You Are Joe Biden,

 

When you finally begin to speak with yourself and listen to your voice, your obsession with power will fall apart. Your ambition to dominate others prevented you from recognizing that you engage, almost permanently, in Disembodied Language (DL), in which language takes you further and further away from yourself. Now, with your ongoing Embodied Language (EL), in which you continue to listen to yourself while you speak, you no longer hide behind the mask, which you were wearing because of how you sounded. Yes, with EL, you sound very different.  

 

When it comes to your DL, you are as stubborn as Joe Biden – or as Karine Jean-Pierre, who told us repeatedly, the president has been very clear – because, behind the façade of your DL, you feel humiliated and devoid of confidence. Stepping down from your long, tragic history of conditioning with DL is as hard as stepping down from the presidency. Nobody needs to tell you it is difficult, necessary and inevitable, as EL is undeniably clear. You know, it could only occur, after you have stopped your own DL.

 

Neither Jill Biden, Hunter Biden, the democrats or the media, are to be blamed for the obvious fact, that Joe Biden – like everyone else, also people on the right, for that matter – keeps engaging in DL. Nobody is going to force anyone, to stop their DL, as we all can only do this ourselves. This change is about our individual freedom. Our power is irrelevant. We either live a meaningful life with ongoing EL or we live a meaningless life with unconscious DL.

 

We are all anxiously trying to stay in the race for power with our DL and only when we switch to EL, do we step down from our delusional way of dealing with language, which made us believe in inner language, our so-called mind. The real let-go of power, is the realization, there never were any words or thoughts inside of us. Due to our automatic involvement in DL, we have been merely imagining about this mental stuff, which doesn’t exist. Our insensitive way of talking, DL, caused the psychosis of hearing our inner voice.  

 

Joe Biden’s terrible performance at the debate with Donald Trump is not the real issue, but the fact, that we were, as a country, and, perhaps, as the whole of mankind, for a brief moment – like when we were watching the solar eclipse – on the same page. What we were watching and hearing, was what happens, when our outdated effortful DL comes to its abrupt end. Joe Biden’s meandering, incoherent speech and difficult to understand mumbling, clearly tells him – and let’s check in with his mouthy press-secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, to get absolutely clear about this – to give it up. Yes, if Joe Biden steps down from the being the celebrated candidate for the democratic party, it will be because he, for once in his life, decided himself.

 

Regardless of whether Joe Biden is going to step down, I want to make a prediction. If it happens – which is, at this point very likely – I predict, he will experience a remarkable recovery, because he would be able to have energizing EL instead of energy-draining DL. Moreover, if Joe Biden does, what anyone will have to do, when they can no longer continue with their DL-bullshit, he doesn’t do it for his country, but for himself. With EL, we don’t ask, but we simply say to ourselves, in clear and simple words, what we can do for ourselves, once we have stopped being busy with others. In effect, it is not what Joe Biden can do for his country, but what he can do for himself, which, might actually make him the biggest future advocate for EL. Thus, it all ends well, as the world is saved from Joe Biden.

 

If Joe Biden decides a change of course, he will be a blessing to his family and to America. I am very grateful to Karine Jean-Pierre for being so clear and for clarifying that Joe Biden has been very clear from the very beginning. What more can we - the people - ask for? It can’t get any clearer than that. This is the clarity, which we all so badly need. Those who still make it seem as if things aren’t clear, don’t know what they are talking about. It should be stated, for clarity’s sake, that people just don’t see what they are seeing, they don’t hear what they are hearing, they don’t know what they say they know and, actually, they are not, who they believe to be.

 

Yes, it is a real problem, that with DL, nothing is what it appears to be. Unfortunately - or fortunately, depending on how you see it - we cannot spin our way out of our usual DL. I’ve heard, I don’t know if it is just gossip, the democratic party came up with a new catchy acronym, CRAZY, for the new candidate. It stands for Clarity, Reality, Assumption, Zoo and, Yes, it is a total mess. The vice president said in one of her lucid moments: the only way forward, is by being here, because if we miss this moment, we are going nowhere. She is right. Going forward requires, we must be where we are and start there. Who better to guide us through these democratic dark times than Kamala Harris? She boldly took the lead, by saying: we are no longer where we have been and we have no other option, than staying with the facts, as we know them. We can count on the great clarity of Kamala Harris, who is clear about the need for clarity itself, which is sadly mostly overlooked by everyone, who isn’t as clear as she is. This is where Gavin Newsom comes in, as he can also really tell us as it is.

