All the way,

 

I went all the way with my Embodied Language (EL) and have discovered, there really exists no other person, because he or she, can only be, how or what I perceive them to be. As long as I still had only an image of my wife, I was only relating to that image, but not to who she truly is. Obviously, she is not the image, I created of her with my way of viewing her, which depends on how I deal with language. Due to my EL, I have let go of that image and am amazed, to live with the loving mystery, I call my wife.

 

After 66 years of living, it is still astonishing to me, no one has plainly said: Maximus, you are right, there is no language inside of me. And, of course, Disembodied Language (DL) is going on everywhere, while EL is, basically, nowhere to be found, as only DL is reinforced, not EL. The way of talking, in which we listen to ourselves while we speak – because we like to hear what we say to ourselves - is only very briefly, very reluctantly and very awkwardly reinforced. I now fully understand, why I get such a kick out of humor, because, like EL, it is also treated in the same lousy way. Even those, who are funny, according to those who have DL, aren’t funny at all according to my EL. Real humor is for the most part not reinforced but punished. My fun is in seeing and hearing everyone fuss and fight and pretending they are right, while they get it wrong, with DL.

 

For most people, the bigger perspective, which is really a matter of bigger listening – of ongoing EL, in which we keep talking with ourselves and listening to ourselves – is sorely lacking. Our DL creates incorrect expectations, which are never fulfilled, while, by contrast, the consequences of our ongoing EL are always positive. With DL, we have no idea, what we believe others are doing to us, is what we are doing ourselves. My way of viewing others from my own perspective is the only way, anyone can view themselves. Yet, everyone, in DL, views others as different from themselves. This imaginary, unaddressed, false construct, is our belief in ourselves, which, as previously stated, is assumed to occur inside the head, as a non-audible private conversation with ourselves, we call: our mind.  

 

There is no other person, who, while I engage in EL, engages in DL, as it is only me, who is making this distinction. If there was another person, who like me, would engage in EL, he or she, would disappear and experience Language Enlightenment (LE), but, not with me, because I am not here. Ridiculously, many people talk a lot these days about mindfulness, but this just shows, they haven’t experienced the workings of ongoing EL, in which we notice, there is and there never was any language inside of us. This freedom of language is either made possible or made impossible by how we speak. Surely, EL only occurs if our DL has been stopped and DL cannot be stopped by writing, so we definitely need to talk.

 

There is no other way, to acquire our ongoing EL, than by talking out loud with ourselves and by talking with others, who have done the same thing as we have. In this sense, EL is like French or Chinese. It makes no sense to speak French with a Chinese. In the same way, it also makes no sense to try to have EL with DL. 

 

For centuries, presumably, sensitive, spiritual, artistic, creative, insightful people, also all the so-called great thinkers or great minds, have written books about things, which, presumably, they couldn’t talk about. Of course, they could talk about it with themselves, but that is not what they have done. Supposedly, they said, in their writing, what they had wanted to say, but this has never resulted in EL and created the illusion of EL. Consequently, most DL is merely the pretention, that it is EL. We are so good at acting as if we are having EL, because this is how we have survived, while we were talking with others. Written language is considered to be more important than our spoken language, because, supposedly, it is the real deal, EL, but, it has distracted us from our spoken language.     

 

We haven’t been, long enough, in a safe, stable, comfortable, stimulating environment, in which our old fear-based, acting-conditioning wasn’t triggered again. By making it seem, as if we are okay, as if we are fine, we are not able to bring attention to the fact – we make sure, we don’t do that – that we are not saying this, to those, who insult, humiliate, reject, hurt, oppress and disrespect us. Of course, we are not fine, when we say, we are fine. When we are fine, we don’t say we are fine. We only say this this to virtue-signal, to imagine, that we ward off the evil, as we dissociate with our DL.

 

Listening to our DL has no appeal to anyone, so we don’t consider this, as the only way to stop it. We do anything in our ability, to move away from our DL, as much as we can. We never tell ourselves what our DL is, because before we get into it, we have already changed the subject. Thus, our ability to pay attention, to what asks our attention, is like asking and answering our own questions. EL has its positive experience, but it also has its content. However, as long as we haven’t had sufficient saturation of our need for such positive experience – from which we were deprived in DL – we are likely to neglect, ignore or downplay, the verbal importance of our EL, which translates our experiences, which were, before, described and interpreted by DL.

 

Going all the way in asking and answering our own questions, with our EL, prevents us from ending up in the DL-fantasy-land of our own imagination. At some point, we have truly said everything we were capable of saying. Then, we will experience a magnificent silence. The more often we accomplish this, the more apparent it becomes, that we have nothing to say anymore.

 

Historically, many, presumably, great authors have been given praise for their writings, as they were seen as visionaries, ahead of their time and more advanced, but, in reality, these celebrated wordsmiths, philosophers, poets, were cowardly escaping from the DL reality of our spoken communication. Their great utopia was always a fabrication of their DL, which went on as if it was EL. Martin Luther King famously said that he had a dream and Osho’s last words were, I leave you my dream. EL is not a dream.

