Donald Trump Almost Got Killed,  

 

I am so relieved Donald Trump survived this almost successful assassination attempt. We need him more than ever. I can’t imagine, what would have happened, if he would have died. I am afraid, all hell would then have broken lose and we would be having some kind of civil war.

 

The incendiary, openly-hateful manner, in which so many left-wing cooks, TV presenters, actors, officials and politicians have been speaking about Trump, over the last couple months, have led up to this escalation of violence. I describe  this totally unhinged rhetoric – in which Trump is repeatedly described as and compared with Adolf Hitler – as Disembodied Language (DL).

 

You may not believe me, but DL is the way of speaking, in which you, as speaker, don’t listen to yourself, while you speak. Moreover, DL has never been properly addressed with Embodied Language (EL) – in which you, as speaker, listen to yourself, while you speak – and is, therefore, going on in every society, around the world. The difference between DL and EL reveals to us the real reason, why human beings can’t get along.

 

You hear many people, on the left, talk about the need to ‘lower-the-temperature’, but it is the left, who continues to incite violence, not the right. It is the always the left and never the right, which is instigating: raging, antisemitic, pro-Hamas, anti-America protests; George Floyd-BLM-riots; shops being looted; judges not prosecuting criminals; harassment of Supreme Court justices; anti-fascist-demonstrations, in which statues and monuments are defaced; the fact, that millions of illegals can just walk in; the nihilism, which suggests, that we cannot fix our problems in our social institutions, which need to be torn and so we can start over; law-fare or legal action, as part of a campaign against the political opponent; need for chaos, as a path to gain status and power, by  calling for the overthrow and the destruction of established order…just to name a few…

 

Although the difference between DL and EL is as unknown, on the left, as on the right side of the political spectrum, it is absolutely clear, the left – and not the right - is repeatedly willing to justify and endorse violence as a means to force their ideology. Moreover, while the right is in favor of the protection of individual freedom, merit, responsibility, accountability and family, the left is constantly on the attack, screaming, basically, like little children, demanding things to go their way. The left is against the family and supporting grooming and indoctrination of children with fake-transgender-identity. Anyone with any awareness about the difference between DL and EL can hear and see, DL fits more with the left, while EL fits with the right.

 

I obviously use this attack on the life of Trump, to let people know, we urgently need to begin to address the DL/EL distinction. Furthermore, it should be noted, DL always escalates. This is the history of mankind. DL and the wars, which are – unconsciously – justified by our usual way of talking, have continued unabated, because we haven’t addressed the quintessential issue of our time: everything we do is determined by how we talk. Once our way of talking changes, all our other behavior begins to change. This is not some spiritual, psychological, philosophical,  cultural fantasy, but a scientific phenomenon.

 

As a new American, who was fortunate to have immigrated from the Netherland in 1999, I have slowly, but surely, become politically aware. In the Netherlands, I never paid much attention to politics, but my views were mostly left leaning, determined by how I grew up and had been educated. My Catholic father, who grew up during the occupation of the Germans, was traumatized by this experience. When Holland was liberated by the Allied Forces, in 1945, he had survived, as a child, the Hunger Winter. The rebuilding of Dutch society – with the help of the Marshall plan – set the stage for his limited education, marriage, immediate employment, the creation of a family of three sons and three daughters and a labor-socialist political view. 

It wasn’t until recently, I began to make sense of politics, in terms of how it relates to DL and EL. My unequivocal conclusion is that EL is truly the language of mankind’s future, because it is the ultimate expression of individual freedom. No amount of virtue-signaling, about the need to presumably protect democracy, convinces me, that the left’s cancel-culture is in favor individual freedom, which is a core principle of the American way of life. No, it is Donald Trump and those MAGA republicans, who support him. I am proud to be one. Please also check out my videos on my two You Tube channels maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw and Maximus Peperkamp. Hear me talk and sing.     

