Exorcising Evil,

 

During Disembodied Language (DL) – which is our usual way of speaking – we are endlessly working on averting some evil without noticing it. In other words, we always find ourselves in a threatening environment in our daily conversations and we are still unable to change the situation, in which we communicate, in such a way that there is no longer any fear. This change can only be achieved if we, as speakers, continue to listen to ourselves while speaking. This listening to ourselves while we are speaking stops our DL, allowing Embodied Language (EL) to take place. There is no evil to exorcize in EL, because evil has been resolved.

 

Over the centuries, people have done all kinds of weird things to avert evil, so to speak. All these  superstitious rituals have, of course, not helped at all. People are as evil as they have always been. It is therefore an indisputable fact that DL is happening everywhere and we hear almost nothing about EL.

 

A conversation that would take place because of speakers who, while speaking, continue to listen to themselves, is something that has never received attention and so EL is something we know nothing about. However, this does not mean we don’t want EL, but it means, we have no understanding of the difference between being polite, being kind, showing respect, having reverence or awe and EL. We cannot have EL if continue to stupidly exercise good manners. The evil that has never been mentioned, let alone thoroughly investigated, is the DL speaker – and, that is, you! It is your way of speaking, which creates the chaos and conflict in this world, not anyone's blissful EL.     

  

Ceremonial speaking, during a wedding, a baptism, a funeral or an official swearing-in, is the only ritual way in which we, due to our unconscious, deceptive, coercive, energy-draining, problematic, unnatural DL, can still pay attention to something together. Only because something is literally imposed on us, are we able to participate briefly together, for form, for good measure, from the old tradition, in a predictable, repetitive event.

 

It doesn't matter, whether people

 are believers or non-believers, 

because they are all - whether 

they admit it or not, because

 of their DL, that has never

 been mentioned or examined 

before - engaged in hoky-poky

 smoke-screen nonsense, 

which they firmly believe 

protects them from difficult

 or evil things in life. In EL, 

however, we – as individuals –

 are without evil, as we know

 all evil is in DL and all

exorcism of evil only 

happens with DL. In DL, 

we believe, we can eradicate

 evil with our ritualistic 

empty words, but this is

 not true. Evil behavior 

is caused and perpetuated

 by DL. In EL, in which 

we finally, as speakers, 

listen to ourselves, evil 

has already been eradicated,

 since DL has ceased. 

As a result, in realistic

 EL, we are no longer 

concerned with childish 

fantasies about eradicating evil.

 

Naturally, only with EL is it possible to have the courage and the clarity, to say the difference between good and bad. With DL, many people - Left-wing protesters, who continue to support Hamas, who are against Israel, who are also anti-America, who still pretend, with their symbolic, horrible, stupid, ritualistic screams, they can see something good in evil, in the horrific killing, raping, mutilation of innocent people – are claiming to support the good cause, supposedly, to liberate Gaza, while supporting the enemies of all Western Democratic countries. Netanyahu said it very clearly, today in his powerful speech before the US Congress - in which many anti-America, cowardly, Left-wing politicians, including Kamala Harris, refused to participate - this is not about a clash between two different cultures, but it is about the inevitable confrontation between barbarism and civilization.

 

After praising the heroic behavior of some of his excellent soldiers, Netanyahu explained again, that all those idiots, who want to protest, in support of Hamas, do not even recognize, that Iran is bringing the Islamic Revolution to the whole world. Nothing will be left of their freedom to demonstrate, once the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – which was established after WWII, to prevent a recurrence – has completely turned into an Islamic Sharia court, which jettisons Israel's survival. Also, the United Nations (UN) has turned anti-Israel and antisemitic and now does the bidding of the evil called political Islam.      

I have never been involved in a demonstration myself, because I always hated it. It strikes me that Left-wing groups are always demonstrating and always starting riots, but that there are hardly any Right-wing demonstrations. I actually believe every demonstration is not a sign of freedom, but an outdated, old-fashioned, superstitious ritual, supposedly, to do something about the evil in the world. However, those who really do something, to fight Hamas, are those brave Israeli soldiers, who give their lives to free those terrified hostages.

 

With my EL, I feel more related to a soldier and Right-wing politics, than to a protester and Left-wing politics. I know, I owe my freedom to people who have gone before me, who ensured that there are societies, in which an individual like me could develop. I consider myself the fortunate product of the entire history of mankind, and do not want the individual-crushing evil, group-behavior, which still is propagated by our DL, in the name of Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Fascism, Islamism and Jihadism, to win from EL. I will do everything in my ability to have EL. That is why I stand with all those, who fearlessly, unashamedly and unscathed fight for real freedom. They may lose a leg, an arm or an eye or even their life, but they are the protectors of my life with EL.

