December 29, 2015
Written by Maximus Peperkamp,
M.S. Verbal Engineer
Dear Students,
This is my final (thirteenth) response to “The Personal Life
of the Behavioral Analyst” by D. Bostow (2011). Bostow concludes “My hope is
that these words may tip the balance towards behaviors the reader is already
inclined to do.” I don’t think that words can
or will tip the balance. Besides, I
don’t “hope” for anything, I predict and everything I predict comes true.
My predictions are not grandiose, but scientific. The results have achieved in my classes were as I predicted. So, yes, not words
will tip the balance, but the sound our voice will do that. Stated differently,
what we say makes more sense because of how we say it. During Sound Verbal
Behavior (SVB) there is an alignment between verbal and nonverbal behavior, but
in Noxious Verbal Behavior (NVB) there is no alignment and we get carried away
by what we say, by our verbal fixation.
In NVB we disconnect from the nonverbal, from our embodied
sound, as we are focused on and obsessed with the content. In academia and in society
at large this means that written words have become more important than spoken
words. SVB restores the importance of our experience of how we sound while we
speak. We already achieve SVB each time we talk with those who love us, care
about us, support us, respect us and welcome us.
SVB isn’t anything new or something we don’t know. However, only
a few us are familiar with SVB that goes on for a longer period of time. Not
enough is known about the contingency needed to make that possible. We can
discover this if we keep on listening to ourselves while we speak. Although contingencies
that make this possible come “necessarily from our contact with others”, it is
important to recognize that we can have SVB on our own.
This self-experimentation, talking out loud and listening to
our tone of voice while we speak, prepares us for both achieving and
maintaining our SVB with others. To the extent that we can have SVB with
ourselves we will be able to have it with others.
“Stimulus control” of our voice is important, but
“differential reinforcement gives prior stimuli their power.” We don’t need to
wait for others to approve of us and tell us we sound good. Once we hear our
own calm voice, we have achieved a behavioral cusp and know this makes social
reinforcement possible. SVB develops the “interlocking local contingencies for
personal behavior”, which “support our own direct contact with the world.”
No comments:
Post a Comment