 

According to Gavin Newsome – who, as we all know, has solved the homeless crisis, by simply saying, that he owns it – people on the left are clear, but people on the right are unclear. Only the left can set the record straight. Obviously, crooked isn’t straight, but saying so, is the first step in this process of straightening the truth. It isn’t such a big stretch to acknowledge, that the truth needs to be stretched, otherwise it will no longer be accepted as true. Researchers have found ample evidence of this everywhere they looked. For the most part, they didn’t even need to look, because nowadays made-up truth is seen as the very essence of individualism and this is what the future of our nation is going to be like, with Californian-La-La-Land-Philosophy.

 

Right-wing extremists have to be silenced, for left-wing clarity to prevail. Therefore, freedom of speech must, at all cost, be abolished and anyone opposing this new-age of clarity shall be judged by a committee of card-readers, psychics and astrologers. We need these truth-tellers, as we have completely lost touch with ourselves, being endlessly busy with this bottomless pit called humanity. Our concern with world-peace is going to pay off with clarity, that is provided by those who say they have it. Yes, it is evident, only those, who say they are clear, are clear. It should be accepted and understood, as the ultimate truth, only our way of talking gives us to the clarity, we wished to have. It is not the intensity of our longing, but it is the feedback, we receive by our talking, which is making it possible for us to really listen. That being said, communication is no longer necessary, as what is said doesn’t need to be listened to by others, because we listen to ourselves in EL.            

 Unscripted Versus Scripted Speech,

 

Yesterday, in the revealing debate with Donald Trump, Joe Biden was on his own, without a teleprompter – to tell him what to say – and the whole nation has witnessed, that the man, he really is, failed dismally. A seemingly different, articulate Joe Biden was at a rally, today, where he enthusiastically read from a teleprompter. It is now clearer than ever before – thanks to Karine Jean-Pierre, who is so good at clarifying that the president has been very clear – that scripted Joe Biden is a completely different Joe Biden, than the unscripted Joe Biden, because we have all seen and heard, Joe Biden without a script, is like the emperor without any clothes. 

What we are witnessing here, is the difference between unscripted and scripted speech, which I call Embodied Language (EL) and Disembodied Language (DL). In the former, the speaker is on his own, which means, we can all hear, who he really is, naturally, but in the latter, the speaker is a phony, fabricated, robot, who acts from a script. This is the enormous difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden: Donald Trump is natural, while Joe Biden – like Barack Obama – is a cheap-fake. Most importantly, these two candidates represent the quintessential issue of our time: the difference between our EL and DL. Although it has ruled every society since humans became verbal, DL is, whether we acknowledge it or not, on its deathbed, as it isn’t really speech. In DL, speakers pretend to speak, and listeners pretend to listen, but in EL, speakers really speak, and listeners really listen. The issue is not whether Joe Biden has dementia or is unfit for office, but the issue is DL versus EL.   

 

 

To be sure, scripted refers to a presentation or performance, where the dialogue, actions or sequences are prearranged and written down. Unscripted, however, implies spontaneity, where dialogue and events occur naturally or are improvised. In other words, scripted is based on written language, whereas unscripted is based on spoken language. Stated differently, in scripted speech, written speech is considered to be more important than spoken speech or to put it precisely, the false assumption that written speech is more important spoken speech, is the reason why DL is occurring everywhere twenty-four-seven.

 

Another consequential aspect of our common, unconscious DL is, that because it is scripted speech, we are never in the here and now and our listening and understanding, only involves the ‘listening’, to what we are supposed to hear, and things are only ‘understood’ in the way a topic was presented. Surely, DL is always about indoctrination, whereas EL is about freedom. Of course, in scripted performances – which, in my opinion, shouldn’t be considered speech – actors rehearse lines, written by someone else, but in unscripted settings, individuals speak and react in real time, without any prior planning. Joe Biden was a full week in hiding, while being prepared for this so-called debate. Every dumb dull thing he managed to say wasn’t his own.

 

Peculiarly, democrats, progressives, liberals or Left-wingers, who, presumably, are the protectors of democracy and, who, therefore, are into helping - which is, of course, gas-lighting - their fellow men, insist on scripted, acted and phony speech, while conservatives, republicans and Right-wingers, are more into actually saying it as it is and more likely to have EL. There is no mystery there, because the former is into the outdated group-behavior, which I call DL, while the latter is into freedom of the individual, which requires responsibility, accountability, independence and intelligence. So, what we are witnessing here, is not communist/socialist/Marxist ideology versus republican/conservative/capitalist ideology, but this is a compare & contrast between our DL and EL.  