 

Ongoing EL debunks all our childish fantasies. Going all the way with EL, means we reason from an entirely new perspective. I live in the reality, which is created by my EL and that is why I say – how could I not? – politics is the only way, in which the immense difference is going to become clear to us. For eons of time, people have dreamed about, intensely longed for and tried to live in freedom, but they have never quite succeeded, as the issue our DL was never addressed with EL. There is a very clear and simple reason for this: group-behavior or DL, always won from individual behavior, which is our EL. This is what the 2024 election is about. The Left, who has always been trying to change the narrative, is now going in narrative-change- overdrive, to get Kamala Harris elected, but Donald Trump luckily still has some sense of reality. As long as we, regardless of our political beliefs, still believe, that we have a mind, we are, unconsciously, always acting out our unintelligent group-behavior, our conditioning history with DL. Individual freedom has nothing to do with any group-behavior. Standing alone could only be proudly accomplished and fully enjoyed with our ongoing EL.    

Belangrijk,

 

Ook al wil niemand dit geloven, Belichaamde Taal (BT) is natuurlijk veel belangrijker dan onze gebruikelijke Ontlichaamde Taal (OT). Iedereen doet met OT net alsof precies het omgekeerde waar is. Het is belangrijker, om wel naar onszelf te luisteren, terwijl wij praten, dan om niet naar onszelf te luisteren, terwijl wij praten.

 

Aangezien ik wel naar mijzelf luister, terwijl ik spreek, ben ik mij ervan bewust, dat iedereen die niet naar zichzelf luistert, voortdurend aan het beweren is, dat het schijnbaar belangrijk zou zijn, om niet naar onszelf te luisteren terwijl wij spreken. Uiteraard zegt men dit niet op deze directe manier, maar men overspoelt elkaar met van alles en nog wat, waar wij naar zouden moeten luisteren, omdat wordt verondersteld, dat het belangrijk zou zijn. Dit alles weerhoudt iedereen, om met zichzelf te spreken en om naar zichzelf te luisteren tijdens het spreken.  

 

Gedurende OT wordt alles in werking gesteld, om ervoor te zorgen, dat wij nooit met onszelf gaan praten, want, dat zou onherroepelijk tot gevolg kunnen hebben, dat wij dan naar onszelf gaan luisteren en, vervolgens, luisterend, in plaats van niet-luisterend, gaan spreken.  

 

Voortgaande BT is onmiskenbaar de taal van het individu, waardoor wij het groeps-gedrag, wat OT is, voorgoed achter ons gaan laten. Het niet willen onderzoeken en erkennen van de verstrekkende gevolgen van BT, is een kwestie van het afsterven van het oude en van vrees – vanuit het oude – voor wat het niewe, BT, zou gaan brengen. OT is heel simpel gezeg incorrect taalgebruik, maar BT is correct taalgebruik.

 

Men zegt in OT, al is de leugen nog zo snel, de waarheid achterhaald hem wel, maar met BT wordt het ons eindelijk duidelijk, dat ook al is de waarheid van BT nog zo snel, de leugen – van onze lange conditionerings geschiedenis met OT – komt keer op keer, opnieuw om de hoek kijken, omdat er geen ontkomen is, aan het feit, dat wij eindeloos zijn geintimideerd, geindoctrineerd en geprogrammeerd met OT. Het is onrealistisch, om te beweren of om te verwachten, dat het zomaar, vanwege een paar aangename ervaringen met BT, gedaan zou zijn met onze tragische, traumatische geschiedenis.  

 

Er is in geen velden of wegen BT te bekennen. Wat zich voordoet als BT, is geen BT, en kan absoluut geen BT zijn, omdat men zich nog steeds met bijgelovige, esoterische, nonsense verhalen bezighoudt, die allemaal verband houden met ons oer-oude bijgeloof van ons zogenaamde denken, het hebben van een innerlijk, gedrag-veroorzakend-en-regulerend zelf, met andere woorden, met innerlijke taal.

 

Zolang als wij blijven beweren en geloven, dat wij, in gedachten, met onszelf zouden kunnen praten, is het onmogelijk voort te gaan met BT, want er is geen taal binnenin ons. Het hebben van deze irrationele, maar door practisch iedere cultuur geaccepteerde fantasie maakt, dat wij, ondanks wetenschappelijke en technologische ontwikkelingen, nog steeds volslagen onbekend zijn met het enorme verschil tussen OT en BT.

 

Ook al heeft men tijdelijk het verschil tussen OT en BT kunnen ervaren, het is onvermijdelijk, dat men weer terugvalt in OT, omdat BT schijnbaar nog niet belangrijk genoeg was, om ermee door te gaan. Wat wij doorgaans, met OT, belangrijk vinden, is natuurlijk wat iedereen belangrijk vindt. Aangezien iedereen – ja, zo komt het ons voor, want het is niet eens zo – OT belangrijk vindt, houden wij het niet vol, om als eenling met onze BT verder te gaan.