 

When we are finally done with our unconscious, forceful, unwilling participation in DL, which even goes on in the name of Democracy, we no longer have to engage in any meaningless rituals. Evil is only seen for what it is, if we realize, our normal way of speaking – DL – causes and maintains all evil behavior and that behavioral change will only take place, if we change our approach to language.

 

If we have ongoing EL, instead of more of the same DL, we will be able to get rid of the bad behavior that was created and maintained by our automatic DL. Good is not bad, high is not low and EL is very different from DL. Evil can never be defined with our common DL, because DL itself is evil, which we can only speak clearly about with EL. Evil is not a complex concept, but a dissociative way of talking, in which we are not – and cannot be – in touch with ourselves, because we do not listen to ourselves. We want others to listen to us or we listen to others, to authority outside ourselves, but we don’t listen to ourselves. This is where all human misery comes from. We do not renounce evil in EL, because in EL, we are no longer evil. EL is not some meaningless ritual.  

 

You can hear me read this writing – later today – on my You Tube channel maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw

 Het Kwaad Bezweren,

 

Tijdens Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) – gedurende onze gebruikelijke wijze van praten – zijn wij eindeloos ongemerkt bezig met het bezweren van een of ander kwaad. Anders gezegd, wij bevinden ons, in onze dagelijkse gesprekken, in een dreigende omgeving en wij zijn tot dusver nog steeds niet in staat, om de situatie waarin wij communiceren zodanig te veranderen, dat er geen enkele sprake meer is van angst. Deze verandering kan alleen worden bewerkstelligd indien wij, als spreker, tijdens het spreken naar onszelf blijven luisteren. Dit Luisterend Spreken stopt onze OT, waardoor Belichaamde Taal (BT) kan plaatsvinden. Er is in BT geen kwaad, om te bezweren, want het kwaad is met BT opgelost.

 

Mensen hebben door de eeuwen heen van alles gedaan, om zogezegd het kwaad te bezweren. Allerlei achterlijke bijgeloven hebben natuurlijk helemaal niets geholpen en mensen zijn net zo kwaadaardig, als dat ze altijd geweest zijn. Het is daarom een onomstotelijk feit, dat OT overal gaande is en dat wij over BT bijna niets horen. Een gesprek, dat plaats vindt vanwege sprekers, die, tijdens het spreken, naar zichzelf blijven luisteren, is iets, dat nog nooit aandacht heeft gekregen en dus is BT iets waar wij niets vanaf weten. Dit wil echter niet zeggen, dat wij geen BT zouden willen hebben, maar het betekent, dat wij geen begrip hebben van het verschil tussen beleefd doen, aardig zijn, respect tonen, eerbied hebben of ontzag hebben en BT. Wij kunnen geen BT hebben, zolang wij nog bezig blijven met het stomme bezweren van het nog nooit eerder benoemde kwaad: de OT-spreker - jij dus!    

 

Het zogenaamde ceremoniele spreken, tijdens een trouwerij, een doop plechtigheid, een begravenis of een officieele beediging, is de enige rituele manier, waarop wij, tijdens onbewuste, problematische, unnatuurlijke OT, nog gezamelijk ergens aandacht voor kunnen opbrengen. Alleen doordat ons letterlijk iets wordt opgelegd, zijn wij enigszins in staat, om, zogenaamd, voor de vorm, voor de goeie orde, vanuit de oude traditie, eventjes samen deel te nemen, aan een vaak herhaald evenement.

 

Het maakt geen ene moer uit, of mensen nou gelovig of ongelovig zijn, want ze zijn allemaal – of ze het nou toegeven of niet, vanwege hun nog nooit eerder benoemde en onderzochtte OT – bezig met bijgelovige rituelen, waarvan ze heilig geloven, dat dit hen beschermt tegen moeilijke of kwaadaardige zaken in het leven. In BT, weten wij – als individu – van de prins geen kwaad en al het zogenaamde bezweren van het kwaad gebeurt alleen maar in OT. In OT geloven wij, dat wij met onze klink-klare, ritueele, onzin het kwaad zouden kunnen uitbannen, maar dit is niet waar. Al het kwaadaardige gedrag wordt veroorzaakt en in stand gehouden door OT. Het mooie is, dat in BT, waarin wij eindelijk, als spreker, naar onszelf luisteren, het kwaad al is uitgebannen, omdat onze OT is opgehouden. Daardoor zijn wij in BT nooit meer bezig met fantasien over het uitbannen van het kwaad.

