Friday, April 22, 2016

September 8, 2014



September 8, 2014

Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Behaviorist

Dear Reader, 

 
It is in the middle of the night, one day before full moon. This writer was inspired to write about meditation. Yesterday, while holding a pen on the paper, it had felt like writing poem. It came out quite good. If it is possible it will happen and if it didn’t happen, it wasn’t possible. It was possible and it happened. 


The trouble that endured______________________
Gone once change occurred_____________________
No need for meditation________________________
Just a better situation_______________________
The body receives stimulation_________________
Which ends infatuation________________________
And improves concentration____________________
On the functional relation____________________
Of life without hesitation____________________


After these words had been written, lines were added. It added something visual and even. There was joy in drawing these lines and expressing these words, which rhyme and reinforce. The coolness and peace of the night was worth waking up for. Soon sleep will come and the journey to bed is short and certain. The clock struck two and these words were caused by that sound to describe only that.

September 7, 2014



September 7, 2014

Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Behaviorist

Dear Reader, 

 
For years this author, like everyone else, believed he was causing his behavior and that others were causing their behavior, but due to his study of behaviorism and behaviorology this belief has dissolved. Of course, this doesn’t mean he has been instantly reconditioned. In the process that began to unfold over the last two years, he notices the impact that the functional account is beginning to have.


It is not the behavior, which he exhibits, but the behavior, which he no longer exhibits, not what he does, but what he doesn’t do, which now repeatedly catches his attention. In his current life, he is doing much less of the things he used to do or he is not doing them at all. Also, he is aware that his self-talk, due to his study of behaviorology, has changed. Microstructural changes of the body occur due to conditioning and he has altered physiological responses.


This writer used to have reactive behaviors, which often shut down his ability to function as a thinking human being and caused him  trouble. These impairing responses have become much less since he found full-time employment as a case manager with parolees. This new environment requires more control and, surprisingly, he has gained more control. It is not he who gained control, but environmental variables that are producing these changes in his behavior. Although old behaviors are sometimes still there, his job demands he stays in contact with his environment. Whenever there is a slight loss of control, he is alerted to it, but not in an alarming, overwhelming manner. This is very much due to his supervisor, who fully supports him and constantly provides reinforcing feedback about his work.        

September 5, 2014



September 5, 2014

Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Behaviorist

Dear Reader, 

 
It seems like it was only just yesterday that this writer was getting frustrated about his interactions with other people, but nowadays he almost doesn’t get upset anymore. Moreover, in recent days various people have been complimenting him for his ability to maintain his equanimity. There is a particular reason why this is happening. 


This writer has good experiences with Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB) every day. He is so often reinforced for SVB that his behavioral momentum has steadily increased. With the increase of effective and rewarding behavior, his tendency to get frustrated with people who don’t want to have it has slowly, but surely declined. He now understands that they don’t want it, because they can't want it.


He also understands that due to old circumstances his attention was mainly drawn to the fact that individuals didn’t want to have SVB. He now understands it is not that they don’t want it, but that they have not been in the circumstances to want it. In other words, there are no ingredients for them to want it and there were ingredients, which prevented this writer from having it too.


As this writer kept experimenting with how environments affect his behavior, he has become happier and more successful. His ability to  ignore the NVB from others is because he is no longer trying to decrease it in himself. Until quite recently, due to his previous conditioning, he somehow still believed that he needed to decrease his own NVB and increase his own SVB, but now he doesn’t view it that way anymore. He is neither responsible for his NVB or his SVB. Since he knows that SVB and NVB are caused by the environment, his attention can go without distraction to what maintains either one.    

September 4, 2014



September 4, 2014

Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Behaviorist

Dear Reader, 

 
Yesterday evening, this writer taught his psychology class for the second time. Students were asked to divide up in groups of five and introduce themselves to each other and talk about what they think about psychology. The exercise opened good conversation and when the groups reported back to class, it was surprising to hear how positive everyone’s experience was. Many students praised this writer for his way of introducing himself to his students and for how he runs this class. During the first class this writer had explained Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB) and he had used his gong to focus attention on how we sound while we speak.


