Bewapening,

 

Vandaag hoorde ik iets in het nieuws over de bewapening van taal. Het is verbazingwekkend hoe zowel links als rechts elkaar blijven beschuldigen van taalgebruik om de publieke opinie te beïnvloeden, in een poging de macht te behouden of te verwerven. Niemand lijkt te beseffen dat we elkaar constant aanvallen en proberen de mond te snoeren. Er is geen echt gesprek gaande op politiek gebied, aangezien iedereen zich slechts bezighoudt met Ontlichaamde Taal (OT). Als we echte dialoog zouden hebben, zou OT stoppen en dan zouden we Belichaamde Taal (BT) hebben. Naar mijn mening wordt deze belangrijke kwestie door niemand goed aangepakt. Ogenschijnlijk is het niet mogelijk, maar het is wel degelijk mogelijk en het is noodzakelijk.

 

Bewapening kenmerkt OT, onze gebruikelijke, dissociatieve manier van praten, en komt veel vaker voor dan we willen toegeven. Menselijke relaties zijn zo erbarmelijk slecht, omdat we over het algemeen niet echt praten, maar doen alsof, verdedigen, aanvallen, afleiden, domineren en intimideren. Al onze problemen komen voort uit hoe we praten en tenzij onze OT wordt gestopt, zullen ze alleen maar toenemen. Om problemen aan te pakken en op te lossen is BT nodig, maar daar heeft niemand het over, behalve ik. Ieder mens moet echter zijn of haar eigen problemen oplossen. Niemand kan het probleem van OT voor iemand anders oplossen. Dit schrijven is geen kritiek op onze samenleving, maar mijn ervaring van mijn  manier van leven, die bijna geheel zonder problemen is, omdat ik er voor zorg dat mijn BT kan blijven doorgaan.

 

Ik ken het grote verschil tussen OT en BT en heb erkend dat ik met OT nooit mezelf kan zijn. Dit is waarom ik liever met mezelf praat, zodat ik BT kan hebben, dan met jou te praten en weer in OT te worden meegesleurd. Ik beweer niet dat ik nooit beïnvloed zal worden door jouw OT of door mijn eigen lange, vreselijke, problematische geschiedenis ermee. Wegblijven van jou of van iemand met OT, is het enige wat ik kan doen, om het onvermijdelijke te voorkomen: weer besmet te raken met saaie, domme, walgelijke OT.

 

Ik verafschuw en weiger je zinloze manier van praten, maar let goed op hoe ik mijn eigen taal behandel. Voor zover ik weet - en mijn weten komt dus voort uit mijn voortdurende BT - is de ziekmakende sociale besmetting van OT eigenlijk nog nooit duidelijk verwoord. Daarom woekert het overal. Er zijn dingen, die we alleen te weten kunnen komen als we eerst onze OT stoppen en daarna doorgaan met BT. Dit is evenwel een wetenschappelijke onderneming.

 

Wetenschappers die betrokken zijn bij onderzoek, proberen hun eigen vooroordelen onder controle te houden en zijn altijd alert op verstorende variabelen. Deze grondige aanpak moet worden toegepast op hoe we met onszelf en met elkaar praten. Neem eens de tijd, om stil te staan bij de immense implicaties van wat ik hier zeg. Ja, je mag lachen, want het is allemaal al triest genoeg, dat de dingen zo tot op het bot verrot zijn als ze zijn. Wat ik hier schrijf komt voort uit wat ik tegen mezelf zeg. Dus, eenvoudig gezegd, beschouw ik eigenlijk al het praten met anderen als onwetenschappelijk, aangezien alleen het praten met onszelf wetenschappelijk kan zijn. Luister alsjeblieft naar me, want mijn observatie heeft te maken met het luisteren naar mezelf, naar het geluid van mijn eigen stem, zodat ik kan horen of het geluid, dat ik produceer, terwijl ik spreek, wel of niet mijn welzijn vertegenwoordigd. Mijn observatie heeft niets te maken met jou gebruikelijke obsessie met visuele prikkels, dat wil zeggen met woorden, zoals deze, maar met de auditieve prikkels, van de klank van je eigen stem.