 

Uiteraard is er het alleen met BT mogelijk, om de moed en de helderheid te hebben, die het verschil tussen goed en slecht weergeeft. Met OT blijven veel mensen – Linkse protesters, die Hamas blijven steunen, die tegen Israel zijn, die eveneens anti-Amerika zijn, die nog steeds doen alsof zij met hun symbolische, afgrijzelijke, domme, rituele geschreeuw, iets goeds weten te ontwaren, in het kwaad – beweren dat zij de goede zaak ondersteunen, terwijl zij echter hun support geven aan de vijanden van alle Westers Democratische landen. Netanyahu zei het heel duidelijk, vandaag in zijn intense speech, voor de US Congress – waaraan vele, anti-Amerika, laf-hartige, Linkse politici, waaronder Kamala Harris, weigerden deel te nemen – het gaat hier niet om een botsing tussen twee verschillende culturen, maar het gaat om de onvermijdelijke confrontatie tussen barbarisme en beschaving.

 

Nadat hij het helden gedrag van een aantal van zijn soldaten had geprezen, legde Netanyahu het nog eens goed uit, dat al die idioten, die voor Hamas willen protesteren, niet erkennen, dat Iran, de Islamtische Revolutie naar de hele wereld aan het brengen is en dat er van hun vrijheid, om te kunnen demonstreren, niets over zal blijven, zodra de International Court of Justice (ICJ) – die notabene was opgericht, na WOII, om herhaling te voorkomen – volledig zal zijn veranderd in een Islamitisch Sharia-court, die het voortbestaan van Israel overboord zet.  

 

Ik ben zelf nooit bij een demonstratie betrokken geweest, omdat ik er altijd een afkeer van had. Het valt mij op dat Linkse groeperingen altijd aan het demonstreren zijn en altijd rellen aan het schoppen zijn, maar dat er van Rechtse demonstraties eigenlijk nauwelijks sprake is. Ik vind iedere demonstratie eigenlijk absoluut geen teken van vrijheid, maar een achterhaald, ouderwets, bijgelovig ritueel, om, zogenaamd, iets te doen aan het kwaad in de wereld. Zij die echter echt iets doen, om Hamas te bestrijden, dat zijn die moedige Israelische soldaten, die hun leven geven, om die gijzelaars te bevrijden.

 

Ik voel mij met mijn BT, meer verwant met een soldaat en met Rechtse politiek, dan met een protester en Linkse politiek. Ik weet, dat ik mijn vrijheid te danken heb aan mensen, die mij zijn voorgegaan en die ervoor hebben gezorgd, dat er maatschappijen zijn waarin het individu zich kan ontplooien. Ik ben het produkt van de hele geschiedenis van de mensheid en wil niet, dat het individu-vermorzelende groeps-gedrag, dat nog steeds door OT, Socialisme, Communisme, Marxisme, Fascisme, Islamisme en Jihadisme wordt gepropageerd, het wint van BT. Daarom sta ik met allen, die onbevreesd, onbeschaamd en ongedeerd strijden voor werkelijke vrijheid.   

 

Als we eindelijk klaar zijn met onze onbewuste deelname aan OT, dan hoeven wij ons niet meer met zinloze rituelen bezig te houden. Het kwaad wordt pas gezien voor wat het is, als wij  beseffen, dat onze normale wijze van spreken – OT – al ons kwalijke gedrag veroorzaakt en dat gedrags-verandering alleen kan plaatsvinden, indien wij onze omgang met taal veranderen.

 

Als wij BT, in plaats van OT, gaan hebben, dan pas gaan wij ons ontdoen van het wan-gedrag, dat door automatische OT werd gecreerd en in stand werd gehouden. Goed is niet slecht, hoog is niet laag en BT is iets heel anders dan OT. Het kwaad is met OT nooit te definieeren, omdat OT zelf het kwaad is, waar wij alleen helder met BT over kunnen spreken. Kwaad is geen complex begrip, maar een manier van praten, waarin wij niet in contact zijn met onszelf, omdat wij niet naar onszelf luisteren. Wij willen dat anderen naar ons luisteren of we luisteren naar anderen, maar niet naar onszelf. Hier komt alle ellende uit voort. We zweren het kwaad niet af, als we BT hebben, want we zijn dan niet meer kwaad.  