 

Writing a speech is a process, which, obviously, excludes the audience, but delivering a speech involves and incorporates the audience in the experience. However, it is due to DL, that we overemphasize the presumed importance of speeches, which are, no matter how you want to put it, monologues. If we are going to have EL, there will be no more speeches by anyone, as we are truly engaging in dialogue. If we are going to be able to have EL, it will be because we have put the monologues of DL to an end. In DL, we speak at each other, but in EL we speak with each other and speakers can become listeners and listeners become speakers, at any time, without any rules, without any hierarchy of who is more or less important than others.  

 

The difference between DL and EL is critical, because we are, naturally, more interested in listening to speakers, who seem to, or who actually do, demonstrate a sincere interest in their audience. In DL, speakers are only able to create the impression, that they are interested in their audience, but in EL, speakers are their own audience first, and consequently, perceive themselves, as their audience perceives them. When we speak spontaneously, with authentic conviction and awareness – that is, when we engage in EL – it signals, we have something to say, something we feel strongly about, we are willing to speak about and truly stand for. A real leader is someone, who is capable of speaking in an unscripted manner.

 

Someone, who has unscripted speech isn’t into dominating, manipulating, exploiting, coercing, distracting or humiliating others, as he or she is always listening to him or herself while he or she speaks. Thus, in unscripted speech or in EL, we master our speech, and we don't want or tolerate any followers, because everyone is their own master during EL. As previously stated, EL is the language of the free individual, while our usual DL, is the language of the oppressive collective. Unless people – who consider themselves to be free – acquire EL, they aren’t free and they are endlessly trying, in vain, to address our DL with DL.    

 

I am in favor of Donald Trump, and I am against Joe Biden, because funny, upbeat Donald Trump engages and inspires his audience, while boring Joe Biden is trying to be perceived as a fantastic speaker, with his propagandistic speech, which was written for him, not even by him. Joe Biden desperately, pathetically, demandingly, and of course, negatively, wants to impress or convince his audience, while Donald Trump speaks freely, creatively and energetically. I use the difference between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, to point out the immense difference between our DL and EL.  

 

Joe Biden’s tiring, unnatural voice, is a voice of the past. He is the embodiment of DL, which is no longer valid. DL is group-behavior, while EL is individual behavior. Joe Biden comes across like the annoying voice on a robocall, intrusive, seemingly friendly, but noticeably stilted and artificial. He is so eager to be right and to get the audience’s approval, that he doesn’t have the time, to process what is happening while he speaks. With Donald Trump, however, you can clearly see and hear, how he constantly, enjoys processes and interprets his audience response.         

 Good Bye,

 

Interestingly, on the evening of old, disgusting, fool Joe Biden completely losing the debate to Donald Trump, it has now become crystal clear to me, why I chose not to continue my skype conversations with my former Dutch friend AnnaMieke. Although I feel grateful for having been able to enjoy my Embodied Language (EL) and my Language Enlightenment (LE), with her, I read in her writing today, that she has not just turned against me, but she has, actually, always, secretively, been against me. AnnaMieke is a classic example of a bleeding-heart liberal, who supposedly only wants to feel good, but who is turned off by the unavoidable rational consequences of her own EL.

 

While I have abundantly endorsed AnnaMieke in the past, in many of my writings and on my You Tube videos, I hereby completely withdraw my support for her. Anyone, who claims to be able to talk about EL – which is called Luisterend Spreken in the Netherlands – is full of shit for not being open and square with me. While I have always been the one, who, out of necessity, has stopped any conversation with anyone, who misjudged my passion for EL, for the Disembodied Language (DL), which I abhor, I now reject AnnaMieke, as well as so many others, as they wish to continue with mushy, esoteric, blablabla.   

 

As I have repeatedly stated, the DL/EL distinction touches every aspect of our lives, including politics. Since I have immigrated to the United States in 1999, I have made the irrefutable link between, on the one hand, DL-and-the-Left, and, on the other hand, EL-and-the-Right. It is absolutely clear to me, that the continuation of DL, deals with Left-wing politics, while freedom-loving Right-wingers are in principle, more open to EL than people on the Left. Since I used to be very liberal myself in the past, it has been a real journey for me to acknowledge this, but America has finally opened my eyes politically.  

