side of avoiding pain, is seeking pleasure, but our DL is – Karine Jean-Pierre clearly doesn't about it – against seeking pleasure. In DL, you are not allowed to seek pleasure while we speak, let alone, express it, hear it, enjoy it or understand it. Confrontations with who we are, when there are no problems, are made impossible, when our dumb DL continues.

 

Certainly, once we know how to have ongoing EL, we are not interested in the confrontations, people keep having with each other in DL. Our notion of confrontation isn’t about others, but about ourselves. We accept the challenge, to step out of our history of conditioning with DL, as often as it is needed. With EL, we are realistic about the possibility that our DL will reappear, because everyone, everywhere, engages in it.

 

All our confrontations, arguments, conflicts and wars, have resulted in the continuation of our DL, which was never properly addressed with our EL. I can write about it in this way, as my EL allows me to express the confrontation in DL, which always escalates into the brutality, violence, chaos and destruction. Joe Biden stays in the race, and he is going to drag the whole country with him into even bigger chaos, than he has already created.          

 

 You Are Joe Biden,

 

When you finally begin to speak with yourself and listen to your voice, your obsession with power will fall apart. Your ambition to dominate others prevented you from recognizing that you engage, almost permanently, in Disembodied Language (DL), in which language takes you further and further away from yourself. Now, with your ongoing Embodied Language (EL), in which you continue to listen to yourself while you speak, you no longer hide behind the mask, which you were wearing because of how you sounded. Yes, with EL, you sound very different.  

 

When it comes to your DL, you are as stubborn as Joe Biden – or as Karine Jean-Pierre, who told us repeatedly, the president has been very clear – because, behind the façade of your DL, you feel humiliated and devoid of confidence. Stepping down from your long, tragic history of conditioning with DL is as hard as stepping down from the presidency. Nobody needs to tell you it is difficult, necessary and inevitable, as EL is undeniably clear. You know, it could only occur, after you have stopped your own DL.

 

Neither Jill Biden, Hunter Biden, the democrats or the media, are to be blamed for the obvious fact, that Joe Biden – like everyone else, also people on the right, for that matter – keeps engaging in DL. Nobody is going to force anyone, to stop their DL, as we all can only do this ourselves. This change is about our individual freedom. Our power is irrelevant. We either live a meaningful life with ongoing EL or we live a meaningless life with unconscious DL.

 

We are all anxiously trying to stay in the race for power with our DL and only when we switch to EL, do we step down from our delusional way of dealing with language, which made us believe in inner language, our so-called mind. The real let-go of power, is the realization, there never were any words or thoughts inside of us. Due to our automatic involvement in DL, we have been merely imagining about this mental stuff, which doesn’t exist. Our insensitive way of talking, DL, caused the psychosis of hearing our inner voice.  

 

Joe Biden’s terrible performance at the debate with Donald Trump is not the real issue, but the fact, that we were, as a country, and, perhaps, as the whole of mankind, for a brief moment – like when we were watching the solar eclipse – on the same page. What we were watching and hearing, was what happens, when our outdated effortful DL comes to its abrupt end. Joe Biden’s meandering, incoherent speech and difficult to understand mumbling, clearly tells him – and let’s check in with his mouthy press-secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, to get absolutely clear about this – to give it up. Yes, if Joe Biden steps down from the being the celebrated candidate for the democratic party, it will be because he, for once in his life, decided himself.

 

Regardless of whether Joe Biden is going to step down, I want to make a prediction. If it happens – which is, at this point very likely – I predict, he will experience a remarkable recovery, because he would be able to have energizing EL instead of energy-draining DL. Moreover, if Joe Biden does, what anyone will have to do, when they can no longer continue with their DL-bullshit, he doesn’t do it for his country, but for himself. With EL, we don’t ask, but we simply say to ourselves, in clear and simple words, what we can do for ourselves, once we have stopped being busy with others. In effect, it is not what Joe Biden can do for his country, but what he can do for himself, which, might actually make him the biggest future advocate for EL. Thus, it all ends well, as the world is saved from Joe Biden.