Je kunt me dit schrijven horen voorlezen op mijn You Tube kanaal maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw   

 When,

 

When you speak, there is no you, who speaks, but there is only speaking. When you speak about your so-called experience, there is no you, who speaks and you, who experiences, but there is only your expressed experience. When your language doesn’t match with your experience, it appears, as if there is a difference between your language and your experience, but your language expresses exactly, the experience of your confusion, distraction or feeling disconnected, troubled and conflicted.

 

When your language expresses your experience correctly, your language and your experience will dissolve, while you speak, but when your language incorrectly expresses your experience, you can’t help, but repeat your experience and your language, until they match. When you have said, what you are able to say, there is nothing anymore to say. Then, you will say things, you didn’t believe you were capable of saying. You use your language correctly when you speak without fear. To speak without fear, you must begin, to speak with fear and then, let yourself know, what it is like, to speak without fear.   

 

When feel you get energy, because someone says something, this indicates, it is important to you, but when you start to get tired of listening to what someone is saying, it doesn’t matter to you. The same rule applies, when you listen to yourself. When what you say to yourself gives you energy, you should definitely continue to explore it to it fullest, but when what you say to yourself sucks, you should stop it, immediately.

 

When you feel energized, by what someone is saying, it may be Embodied Language (EL), but it only is EL, if it is something you have first said to yourself and have heard yourself say. Thus, when you hear someone sounds like you, when you have EL – alone, with yourself – only then, do you know for sure, you are having EL with someone else. Certainly, EL with someone else is an event, which happens very rarely. Quite likely, you mistake your Disembodied Language (DL) for EL, as you hope to have EL with others.

 

When you have EL, you have already stopped your DL. The big challenge is to stop your DL, not to have EL. You can only have EL when your DL has been stopped. Everyone, unconsciously, engages in DL, so when you talk with others, you engage in it as well. When you want to be able to stop your own DL, you will first have to move away from all the people with whom you engage in DL. In other words, you will have to be alone; to be able to explore what it takes to stop your own DL. When you remain together with those with whom you get involved in DL, you will not be able to stop your DL, as you remain busy with the DL of others.

 

When you talk out loud alone with yourself, it is relatively easy to differentiate between your DL and your EL. However, we are so entrenched in our DL, that even after we have several times, on our own, determined what is DL and what is EL, this clarity disappears very quickly, when we get together with others. Stopping our own DL depends on our ability, to fully acknowledge, that our DL contains all our beliefs, convictions, everything we know and desire. It is easier and also more effective, to admit this to ourselves, than to divulge this to others, who haven’t yet identified their own DL and EL, who, therefore, still keep engaging in DL. When you accept, that what you call your mind or your thinking, is actually your DL – which wears you out, drains you and depletes your energy – your DL stops.

 

When you have stopped your DL, you know, the continuation of your EL was never a problem, as it was always the continuation of your DL, that prevented you from having EL. Thus, when you manage to stop your conditioning – that is what you do when you stop your DL – EL happens by itself, naturally and effortlessly. Therefore, there is no need to be busy with EL, which takes care of itself. The thing to pay as much attention to as you can, is your own DL, which always asks, demands, holds and exhausts your attention.

 

When you listen to your own DL, you’ll notice it isn’t any fun to listen to your struggle, conflict, confusion, stress, depression, fear, arrogance and hate. No one wants to hear your negative DL and you don’t want to hear it either. When you listen to how your DL sounds, it turns you off. Your DL, which you engage in every day, is always about you being unhappy, dissatisfied, anxious, disillusioned, frustrated, unconscious, lost and meaningless. You are only going to end your DL, when you have no more energy for it.

 

When you stop your DL, you put an end to your conditioning history. It is like and end of life situation. Your survival struggle has made you stay alive, but it always prolonged your DL. When your DL at long last stops, you finally can understand, you have always been reacting in a survival mode. Unless you are motivated, to die to your past, to how you have been – which is not the same as sacrificing yourself on the altar of your beliefs – you will go on repeating yourself and you will continue with your DL.  

 

When you have DL, you are always fighting, arguing, hiding, fleeing, escaping, pretending that you are not here, defending, posturing or you believe to be all-powerful, immortal, your truth is eternal, you are so special, chosen and anointed. All of this has happened down the ages, this is the history of mankind, and this is why DL is still happening everywhere today. No one, except me, is capable of letting you know about EL, because DL has never been stopped. We have only believed, we have stopped it, but our so-called civility, politeness or respect isn’t the same as stopping our DL. I am truly special not because I want to be special, but because I have stopped my DL. I just got tired of it. Everything I have described, I have myself done and these words derive from my EL. When you can stop your own DL, you can speak with your EL about your own DL and about everyone’s else’s DL.           

