Religion,

 

Those who have the courage, to explore the great difference between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL), will have to admit, that all of religion is complete nonsense. It is because of our unconscious involvement in DL, that we keep giving a free pass to religion, which has created – which continuous to create – gigantic problems for human beings. People talk about climate change, injustice or the need for diversity, equity and inclusion, but nobody objects to the stupidity and human tragedy, which is maintained by our belief in a higher power.

 

The future of mankind is not in religion, but in the sense of individuality, which will forever abandon prayer, as the hallucination of talking with unseen others. EL is the language of individualism, but DL is based on our fear of social retaliation, that is, we behave as we do, because others, in one way or another, force us to behave a certain way. DL is group-behavior, which makes it seem, as if there is no need for EL. DL has always judged, ridiculed, disrespected and rejected any attempt at EL and mankind is where it is today, because, to my knowledge, only two people - me and my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke - have investigated and experienced, what it is like to continue with EL.  

 

Astonishingly, only two people, in the whole wide world, are able to speak and write about their Language Enlightenment (LE), because they possess the skill, that is necessary to continue with EL, but this skill has nothing to do with religion. In fact, all religion has made us literally believe, everything will be okay without this skill, and this is precisely, why we are ignorant about our EL and, inadvertently, engage in superstitious, grandiose, ineffective DL. As I was talking with someone this morning, I received the common feed-back, anyone who criticizes religion is bound to get. Supposedly, we have to be respectful of a person’s religion. Of course, it makes no sense to get ourselves in trouble, by opposing those, by exposing those or by arguing with those, who believe in a none-existent deity, which, supposedly, is more important than their own existence. While the person was willing to talk with me, he accused me of being negative towards people with religion.

 

Anyone who, like me, has become aware – with his or her EL – about his or her LE, anyone whose own language has revealed his or her own true nature, will have, what can perhaps best be described as positive negativity. Of course, I describe it this way, so that the reader, who unknowingly engages in DL, begins to understand, I am against all religion, as I am in favor of EL. I am not against DL, however, but I am against the products of DL, which can only be prevented if our DL is stopped. Being against DL has prevented us from becoming conscious about how we interact with each other. I cannot stop your DL, since you must do this yourself and you will never be able to experience the positive outcomes of your EL, if you refuse to acknowledge and then stop your own DL. Religion basically gives you another excuse, to go on with your unintelligent, dull, coercive DL.

 

Obviously, the imaginary conversation with some non-existent deity has always distracted people from having EL with each other, but if we look at religion more closely, there is no denying, it wasn’t this so-called higher power, which prevented us from EL, but other people. Actually, anyone who really goes into exploring, what it is like to have continuous EL, cannot avoid the realization, that it isn’t others, who were preventing us from EL, but it is we, ourselves. In other words, it is our identity or who we believe ourselves to be, which prevents us from having EL and once we have ongoing EL, our belief in who we believed to be dissolves. Therefore, our false belief in a mystical higher power – like our belief in a fabricated, behavior-causing, inner self or a mind – evaporates the moment we begin to value talking with ourselves, as more important than talking with others. Stated differently, others always are the so-called identity-priests, who both instill as well as reinforce our belief in who we appear to be.

 

Who we are is not a religion. It is only in absence of our EL, that we conjure constructs about ourselves, which are absolutely wrong. We are in denial of our mortality and still imagine, that we have an eternal soul, which lives on, after death or which is reborn in a different form. All of this is merely to maintain the notion of some sort of immortality. Surely, it is with DL, that we remain fearful of death and hang on to these superstitions. Presumably, the test of religion is its effect on conduct, but this is putting the horse behind the wagon. Once we focus on our conduct, on how we deal with our language, we discover that religion, as well as, an inner self or a mind, are constructs, which came about because we were forced to have DL and were never able to discover, acknowledge, explore and enjoy our EL, which reveals our LE.