 

If Joe Biden decides a change of course, he will be a blessing to his family and to America. I am very grateful to Karine Jean-Pierre for being so clear and for clarifying that Joe Biden has been very clear from the very beginning. What more can we - the people - ask for? It can’t get any clearer than that. This is the clarity, which we all so badly need. Those who still make it seem as if things aren’t clear, don’t know what they are talking about. It should be stated, for clarity’s sake, that people just don’t see what they are seeing, they don’t hear what they are hearing, they don’t know what they say they know and, actually, they are not, who they believe to be.

 

Yes, it is a real problem, that with DL, nothing is what it appears to be. Unfortunately - or fortunately, depending on how you see it - we cannot spin our way out of our usual DL. I’ve heard, I don’t know if it is just gossip, the democratic party came up with a new catchy acronym, CRAZY, for the new candidate. It stands for Clarity, Reality, Assumption, Zoo and, Yes, it is a total mess. The vice president said in one of her lucid moments: the only way forward, is by being here, because if we miss this moment, we are going nowhere. She is right. Going forward requires, we must be where we are and start there. Who better to guide us through these democratic dark times than Kamala Harris? She boldly took the lead, by saying: we are no longer where we have been and we have no other option, than staying with the facts, as we know them. We can count on the great clarity of Kamala Harris, who is clear about the need for clarity itself, which is sadly mostly overlooked by everyone, who isn’t as clear as she is. This is where Gavin Newsom comes in, as he can also really tell us as it is.

 

According to Gavin Newsome – who, as we all know, has solved the homeless crisis, by simply saying, that he owns it – people on the left are clear, but people on the right are unclear. Only the left can set the record straight. Obviously, crooked isn’t straight, but saying so, is the first step in this process of straightening the truth. It isn’t such a big stretch to acknowledge, that the truth needs to be stretched, otherwise it will no longer be accepted as true. Researchers have found ample evidence of this everywhere they looked. For the most part, they didn’t even need to look, because nowadays made-up truth is seen as the very essence of individualism and this is what the future of our nation is going to be like, with Californian-La-La-Land-Philosophy.

 

Right-wing extremists have to be silenced, for left-wing clarity to prevail. Therefore, freedom of speech must, at all cost, be abolished and anyone opposing this new-age of clarity shall be judged by a committee of card-readers, psychics and astrologers. We need these truth-tellers, as we have completely lost touch with ourselves, being endlessly busy with this bottomless pit called humanity. Our concern with world-peace is going to pay off with clarity, that is provided by those who say they have it. Yes, it is evident, only those, who say they are clear, are clear. It should be accepted and understood, as the ultimate truth, only our way of talking gives us to the clarity, we wished to have. It is not the intensity of our longing, but it is the feedback, we receive by our talking, which is making it possible for us to really listen. That being said, communication is no longer necessary, as what is said doesn’t need to be listened to by others, because we listen to ourselves in EL.            

 Unscripted Versus Scripted Speech,

 

Yesterday, in the revealing debate with Donald Trump, Joe Biden was on his own, without a teleprompter – to tell him what to say – and the whole nation has witnessed, that the man, he really is, failed dismally. A seemingly different, articulate Joe Biden was at a rally, today, where he enthusiastically read from a teleprompter. It is now clearer than ever before – thanks to Karine Jean-Pierre, who is so good at clarifying that the president has been very clear – that scripted Joe Biden is a completely different Joe Biden, than the unscripted Joe Biden, because we have all seen and heard, Joe Biden without a script, is like the emperor without any clothes. 