 Something about Kamala Harris,

 

Here is something for you to read. I hope you follow my instructions. Something good will happen if you do. This text is simply, to help you to say something. Please, read it out loud. Are you hearing something? If you don’t, you are not doing as I am asking you and you might as well stop reading. Start doing something else.

 

Only if you read this text out loud, so that you can hear your voice, something beautiful will happen, which didn’t and couldn’t happen in the Disembodied Language (DL) you are used to, in which you don’t listen to yourself while you speak. Are you reading out loud? Good. Can you hear your own voice? Good. You are now listening to yourself, while you speak. I call this Embodied Language (EL). You should be feeling something unusual. You hear yourself while you speak, but, normally, you don’t do this. It is very pleasant, because it relaxes you. It is so nice and calming to listen to yourself, while reading this easy text. Reading a text from a teleprompter is what dishonest politicians do, who are uncomfortable speaking in an unscripted manner.   

 

I didn’t write these words, to explain something to you or to make you understand something, but while you read this text and while you listen to yourself, you can understand, why listening to yourself while you speak is important, because listening to yourself helps you to be and to stay in touch with yourself. EL is something that is so simple, it easily escapes everyone. We are all constantly involved in DL, in which we don’t listen to ourselves, and we don’t even know it.

 

There is certainly something to it, to read these words out loud and be able to hear your sound. Perhaps, you would like to stop reading for a moment and say something to yourself, about how it is for you, to hear your voice, while you speak? You don’t have to do it, but you can, if you want. I suggest this, to give you a break from this text, because this text is of no importance. What matters is, you get a chance to hear yourself, while you speak.

 

I was listening to some music, before I wrote this text. As I looked up some songs, something occurred to me. Suddenly, this dumb, cackling, fake person, Kamala Harris, is all over the place. She is trying to become the next president. She is now promoted all over the place. Why is everyone involved in DL and not in EL? Kamala Harris isn’t going to talk about the difference between DL and EL. She is now presented as the queen of the Left, but she is unfit, because she is incapable of saying something meaningful about listening to yourself while you speak. Like so many others, she will make you listen to her, instead of to yourself.

 

You should do something about the fact, that you keep having DL instead of EL. What are you going to do about it? There is only one thing you can do, which is, to stop your DL, so you can have EL. If you are still reading out loud and still listening to yourself, this must already have happened. If didn’t happen, it means, you either weren’t reading out loud, or you weren’t listening to yourself and you were, like Kamala Harris, engaging in DL. Kamala Harris is already making a big difference, as she demonstrates what someone sounds like, who doesn’t listen to herself. It doesn’t matter what she says, it is about how she says it. Something in her voice tells you, she is not hearing herself, but she only wants to be heard and adored.  

 

This text wasn’t meant, to get you out of your mind, but to let you listen to something you had probably never listened to. If you still read these words out loud, you hear yourself and not Kamala Harris, which is already something positive. It is a good thing, you finally really get to do something about the problems, created by your participation in DL. May be, you can let Kamala Harris know about it?

 

With your DL, you always knew something was wrong, but you never knew what it was. Now you know, you weren’t listening to yourself, but to lying, vicious, hollow politicians, like Kamala Harris. In this writing, I don’t intend to give you something to think about, but something to talk about, so you can hear and identify your DL. I am sure something good will come from listening to yourself, especially now that your attention is piqued, because I mentioned the name the new presidential candidate. Even if she never makes it into the presidency, she is of great value for pointing out something about DL. Surely, something about the voice of Kamala Harris wears out everyone, who listens to her. Luckily, by reading these words out loud, you are now experiencing something of the opposite effect, because EL gives you energy. Kamala Harris has fired many of her worn-out staff members, who simply couldn’t stand listening to her anymore.                    

 I am right,

 

Everyone is always right, in his or her view of their own way of doing things. Even the depressed and the schizophrenics are absolutely right, that their depressive view of their life or their psychosis is entirely true. In other words, everyone supposedly sticks to whatever they believe about themselves. The addict starts using more drugs or alcohol and the ambitious striver for power, money and prestige wants to acquire even more influence and property. There is no exception, the scientist is hooked on knowing and the criminal commits another crime. We are all unknowingly, therefore involuntarily, attached to what we tell ourselves about ourselves.

 

No one can see things the way that we do, because everyone has remained imprisoned in their own language, which is Disembodied Language (DL). However, if we finally start listening to what our voice sounds like, while telling ourselves what we believe is going on, then the sudden liberation of the language, in which we were unconsciously trapped, will automatically take place.