The students approved that this writer would bring his gong to every class and would continue to keep everyone tuned in to his teaching. Although the class runs from 6:30pm till 9:20pm and many students were tired, because they had been working their day time jobs, they were relaxed and happy and there was laughter and a lot of positive energy in the room, which accumulated as the time went by.


A big portion of the lecture was about the science of psychology. This writer explained the functional relation which occurs between two variables, the independent and the dependent variable and he linked it to the how the sound of his voice affects his lecture. At one point, his explanation was becoming distracted by students in the back of the class, who were not paying attention and who were talking among themselves. As he was affected by this, he asked them to listen to what he was saying, because that would help create a better flow of the lecture. They agreed and paid attention and he elaborated on the fact that we constantly positively or negative affect each other.


He explained that once a person is familiar with SVB, he or she doesn’t want to have Noxious Verbal Behavior (NVB) anymore. In SVB we regulate, but in NVB we dis-regulate each other. Whether or not we regulate or dis-regulate each other is the dependent variable and how we sound, how we speak non-verbally, is the independent variable, which has an effect on the dependent variable. Said differently, the nonverbal affects the verbal in such a way that the lecture improves, gets better, is easier understood and is more enjoyable for both the lecturer and the students, when there is no nonverbal dis-regulation. Another way of saying this is that the verbal part of communication is functionally related to the nonverbal part of communication.


It is important to know that independent variables resemble elements of the environment (i.e. the talking students), which stimulate the dependent variable, the behavior in question (i.e. distraction of the teacher). Although the environment consists of what happens within and outside of a person's skin, behaviorists and behaviorologists focus on observable stimuli, outside our skin, which are functionally related to what happens inside of our skin. The strengthening or weakening of the dependent variable, in this case the behavior of the teacher, is called conditioning and often works both ways: the teacher gets more often distracted when the students are not paying attention to the lecture and start talking with each other, but also, students start talking more often as the teacher becomes more often distracted. This bi-directional conditioning process is due to the fact that we are each other's environment.          

September 2, 2014



September 2, 2014

Written by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Behaviorist

Dear Reader, 

With Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB), this writer continues reading, studying and extending Skinner’s Radical Behaviorism. Amazingly, in 2012 he discovered B.F. Skinner, whose works explain SVB. After reading about and being reinforced by behaviorism, he then found Behaviorology, the natural science of human behavior. When this writer set out to study psychology, he had done so because he was convinced that SVB is a natural and not just some mystical process.


While finding out about behaviorology, this writer was able to personally connect with three board members of The International Behaviorology Institute (TIBI): Fraley, Ledoux and Ferreira. With each of these  scholars he continues to have positive relations and each of them encouraged him to fully dive into behaviorology. As a consequence of these exciting contacts, this writer feels understood, approved and increasingly changed. Especially, that he is not causing his own behavior is having a major effect on him.

  
It fascinates this writer that a separation of disciplines had to occur and that behaviorology moved away from psychology, which is permeated by non-natural and fundamentally mystical perspectives. 


In 2012, this writer withdrew from an non-supportive Ph.D. program, which, based on what they called the Scientist-Practitioner Model, was educating him to become a Clinical Psychologist. In retrospect, it is evident that Palo Alto University (PAU) is an institution that is founded upon unscientific, agential mentalism, which behaviorists and behaviorologists eschew. No one showed any interest at all in this writer's passion for SVB, which led him study psychology. He was literally told by the director to put his passion on a hold and to earn his Ph.D. by aligning himself with the arrogant researchers who teach at PAU. When this writer eventually withdrew from the Ph.D. program, it was a sad affair, but he never regretted his withdrawal because it allowed him to come in contact with behaviorism.