What we are witnessing here, is the difference between unscripted and scripted speech, which I call Embodied Language (EL) and Disembodied Language (DL). In the former, the speaker is on his own, which means, we can all hear, who he really is, naturally, but in the latter, the speaker is a phony, fabricated, robot, who acts from a script. This is the enormous difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden: Donald Trump is natural, while Joe Biden – like Barack Obama – is a cheap-fake. Most importantly, these two candidates represent the quintessential issue of our time: the difference between our EL and DL. Although it has ruled every society since humans became verbal, DL is, whether we acknowledge it or not, on its deathbed, as it isn’t really speech. In DL, speakers pretend to speak, and listeners pretend to listen, but in EL, speakers really speak, and listeners really listen. The issue is not whether Joe Biden has dementia or is unfit for office, but the issue is DL versus EL.   

 

 

To be sure, scripted refers to a presentation or performance, where the dialogue, actions or sequences are prearranged and written down. Unscripted, however, implies spontaneity, where dialogue and events occur naturally or are improvised. In other words, scripted is based on written language, whereas unscripted is based on spoken language. Stated differently, in scripted speech, written speech is considered to be more important than spoken speech or to put it precisely, the false assumption that written speech is more important spoken speech, is the reason why DL is occurring everywhere twenty-four-seven.

 

Another consequential aspect of our common, unconscious DL is, that because it is scripted speech, we are never in the here and now and our listening and understanding, only involves the ‘listening’, to what we are supposed to hear, and things are only ‘understood’ in the way a topic was presented. Surely, DL is always about indoctrination, whereas EL is about freedom. Of course, in scripted performances – which, in my opinion, shouldn’t be considered speech – actors rehearse lines, written by someone else, but in unscripted settings, individuals speak and react in real time, without any prior planning. Joe Biden was a full week in hiding, while being prepared for this so-called debate. Every dumb dull thing he managed to say wasn’t his own.

 

Peculiarly, democrats, progressives, liberals or Left-wingers, who, presumably, are the protectors of democracy and, who, therefore, are into helping - which is, of course, gas-lighting - their fellow men, insist on scripted, acted and phony speech, while conservatives, republicans and Right-wingers, are more into actually saying it as it is and more likely to have EL. There is no mystery there, because the former is into the outdated group-behavior, which I call DL, while the latter is into freedom of the individual, which requires responsibility, accountability, independence and intelligence. So, what we are witnessing here, is not communist/socialist/Marxist ideology versus republican/conservative/capitalist ideology, but this is a compare & contrast between our DL and EL.  

 

Writing a speech is a process, which, obviously, excludes the audience, but delivering a speech involves and incorporates the audience in the experience. However, it is due to DL, that we overemphasize the presumed importance of speeches, which are, no matter how you want to put it, monologues. If we are going to have EL, there will be no more speeches by anyone, as we are truly engaging in dialogue. If we are going to be able to have EL, it will be because we have put the monologues of DL to an end. In DL, we speak at each other, but in EL we speak with each other and speakers can become listeners and listeners become speakers, at any time, without any rules, without any hierarchy of who is more or less important than others.  

 

The difference between DL and EL is critical, because we are, naturally, more interested in listening to speakers, who seem to, or who actually do, demonstrate a sincere interest in their audience. In DL, speakers are only able to create the impression, that they are interested in their audience, but in EL, speakers are their own audience first, and consequently, perceive themselves, as their audience perceives them. When we speak spontaneously, with authentic conviction and awareness – that is, when we engage in EL – it signals, we have something to say, something we feel strongly about, we are willing to speak about and truly stand for. A real leader is someone, who is capable of speaking in an unscripted manner.

 

Someone, who has unscripted speech isn’t into dominating, manipulating, exploiting, coercing, distracting or humiliating others, as he or she is always listening to him or herself while he or she speaks. Thus, in unscripted speech or in EL, we master our speech, and we don't want or tolerate any followers, because everyone is their own master during EL. As previously stated, EL is the language of the free individual, while our usual DL, is the language of the oppressive collective. Unless people – who consider themselves to be free – acquire EL, they aren’t free and they are endlessly trying, in vain, to address our DL with DL.    