 

Ik kan alleen deelnemen aan BL, in de mate dat mijn stem mijn ​​gevoel van veiligheid en geborgenheid kan blijven  uitdrukken. OT neemt het onmiddellijk weer over, op het moment dat ik me bedreigd, angstig, gekwetst, gestrest of anderszins ongemakkelijk voel. Het is echter natuurlijk mijn conditioneringsgeschiedenis die mijn perceptie van afkeer of aantrekkelijkheid  bepaalt. Wij accepteren OT als normaal omdat we zo zijn geconditioneerd, maar praten met OT kan niet wetenschappelijk zijn, want in OT eist de spreker de aandacht van de luisteraar met het energie-verslindende geluid van hun stem. In OT dwingen sprekers altijd op de een of andere manier de luisteraars in een vorm van gehoorzaamheid. Iedereen met enige kennis over wetenschappelijk gedrag, zou het ermee eens moeten zijn en erkennen dat OT, onze dagelijkse, bijgelovige, oppervlakkige wijze van spreken, onwetenschappelijk is.

 

Gezien het onmiskenbare feit dat OT overal aan de gang is, 24/7, is het nu hopelijk duidelijk, dat we dus de hele tijd onwetenschappelijke, angstige, stressvolle, chaotische, afleidende, verontrustende en dwaze gesprekken voeren, zonder het zelf te beseffen Het. De kwestie van wetenschappelijke spraak heeft nooit de juiste aandacht gekregen, aangezien alleen geschreven verhandelingen een academische goedkeuring krijgen. Deze gang van zaken, waardoor zelfs de slimsten van de slimsten de gesproken communicatie verwaarlozen, wordt steeds onhoudbaarder. Wetenschappers zouden de eersten moeten zijn, die zich bezighouden met BT en die BT zouden moeten waarderen, aangezien hun houding ten opzichte van de werkelijkheid er een is van onderzoek en nieuwsgierigheid. Stel jezelf eens deze vraag: hoe vaak komt het voor, dat je precies kunt zeggen wat je wilde zeggen en dat wat je zei werd begrepen en daardoor resulteerde in positieve resultaten, die zowel je eigen leven als het leven van anderen verbeterde? We weten allemaal dat zulke gelukkige omstandigheden maar zeer zelden of nooit voorkomen. 

 

Met OT zijn we allemaal tevergeefs blijven geloven, dat  met elkaar te communiceren het probleem is, maar het echte probleem is en is altijd geweest dat we problemen hebben om met onszelf te praten.  We hebben geen voeling met onszelf vanwege onze OT en tenzij onze OT wordt gestopt, kunnen we niet deelnemen aan BT. Het lijkt alsof we onze OT niet kunnen stoppen, maar als we eenmaal naar onszelf luisteren - in plaats van naar elkaar - terwijl we praten, dan stappen we moeiteloos en gracieus uit onze conditioneringsgeschiedenis en kunnen we - zonder enige oefening - ons bezig gaan houden met onze BT. Zeker, we kunnen en zullen onze OT gaan stoppen en ons bezig gaan houden met BT, aangezien dit de enige werkelijke optie voor de mensheid is voor een betere toekomst. Vergis je niet, onze OT drijft ons ertoe om onszelf te vernietigen.