 

Vele mensen, die het gigantische verschil tussen OT en BT even hebben durven ervaren, waren tot waanzin gedreven, omdat er niemand was – ook geen psycholoog, psychiater of therapeut – die hen kon bekrachtigen in hun BT. De enige wijze waarop zij BT konden hebben, was hun vermogen, om zichzelf te kunnen stimuleren. Deze zelf-stimulatie – in de gedragsleer noemt men dat automatische bekrachtiging – maakte dat zij OT als BT beschouwden, die hun sociale isolatie verhevigde. Vanwege mijn vele jaren van studie en werkzaamheden in de psychiatrie en psychology, weet ik heel zeker, dat het voor BT net zo noodzakelijk is, om door anderen sociaal te worden bekrachtigd, net als elke andere taal.  

 

Het is ontegenzeggelijk waar, dat OT, die overal plaatsvindt, een grote rol speelt in het ontstaan en het accepteren van de waanzin, dat men een of andere zogenaamde geestes-aandoening zou hebben of dat wij, zoals de Duitsers dat zo mooi en nadrukkelijk kunnen zeggen, krank im kopf zouden zijn. Ons individuele gedrag, dat samen zou moeten gaan met onze individuele taal, BT, wordt echter vanuit het oude, dwangmatige, groeps-gedrag, waaraan iedereen gewend is – en waarmee wij ook zelf zijn geconditioneerd – als abnormaal en dus als een ziekte ervaren.

 

Niemand met OT wil met mij spreken. Zelfs zij, die, omdat zij mij hebben ontmoet, het verschil zijn gaan kennen tussen OT en BT, willen niet meer met mij spreken en BT met mij hebben, want ze blijven mij of anderen de schuld geven van hun eigen OT. Elke keer gebeurde het weer, dat ik van anderen - direct of indirect - te horen kreeg, dat ik het bij het verkeerde eind zou hebben en duizenden keren ben ik hierdoor afgewezen. Het is zo vaak gebeurd, dat ik super-gevoelig ben geworden voor afwijzing. Ik kon alleen met mijn BT verder gaan, omdat ik keer op keer bleef erkennen, dat OT en BT nooit samen gaan. Ik weet exact of ik of anderen OT of BT hebben. Aangezien ik niet de OT van anderen kan stoppen, omdat zij dat zelf dienen te doen, heb mij steeds minder naar anderen uitgesproken, over wat ik waarnam. Ik voelde en hoorde de tekenen aan de wand, dat men mij weer zou verlaten, afwijzen, vergeten,  veroordelen, vermijden of doodzwijgen.

 

En zo voltrok zich dus het fantastische, ontroerende process, waarin mijn BT – ondanks alle ogenschijnlijke tegenslag – verder begon te gaan en waardoor mijn Taal Verlichting (TV) gestalte begon te krijgen, omdat ik iedereen met OT achter mij ben gaan laten. Ik was daar vroeger zo bedroefd over, maar ik voel mij nu niet meer verdrietig of afgewezen. Mijn BT en TV is belangrijker, dan de OT die overal gaande is. Ik heb mij geschikt in mijn merkwaardige lot, dat ik nu iedere dag van mijn BT en TV kan genieten. Ik begrijp waarom anderen hier niet mee verder willen, want het is een enorme confrontatie, om helemaal alleen te kunnen zijn, met onze eigen BT. Toch is mijn voortgaande BT alle ongemak waard geweest, dat ik heb doorgemaakt, omdat ik mijn rug heb toegekeerd naar de OT, waar iedereen zich onbewust mee bezig blijft houden.

 

Men vindt, als men zich daarop richt, precies  voldoende aansluiting bij anderen, die – ook al is het maar tijdelijk – BT kunnen hebben. Die bekrachtiging van de ander, overtuigd ons van het onomstotelijke feit, dat BT belangrijker is dan OT – of wat dan ook – in het leven. Het is een hele uitdaging, om, ondanks het feit dat iedereen OT heeft, toch met BT verder te gaan, maar zonder dat, zou er geen motivatie zijn.          

 Exorcising Evil,

 

During Disembodied Language (DL) – which is our usual way of speaking – we are endlessly working on averting some evil without noticing it. In other words, we always find ourselves in a threatening environment in our daily conversations and we are still unable to change the situation, in which we communicate, in such a way that there is no longer any fear. This change can only be achieved if we, as speakers, continue to listen to ourselves while speaking. This listening to ourselves while we are speaking stops our DL, allowing Embodied Language (EL) to take place. There is no evil to exorcize in EL, because evil has been resolved.

 

Over the centuries, people have done all kinds of weird things to avert evil, so to speak. All these  superstitious rituals have, of course, not helped at all. People are as evil as they have always been. It is therefore an indisputable fact that DL is happening everywhere and we hear almost nothing about EL.