 

You can hear my songs and talks on:

You Tube: Maximus Peperkamp

You Tube: maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw

 

If you wish to talk with me, you can reach me:

Skype: limbicease

Email: mpeperkamp@sbcglobal.net

Continuation Humor,

 

Why laugh and then stop again? Why not continue? Who cares about one miserly joke? So what, you told or heard a couple of smartass jokes? After some so-called fun, we are back to the reality again, from which we have escaped and which has only gotten worse. If we can’t keep laughing, we might as well not laugh at all. Why wet our appetite, but never satisfy our unfulfilled need for continuation humor, which would finally have us laugh until we’ve had enough? With Disembodied Language (DL) we never truly laugh to our heart’s content.

 

The etymology of continuation is fascinatating. https://www.etymonline.com/word/continuation Continuation is the act or fact of continuing or prolonging, an extension in time or space. It derives from the Latin word continuationem (normative continuatio), a following of one thing after another, noun of action from past-participle stem of continuare, to join together, connect; make or be continuous, from continere (instransitive), to be uninterrupted, literally, to hang together or contain. To restrain (someone), control (oneself), behave (in a certain way) from Old French contein-, tonic stem of contenir, from Latin continere (transitive) to hold together, enclose, from con (together) + tenere (to hold, from root, ten, to stretch). Surprisingly, the ancient meaning of continuation seems to refer to our Embodied Langauge (EL).

 

Both the embodiment as well as the furtherance of our humor, are captured in one beautiful word. Our laughter will be continuous, when we can relax and experience our body as an extension in time and space. Continuation humor becomes possible, because we are no longer concerned with merely one event, one joke or a couple of jokes, but with an uninterrupted stream of humor, in which our EL will string together, and, therefore, contain our fun. Of course, we also need to control or contain ourselves and behave in a certain way; to survive and so, continuation humor is about self-regulation.

 

Certainly, our continuation humor, which requires our ongoing EL, is a continuation to our Language Enlightenment (LE). Every time we have some EL, we experience our LE, which is apparent whenever our EL is happening. Naturally, our EL only always happens when our DL has been stopped, therefore, our continuation humor is about the absence or the disappearance of our DL. Our DL – which includes our fantasy of inner language or mind – dissolves the moment, we listen to ourselves, while we speak, as we speak, in order to be able to hear ourselves.

 

Our continuation humor is a reliable result of our ability to speak out loud with ourselves, in precisely such a manner, that we enjoy the sound of our own voice. Thus, our ongoing EL, which I have previously also described as the language which creates space, is about a tangible awareness of our own vibration or our energy, the embodied sound we produce and experience. In other words, it is utmost sensitivity and refinement, that makes our continuation humor possible. Stated differently, unlike the fake-humor, we are used to with DL – in which one outrageous, overwhelming, coercive thing is said after another, which seems to suggest a sense of losing control – the continuous humor of EL is actually about self-control.

 

The continuation of our EL is such a delightful and refreshing thing, as it involves the expression of our continuation humor. We really need this new kind of humor to be able to withstand the constant pull of DL, which is going on everywhere around us. One of the important ways in which we begin to notice, our EL has stopped, and that we are caught up again in our conditioning history with DL, is that we are no longer having any fun. There is an enormous taboo on enjoying ourselves with our own language. In the lame humor of DL, it is always about the demanding language of others, but in EL, we laugh about our own language, as this produces continuous humor.

 

Since our continuous humor goes hand in hand with our ongoing EL, it is clear, our continuous humor is just another word for our LE, our intelligence or our ability to simply be ourselves with our language. The connectivity and inclusiveness of EL is phenomenal, whereas DL makes us feel scattered, depleted and all over the place. Certainly, continuous humor is an accumulative process, in which we contain as much energy as we are able to hold together, before we release it with our EL. Periods of silence, created by our EL – our own language – liberate us from our imaginary mind and so-called thoughts and from being constantly busy with the language of others, which is DL.

 

Our continuation humor, with our ongoing EL is an upward, positive, energizing continuation, but our unintelligent, boring, brutal humor, produced by our DL is clearly a downward, negative, energy-draining continuation. With DL we praise the latter, but with EL, we acquire the former, as we can recognize the devastating detrimental effects of getting humor so incredibly wrong. Yes, with our unconscious DL, we have always laughed for the wrong reason and that is why there was basically never any continuation of our laughter. If there was any laughter at all, it was gone before we could even enjoy it. The laughter of our DL has cost us enormously, as it always meant the promotion of the continuation of our problematic DL. In continuation humor we laugh for the right reasons.             