 

BT is wetenschappelijke spraak. Als we het eenmaal hebben, dan zijn we het erover eens, dat we het hebben, aangezien onze OT, onze bevooroordeelde spraak, dan is geëindigd. Zoals gezegd, hadden wetenschappers altijd al BT moeten hebben, maar dat was niet zo, omdat het hun prioriteit was om hun bevindingen op schrift te stellen. Als ze een lezing gaven over hun onderzoek, was hun manier van spreken gescript, dat wil zeggen, ze herhaalden wat ze hadden geschreven. Ze acteren hun manier van praten en maakten indruk op anderen met hun geweldige kennis. Hoewel ze zelf misschien nooit van plan waren dit te doen, is dit wat ze altijd hebben gedaan, aangezien ze nooit met BT over hun wetenschap hebben gesproken, omdat daar  nooit de gelegenheid voor was. Bovendien konden ze dat niet, omdat ze niet wisten hoe ze dat konden doen. Zelfs de beste leraren, de wijste professoren, de meest briljante filosofen, hielden zich nooit bezig met BT met hun toehoorders. Ik weet dat je dit moeilijk te geloven vindt, maar als je eenmaal het verschil tussen OT en BT hebt geïdentificeerd, kun je dit historische feit niet langer ontkennen.

 

BT is totaal nieuw en het blijft altijd enerverend, omdat het wetenschappelijk is. Bovendien verwerven we met BT een betrouwbare zelfkennis, die ons leven op alle mogelijke manieren zal verbeteren. Er komt nooit een einde aan de wetenschappelijke ontdekkingen en, ja, onze manier van praten vormt de basis voor verkenning, observatie, beschrijving, verklaring en verificatie of niet. OT doet niet en kan niet doen wat BT doet. Zo simpel is het. Het kan me niet schelen of niemand naar me luistert, want ik luister naar mezelf en ik weet, dat wat ik zeg waar is. Ik spreek op mijn eigen gezag en dat is mijn Taal Verlichting (TV). Ik heb het verschil tussen OT en BT exact beschreven zoals niemand anders dat heeft gedaan. Natuurlijk hebben mensen ook geprobeerd om te verwoorden waar ik het over heb, maar ze faalden altijd, omdat ze hun OT nog nooit hebben gestopt.

 

Ik beschouw mezelf als een wetenschapper en naar mijn mening is BT van onschatbare waarde voor de vooruitgang van de wetenschap, maar ook voor het onderwijs in de wetenschap. Zolang onze OT niet is gestopt en vervangen door duurzame BT, zal ons onderwijs er niet in slagen de wetenschappelijke houding te cultiveren, die nodig is om vandaag de dag een gelukkig en gezond te leven, in een wereld, die is gecreëerd en ondersteund door wetenschap.

 

Wat er is gebeurd in naam van de zogenaamde dialoog, was nooit BT, het was slechts de veronderstelling van BT. Ondanks alle prachtige wetenschappelijke vorderingen is onze OT onverminderd doorgegaan. Dit schrijven is een van de allereerste en waarschijnlijk enige geschriften, dat is gebaseerd op doorgaande BT.  Het maakt mij geen moer uit of er een boek hierover is gepubliceerd of een wetenschappelijk artikel, want het is waar, ongeacht iemand’s mening. Ik heb ooit geprobeerd een Ph.D. in Psychologie te behalen, maar ik trok mij teleurgesteld terug uit mijn studie, omdat geen van die zogenaamde objectieve, wetenschappelijke, academische mensen dapper genoeg was om met mij te praten en om mijn proefschrift in een gesprek samen met mij te onderzoeken. Ook heb ik jarenlang les gegeven in psychologie, maar ze ondersteunen tegenwoordig liever belachelijke, politieke,  onwetenschappelijke diversiteit, rechtvaardigheid en inclusiviteit in plaats van BT. Ik heb de hele academische wereld achter me gelaten en iedereen die blijkbaar nog steeds door wil gaan met OT, omdat het voor mij belangrijker is om te kunnen praten met degenen, die BT met mij willen hebben.