 

A conversation that would take place because of speakers who, while speaking, continue to listen to themselves, is something that has never received attention and so EL is something we know nothing about. However, this does not mean we don’t want EL, but it means, we have no understanding of the difference between being polite, being kind, showing respect, having reverence or awe and EL. We cannot have EL if continue to stupidly exercise good manners. The evil that has never been mentioned, let alone thoroughly investigated, is the DL speaker – and, that is, you! It is your way of speaking, which creates the chaos and conflict in this world, not anyone's blissful EL.     

  

Ceremonial speaking, during a wedding, a baptism, a funeral or an official swearing-in, is the only ritual way in which we, due to our unconscious, deceptive, coercive, energy-draining, problematic, unnatural DL, can still pay attention to something together. Only because something is literally imposed on us, are we able to participate briefly together, for form, for good measure, from the old tradition, in a predictable, repetitive event.

 

It doesn't matter, whether people

 are believers or non-believers, 

because they are all - whether 

they admit it or not, because

 of their DL, that has never

 been mentioned or examined 

before - engaged in hoky-poky

 smoke-screen nonsense, 

which they firmly believe 

protects them from difficult

 or evil things in life. In EL, 

however, we – as individuals –

 are without evil, as we know

 all evil is in DL and all

exorcism of evil only 

happens with DL. In DL, 

we believe, we can eradicate

 evil with our ritualistic 

empty words, but this is

 not true. Evil behavior 

is caused and perpetuated

 by DL. In EL, in which 

we finally, as speakers, 

listen to ourselves, evil 

has already been eradicated,

 since DL has ceased. 

As a result, in realistic

 EL, we are no longer 

concerned with childish 

fantasies about eradicating evil.

 

Naturally, only with EL is it possible to have the courage and the clarity, to say the difference between good and bad. With DL, many people - Left-wing protesters, who continue to support Hamas, who are against Israel, who are also anti-America, who still pretend, with their symbolic, horrible, stupid, ritualistic screams, they can see something good in evil, in the horrific killing, raping, mutilation of innocent people – are claiming to support the good cause, supposedly, to liberate Gaza, while supporting the enemies of all Western Democratic countries. Netanyahu said it very clearly, today in his powerful speech before the US Congress - in which many anti-America, cowardly, Left-wing politicians, including Kamala Harris, refused to participate - this is not about a clash between two different cultures, but it is about the inevitable confrontation between barbarism and civilization.

 

After praising the heroic behavior of some of his excellent soldiers, Netanyahu explained again, that all those idiots, who want to protest, in support of Hamas, do not even recognize, that Iran is bringing the Islamic Revolution to the whole world. Nothing will be left of their freedom to demonstrate, once the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – which was established after WWII, to prevent a recurrence – has completely turned into an Islamic Sharia court, which jettisons Israel's survival. Also, the United Nations (UN) has turned anti-Israel and antisemitic and now does the bidding of the evil called political Islam.      

I have never been involved in a demonstration myself, because I always hated it. It strikes me that Left-wing groups are always demonstrating and always starting riots, but that there are hardly any Right-wing demonstrations. I actually believe every demonstration is not a sign of freedom, but an outdated, old-fashioned, superstitious ritual, supposedly, to do something about the evil in the world. However, those who really do something, to fight Hamas, are those brave Israeli soldiers, who give their lives to free those terrified hostages.

 

With my EL, I feel more related to a soldier and Right-wing politics, than to a protester and Left-wing politics. I know, I owe my freedom to people who have gone before me, who ensured that there are societies, in which an individual like me could develop. I consider myself the fortunate product of the entire history of mankind, and do not want the individual-crushing evil, group-behavior, which still is propagated by our DL, in the name of Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Fascism, Islamism and Jihadism, to win from EL. I will do everything in my ability to have EL. That is why I stand with all those, who fearlessly, unashamedly and unscathed fight for real freedom. They may lose a leg, an arm or an eye or even their life, but they are the protectors of my life with EL.

 

When we are finally done with our unconscious, forceful, unwilling participation in DL, which even goes on in the name of Democracy, we no longer have to engage in any meaningless rituals. Evil is only seen for what it is, if we realize, our normal way of speaking – DL – causes and maintains all evil behavior and that behavioral change will only take place, if we change our approach to language.

 

If we have ongoing EL, instead of more of the same DL, we will be able to get rid of the bad behavior that was created and maintained by our automatic DL. Good is not bad, high is not low and EL is very different from DL. Evil can never be defined with our common DL, because DL itself is evil, which we can only speak clearly about with EL. Evil is not a complex concept, but a dissociative way of talking, in which we are not – and cannot be – in touch with ourselves, because we do not listen to ourselves. We want others to listen to us or we listen to others, to authority outside ourselves, but we don’t listen to ourselves. This is where all human misery comes from. We do not renounce evil in EL, because in EL, we are no longer evil. EL is not some meaningless ritual.  