 Language Discrimination,

 

While reading about bilingualism – I speak and write in Dutch and English – I came across the term Language Discrimination (LD), which occurs when a person is treated differently because of that person’s native language or other characteristics of that person’s speech. Of course, such different treatment is always negative. For instance, in an employment situation, an employee may be subjected to LD if the workplace has a speak-English-only policy, but the employee’s primary language is something other than English. In this case, the employee may be a victim of LD, if he or she is treated less favorably than other employees, because he or she speaks English with an accent or if the employee is told, he or she does not qualify for a position due of a lack of English proficiency. Also, outside the work situation LD may happen when a person is denied access to business or government services because he or she doesn’t speak English. In California, where I live, LD is considered a form of discrimination, on the bases of race or national origin.

 

As I have often stated, I consider the immensely important difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL), as the difference between languages, because, in terms of acquiring EL, the same principles of learning apply. Both DL as well as EL, exist only to the extent that they are reinforced and the very reason, that DL is happening everywhere, but that EL only happens very seldom, briefly, and unconsciously, show EL isn’t reinforced. The lack of reinforcement for EL, can be justifiably viewed as a form of LD or, more bluntly: DL is the LD, which puts anyone with EL to shame.

 

When children grow up bilingually, they often – obviously, because of DL – end up speaking only one language. This glotophobia is the rejection of people for their way of speaking, writing or vocabulary, based on the dominant norms of language. Like an identity card, the language we speak and, particularly, the way in which we speak, reveals who we really are. DL and EL occur within every language, so within French, Chinese or English, people are able to engage in DL or in EL. Within every language, there is LD, because as long as DL goes on, EL is impossible.

 

The act of elocution – the skill of clear and expressive speech, especially of distinct pronunciation and articulation – should be affirmative of who we truly are, but this is not the case as long as we, unknowingly, engage in DL. Indeed, in absence of any attention for EL, our ordinary speech is an act of denunciation of who we really are. Moreover, our negative DL always happens unconsciously. Thus, with our automatic, forceful DL, we shoot ourselves in the foot, as we discriminate against ourselves, by preventing ourselves from having any EL. It is even more insidious, as we prevent ourselves and each other from having EL, because we fear, we don’t belong to the dominant group, the majority, with DL.

 

Certainly, there is the importance to diversity of languages – such as Russian, Spanish, Swedish, etc. – but, we aren’t appreciative of linguistic plurality, because our hostile, distrusting DL, which continues our LD and isn’t interested in the vitality and richness of the world and society in which we live. There is no EL and there basically cannot be any EL, because DL and LD, belittles and practically annihilates anyone who has EL. I am still alive, and I am – in spite of endless rejection and judgement – able to make it, because I talk out loud with myself, I listen to myself, and I act on what how I have instructed myself. My ability to self-stimulate was always sufficient, to find and meet the rare, courageous, honest individuals, with whom I could have mutually reinforcing EL.   

 

DL, in which speakers don’t listen to themselves while they speak, isn’t merely a dismissal of just one or two aspects of who we are, but it is the complete denial of who are as a person. In DL, we all turn our backs on our naturalness. Yes, our DL is the ultimately form of discrimination, called LD. We do this to ourselves and others, because we were conditioned to do this and not because we want to do this. Once we talk with ourselves and listen to ourselves, we find that we don’t want to have DL, but we want EL.

 

In conclusion, I claim our DL is in essence racist. With our unintelligent DL, we discriminate against the human race.  Supposedly, DL is acceptable, as it is going on everywhere, twenty-for-seven, but anyone like me, who knows the great difference between DL and EL, doesn’t accept DL, because he or she will somehow be able to manage to continue with their EL. My skill to do that, is because I hear the difference between my own DL and EL. Once you can hear the big difference between your DL and EL, you will be able to hear it in others. We engage continuously in DL because of our conditioning history, in which we were reinforced for our DL, but we were punished for our EL.       

 No longer,

 

For some time I no longer feel like being friends with AnnaMieke - with whom I have had so many pleasant, wonderful conversations on Skype - because she does not want to talk about politics.