 

Weaponization,  

 

Today, I heard something in the news about the weaponization of language. It is astonishing, how both the left and the right keep accusing each other of using language to influence public opinion, in an attempt to maintain or gain power. Nobody seems to bother about the obvious fact, that they are both constantly attacking each other and trying to shut each other up. There is no real conversation going on politically, as everyone engages in Disembodied Language (DL). If there would be any dialogue, DL would stop and we would have Embodied Language (EL). In my opinion, this important issue is never properly addressed by anyone. Supposedly, it isn’t possible, but it is possible and it is very necessary.

 

Weaponization characterizes DL, our usual way of talking and is, therefore, much more common than we are willing to admit. Human relationship is as bad as it is, because, generally speaking, we don’t really talk, but we pretend, defend, attack, distract, dominate and intimidate. Our problems stem from how we talk and unless our DL is stopped, they will only increase. Addressing and solving our problems requires EL, but no one is talking about that except me. However, each human being must solve his or her own problems. No one can solve the problem of DL for someone else. This writing isn’t some critique on our society, but simply my experience of my own way of life, which is, almost without any problems, because I always make sure my EL can continue.  

 

I know the difference between DL and EL and I have recognized, that with DL, I cannot be myself. This is why I rather talk with myself, so I can have EL, than talk with you and be dragged into DL again. I don’t make any claims about never being affected by your DL or by my own long, dreadful, problematic history with it. Staying away from you or from anyone with DL, is all I can do, to prevent the inevitable: getting contaminated again with dull, dumb, disgusting DL.

 

I abhor and refuse your meaningless way of talking, but take great care of how I treat my own language. To my knowledge – which derives from my ongoing EL – the sickening social contagion of DL has never been clearly articulated. This is why it is rampant everywhere. There are things, we can only come to know, if we, first, stop our DL and proceed with EL. This is, of course, in essence, a scientific endeavor.

 

Scientists, involved in research, try to control for their own biases and are always on the look out for confounding variables. This thorough approach has to be applied to how we talk with one another. Take a moment, to consider the immense implications of what I am saying. Yes, you may laugh, because it is already sad enough, that things are as screwed up as they are. What I write comes from what I say to myself. Simply stated, I consider talking with others unscientific, as only talking with ourselves can be scientific. Please, hear me out, as my observation has to do with listening to myself, to the sound of my own voice, so I can hear, whether the sound, I produce, while I speak, represents my wellbeing or not. My observation has nothing to do with your usual obsession with visual stimuli, that is, with words, but with aural stimuli, with my own voice.  

 

I can only engage in EL, to the extend, that my own voice continues to express a sense of feeling safe and secure. DL instantly takes over, the moment, I feel threatened, fearful, hurt, stressed or, otherwise, uneasy again. However, it is my conditioning history, which determines my perception of aversiveness or appetitiveness. Talking with DL cannot be scientific, as with DL, I always demand the listener’s attention with the sound of my voice. In DL, speakers, in one way or another, coerce listeners. Anyone with any knowledge about scientific behavior, should be able to agree and acknowledge, that DL is unscientific.  

 

Considering the undeniable, devastating fact, that DL is going on everywhere, twenty-four-seven, it is now clear, we engage in unscientific, superstitious, fearful, stressful, chaotic, distracting, upsetting and foolish conversation all the time, without realizing it. The issue of scientific speech has never received the right kind of attention, as only written treatises get academic approval. This state of affairs, which makes even the brightest of the brightest neglect spoken communication, is becoming increasingly untenable. Scientists should be the first ones to engage in and appreciate EL, as their attitude to reality is one of inquiry and curiosity. Ask yourself this question: how often does it occur, in your life, that you are able to say exactly what you wanted to say and what you say is understood and, therefore, resulting in positive outcomes, which enhance your own life as well as the lives of others? We all know such happy occasions happen very rarely, if at all.

 

With DL, we have in vain continued to believe, that we have problems communicating with each other, but the real issue is and has always been, that we have problems communicating with ourselves. We are out of touch with ourselves, because of our DL and unless our DL is stopped, we cannot engage in EL. It appears as if we are unable to stop our DL, but once we listen to ourselves – instead of each other – while we speak, we effortlessly and gracefully step out of our conditioning history and – without any practice – we are able to engage in EL. Certainly, we can and we will stop our DL and engage in EL, as this is mankind’s only option to a brighter future. Make no mistake, our DL is driving us to destroy ourselves.  

