June 22, 2014
Written by Maximus Peperkamp,
M.S. Verbal Behaviorist
Dear Reader,
It is very satisfying to write every day about the developments that are
happening due to Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB). In the past, this author has made
many audio-recordings of himself on which he explored listening to himself
while he speaks, but now he writes about his thoughts and feelings in this journal,
which is an ongoing accumulation of the discoveries that are made possible by
SVB. The fact that this writing is pleasing this writer is why he keeps doing
it. Because these words make sense, this writer is reinforcing himself.
However, these words make sense to the reader too and their reinforcing effect
is possible because the reader may read and enjoy this writing too. If there
was no reader to enjoy this writing, this writing would not be reinforcing this
writer. He reads his is own writing, as readers read his writing and they read his writing, in the same way as he reads it.
When this writer was still recording audio tapes of himself to explore
SVB, he didn’t know anything about behaviorism. It was important to him that he
made these recordings, because by recording himself, he was working with evidence,
which could be listened to again, in the same way that this writing can be read
again and again. Although he often went on tangents and allowed himself to explore his
own Noxious Verbal Behavior (NVB), he collected evidence of that too.
Now that he is writing about SVB and became more knowledgeable about
behaviorism, he is producing less and less NVB than when he was speaking about
it. There is less and less NVB to be explored, while SVB is abundantly
available in his life. In this writing this writer is telling himself and the
reader that this is really possible. When he first discovered SVB, he began to speak
out loud with himself, because at in the beginning he couldn't even believe it. Because he did
that, he convinced himself that it was true, that SVB really exists and that it is
possible. Now that he writes about it, he is no longer trying to make himself
believe it.
This writer writes that SVB is possible, not convince himself or the
reader, but because it is such a delight to write about it. It used to be such
a delight to speak about it and when he made those audio-recordings, this
writer would spend hours, sometimes days recording himself. Because through the years he has created so much
SVB with so many people, he no longer feels like making audio-recordings.
Although he sometimes still listens to them and still enjoys them, he now
writes every day and only has time to read what he is writing while he is
writing it. While he finishes this sentence, it seems as if these words are
catching up with him.
When the reader, the listener, who ideally reads out loud, reads and hears these words, he or she
should get in touch with him or herself. However, if that doesn’t happen, this
writing, this speaking is useless, but if it does, and this writer, this
speaker, thinks it will, then the reader, the listener, realizes that SVB is
possible, because the reader, the listener is another person than he or she thought
he or she was. In SVB the reader,
listener becomes the writer, speaker.
In NVB, the reader, listener was thinking that he or she couldn’t become the writer, the speaker. That was true. In NVB, the writer, the speaker was also thinking he or she couldn’t become the reader, the listener and this was true too; he or she couldn’t. In NVB we were confined to roles, which didn’t allow us to communicate: we can’t speak if we don’t listen and we don’t listen if we don’t speak; we can’t read if we don’t write and we can‘t write if we don’t read; we can’t write if we don’t speak and we can’t read if we don’t listen. In NVB, we can only verbally misbehave.
In NVB, the reader, listener was thinking that he or she couldn’t become the writer, the speaker. That was true. In NVB, the writer, the speaker was also thinking he or she couldn’t become the reader, the listener and this was true too; he or she couldn’t. In NVB we were confined to roles, which didn’t allow us to communicate: we can’t speak if we don’t listen and we don’t listen if we don’t speak; we can’t read if we don’t write and we can‘t write if we don’t read; we can’t write if we don’t speak and we can’t read if we don’t listen. In NVB, we can only verbally misbehave.
SVB reveals the possibilities which are necessary to have real
communication. If these possibilities remain out of sight, out of hearing range, nothing stimulate
us to communicate. We are not stimulated to communicate and that is why we
don’t communicate. People may want to communicate, but they don’t know how to do
it. Many people have told us how to communicate and we communicate in the way in
which we were told, but what we were told was incorrect. We were stimulated to
have NVB not SVB. These words stimulate SVB, the correct way of communicating.
No comments:
Post a Comment