 

Actually, I had known about her position for quite a while, but I enjoyed our contact, which was possible, as I had never so far felt a strong impetus to talk about politics.  

 

Now that it has been a while since I broke off our contact, I realize how important it was for me to take this step, to be able to continue talking about what I want to talk about. Initially, I didn't find it that objectionable, although I already knew that AnnaMieke automatically viewed politics as something that would distract from Embodied Language (EL). Since I live in the United States, where politics is something very important, which everyone talks about it day in, day out, I cannot avoid talking and writing about it with my EL.

Since I no longer speak with AnnaMieke, I have become convinced, politics plays an incredibly important role in the fact that everywhere in the world - not just in America - we do not have EL, but only Disembodied Language (DL). 

 

I simply cannot escape the impression, although DL is the basis of every culture, the opposite is also possible. In fact, I am convinced, this is precisely where the real future lies for our EL. And, it seems to me, EL is ultimately going to determine politics, because it is the language of the future.    

I'm not imagining anything, because I know all too well what the current state of affairs is. For me, it is as clear as day, that left-wing politics fits with DL, but right-wing politics aligns with EL. I find it absolutely ridiculous, that even someone like AnnaMieke still does not want to acknowledge this. It points to an unwillingness to admit, that the worldview she had with her DL still influences her and she wants to make it seem as if her EL could continue in concert with this horrible perspective. It will probably never happen that AnnaMieke admits, I am not merely expressing my opinion. This is why I no longer speak with her or anyone else who wants to continue with DL.

 

Fortunately, I have given up trying to make it clear to others, they have DL, because I believe they can and should do this themselves. I am only interested in the progress of EL and will not let anyone hinder me in this.

 

It is important for me to be clear about EL's political implications, because, due to my conditioning, that clarity was not there until quite recently. So, there is no possibility of having ongoing EL and at the same time adhering to left-wing, socialist, Marxist, communist, individuality-oppressing politics. It is also impossible to have EL, if one still lives in the illusion, that one is a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu or atheist, or when one considers oneself as someone important, because of meditation, consciousness, sensitivity, creativity, education, weapons, science or economics. Who we believe to be, is always tied to the continuation of DL. I don't believe I have EL, but I have it and I know I do and that is my Language Enlightenment (LE). My EL and LE have nothing to do with faith.

 

I have nothing to say and, therefore, I can say what I really want to say. I always start with nothing and speak and write only from there. Left-wing politics is the biggest obstacle to individuality and anyone who has listened to themselves, should be able to admit, this is unquestionably true. In other words, only capitalism – and no other view – has enriched humanity and resulted in individuals being given rights in Democratic Western societies. However, all the enemies of capitalism are – always – against the freedom of the individual.

  

DL is the history of mankind, in which group behavior has repeatedly suppressed individual behavior. It is an indisputable fact that EL could only emerge from the prosperity created by capitalism. Yes, I am a product of the society in which I grew up. I foresee the possibility, with our EL, we will one day create a completely different society, based on wealth and well-being.

 

My view is simple and realistic.  Everything we created and maintained with DL will gradually disappear and be replaced by something better with our EL. Only the behavioral repertoires that fit EL remain, which means, that our lives will become increasingly simpler and more satisfying.

 

Everyone can experience and acknowledge how everything becomes more difficult and complicated. This is the inevitable consequence of our unconscious participation in and approval of DL. Especially in DL, there is pretense of simplicity and comfortable living, but these are just empty slogans, that have no support in reality. We are merely told something - by others, but also by ourselves - with the help of DL, which is not true, but we believe it, because others have believed it too. This is our historic group behavior, which, to this day, continues our devastating, unnatural DL, but this comes to a decisive end with our natural EL.

 Niet langer,

 

Ik voel mij sinds enige tijd niet langer meer bevriend met AnnaMieke – met wie ik zovele aangename, prachtige gesprekken heb gehad op skype – omdat ze niet over politiek wil praten.