 Mankind Humor,

 

We haven’t heard about the universal humor, which is addressed in this writing, because our common Disembodied Language (DL) simply couldn’t produce it. People all across the world are into nonsensical transcendental meditation or other world-wide religious fantasies, but not into transcendental humor, as it doesn’t seem to be important enough to anyone to laugh. It is also often repeated, that music is the universal language, but, to my knowledge, nobody has ever spoken about our dire need for cross-cultural humor.

 

Although it occurs in every society, around the world, DL has never been properly addressed. Surely, DL is the most difficult of all problems facing mankind. While everyone seems to agree that we should all, day in day out, engage in unintelligent DL, mankind has yet to wake up to the fact, that not listening to ourselves while we speak, is problematic, as it prevents laughter. Of course, we can and should listen to ourselves, while we speak, so we are able to engage in Embodied Language (EL) and acquire mankind humor, that will save us from immanent doom.

 

All human societies have language, and, in every civilization, people communicate a full range of experiences, including laughter. However, there is real and phony communication around the world, but we have never acknowledged the great difference between our DL and our EL, because everywhere – in societies that are governed by autocratic governments, but also in western democratic free societies – DL dominates. As a result, mankind is still busy with many wars and problems, as mankind humor is still unknown.  

 

Certainly, mankind humor, which needs ongoing EL, is the solution to all our repetitive problems, which are caused and maintained by our DL. If we can stop our DL and have EL, we are happy and free and both happiness and freedom are the ultimate goals for all of mankind. Moreover, the notion, that each person is an end in him or herself, only applies to EL, because in our usual, superficial DL, we only pay lip-service to such a lofty moral value. How can we recognize and honor the individuality and autonomy of others, if our own DL prevents us from being aware about our own uniqueness and freedom? With DL, no one can ever be an end to themselves, as their language prevents them from making their own choices and leading their own life.

 

In their habitual way of talking, human beings, around the world, attempt to use their fellow men as a means to their end. In effect, in DL, we try to dominate, force, intimidate, humiliate, exploit, distract or confuse others and in doing so, our unconscious use of our language elicits negative emotions, which are not conducive to laughter. Only EL elicits positive emotions, but since we are unknowingly trapped by our habit, we pretend as if our DL can elicit positivity. This ethnocentric, cultural-specific humor obviously is the big stand in the way for mankind humor.

 

We have – with our DL – prevented ourselves and each other from having mankind humor, because we were told to do as the Romans do, although we have, most likely, never really been in Rome. While our language is believed to have evolved at the same time, as our species, Homo Sapience, arose in Africa between 160.000 and 200.000 years ago, nothing has changed about our fear-based, primitive use of language, in which other-listening takes president over our ability to talk with and peacefully, joyfully, laughingly listen to ourselves.

 

Scientists – who, just like everyone else, mainly, unconsciously, engage in DL, every boring day – agree that laughter plays a crucial role in every culture around the world. Not surprisingly, they are still in the dark about why laughter exists. Laughter is undeniably a social phenomenon, since people laugh 30 times more together, in a group, than alone, but, since nobody has ever explored – as I have done – what humor is like with ongoing EL, the function of laughter as a form of communication remains mysterious. To someone like me, who has ongoing EL, there is nothing mysterious about laughter. Laughter – in EL – signifies we are experiencing, enjoying, our Language Enlightenment (LE), because we are, at long last, using our language effectively.  

 

Spontaneous laughter, which is unintentionally triggered by conversations or events, emerges in the first few months of life, even in children who are deaf or blind. Laughter not only transcends human cultural boundaries, but also species boundaries, too; it is present in similar form in great apes. Naturally, the principal function of laughter is survival, that is, creation and deepening of social bonds. We also laugh, when we are at ease and happy. If we all have EL, we experience mankind humor.

 

We can only understand mankind humor with our ongoing EL, which makes us acknowledge that our common sense is essential for our survival. With DL, we lack this common sense. Surely, our survival is at stake, if we don’t stop our DL. DL is no longer working as it used to, in times, in which our institutions of authority were trusted and supported by people. We are now experiencing the final days of our DL, but we don’t know this yet. Only mankind humor can help us to accept this reality, which challenges us to develop our EL.  