 

You can hear me read this writing – later today – on my You Tube channel maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw

 Het Kwaad Bezweren,

 

Tijdens Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) – gedurende onze gebruikelijke wijze van praten – zijn wij eindeloos ongemerkt bezig met het bezweren van een of ander kwaad. Anders gezegd, wij bevinden ons, in onze dagelijkse gesprekken, in een dreigende omgeving en wij zijn tot dusver nog steeds niet in staat, om de situatie waarin wij communiceren zodanig te veranderen, dat er geen enkele sprake meer is van angst. Deze verandering kan alleen worden bewerkstelligd indien wij, als spreker, tijdens het spreken naar onszelf blijven luisteren. Dit Luisterend Spreken stopt onze OT, waardoor Belichaamde Taal (BT) kan plaatsvinden. Er is in BT geen kwaad, om te bezweren, want het kwaad is met BT opgelost.

 

Mensen hebben door de eeuwen heen van alles gedaan, om zogezegd het kwaad te bezweren. Allerlei achterlijke bijgeloven hebben natuurlijk helemaal niets geholpen en mensen zijn net zo kwaadaardig, als dat ze altijd geweest zijn. Het is daarom een onomstotelijk feit, dat OT overal gaande is en dat wij over BT bijna niets horen. Een gesprek, dat plaats vindt vanwege sprekers, die, tijdens het spreken, naar zichzelf blijven luisteren, is iets, dat nog nooit aandacht heeft gekregen en dus is BT iets waar wij niets vanaf weten. Dit wil echter niet zeggen, dat wij geen BT zouden willen hebben, maar het betekent, dat wij geen begrip hebben van het verschil tussen beleefd doen, aardig zijn, respect tonen, eerbied hebben of ontzag hebben en BT. Wij kunnen geen BT hebben, zolang wij nog bezig blijven met het stomme bezweren van het nog nooit eerder benoemde kwaad: de OT-spreker - jij dus!    

 

Het zogenaamde ceremoniele spreken, tijdens een trouwerij, een doop plechtigheid, een begravenis of een officieele beediging, is de enige rituele manier, waarop wij, tijdens onbewuste, problematische, unnatuurlijke OT, nog gezamelijk ergens aandacht voor kunnen opbrengen. Alleen doordat ons letterlijk iets wordt opgelegd, zijn wij enigszins in staat, om, zogenaamd, voor de vorm, voor de goeie orde, vanuit de oude traditie, eventjes samen deel te nemen, aan een vaak herhaald evenement.

 

Het maakt geen ene moer uit, of mensen nou gelovig of ongelovig zijn, want ze zijn allemaal – of ze het nou toegeven of niet, vanwege hun nog nooit eerder benoemde en onderzochtte OT – bezig met bijgelovige rituelen, waarvan ze heilig geloven, dat dit hen beschermt tegen moeilijke of kwaadaardige zaken in het leven. In BT, weten wij – als individu – van de prins geen kwaad en al het zogenaamde bezweren van het kwaad gebeurt alleen maar in OT. In OT geloven wij, dat wij met onze klink-klare, ritueele, onzin het kwaad zouden kunnen uitbannen, maar dit is niet waar. Al het kwaadaardige gedrag wordt veroorzaakt en in stand gehouden door OT. Het mooie is, dat in BT, waarin wij eindelijk, als spreker, naar onszelf luisteren, het kwaad al is uitgebannen, omdat onze OT is opgehouden. Daardoor zijn wij in BT nooit meer bezig met fantasien over het uitbannen van het kwaad.

 

Uiteraard is er het alleen met BT mogelijk, om de moed en de helderheid te hebben, die het verschil tussen goed en slecht weergeeft. Met OT blijven veel mensen – Linkse protesters, die Hamas blijven steunen, die tegen Israel zijn, die eveneens anti-Amerika zijn, die nog steeds doen alsof zij met hun symbolische, afgrijzelijke, domme, rituele geschreeuw, iets goeds weten te ontwaren, in het kwaad – beweren dat zij de goede zaak ondersteunen, terwijl zij echter hun support geven aan de vijanden van alle Westers Democratische landen. Netanyahu zei het heel duidelijk, vandaag in zijn intense speech, voor de US Congress – waaraan vele, anti-Amerika, laf-hartige, Linkse politici, waaronder Kamala Harris, weigerden deel te nemen – het gaat hier niet om een botsing tussen twee verschillende culturen, maar het gaat om de onvermijdelijke confrontatie tussen barbarisme en beschaving.

 

Nadat hij het helden gedrag van een aantal van zijn soldaten had geprezen, legde Netanyahu het nog eens goed uit, dat al die idioten, die voor Hamas willen protesteren, niet erkennen, dat Iran, de Islamtische Revolutie naar de hele wereld aan het brengen is en dat er van hun vrijheid, om te kunnen demonstreren, niets over zal blijven, zodra de International Court of Justice (ICJ) – die notabene was opgericht, na WOII, om herhaling te voorkomen – volledig zal zijn veranderd in een Islamitisch Sharia-court, die het voortbestaan van Israel overboord zet.  