 

Eigenlijk wist ik al enige tijd van haar standpunt,  maar ik genoot van ons contact, wat mogelijk was, omdat ik nog niet eerder de aanzet had gevoeld, om het toch over politiek te hebben.

 

Nu het alweer een tijdje geleden is, dat ik het contact heb verbroken, realiseer ik me, hoe belangrijk het voor mij was, om deze stap te nemen, om het te kunnen blijven hebben over waar ik het over wil hebben. Aanvankelijk vond ik het nog niet zo bezwaarlijk, ofschoon ik wel wist, dat AnnaMieke politiek automatisch beschouwd als iets wat af zou leiden van Belichaamde Taal (BT), maar, aangezien ik in de Verenigde Staten leef, waar politiek iets heel belangrijks is, waar iedereen het, dag in, dag uit, over heeft, ontkom ik er niet aan, om daar vanuit BT over te praten en te schrijven.

 

Sinds ik niet meer met AnnaMieke spreek, ben ik ervan overtuigd geraakt, dat politiek een zeer belangrijke rol speelt in het feit, dat wij overal ter wereld – niet alleen in Amerika – geen BT, maar Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) hebben.  

 

Ik kan mij eenvoudigweg niet aan de indruk onttrekken, dat ofschoon OT natuurlijk ten grondslag ligt aan iedere cultuur, ook het ongekeerde mogelijk is. Ik ben er zelfs van overtuigd, dat juist precies daar de enige reele toekomst ligt voor BT. En, het schijnt mij toe, dat BT uiteindelijk de politiek zal gaan bepalen, want BT is de taal van de toekomst en niet OT.   

 

Ik beeld mij niets in, want ik weet maar al te goed wat de huidige stand van zaken is. Voor mij is het echter zo klaar als een klontje, dat linkse politiek past bij OT, maar dat de rechtse politiek aansluit bij BT. Ik vind het belachelijk, dat zo’n iemand als AnnaMieke, dit niet wil erkennen. Het wijst op de onwil, om toe te geven, dat het wereld-beeld wat ze had met OT, nog steeds van invloed op haar is en het zelfs wil doen voorkomen, alsof BT zou kunnen voortgaan in samenspraak met deze afgrijzelijke opvatting. Het zal waarschijnlijk wel nooit gaan gebeuren, dat AnnaMieke toe gaat geven, dat dit zo is. Ik spreek niet meer met haar, of met wie dan ook, die, mijnsinziens, voort wil blijven gaan met OT.

 

Ik heb gelukkig opgegeven, om het aan anderen duidelijk te maken, dat ze OT hebben, want ik vind, dat ze dit zelf kunnen doen. Ik ben alleen maar geinteresseert in de voortgang van met BT en laat mij door niemand hierin belemmeren.

 

Het is van groot belang, om over de politiek van BT duidelijk te zijn, omdat die duidelijkheid, vanwege mijn conditionering, er tot voor kort nog niet was. Er bestaat dus geen mogelijkheid, om BT te hebben en om tegelijkertijd linkse, socialistische, Marxistische, communistische, het-vrije-individu-onderdrukkende-politiek aan te hangen. Eveneens is het onmogelijk om BT te hebben, als men nog in de illusie leeft, dat men een Christen, Muslim, Jood, Hindoe of atheist zou zijn, of dat men zich belangrijk waant, vanwege meditatie, bewustzijn, gevoeligheid, creativiteit, schooling, wapens, wetenschap of economie. Wie wij geloven te zijn, hangt samen met de voortgang van OT. Ik geloof niet dat ik BT heb, want ik heb het. Dat is Taal Verlichting (TV). Mijn BT heeft niets met geloof te maken.