 

EL is scientific speech. Once we have it, we agree, we have it, as DL, our biased speech, has ended. As stated, scientists should have been able to have EL, all along, but never did, as their priority was to put their findings in writing. If they gave a lecture about their research, their way of speaking was scripted, that is, they repeated what they had written. They  acted their way of talking and impressed others with their knowledge. Although, they themselves, perhaps, never intended to do so, this is what they have always done, as they have never spoken with EL about their science, as there was never such an opportunity. Besides, they couldn’t do that, as they really absolutely didn’t know how to do that. Even the best teachers, the wisest professors, the most brilliant philosophers, never engaged in EL with their audiences. I know you find this hard to believe, but once you have identified the difference between DL and EL, you cannot deny this historical fact.

 

EL is totally novel and it remains exciting, because it is scientific. Moreover, with EL, we acquire reliable self-knowledge, which improves our lives in every possible way. There is no end to scientific discovery and, yes, our way of talking either sets the stage for exploration, observation, description, explanation and verification or not. DL doesn’t do and cannot do what EL does. It is as simple as that. I don’t care if nobody listens to me, as I listen to myself and know that what I say is true. I speak on my own authority and that is my Language Enlightenment (LE). I have described the difference between DL and EL in the way that nobody else has. Of course, people have tried to address what I am talking about, but they  always failed, as they have never stopped their DL.

 

I consider myself a scientist and, in my view, EL is of tremendous importance for the advance of science as well as for the teaching of science. As long as our DL has not been stopped and replaced by ongoing EL, our education will fail to cultivate the scientific attitude, necessary to live happily and sanely, in a world, which is created and sustained by science.

 

In conclusion, what went on in the name of EL, was never EL. It was always merely the assumption of EL. Stated differently, in spite of our scientific advances, DL has continued unabated. This writing is one of the first and only writings, that is based on ongoing EL. I don’t care if there is a book published about this or a scientific paper, as it is true, regardless of anyone’s opinion. I once attempted to get a Ph.D. in Psychology, but withdrew from my study, because none of the so-called scientific, academic people were brave enough to speak with me, to explore my thesis in a conversation. I also taught Psychology for many years, but they rather support the unscientific teaching of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion than EL. I have left academia and everyone, who apparently wants to continue with DL, as it is more important to me, to talk with those, who can have EL with me.

 

Do,

 

This is what I do. I speak and I hear the sound of my well-being. This is a different way of reasoning than speaking without being able to enjoy my own voice. A philosophy of language, based on listening while you speak, lets us know that we are sentient beings, who could therefore have a different conversation than our normal, automatic, stupid nagging and whining, which occurs day in and day out and which we habitually, but unwillingly keep repeating.

 

It is disgraceful, that you, who read this - although you have read and studied so much, although you are so intelligent, so cultured, so respected, so religious, so moral, so just and so supposedly outspoken – never listen to yourself, while you speak. It is inconceivable, unacceptable and yet so blatantly clear, you have never engaged in speaking with a voice that is free of fear and stress, but this is unfortunately the banal reality which you create.

 

Just do as I ask you, take the plunge and talk to me and then finally find out that you have completely missed the most important thing in your life so far. Talking to yourself and listening to yourself – and exploring what you have to say to yourself, with your own sound, which sounds natural and relaxed – is the only way to really get to know your own intelligence.

 

Everything else you have heard about language is dwarfed by what you might say to yourself. Talking to yourself is infinitely more interesting than talking to others, who, just like you, also apparently never had the courage to speak to themselves attentively, honestly, naturally, about what truly matters to them. I always do what I describe and my writings are always about that. It is certainly not by accident that I, unlike everyone else, no longer concern myself with what others say or write or claim and that I have therefore completely devoted myself to and surrendered myself to my own language.