 

Ik ben zelf nooit bij een demonstratie betrokken geweest, omdat ik er altijd een afkeer van had. Het valt mij op dat Linkse groeperingen altijd aan het demonstreren zijn en altijd rellen aan het schoppen zijn, maar dat er van Rechtse demonstraties eigenlijk nauwelijks sprake is. Ik vind iedere demonstratie eigenlijk absoluut geen teken van vrijheid, maar een achterhaald, ouderwets, bijgelovig ritueel, om, zogenaamd, iets te doen aan het kwaad in de wereld. Zij die echter echt iets doen, om Hamas te bestrijden, dat zijn die moedige Israelische soldaten, die hun leven geven, om die gijzelaars te bevrijden.

 

Ik voel mij met mijn BT, meer verwant met een soldaat en met Rechtse politiek, dan met een protester en Linkse politiek. Ik weet, dat ik mijn vrijheid te danken heb aan mensen, die mij zijn voorgegaan en die ervoor hebben gezorgd, dat er maatschappijen zijn waarin het individu zich kan ontplooien. Ik ben het produkt van de hele geschiedenis van de mensheid en wil niet, dat het individu-vermorzelende groeps-gedrag, dat nog steeds door OT, Socialisme, Communisme, Marxisme, Fascisme, Islamisme en Jihadisme wordt gepropageerd, het wint van BT. Daarom sta ik met allen, die onbevreesd, onbeschaamd en ongedeerd strijden voor werkelijke vrijheid.   

 

Als we eindelijk klaar zijn met onze onbewuste deelname aan OT, dan hoeven wij ons niet meer met zinloze rituelen bezig te houden. Het kwaad wordt pas gezien voor wat het is, als wij  beseffen, dat onze normale wijze van spreken – OT – al ons kwalijke gedrag veroorzaakt en dat gedrags-verandering alleen kan plaatsvinden, indien wij onze omgang met taal veranderen.

 

Als wij BT, in plaats van OT, gaan hebben, dan pas gaan wij ons ontdoen van het wan-gedrag, dat door automatische OT werd gecreerd en in stand werd gehouden. Goed is niet slecht, hoog is niet laag en BT is iets heel anders dan OT. Het kwaad is met OT nooit te definieeren, omdat OT zelf het kwaad is, waar wij alleen helder met BT over kunnen spreken. Kwaad is geen complex begrip, maar een manier van praten, waarin wij niet in contact zijn met onszelf, omdat wij niet naar onszelf luisteren. Wij willen dat anderen naar ons luisteren of we luisteren naar anderen, maar niet naar onszelf. Hier komt alle ellende uit voort. We zweren het kwaad niet af, als we BT hebben, want we zijn dan niet meer kwaad.  

Je kunt me dit schrijven horen voorlezen op mijn You Tube kanaal maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw   

 When,

 

When you speak, there is no you, who speaks, but there is only speaking. When you speak about your so-called experience, there is no you, who speaks and you, who experiences, but there is only your expressed experience. When your language doesn’t match with your experience, it appears, as if there is a difference between your language and your experience, but your language expresses exactly, the experience of your confusion, distraction or feeling disconnected, troubled and conflicted.

 

When your language expresses your experience correctly, your language and your experience will dissolve, while you speak, but when your language incorrectly expresses your experience, you can’t help, but repeat your experience and your language, until they match. When you have said, what you are able to say, there is nothing anymore to say. Then, you will say things, you didn’t believe you were capable of saying. You use your language correctly when you speak without fear. To speak without fear, you must begin, to speak with fear and then, let yourself know, what it is like, to speak without fear.   

 

When feel you get energy, because someone says something, this indicates, it is important to you, but when you start to get tired of listening to what someone is saying, it doesn’t matter to you. The same rule applies, when you listen to yourself. When what you say to yourself gives you energy, you should definitely continue to explore it to it fullest, but when what you say to yourself sucks, you should stop it, immediately.

 

When you feel energized, by what someone is saying, it may be Embodied Language (EL), but it only is EL, if it is something you have first said to yourself and have heard yourself say. Thus, when you hear someone sounds like you, when you have EL – alone, with yourself – only then, do you know for sure, you are having EL with someone else. Certainly, EL with someone else is an event, which happens very rarely. Quite likely, you mistake your Disembodied Language (DL) for EL, as you hope to have EL with others.

 

When you have EL, you have already stopped your DL. The big challenge is to stop your DL, not to have EL. You can only have EL when your DL has been stopped. Everyone, unconsciously, engages in DL, so when you talk with others, you engage in it as well. When you want to be able to stop your own DL, you will first have to move away from all the people with whom you engage in DL. In other words, you will have to be alone; to be able to explore what it takes to stop your own DL. When you remain together with those with whom you get involved in DL, you will not be able to stop your DL, as you remain busy with the DL of others.

 

When you talk out loud alone with yourself, it is relatively easy to differentiate between your DL and your EL. However, we are so entrenched in our DL, that even after we have several times, on our own, determined what is DL and what is EL, this clarity disappears very quickly, when we get together with others. Stopping our own DL depends on our ability, to fully acknowledge, that our DL contains all our beliefs, convictions, everything we know and desire. It is easier and also more effective, to admit this to ourselves, than to divulge this to others, who haven’t yet identified their own DL and EL, who, therefore, still keep engaging in DL. When you accept, that what you call your mind or your thinking, is actually your DL – which wears you out, drains you and depletes your energy – your DL stops.