 

Ik heb niets te zeggen en daarom kan ik zeggen wat ik echt wil zeggen. Ik begin altijd met niets en spreek en schrijft alleen daarvanuit. Linkse politiek is de grootste sta-in-de-weg voor individualiteit en iedereen, die ooit eens eventjes echt naar zichzelf heeft kunnen luisteren, zou volgens mij in staat moeten kunnen zijn, om volmondig toe te geven, dat dit zonder meer waar is. Anders gezegd, alleen het kapitalisme – geen enkele andere opvatting – heeft de mens verrijkt en heeft tot gevolg gehad, dat in Democratische Westerse maatschappijen individuen rechten hebben gekregen. Alle vijanden van het kapitalisme zijn echter – altijd – tegen de vrijheid van het individu.

 

OT is de geschiedenis van de mensheid, waarin het groep-gedrag telkens het individuele gedrag de kop heeft ingedrukt. Het is een onomstotelijk feit, dat BT alleen kon voortkomen uit de welvaart, die door het kapitalisme tot stand was gebracht. Ja, ik ben een produkt van de maatschappij waarin ik opgroeide. Ik voorzie de mogelijkheid, dat wij met onze BT een heel andere maatschappij gaan creeren, die gebaseerd is op welvaart en welzijn.

 

Mijn kijk is simpel en realistisch.  Alles wat wij met OT hebben gecreerd en in stand hebben gehouden, zal geleidelijk aan gaan verdwijnen en worden vervangen door iets beters met BT. Alleen het gedrag dat past bij BT blijft over, wat dus inhoudt, dat ons leven alsmaar eenvoudiger en genoegzamer gaat worden.

 

Iedereen ervaart aan den lijve, hoe alles alleen maar moeilijker en ingewikkelder wordt. Dit is het onvermijdelijke gevolg van onze onbewuste deelname aan en goedkeuring van OT. En, juist in OT vindt de pretentie plaats van eenvoud en gemak, maar dit zijn slechts loze kreten, die geen enkel draagvlak in de werkelijkheid hebben. Er wordt ons – door anderen, maar ook door ons zelf – met behulp van OT iets voorgehouden, wat niet waar is, maar wij geloven het, omdat anderen het ook geloven. Dit is ons historische groeps-gedrag, dat, tot op de dag van vandaag, de voortgang van onze onnatuurlijke OT bewerkstelligd, maar hieraan komt een pertinent einde met onze natuurlijke BT.   

 Almost,

 

You can’t make this shit up. This is how crazy American politics is today. Luckily, the so-called Save-Act – which requires proof of citizenship in federal elections – was passed, yesterday, in the House in a 221-198 vote. So, almost every treasonous democrat voted to, supposedly, ‘protect’ the ability of illegals to vote. Surely, Alejandro Mayorkas, who is the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, has willfully and systematically refused to comply with the law, in regard to federal immigration laws and breach of the public trust. Without any doubt, the with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) afflicted democrats, have deliberately, flooded the United States with millions of illegals – who the hell knows how many terrorists are among them? – in an all-out attempt, to give them voting rights and interfere with next election. A full House vote on February 6, to impeach this America-hating traitor, failed to pass in a 214-216 vote, also, almost entirely along party-lines.

 

Anyone, who objects to these evil democrats, is considered a fascist, a racist, a nationalist, but the fact of the matter is, that the democratic party welcomes the current invasion of the United States, along with mass unfettered migration as a whole, because they desire to decrease the power held by the founding American-European population for the purpose of advancing their neo-communist agenda. The same thing is happening in Europe as well as in United States, because, in spite of there being so-called free democratic societies, nobody has paid attention to Disembodied Language (DL), our dominant, primitive, reactive, fear-based, always-escalating, stupid, effortful, unnatural, unconscious way of talking, which is our ancient group-behavior, which is against the individual.

 

We have almost reached the complete collapse of Western civilization. With DL, the destruction of the free world, is almost a fait accompli. Our denial to acknowledge the immense difference between our, usual, insensitive, automatic way of dealing with language, which, simply stated, is language-as-determined-by-the-group and our Embodied Language (EL), our new way of dealing with language – in which we do not speak to listen to each other, but to ourselves – is why our forceful group-behavior continues.  