 

What I do, what I say and what I describe cannot be invented. The restoration of the sound experience of your own voice while speaking to yourself takes place because you focus on how you deal with your language. This gives you irrevocable access to your own world of experience and you come to know everything you want to know and can know, because you have let go of what is never yours in the first place. You can hear exactly if it suits you or not. If you are still in doubt, then it has nothing to do with you and letting go is this understanding.

 

When you are doing what I do, there is no getting around the fact, that no one is with themselves in that way, as it is only possible when we are allowed to verbally follow the music of our own speaking voice. Allowing this to happen is a revelation, a birth in sound and language, which convinces us that we owe this to ourselves alone. Everything that has been said and written about our so-called thinking has prevented us from speaking to ourselves, with  the sound we wanted to hear, so we started to listen and act on what we have said to ourselves.

 

Behavioral change or behavioral improvement can and will only take place if we completely agree with ourselves. The lack of positive results always shows that we have not yet had the conversation with ourselves that is absolutely necessary to bring about that beautiful transformation. I do this because – because of the connection between my language and my effortless, embodied sound – I can be my own authority. Only I can hear for myself and therefore perceive and then select, which behaviors are important and necessary to me. What I do – and what I write here today – is not a choice, but the fulfillment of what has become possible for me.

 

Doe,

 

Dit is wat ik doe. Ik spreek en ik hoor het geluid van mijn welbevinden. Dit is een totaal andere manier van redeneren, dan te spreken, zonder te kunnen genieten van mijn eigen stem. Een taal-filosofie, die gebaseerd is op luisterend spreken, laat ons weten, dat wij bewuste wezens zijn, die dus een heel ander gesprek zouden kunnen hebben, dan ons normale,  automatische, domme gezanik, dat zich dag in dag uit, tegen beter weten in, maar blijft herhalen.

 

Het is schandelijk, dat jij, die dit leest – ook al heb je nog zoveel gelezen en gestudeerd, ook al ben je nog zo intelligent, zo gekultiveerd, zo gerespecteerd, zo gelovig, zo zedelijk, zo rechtvaardig en zogenaamd zo recht voor z’n raap – nooit naar jezelf luistert, terwijl je spreekt. Het is onvoorstelbaar, dat jij je nog nooit hebt bezig gehouden, met het spreken met een stemgeluid, dat vrij is van angst en stres, maar dit is helaas de banale realiteit, die jij creert.

 

Doe nou maar eens wat ik je vraag, trek maar eens de stoute schoenen aan en praat maar eens met mij en kom er dan maar eens eindelijk achter, dat jij het allerbelangrijkste in je leven, tot dusver volledig bent misgelopen. Het spreken met jezelf en het luisteren naar jezelf – en het verkennen van wat jij  aan jezelf te zeggen hebt, met je eigen klank, die natuurlijk en ontspannen klinkt – is de enige manier, om echt kennis te nemen van je eigen intelligentie.

 

Al het andere, wat je over taal hebt gehoord, valt in het niet, bij wat jij aan jezelf te zeggen hebt. Praten met jezelf is oneindig veel interessanter, dan praten met anderen, die, net als jij, ook schijnbaar nooit de moed hebben gehad, om eens aandachtig, eerlijk, vanzelfsprekend, met zichzelf te spreken, over wat voor hen van belang is. Ik doe wat ik beschrijf en mijn teksten gaan altijd daarover. Het is beslist niet zomaar vanzelf, dat ik mij niet meer, zoals iedereen, bezighoud met wat anderen zeggen of schrijven of beweren en dat ik me dus daardoor helemaal heb toegelegd op en overgegeven aan mijn eigen taal.  