 

The outcome of the debate, which is going to take place this week between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, will be determined by who is able to properly address the great importance of mankind humor. I have, so far, not been able to laugh even once about Joe Biden, but, luckily, Donald Trump makes me laugh all the time. The future of America, but also of mankind is at stake and I am ready for a good doses of mankind humor. If all of mankind laughs, we are really moving forward.

 En Nu,

 

En nu ga ik schrijven over wat er kan komen. Nee, het zijn geen dromen, maar ik laat het me overkomen, want het gaat zoals het wil gaan en zo kan ik het prima verstaan.

 

Nu is een begrip in mijn taal, waaruit ik iedere dag zo verbazingwekkend veel haal. Voor mij is dit heel normaal, want ik vind het abnormaal, dat een paal die boven water staat, niets meer zou betekenen. Toen wij nog voortvarend waren, was het ons wel heel duidelijk, dat onze moderne zogenaamde welvarendheid, helemaal niets met welvarendheid te maken heeft. Want waar stevenen wij op aan? Wij zijn al aan lager wal.

 

De maritieme oorsprong van veel Nederlandse zegswijzes is wellicht een goeie invalshoek, om niet aan de grond of op de klippen te lopen met onze onverantwoordelijke Ontlichaamde Taal (OT). Het is hoog tij(d) om OT, waar wij zo mee in onze maag zaten, overboord te zetten, uit te kotsen en zogezegd aan Neptunus te offeren.   

 

Met onze OT gaan wij keer op keer met elkaar aan de haal, maar in de werkelijkheid vertellen wij voor de zoveelste keer, een oud, onwaar, oninteressant verhaal. Wij krijgen met onze OT nooit antwoord op de vragen die wij hebben, omdat wij ons door anderen laten afschepen.

 

Wanneer wij OT overboord zetten, dan pas gaat het ons echt voor de wind, omdat wij met onze Belichaamde Taal (BT) in het er-varen van wat er nu aan de hand is veilig kunnen laveren. Als het getij verloopt, dan verzet men de bakens, want getijstromen veroorzaken geulen en ondieptes waar wij op vast zouden hebben kunnen lopen. Die geulen worden gemarkeerd door bakens en takken. Door sterke stormen en stromen – die in OT worden veroorzaakt, doordat wij niet naar onszelf luisteren terwijl wij spreken – is de situatie steeds aan verandering onderhevig. De geulen verlopen en de bebakening dient regelmatig aangepast te worden. Uiteraard is het zetten van die bakens, in onze geprekken, een kwestie van het blijven hebben van BT.

 

De gewoonte om OT te hebben, maakt dat wij niet in de gaten hebben wat er nu gebeurt. Ik heb BT en besef maar al te goed, dat het nodig is om alle hens aan dek te hebben, want ook al is dit nog de stilte voor de storm, die storm van onze rampzalige OT gaat komen en iedereen is nodig, om zogezegd het tij te keren en om BT te gaan hebben. Het gaat niet meer om het reven van zeilen of alles aan dek vastsjorren, maar om het kunnen hebben van BT, die van toepassing is op de enorme dreiging in wat er nu gebeurt.

 

Er was een tijd, waarin dingen gezegd werden, die waar waren. Die tijd breekt weer aan, als wij BT in plaats van OT gaan hebben. Nu is nog zo, dat wij een vlag op een stront-schuit zetten, omdat wij doen alsof OT een eerbiedwaardige zaak is. Men zette vroeger geen nationale vlag op een modder-schuit, omdat men dat ongepast vond. In OT doen wij elkaar en onzelf geloven in de belachelijke opvatting, dat wat wij zeggen en hoe wij het zeggen, bij elkaar zou passen, omdat wij het van elkaar en onszelf afdwingen.

 

Met OT kom jij nooit aan de bak, want het gaat in OT altijd over anderen. Je haalt altijd bakzijl in OT, je krabbelt altijd terug, want je krijgt de wind van voren, omdat je zeilen verkeert zijn gezet. Het gaat zogenaamd altijd alleen maar om wat je zegt, maar niet over hoe je het zegt. Je schip – wie je dus bent – verliest daardoor z’n vaart en door niet naar jezelf te luisteren, raak je helemaal je koers kwijt van wat voor jou van belang is. Je waait met alle winden mee – met wat er in OT wordt gezegd – in plaats van de wind – je taal – ten voordeel te gebruiken.