 

Our new way of talking, EL, which I describe as  language-as-determined-by-the-individual, is the only way, to effectively counteract our long and dreadful conditioning history with DL. Our political system is based on political parties, on groups, but now, it almost cannot be denied, only conservatives and republicans are in favor of the individual, while democrats are willing to invite hordes of unknown aliens, who have no allegiance to American values, grounded in the supremacy of freedom for the individual. They are willing to sacrifice everything that is good about the United States on the altar of their ideology.  

 

EL, which is the honest, sensitive, intelligent,  expression of our individual freedom, is against anything, that is forced, coerced or pushed on us, with language. Anyone, who knows about the great difference between DL and EL, will always reject DL and prefer EL. Once there is clarity and certainty, about the importance of the continuation of our own EL, we will do anything, that will make it happen, which means, we will defend ourselves from the forces of evil, which are caused and maintained by DL, which is our common way of talking. The only way to do this, is by talking with ourselves and by listening to ourselves, because without this necessary form of self-stimulation, our EL,  subsides in absence of social reinforcement. A new sense of unity is experienced by our shared EL, because we come together as individuals, who are staying away from any group-behavior.

 

We may like to believe, that a lot has changed, because of our wonderful technology, but when it comes to speaking and listening, that is, to our individual human relationships, to our way of interacting, almost nothing has changed. We are still ignorant about our communication and that is why we have accepted hierarchical DL – in which someone is presumably superior, while others are inferior – as the only possible way. This has been going on and this is still going on in every society around the world, because it has never been addressed, as I do, with my EL.

 

Our blunt, outdated, unintelligent DL affects almost all aspects of our lives, but we don’t even know this. Democrats justify their DL by anti-racist campaigns and by insisting diversity is our strength, but they are as much in denial of EL as conservatives. It is interesting to see, how people on the right, basically, don’t dare to speak about their objectives, as they are in fear of being accused of discrimination. However, distinguishing between our DL and our EL, is the most ultimate form of discrimination, as it will expose and discard our superstitious DL-beliefs.

 

A lot has been said and written about freedom, but written language – the Constitution – did  not and could not accomplish the revolutionary change in spoken language from DL to EL, which I am referring to. We cannot write or study our way into a better way of communicating and it should be stated here, that psychology – which I have studied and taught for many years – has utterly failed us. Our way of dealing with our language, but also all of our other behavior, is determined by how we speak. If we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak, we will inevitably imagine to be living in the la-la-land of so-called inner language, our mind, but when we listen to ourselves, while we speak – as we do in EL – we realize, we are free, as there is no inner speech. And, this frees us up to have EL with each other.  

 

EL almost seems too good to be true. Perhaps, it is the puritan, self-effacing, religious attitude, which still underlies the modern Pilgrim’s grit, which has prevented him or her from enjoying true individualism, with EL, which is without the deity called God or the deity called inner self. If one takes the time, to speak, in order to be able to listen to oneself and to understand oneself, one notices, almost immediately, an incredible blessing, from the energy, that was stuck in DL, which comes back to you, when you have EL.            

 Why?

 

Why are so many horrible things happening? Why does no reporter have the guts to say that Machine Jean-Pierre is an arrogant, nasty, celebrity bitch? Why aren’t there any peace-talks between Russia and Ukraine? Why is America sending millions of dollars to Ukraine, which is a devastating, corrupt mess, under its current leadership, which has whipped out a generation of young men? Why are there many countries in the UN, which are in blatant violation of human rights? Why is Turkey in the democratic EU, while it’s president is an antisemitic, autocrat? Why are there so many anti-Israel demonstrations, but not a word about the massacres, committed by Muslims against Muslims in Syria and Yemen or Muslims against Christians or Hindus? Why am I the only one, who is talking about the obvious difference between our Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL)?