 

When you have stopped your DL, you know, the continuation of your EL was never a problem, as it was always the continuation of your DL, that prevented you from having EL. Thus, when you manage to stop your conditioning – that is what you do when you stop your DL – EL happens by itself, naturally and effortlessly. Therefore, there is no need to be busy with EL, which takes care of itself. The thing to pay as much attention to as you can, is your own DL, which always asks, demands, holds and exhausts your attention.

 

When you listen to your own DL, you’ll notice it isn’t any fun to listen to your struggle, conflict, confusion, stress, depression, fear, arrogance and hate. No one wants to hear your negative DL and you don’t want to hear it either. When you listen to how your DL sounds, it turns you off. Your DL, which you engage in every day, is always about you being unhappy, dissatisfied, anxious, disillusioned, frustrated, unconscious, lost and meaningless. You are only going to end your DL, when you have no more energy for it.

 

When you stop your DL, you put an end to your conditioning history. It is like and end of life situation. Your survival struggle has made you stay alive, but it always prolonged your DL. When your DL at long last stops, you finally can understand, you have always been reacting in a survival mode. Unless you are motivated, to die to your past, to how you have been – which is not the same as sacrificing yourself on the altar of your beliefs – you will go on repeating yourself and you will continue with your DL.  

 

When you have DL, you are always fighting, arguing, hiding, fleeing, escaping, pretending that you are not here, defending, posturing or you believe to be all-powerful, immortal, your truth is eternal, you are so special, chosen and anointed. All of this has happened down the ages, this is the history of mankind, and this is why DL is still happening everywhere today. No one, except me, is capable of letting you know about EL, because DL has never been stopped. We have only believed, we have stopped it, but our so-called civility, politeness or respect isn’t the same as stopping our DL. I am truly special not because I want to be special, but because I have stopped my DL. I just got tired of it. Everything I have described, I have myself done and these words derive from my EL. When you can stop your own DL, you can speak with your EL about your own DL and about everyone’s else’s DL.           

 Something about Kamala Harris,

 

Here is something for you to read. I hope you follow my instructions. Something good will happen if you do. This text is simply, to help you to say something. Please, read it out loud. Are you hearing something? If you don’t, you are not doing as I am asking you and you might as well stop reading. Start doing something else.

 

Only if you read this text out loud, so that you can hear your voice, something beautiful will happen, which didn’t and couldn’t happen in the Disembodied Language (DL) you are used to, in which you don’t listen to yourself while you speak. Are you reading out loud? Good. Can you hear your own voice? Good. You are now listening to yourself, while you speak. I call this Embodied Language (EL). You should be feeling something unusual. You hear yourself while you speak, but, normally, you don’t do this. It is very pleasant, because it relaxes you. It is so nice and calming to listen to yourself, while reading this easy text. Reading a text from a teleprompter is what dishonest politicians do, who are uncomfortable speaking in an unscripted manner.   

 

I didn’t write these words, to explain something to you or to make you understand something, but while you read this text and while you listen to yourself, you can understand, why listening to yourself while you speak is important, because listening to yourself helps you to be and to stay in touch with yourself. EL is something that is so simple, it easily escapes everyone. We are all constantly involved in DL, in which we don’t listen to ourselves, and we don’t even know it.

 

There is certainly something to it, to read these words out loud and be able to hear your sound. Perhaps, you would like to stop reading for a moment and say something to yourself, about how it is for you, to hear your voice, while you speak? You don’t have to do it, but you can, if you want. I suggest this, to give you a break from this text, because this text is of no importance. What matters is, you get a chance to hear yourself, while you speak.

 

I was listening to some music, before I wrote this text. As I looked up some songs, something occurred to me. Suddenly, this dumb, cackling, fake person, Kamala Harris, is all over the place. She is trying to become the next president. She is now promoted all over the place. Why is everyone involved in DL and not in EL? Kamala Harris isn’t going to talk about the difference between DL and EL. She is now presented as the queen of the Left, but she is unfit, because she is incapable of saying something meaningful about listening to yourself while you speak. Like so many others, she will make you listen to her, instead of to yourself.

 

You should do something about the fact, that you keep having DL instead of EL. What are you going to do about it? There is only one thing you can do, which is, to stop your DL, so you can have EL. If you are still reading out loud and still listening to yourself, this must already have happened. If didn’t happen, it means, you either weren’t reading out loud, or you weren’t listening to yourself and you were, like Kamala Harris, engaging in DL. Kamala Harris is already making a big difference, as she demonstrates what someone sounds like, who doesn’t listen to herself. It doesn’t matter what she says, it is about how she says it. Something in her voice tells you, she is not hearing herself, but she only wants to be heard and adored.  