 

I am in favor of Donald Trump, and I am against Joe Biden, because funny, upbeat Donald Trump engages and inspires his audience, while boring Joe Biden is trying to be perceived as a fantastic speaker, with his propagandistic speech, which was written for him, not even by him. Joe Biden desperately, pathetically, demandingly, and of course, negatively, wants to impress or convince his audience, while Donald Trump speaks freely, creatively and energetically. I use the difference between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, to point out the immense difference between our DL and EL.  

 

Joe Biden’s tiring, unnatural voice, is a voice of the past. He is the embodiment of DL, which is no longer valid. DL is group-behavior, while EL is individual behavior. Joe Biden comes across like the annoying voice on a robocall, intrusive, seemingly friendly, but noticeably stilted and artificial. He is so eager to be right and to get the audience’s approval, that he doesn’t have the time, to process what is happening while he speaks. With Donald Trump, however, you can clearly see and hear, how he constantly, enjoys processes and interprets his audience response.         

 Good Bye,

 

Interestingly, on the evening of old, disgusting, fool Joe Biden completely losing the debate to Donald Trump, it has now become crystal clear to me, why I chose not to continue my skype conversations with my former Dutch friend AnnaMieke. Although I feel grateful for having been able to enjoy my Embodied Language (EL) and my Language Enlightenment (LE), with her, I read in her writing today, that she has not just turned against me, but she has, actually, always, secretively, been against me. AnnaMieke is a classic example of a bleeding-heart liberal, who supposedly only wants to feel good, but who is turned off by the unavoidable rational consequences of her own EL.

 

While I have abundantly endorsed AnnaMieke in the past, in many of my writings and on my You Tube videos, I hereby completely withdraw my support for her. Anyone, who claims to be able to talk about EL – which is called Luisterend Spreken in the Netherlands – is full of shit for not being open and square with me. While I have always been the one, who, out of necessity, has stopped any conversation with anyone, who misjudged my passion for EL, for the Disembodied Language (DL), which I abhor, I now reject AnnaMieke, as well as so many others, as they wish to continue with mushy, esoteric, blablabla.   

 

As I have repeatedly stated, the DL/EL distinction touches every aspect of our lives, including politics. Since I have immigrated to the United States in 1999, I have made the irrefutable link between, on the one hand, DL-and-the-Left, and, on the other hand, EL-and-the-Right. It is absolutely clear to me, that the continuation of DL, deals with Left-wing politics, while freedom-loving Right-wingers are in principle, more open to EL than people on the Left. Since I used to be very liberal myself in the past, it has been a real journey for me to acknowledge this, but America has finally opened my eyes politically.  

 

You can hear my songs and talks on:

You Tube: Maximus Peperkamp

You Tube: maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw

 

If you wish to talk with me, you can reach me:

Skype: limbicease

Email: mpeperkamp@sbcglobal.net

Continuation Humor,

 

Why laugh and then stop again? Why not continue? Who cares about one miserly joke? So what, you told or heard a couple of smartass jokes? After some so-called fun, we are back to the reality again, from which we have escaped and which has only gotten worse. If we can’t keep laughing, we might as well not laugh at all. Why wet our appetite, but never satisfy our unfulfilled need for continuation humor, which would finally have us laugh until we’ve had enough? With Disembodied Language (DL) we never truly laugh to our heart’s content.

 

The etymology of continuation is fascinatating. https://www.etymonline.com/word/continuation Continuation is the act or fact of continuing or prolonging, an extension in time or space. It derives from the Latin word continuationem (normative continuatio), a following of one thing after another, noun of action from past-participle stem of continuare, to join together, connect; make or be continuous, from continere (instransitive), to be uninterrupted, literally, to hang together or contain. To restrain (someone), control (oneself), behave (in a certain way) from Old French contein-, tonic stem of contenir, from Latin continere (transitive) to hold together, enclose, from con (together) + tenere (to hold, from root, ten, to stretch). Surprisingly, the ancient meaning of continuation seems to refer to our Embodied Langauge (EL).