 

Vanwege OT wordt je snel oud en takel je gauw af, omdat je je eigen intelligentie – je taal – niet optimaal gebruikt. Een schip dat voor lange tijd niet vaart wordt afgetuigd en ontdaan van alle tuigage. Als jij jezelf niet echt bent en dus niet in je eigen vaarwater blijft, dan verwaterd jou passie.

 

Omdat wij niet erkennen, dat OT, net als storm, niet binnenin ons zit, maar alleen bestaat als de kracht, die woeste golven veroorzaakt, die ons schip – onze relatie – doet vergaan, raken wij buiten westen of verliezen wij het noorden en raken wij van koers. Ofschoon wij zeeen van tijd hebben, om onze horizon te verleggen en BT te onderzoeken, raken we gestrand en zijn we vast gelopen, omdat wij met OT altijd benepen zijn.

 

Indien wij ons slechts laten leiden door onze conditionering met OT, dan vangen wij bot, omdat het zogenaamde roeien met de riemen die wij hebben, altijd inhoudt, dat wij de bodem raken, waardoor die riemen uit onze handen worden gerukt. Met BT hebben wij positieve ervaringen bij de vleet, maar met OT krijgen wij telkens de kous op de kop. Iemand die na een vergeefse zeereis berooid terugkeerde, was zo arm, dat hij z’n kous als muts moest gebruiken.

 

Wij doen alsof OT okay is en wimpelen iemand zoals ik, die BT kent en heeft, telkens af. Het is schijnbaar niet nodig of mogelijk, om OT te stoppen en BT te hebben, maar dit afschepen gebeurt, omdat de beste stuurlui altijd aan wal staan. Alleen iemand als ik, die voortgaande BT heeft, weet hoe iedereen voortdurend elkaar de loef probeert af te steken en de wind uit de zeilen probeert te halen met kwaadaardige OT.

 

Er is met OT werkelijk geen land te bezeilen en al onze relatie problemen, ter land en ter zee, hebben te maken met hoe wij met onze taal omgaan. Een gestorven zeeman wordt met een, twee, drie, in Godsnaam, overboord gezet en zo is het voor de overledenen, driemaal scheepsrecht. We hebben met onze OT eigenlijk, in een keer, alles wat echt met onszelf te maken heeft overboord gezet, want onze taal past niet bij onze ervaring.

 

De problemen stappelen zich op en elke keer weer escaleert OT in argumenten, gevechten, oorlogen. Het loopt met OT de spuigaten uit. Deze uitdrukking verwijst naar vele zeeslagen die hebben plaatsgevonden, waarin het bloed van de gewonden langs het dek stroomde en zo de spuigaten uitliep. We gaan met OT allemaal het schip in, want wij nemen niet vrijwillig deel aan deze wilde vaart. Wij werden gepaaid met mooie beloftes, maar zijn in de boot genomen.

 

Met BT nemen wij het voortouw en laten wij ons niet afschrikken door angstaanjagenede leuzes als, hoe dichter bij Dort, hoe rotter het wordt. Met BT zullen wij onverschrokken alle zeven zeeen gaan bevaren en zodoende onze Taal Verlichting (TV) realiseren. Het betekent dat wij met voorgaande, er-varen BT al onze er-varingen op de juiste wijze kunnen verwoorden.

 

Wij hebben BT absoluut nodig, om niet ten onder te gaan in de maalstroom van het leven. Wij laten ons maar al te gemakkelijk meevoeren in het kielzog van anderen en daardoor raken wij kant nog wal, met onze er-varing, die niet op de juiste wijze door OT wordt weergegeven. Je kunt dus de wind niet veranderen, maar wel de stand van je zeilen. Het is echt kantje boord, dat je, ondanks je negatieve OT toch in deze haven van mijn blog bent aangeland. Hoezee! Hier heb je eindelijk vaste grond onder je voeten.

 

Ik hoop dat je niet met de noorderzon vertrekt, dat je onder de vlag van BT wilt varen, dat je het niet meteen over een ander boeg gooit en weer OT gaat hebben. Probeer eens jou roer in eigen handen te houden. Als het je eenmaal met BT voor de wind begint te gaan, dan ga je met een gevierde schoot zeilen. Met BT is het altijd ruimschoots zeilen geblazen, omdat jou zeil zo breed mogelijk uit gaat staan, zodat je zoveel mogelijk wind vangt. Ook zal je eindelijk met jou BT schoon schip gaan maken en alle ellende van je verleden met OT achter je laten. Met BT ben je niet meer tegen de keer in, omdat je kennis hebt jou emoties, de getijen. En nu, vaar wel! Een definitief afscheid van wie je geloofde te zijn met je onbewuste OT.