 

The big difference between DL and Embodied Language (EL) is that we don't listen to ourselves during DL, but we listen to ourselves during EL. Another big difference between DL and EL is in DL, we want others to know we are right, but in EL we agree with ourselves, and we are, therefore, right. You could also say, during DL - no matter how strongly we believe we are right, because we say we are right – which we confuse with freedom - we are always concerned about getting others to say we are right and having power over others, as we don’t believe in ourselves. We will only be right for ourselves, when we produce EL.

 

It took many years before I, with my EL, 

could fully admit to myself, I am really

 right in what I say and write about the

 big difference between EL and DL. 

Since virtually no one is interested 

in talking to me about this difference, 

I have had to learn how to handle, 

many people, who, when push comes

 to shove, could not admit, I was 

right with my EL and they, therefore, 

with their false, pretentious, rash, 

stupid, oblivious, DL, were completely wrong.

 

Thousands of people who have come into contact with me over the years, have all turned away from me again, because of their own so-called rightness. However, if they, for themselves, were to recognize their own DL as DL, they could still discover their EL and benefit from it. However, that's where the problem comes in, because they really don't want to do that. In order to maintain their own pitiful, combative and dilapidated sense of being right, they act, as if their DL was their EL. I could always tell the difference. I was and still am right. 

 

There is a great taboo on the fact, I happen to be someone, who has actually learned something about himself and others through my EL. Also, because of the ubiquitous, never properly described DL, there is still a huge battle going on between science – in which we are right about how things work - and the fabrications of our religions or cultures. Objective scientific knowledge applies to all of us and makes us all right, because it concerns the facts, but science matters in our personal lives only to a very limited extent, as there is an even greater taboo on acquiring the irrefutable information of our own self-knowledge.

 

There have been all kinds of people, who were said to be wise and who we supposedly should listen to.  None of all those vaunted saints, self-realized ones, gurus and philosophers have ever talked about the gigantic difference between our usual DL and our ability to have EL. In other words, we have listened to all these authorities, who had absolutely no idea at all about ​​the difference between DL and EL and who, therefore, never were able to talk about it. It is still a mystery to me, there was never anyone who started listening to himself and talking to himself and thus began to distinguish his EL from his DL. It took me a long time to admit I was right about this.   

 

True self-knowledge is exemplified by our ongoing EL and nothing else. So, there is no need for religion, spirituality, philosophy or psychology, because they have all taken our attention away from how we – as individuals – deal with our language.  We can tell others all kinds of things about ourselves, but if we start talking to ourselves, in order to be able to listen to ourselves, it turns out self-understanding of who we are, is something completely different from our justification, for why have are and remain involved in DL, every day. We can only truly understand ourselves with EL, but with DL, we are and remain in conflict with ourselves.

 

When we recognize the great difference between our DL and EL, it becomes clear, in DL, in which we unknowingly, unintentionally, participated, we have never been able to experience how wonderful it is, to truly be right about things and to trust our own self-knowledge as truth. You are absolutely right, if you continue with EL, because you no longer believe in the necessity, you should or can think about yourself. You know, in EL, you can no longer think about anything, because there simply is no inner language.

Please check out my two You Tube channels: 1) Maximus Peperkamp and 2) maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw 

 Gelijk,

 

Iedereen heeft, voor zijn of haar opvatting, over hun eigen manier van doen en laten, altijd gelijk. Zelfs de depressievelingen en de schizophrenen, hebben helemaal gelijk, dat hun depressieve kijk op hun leven of hun psychose, helemaal waar is. Met andere woorden, iedereen houdt zogezegd vast aan wat ze over zichzelf geloven. De verslaafde gaat nog meer drugs of alcohol gebruiken en de ambitieuze strever naar macht, geld en aanzien,  will nog meer invloed en bezit verwerven. Er is geen enkele uitzondering en de wetenschapper is verlingerd aan weten en de crimineel begaat nog weer een misdaad. Wij zijn allemaal onwillekeurig, dus onvrijwilling, verknocht, aan wat wij over onszelf aan onszelf vertellen.

 

Niemand ziet de dingen, zoals wij dat doen, omdat iedereen ongemerkt gevangen is blijven zitten in hun eigen taal, wat dus Ontlichaamd Taal (OT) is. Als wij echter eindelijk eens gaan luisteren, naar hoe onze stem klinkt, terwijl wij aan onszelf gaan vertellen, hoe het volgens ons zit, dan vindt er vanzelf de plotselinge bevrijding plaats van de taal, waarin wij onbewust gevangen zaten.