 

Both the embodiment as well as the furtherance of our humor, are captured in one beautiful word. Our laughter will be continuous, when we can relax and experience our body as an extension in time and space. Continuation humor becomes possible, because we are no longer concerned with merely one event, one joke or a couple of jokes, but with an uninterrupted stream of humor, in which our EL will string together, and, therefore, contain our fun. Of course, we also need to control or contain ourselves and behave in a certain way; to survive and so, continuation humor is about self-regulation.

 

Certainly, our continuation humor, which requires our ongoing EL, is a continuation to our Language Enlightenment (LE). Every time we have some EL, we experience our LE, which is apparent whenever our EL is happening. Naturally, our EL only always happens when our DL has been stopped, therefore, our continuation humor is about the absence or the disappearance of our DL. Our DL – which includes our fantasy of inner language or mind – dissolves the moment, we listen to ourselves, while we speak, as we speak, in order to be able to hear ourselves.

 

Our continuation humor is a reliable result of our ability to speak out loud with ourselves, in precisely such a manner, that we enjoy the sound of our own voice. Thus, our ongoing EL, which I have previously also described as the language which creates space, is about a tangible awareness of our own vibration or our energy, the embodied sound we produce and experience. In other words, it is utmost sensitivity and refinement, that makes our continuation humor possible. Stated differently, unlike the fake-humor, we are used to with DL – in which one outrageous, overwhelming, coercive thing is said after another, which seems to suggest a sense of losing control – the continuous humor of EL is actually about self-control.

 

The continuation of our EL is such a delightful and refreshing thing, as it involves the expression of our continuation humor. We really need this new kind of humor to be able to withstand the constant pull of DL, which is going on everywhere around us. One of the important ways in which we begin to notice, our EL has stopped, and that we are caught up again in our conditioning history with DL, is that we are no longer having any fun. There is an enormous taboo on enjoying ourselves with our own language. In the lame humor of DL, it is always about the demanding language of others, but in EL, we laugh about our own language, as this produces continuous humor.

 

Since our continuous humor goes hand in hand with our ongoing EL, it is clear, our continuous humor is just another word for our LE, our intelligence or our ability to simply be ourselves with our language. The connectivity and inclusiveness of EL is phenomenal, whereas DL makes us feel scattered, depleted and all over the place. Certainly, continuous humor is an accumulative process, in which we contain as much energy as we are able to hold together, before we release it with our EL. Periods of silence, created by our EL – our own language – liberate us from our imaginary mind and so-called thoughts and from being constantly busy with the language of others, which is DL.

 

Our continuation humor, with our ongoing EL is an upward, positive, energizing continuation, but our unintelligent, boring, brutal humor, produced by our DL is clearly a downward, negative, energy-draining continuation. With DL we praise the latter, but with EL, we acquire the former, as we can recognize the devastating detrimental effects of getting humor so incredibly wrong. Yes, with our unconscious DL, we have always laughed for the wrong reason and that is why there was basically never any continuation of our laughter. If there was any laughter at all, it was gone before we could even enjoy it. The laughter of our DL has cost us enormously, as it always meant the promotion of the continuation of our problematic DL. In continuation humor we laugh for the right reasons.             

 Mankind Humor,

 

We haven’t heard about the universal humor, which is addressed in this writing, because our common Disembodied Language (DL) simply couldn’t produce it. People all across the world are into nonsensical transcendental meditation or other world-wide religious fantasies, but not into transcendental humor, as it doesn’t seem to be important enough to anyone to laugh. It is also often repeated, that music is the universal language, but, to my knowledge, nobody has ever spoken about our dire need for cross-cultural humor.