 

My answer to all the aforementioned questions is: people simply lack the skill to have ongoing EL and, therefore, haven’t and couldn’t have acquired the necessary self-knowledge, to make decisions, which result into better outcomes. Stated differently, our outdated DL, in which we, as speakers, don’t listen to ourselves ruins everything, that is beautiful and meaningful in life. Our DL creates and maintains our absurd beliefs, which prevent us from having the EL, which I am talking about. Moreover, I am the only one, who is talking and writing about the DL/EL distinction, because people don’t have the sincerity to acknowledge this major truth.

 

Why don’t you have any EL? You can’t have EL, as long as you don’t listen to yourself while you speak. Why don’t you listen to yourself while you speak? You don’t listen to yourself while you speak, because you were taught to listen to others, to authority outside of you and, yes, you were punished for speaking with and listening to yourself, you were – in DL – condemned for being an individual. Why do we all abide by the rules for communication, which were set by DL? We seem to be having no other choice, than to conform to the social hierarchy, in which only a few manage to become superior, while the rest is inferior. This is why even today only a handful of people do all the talking, and, supposedly, do the talking on behalf of the millions of people, who are merely reduced to listeners or readers.

 

Why do I have ongoing EL, while everyone else engages, day in, day out, in DL? I was supposed to have DL, just like everyone else, but I failed. Somehow, DL wasn’t working for me. Before I knew about the DL/EL distinction, I wondered, desperately, for many years, why everyone was always getting away with their DL, but I didn’t? It seemed so unfair, that I always got punished, rejected, ridiculed, ignored, humiliated, judged, avoided or disrespected, but I found out people just couldn’t stand it, whenever I spoke up and raised my voice. Why are all hateful protesters on college and university campuses allowed to scream hysterically and make any conversation impossible, while my DL isn’t tolerated? I know when I have DL, but others don’t. I can engage in DL with you and still admit, that we are both having DL, you can’t. Since I am the one, who is willing to admit it, I always got blamed for DL, while I was merely addressing it was happening. Why did I stop addressing DL with DL? I didn’t like the outcome and I rather go on with my EL.

 

Why does Nancy Peligroso look so pale, all of a sudden? Why is no democrat willing to answer any reporter anymore? Why is the democratic party in disarray? Why is the dam breaking on the many lies, which have been told about Joe Biden’s health? Why is the Left-wing media in a panic? Why has Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) spread so quickly among democrats and Republicans In Name Only (RINO’s)? Why are the democrats in favor of letting all the illegals vote? Why is Joe Biden still pretending as if he is going to be the next president? Why has no one in academia or in science – in spite of my many years studying psychology, working in psychology and teaching psychology – admitted that all these questions have different answers, depending on whether we engage in DL or EL, whether we have real of phony conversations?

 

Why are people, who were chosen in leadership positions by the Biden administration, because of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) a disaster for the Unites States? Why does it matter, Kamala Harris is so unpopular? Why is DEI, like religion, a failed attempt at having EL? Why is your way of talking, in which you don’t listen to yourself, having far-reaching horrendous consequences? Why all the fuss about someone’s fake-genitals, fake-butt, fake-tits, fake-eyelashes, fake-lips, fake-hair or tattoos, nails and piercings? Why do we only pay any attention to those who instill fear in us, who intimidate, overwhelm and dominate us? It is because we were only reinforced for our DL.

 

Why would you explore the possibility of talking with yourself and listening to yourself? It is only because someone – like me – stimulates you to do this, because he or she is able to show you the positive consequences of having done so him or herself. Why is DL, like the power of Joe Biden, coming to its end? It is because people want a different way of talking, a different way of governing, a different way of relating. Why is Joe Biden a bad father? His daughter wrote in her diary, that he took inappropriate showers with her; his son’s laptop – which, supposedly, was Russian-planted disinformation – showed, he was a perverted junkie, who refused to pay childcare for his child with a prostitute, which Joe Biden refused to acknowledge as a member of his family. Why is Biden a racist? Look it up and find out for yourself, the many sickening racist things he said. Why did no one hold him accountable for his fabrications, his plagiarisms, his disgusting hair-sniffing and touching? Why has no one ever apologized for covering for Joe Biden? It is because everyone is complicit with their DL.                   