 

Het grote verschil tussen OT en Belichaamde Taal (BT), is dat wij niet naar onszelf luisteren tijdens OT en wel naar onszelf luisteren tijdens BT. Een ander groot verschil tussen OT en BT, is dat in OT willen wij gelijk hebben van anderen, maar in BT geven wij onszelf gelijk en hebben wij daardoor, werkelijk, gelijk. Ook zou je kunnen zeggen, dat wij tijdens OT – al staan wij nog zo op ons eigen gelijk, die wij met vrijheid verwarren –  eigenlijk altijd bezig blijven, met het gelijk krijgen van, of  het macht hebben over, anderen, omdat wij voor onszelf nog geen gelijk hebben. Wij hebben alleen dan pas gelijk voor onszelf, als wij BT produceren.

 

Het heeft vele jaren geduurd, voordat ik, met mijn BT, volledig aan mezelf kon erkennen, dat ik echt gelijk heb, in wat ik zeg en schrijf over het grote verschil tussen BT en OT. Aangezien, vrijwel niemand geinteresseerd is, om met mij over dit verschil te praten, heb ik lange tijd te maken gehad met mensen, die als puntje bij paaltje kwam, niet konden toegeven, dat ik met mijn BT gelijk had en dat zij dus, met hun valse, pretentieuze, onbesuisde, domme, onbewuste,  OT, het helemaal bij het verkeerde eind hadden.

 

De duizenden mensen, die door de jaren heen met mij in contact zijn gekomen, hebben zich allemaal weer van mij afgekeerd, vanwege hun eigen zogenaamde gelijk. Indien zij echter, voor zichzelf, hun OT als OT zouden gaan erkennen, dan kunnen zij alsnog ook hun BT ontdekken en daar hun voordeel bij doen. Daar wrikt echter de schoen, want dat willen ze echt niet doen. Om hun eigen erbarmelijke, strijdvaardige en aftandse gelijk te behouden, doen ze daarom meestal alsof hun OT, hun BT zou zijn. Maar dat is dus niet zo. Ik had en ik heb nog steeds gelijk.  

 

Er ligt een groot taboe op het feit, dat ik iemand ben, die werkelijk, met BT, iets over zichzelf en anderen aan de weet is gekomen. Vanwege de alomheersende, nog nooit correct beschreven OT, is er nog steeds een enorme strijd gaande tussen wetenschap – echt gelijk hebben – en de verzinsels van diverse godsdiensten en cultuur. Objectieve, voor iedereen geldende kennis van de wetenschap, geeft ons allen tesamen gelijk, omdat het om de feiten gaat, maar toch komt dat begrip maar mondjesmaat bij mensen tot z’n recht, omdat er een nog groter taboe ligt op het verwerven van onweerlegbare zelf-kennis.

 

Er zijn allerlei mensen geweest,  waarvan werd gezegd, dat ze wijs waren en dat wij naar hen zouden moeten luisteren. Niemand van al die bewierookte heiligen, zelfgerealiseerden, gurus en filosofen, heeft het ooit over het gigantische verschil gehad, tussen onze gebruikelijke OT en ons vermogen om BT te hebben. Met andere woorden, we hebben allemaal geluisterd naar zogenaamde autoriteiten, die geen enkel besef hadden van het verschil tussen OT en BT en die, daarom hier nooit over hebben gesproken. Het is voor mij nog steeds een raadsel, dat er nooit iemand was, die naar zichzelf begon te luisteren en met zichzelf begon te praten en zodoende zijn BT begon te onderscheiden van zijn OT.   

 

Werkelijke zelf-kennis wordt geillustreerd door onze voortgaande BT en door niets anders. Er is dus absoluut geen enkele noodzaak aan religie,  spiritualiteit, filosofie of psychology, omdat die allen onze aandacht hebben weggenomen, van hoe wij – als individu – met onze taal omgaan.  We kunnen aan anderen van alles over onszelf vertellen, maar indien wij met onszelf gaan spreken, om naar onszelf te kunnen luisteren, dan blijkt, dat begrijpen – van wie wij werkelijk zijn – iets totaal anders is, dan het zogenaamde goedpraten dat wij met OT gewend zijn. Wij kunnen onszelf alleen begrijpen met BT, maar met OT zijn en blijven wij in conflict met onszelf.