 Disappear Humor,

 

Peek-a-boo is a form of play with an infant, but disappear humor is the play of an adult, who is mature enough to laugh about him or herself, whenever he or she seemingly disappears into unconscious Disembodied Language (DL) and reappears in Embodied Language (EL). During the peek-a-boo game, the adult player hides his or her face and then, suddenly, pops back into view of the other, the infant player, while saying peek-a-boo. However, disappear humor is done alone, by one person, who – switching back and forth between DL and EL – delights in hearing the sound of his or her own reappearance of who he or she truly is.

 

Initially, we laugh – in EL – about the fact that we become conscious again, as we realize, we have been unconscious of ourselves during DL, but as we laugh more and more, because we remain conscious and are capable of continuing with our EL, we can recognize our ongoing EL as our Language Enlightenment (LE). Remarkably, at some point, we no longer seem to reappear, since we are no longer disappearing in our DL, that is, we don’t believe anymore, in who we believed to be from our conditioning history. This is such a relief. 

 

Surely, in dreadful DL, our so-called identity was always based on the assumption of inner language. We discover and acknowledge during our ongoing EL, that there is – and never was – any language inside of us, that our so-called covert private speech or our mind, was only a fantasy, an oral illusion, which was created by our DL. Similarly, to optical illusions, when your eyes and brain are tricked into seeing things, which are not really there, there can also be auditory illusions.

 

We generally believe, that auditory illusions are experienced by someone, who is – with our DL, is said to be – mentally ill, but when we refer to our imaginary mind, we talk about hearing a voice inside of us, while in reality, of course, no sound is made and nothing is really heard. The common auditory illusion, we call thinking, in which we habitually say, we hear something, which isn’t there and, then, supposedly, listen to what is said by our inner self or being, is equally false as the optical illusion, in which we seem to see things, which aren’t there, but which we are tricked into believing to be there.  

 

The difference between our DL and EL, is quite simple: in DL we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak, but in EL, we listen to ourselves while we speak. Consequently, in DL we imagine to be hearing all sorts of stuff inside of us and we say it is our thinking, because we don’t get to fully express ourselves with our real voice, which can be heard. Once we have EL, it is very clear – and we are forever grateful to Karine Jean-Pierre, the arrogant, obviously lying press-secretary of our hopefully soon to be gone, stupid Joe Biden – that our DL, in which we don’t listen to our own voice, while we speak, has tricked us into believing in inner language. This is a mistake of catastrophic psychological proportions, but here our disappear humor comes to the rescue. It is the solution to all the gas-lighting that is going on everywhere. 

 

Once we discover – with our EL, for ourselves and by ourselves, while enjoying our disappear humor – that our thinking or mind, is nothing else, but an auditory illusion - and, indeed, we have constantly believed in hearing something, which never was really there, in the first place, and, that we have based all our actions on a sound, which we didn’t and couldn’t hear, but which we believed to be hearing - we laugh whole-heartedly at the disappearance of this nightmare, which has kept all of mankind stuck, not in this imaginary mind, but in this horrific, automatic DL, the way of talking, which is causing and increasing all of our problems.

 

Only in DL, but never with EL, do we create and maintain the auditory illusion, which we have called our mind. In EL, we listen to ourselves, and we dispel the illusion, which permanently disappears, and this is our LE. It should be clear by now to the attentive reader – and to Karine Jean-Pierre, who hopefully informs our idiotic president Joe Biden about this phenomenal discovery – that during an auditory illusion, it is not someone’s brain, which is falsely interpreting its surrounding and distorting their perception of the world around them, but it is DL, the way of talking, in which we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak.

 

The peek-a-boo play has many variations and disappear humor is one of them, for grownups. You can hide behind a tree or hide your face behind your hand and say, where am I or ask, where is the baby? In EL, you say, instead of, I see you, I hear you, to yourself. Surely, there is no me and myself and this convoluted dual aspect of who I seemed to be finally disappears. Not coincidentally, peek-a-boo is considered – with our DL – as the fundamental structure of all good jokes, since we dominate, manipulate or surprise the expectation of others with our sound and words. In EL, we are not busy with others and that is why we speak naturally and effortlessly. To our great delight, who we really are, appears during EL. Our disappear humor, is about our EL, in which all our problems dissolve.