 Political Speech,

 

I am in favor of Embodied Language (EL) and against Disembodied Language (DL) and, this is why I write and speak – from the point of view, afforded by my ongoing EL – about what each human being, individually, should and shouldn’t do. However, my EL is not an argument for or against something, as that would be more of the same DL, which is happening everywhere. I am not having any relationship, with those who have DL, as I only relate to those who have EL.

 

Surely, EL will make your life better, because you finally get to attend to yourself, with your own language. In effect, EL marks the end of your allegiance to DL, the group-behavior, that has been going on since time memorial, which still continues until today, in the name of Left as well as Right-wing politics. Unless DL is stopped, there can be no EL. Both parties keep trying to address DL with DL, but that has never worked.

 

I want everyone to take action: start speaking with yourself and listening to yourself and begin to hear the great difference between your own DL and EL. Only you can stop your DL and if you do, you will be able to have EL and experience a better way of life. I write my blog and speak on my You Tube channels – 1) Maximus Peperkamp and 2) maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw – because I only want to engage in political speech with EL. I have nothing to say, politically, with DL, as for me, EL is not a contentious or contested issue.

 

I don’t merely speak – as everyone with blunt, scripted, unconscious DL does – with my EL about politics, but I engage in an instance of politics, which, therefore, isn’t aimed at any group, but only at those rare individuals, who are receptive to my perspective. I’m not trying to win support for a proposition concerning some community, party, counsel or country, as I am only concerned with the genuine interaction between one person and another. The issue of persuasive speech is irrelevant and absent in EL.

 

Although I would like you to stop your own DL, so that you can have EL with me and others, I am not thinking that should happen. To me thinking is a false concept, which refers to our long, dreadful, problematic history with DL, in which we stubbornly believed in the occurrence of inner language or private speech. EL is not about changing the so-called minds and hearts of people, because these are useless concepts, which came about due to our DL. EL is about changing the way, in which you, as an individual speak and this will alter all your other behavior.

 

Once you have ongoing EL, you acknowledge, it is not about supporting or opposing this or that idea, because any so-called idea is just another fabrication of your DL, in which you never could say what you wanted to say and were capable of saying. Therefore, ideas are fantasies about language, inside of us, which we call mind. This illusion is created and maintained by your DL. I give you reason and motivation, to stop your DL: with DL, you cannot be yourself. I don’t care if you agree or disagree with me, because EL or DL is about whether your language agrees or disagrees, fits or doesn’t fit, with your behavior.

 

A so-called political stump speech is a standard speech used by a politician running for office. Typically, a candidate, who schedules many appearances, prepares a short, standardized stump speech that is repeated verbatim to each audience before opening to questions. The stump speech is an early American custom, in which candidates campaigned from town to town and stood upon a sawed-off tree stump to deliver their speech. Usual, scripted, political stump speech is of course, very different from unusual, unscripted speech, in which we speak with one another, as an individual. This is the gigantic difference between our DL and EL.

 

Real communication is unscripted, but phony speech is always scripted. Joe Biden is clearly into the old, scripted speech and he falls apart, each time he speaks off the cuff. Donald Trump is so refreshing, because he shows us, political speech doesn’t have to be boring and scripted. He speaks as a real individual and he is funny, but angry Joe Biden virtue-signals, he is saving democracy, while the Left is blatantly against the freedom of speech, the founding principle of the United States. Although people on the Right also don’t know about the difference between DL and EL, they are in favor of the freedom of speech, and they are more open to what I am talking about than the Left. This conclusion is inevitable, to anyone who has EL. Those who don’t want to admit and talk about, that political speech of the Left and the Right, map - not coincidentally - onto the DL/EL distinction, are against individual freedom.