 

Wanneer wij het verschil tussen onze eigen OT en onze eigen BT gaan erkennen, dan wordt het ons duidelijk, dat wij, met de OT, waaraan wij ongemerkt en ongewild deelnamen, eigenlijk nooit echt hebben kunnen ervaren, hoe heerlijk het is, om echt gelijk te hebben en om dus onze zelf-kennis als waarheid te kunnen vertrouwen. Je hebt dus volledig gelijk, als je voort blijft gaan met je BT, omdat je niet langer meer geloofd, in de belachelijke zogenaamde noodzaak, dat je over jezelf zou moeten en kunnen nadenken. Je weet, dat je nergens meer over kan nadenken, want er is eenvoudigweg geen innerlijke taal.          

 Mission Possible,

 

In the TV series Mission Impossible, Mr. Phelps listens to his next task, which is recorded on an audio-tape, which, after the message has been played and listened to, will destroy itself in five seconds. The popular series – I was between eight and fifteen years old – played from 1966 till 1973. Each episode was about a small covert team of secret government agents, known as the Impossible Missions Force and their sophisticated methods of deceiving, manipulating and thwarting Iron Curtain governments, third world dictators, corrupt industrialists and crime lords, among others.

 

I like to talk about this obviously pro-American TV program and speak and write about it, in the light of the distinction between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL). It is interesting, in EL, everything we say, out loud, to ourselves and carefully listen to, disappears, just like that self-destroying audio-recording. EL can be said to be Mission Possible, but, actually, like Mission Impossible, it always proved to be possible. Although the series wasn’t intended to show the difference between DL and EL, it le us listen to and watch those, who, presumably, were the bad guys and the good guys. In doing so, it was – no matter how vague – an attempt at illustrating the difference between DL and EL.

 

The original TV series began in a similar way, by first listening to a message from the higher-ups in the secret service. Before the message had ended, a grim-sounding voice then said: your mission, Jim, should you decide to accept it, is to make Stephan – some villain – believe that Thompson’s false information is true and, thus, prevent a disastrous catastrophe. It concluded with: if any of your force is caught or killed, the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions. If you decide to accept the challenging mission, to have EL instead of DL, there will be no team, to bail you out, as you will be entirely on your own against the evil of everyone with DL. However, the false information is contained by your DL, but you will be endlessly distracted into the belief, that being busy with the DL of others, is more important. Fact is, that the DL of others, always triggers your own conditioning.  

 

People have, historically, always tried to address DL with more of the same DL. As you can tell, from the Mission Impossible series, those who, supposedly, are the good guys, they are tasked, to wipe out the bad guys and this is exactly how DL has always worked. In the ongoing battle for the attention of the audience – others – some speaker, presumably, is more powerful, smarter, intimidating, strategic, deceiving or holy. Those who claim, to have the moral high ground, most likely do most of talking and remain in power. In EL, on the other hand, we give up on this brutal race to the top, that has been going on forever. We can only do so, if we pay attention to our own DL and stop it as often as is needed, to be able to achieve, what seems to be impossible: happiness and satisfaction, which derives from using our language to our own advantage.  

 

With DL you can never achieve the wellbeing, which occurs when your language fits with your behavior. Basically, you are, unconsciously, on a mission impossible. As you get older, you can’t keep up with you own lies anymore and like Joe Biden, you say or leak things, which reveal your real evil motives. Simply stated, during DL, you are always trying to take someone out, that is, you are always on a trip of revanche for pain, which has been caused to you by others in the past. In effect, DL is the sentimental, childish, negative, demanding way of talking, in which everyone is projecting their traumatic problematic history of conditioning on others and seeks to get away with it. It sounds horrible, to hear your own DL.

 

Lastly, in DL – which is our usual way of talking in which we don’t listen to ourselves, while we speak – we are always hiding and protecting some ugly, dreadful, embarrassing secret. There are, so to speak, many verbal-skeletons in our closet and these concepts and constructs have all been created and maintained by our DL. We need to express these falsehoods to ourselves, not to confess, but to match our language with our behavior. The LBGTQ so-called ‘coming out’, is again always directed at others, that is why we should all supposedly pay attention to them. It signifies, how, in DL, speakers dominate their listeners, as they refuse to listen to themselves. Moreover, there is, the real coming out with EL, which I do here on this blog and on my two You Tube channels 1) Maximus Peperkamp and 2) maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw. 

You may not yet know anything about the difference between your own DL and EL, but you can hear, in the sound of my voice, what this important difference is all about. You can hear me talk with myself and be myself. You can talk with yourself and be yourself too, if you listen to yourself and let yourself know it has to do with how you sound. DL is impossible, as it forces you to follow expectations of the group, but EL is possible, because it is truly the future of mankind, to speak from our own individuality.