 

Although it occurs in every society, around the world, DL has never been properly addressed. Surely, DL is the most difficult of all problems facing mankind. While everyone seems to agree that we should all, day in day out, engage in unintelligent DL, mankind has yet to wake up to the fact, that not listening to ourselves while we speak, is problematic, as it prevents laughter. Of course, we can and should listen to ourselves, while we speak, so we are able to engage in Embodied Language (EL) and acquire mankind humor, that will save us from immanent doom.

 

All human societies have language, and, in every civilization, people communicate a full range of experiences, including laughter. However, there is real and phony communication around the world, but we have never acknowledged the great difference between our DL and our EL, because everywhere – in societies that are governed by autocratic governments, but also in western democratic free societies – DL dominates. As a result, mankind is still busy with many wars and problems, as mankind humor is still unknown.  

 

Certainly, mankind humor, which needs ongoing EL, is the solution to all our repetitive problems, which are caused and maintained by our DL. If we can stop our DL and have EL, we are happy and free and both happiness and freedom are the ultimate goals for all of mankind. Moreover, the notion, that each person is an end in him or herself, only applies to EL, because in our usual, superficial DL, we only pay lip-service to such a lofty moral value. How can we recognize and honor the individuality and autonomy of others, if our own DL prevents us from being aware about our own uniqueness and freedom? With DL, no one can ever be an end to themselves, as their language prevents them from making their own choices and leading their own life.

 

In their habitual way of talking, human beings, around the world, attempt to use their fellow men as a means to their end. In effect, in DL, we try to dominate, force, intimidate, humiliate, exploit, distract or confuse others and in doing so, our unconscious use of our language elicits negative emotions, which are not conducive to laughter. Only EL elicits positive emotions, but since we are unknowingly trapped by our habit, we pretend as if our DL can elicit positivity. This ethnocentric, cultural-specific humor obviously is the big stand in the way for mankind humor.

 

We have – with our DL – prevented ourselves and each other from having mankind humor, because we were told to do as the Romans do, although we have, most likely, never really been in Rome. While our language is believed to have evolved at the same time, as our species, Homo Sapience, arose in Africa between 160.000 and 200.000 years ago, nothing has changed about our fear-based, primitive use of language, in which other-listening takes president over our ability to talk with and peacefully, joyfully, laughingly listen to ourselves.

 

Scientists – who, just like everyone else, mainly, unconsciously, engage in DL, every boring day – agree that laughter plays a crucial role in every culture around the world. Not surprisingly, they are still in the dark about why laughter exists. Laughter is undeniably a social phenomenon, since people laugh 30 times more together, in a group, than alone, but, since nobody has ever explored – as I have done – what humor is like with ongoing EL, the function of laughter as a form of communication remains mysterious. To someone like me, who has ongoing EL, there is nothing mysterious about laughter. Laughter – in EL – signifies we are experiencing, enjoying, our Language Enlightenment (LE), because we are, at long last, using our language effectively.  

 

Spontaneous laughter, which is unintentionally triggered by conversations or events, emerges in the first few months of life, even in children who are deaf or blind. Laughter not only transcends human cultural boundaries, but also species boundaries, too; it is present in similar form in great apes. Naturally, the principal function of laughter is survival, that is, creation and deepening of social bonds. We also laugh, when we are at ease and happy. If we all have EL, we experience mankind humor.

 

We can only understand mankind humor with our ongoing EL, which makes us acknowledge that our common sense is essential for our survival. With DL, we lack this common sense. Surely, our survival is at stake, if we don’t stop our DL. DL is no longer working as it used to, in times, in which our institutions of authority were trusted and supported by people. We are now experiencing the final days of our DL, but we don’t know this yet. Only mankind humor can help us to accept this reality, which challenges us to develop our EL.  

 

The outcome of the debate, which is going to take place this week between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, will be determined by who is able to properly address the great importance of mankind humor. I have, so far, not been able to laugh even once about Joe Biden, but, luckily, Donald Trump makes me laugh all the time. The future of America, but also of mankind is at stake and I am ready for a good doses of mankind humor. If all of mankind laughs, we are really moving forward.