 

This text wasn’t meant, to get you out of your mind, but to let you listen to something you had probably never listened to. If you still read these words out loud, you hear yourself and not Kamala Harris, which is already something positive. It is a good thing, you finally really get to do something about the problems, created by your participation in DL. May be, you can let Kamala Harris know about it?

 

With your DL, you always knew something was wrong, but you never knew what it was. Now you know, you weren’t listening to yourself, but to lying, vicious, hollow politicians, like Kamala Harris. In this writing, I don’t intend to give you something to think about, but something to talk about, so you can hear and identify your DL. I am sure something good will come from listening to yourself, especially now that your attention is piqued, because I mentioned the name the new presidential candidate. Even if she never makes it into the presidency, she is of great value for pointing out something about DL. Surely, something about the voice of Kamala Harris wears out everyone, who listens to her. Luckily, by reading these words out loud, you are now experiencing something of the opposite effect, because EL gives you energy. Kamala Harris has fired many of her worn-out staff members, who simply couldn’t stand listening to her anymore.                    

 I am right,

 

Everyone is always right, in his or her view of their own way of doing things. Even the depressed and the schizophrenics are absolutely right, that their depressive view of their life or their psychosis is entirely true. In other words, everyone supposedly sticks to whatever they believe about themselves. The addict starts using more drugs or alcohol and the ambitious striver for power, money and prestige wants to acquire even more influence and property. There is no exception, the scientist is hooked on knowing and the criminal commits another crime. We are all unknowingly, therefore involuntarily, attached to what we tell ourselves about ourselves.

 

No one can see things the way that we do, because everyone has remained imprisoned in their own language, which is Disembodied Language (DL). However, if we finally start listening to what our voice sounds like, while telling ourselves what we believe is going on, then the sudden liberation of the language, in which we were unconsciously trapped, will automatically take place.

 

The big difference between DL and Embodied Language (EL) is that we don't listen to ourselves during DL, but we listen to ourselves during EL. Another big difference between DL and EL is in DL, we want others to know we are right, but in EL we agree with ourselves, and we are, therefore, right. You could also say, during DL - no matter how strongly we believe we are right, because we say we are right – which we confuse with freedom - we are always concerned about getting others to say we are right and having power over others, as we don’t believe in ourselves. We will only be right for ourselves, when we produce EL.

 

It took many years before I, with my EL, 

could fully admit to myself, I am really

 right in what I say and write about the

 big difference between EL and DL. 

Since virtually no one is interested 

in talking to me about this difference, 

I have had to learn how to handle, 

many people, who, when push comes

 to shove, could not admit, I was 

right with my EL and they, therefore, 

with their false, pretentious, rash, 

stupid, oblivious, DL, were completely wrong.

 

Thousands of people who have come into contact with me over the years, have all turned away from me again, because of their own so-called rightness. However, if they, for themselves, were to recognize their own DL as DL, they could still discover their EL and benefit from it. However, that's where the problem comes in, because they really don't want to do that. In order to maintain their own pitiful, combative and dilapidated sense of being right, they act, as if their DL was their EL. I could always tell the difference. I was and still am right. 

 

There is a great taboo on the fact, I happen to be someone, who has actually learned something about himself and others through my EL. Also, because of the ubiquitous, never properly described DL, there is still a huge battle going on between science – in which we are right about how things work - and the fabrications of our religions or cultures. Objective scientific knowledge applies to all of us and makes us all right, because it concerns the facts, but science matters in our personal lives only to a very limited extent, as there is an even greater taboo on acquiring the irrefutable information of our own self-knowledge.

 

There have been all kinds of people, who were said to be wise and who we supposedly should listen to.  None of all those vaunted saints, self-realized ones, gurus and philosophers have ever talked about the gigantic difference between our usual DL and our ability to have EL. In other words, we have listened to all these authorities, who had absolutely no idea at all about ​​the difference between DL and EL and who, therefore, never were able to talk about it. It is still a mystery to me, there was never anyone who started listening to himself and talking to himself and thus began to distinguish his EL from his DL. It took me a long time to admit I was right about this.   

 

True self-knowledge is exemplified by our ongoing EL and nothing else. So, there is no need for religion, spirituality, philosophy or psychology, because they have all taken our attention away from how we – as individuals – deal with our language.  We can tell others all kinds of things about ourselves, but if we start talking to ourselves, in order to be able to listen to ourselves, it turns out self-understanding of who we are, is something completely different from our justification, for why have are and remain involved in DL, every day. We can only truly understand ourselves with EL, but with DL, we are and remain in conflict with ourselves.

 

When we recognize the great difference between our DL and EL, it becomes clear, in DL, in which we unknowingly, unintentionally, participated, we have never been able to experience how wonderful it is, to truly be right about things and to trust our own self-knowledge as truth. You are absolutely right, if you continue with EL, because you no longer believe in the necessity, you should or can think about yourself. You know, in EL, you can no longer think about anything, because there simply is no inner language.

Please check out my two You Tube channels: 1) Maximus Peperkamp and 2) maximuspeperkamp-hw8sw