 

Wat ik doe, wat ik zeg en wat ik beschrijf, is niet te verzinnen. Het eerherstel van de klankbeleving van je eigen stemgeluid tijdens het spreken met jezelf, vindt plaats, omdat jij je richt op hoe jij omgaat met jou taal. Je krijgt hierdoor onherroepelijk toegang tot je eigen belevingswereld en je komt alles aan de weet wat je wil weten en kan weten, omdat je hebt losgelaten wat niet van jou is. Je kunt precies horen of het bij jou past. Als je nog twijfelt, dan heeft het niets met jou te maken en loslaten is dan dit begrip.

 

Wanneer jij gaat doen wat ik doe, dan valt er niet meer omheen te gaan, dat niemand op die manier bij zichzelf is, zoals dat alleen mogelijk is, wanneer wij verbaal de muziek mogen volgen, van onze eigen spreek stem. Het toestaan van dit gebeuren, is een openbaring, een geboorte in klank en taal, die ons ervan overtuigt, dat wij dit uitsluitend en alleen aan onszelf te danken hebben. Alles wat er is gezegd en geschreven over ons zogenaamde denken, heeft ons ervan weerhouden om met onszelf te spreken, met het geluid, dat wij wilden horen en waarnaar wij dus eindelijk zijn gaan luisteren en zijn gaan handelen.

 

Gedrags-verandering en gedrags-verbetering vindt enkel dan pas plaats, indien wij het helemaal met onszelf eens zijn. Het uitblijven positieve resultaten toont altijd aan, dat wij nog niet het gesprek met onszelf hebben gehad, dat absoluut noodzakelijk is, om die transformatie te bewerkstelligen. Ik doe dit, omdat ik – vanwege de verbinding tussen mijn taal en mijn moeiteloze, belichaamde klank – mijn eigen authoriteit ben. Alleen ik kan voor mijzelf horen en  daardoor dus waarnemen en vervolgens selecteren, welke gedragingen voor mij van belang zijn. Wat ik doe – en wat ik hier schrijf – is geen keuze, maar de vervulling van wat voor mij mogelijk is geworden.

 

 

 

Enemy,

 

I am only writing these words to please myself. If you happen to read them, I hope you realize, that I consider you my enemy, because you keep engaging in Disembodied Language (DL), while I write about Embodied Language (EL). You are not my friend. I don’t want you to feel comfortable, while reading my words. To the contrary, you should feel upset, I address you so directly. Of course, you are feeling frustrated, that I call you out and that you can’t say anything back. This writing is meant to put you in your place. Your way of talking is negative and you know it, but you will never admit it, I say it. I know what the difference between DL and EL is about.

 

You may not say so directly, but you indirectly claim to have the moral upper hand. You are manipulative in how you talk and you never show your real face. I know you, as I know DL. Your DL holds no secret to me, no matter how defensive or controlled you are. I can hear and feel, that you are determined to push anyone out of the conversation, who exposes what you do. I write this to you, as this is the best way to get to you and to let you know, your old ugly way of talking isn’t working. There is no way, I will ever talk with you again, as I don’t see any purpose in it. Yes, I have abandoned you and this makes you feel stupid.

 

I don’t play by your rules, as I know how to continue with my EL, without you. I don’t accept you, I don’t respect you, I don’t want to listen to you, as there is nothing you say, which is of any interest to me. No, I will not even give you the benefit of the doubt. You are out of my life and I have cast you out. Although, I know, you are trying to get back in, underneath my skin, I let you know, with my words, that you are not welcome on my platform. Yes, I have my own world, which I have created and in which I live and you are not part of it. I have decided, you are not part of EL.   

 

When I say, that you are my enemy, this means, I am opposed to your hostility. I don’t even try to be with you anymore, as you always try to harm and weaken me, but I wouldn’t let you. Surely, I have outsmarted you and now you sound like a complainer, who is not having his or her way. I don’t even want to hear you, as I rather listen to my own victorious sound, which ridicules your arrogance. I am not going to lie about your disrespect, which is telling me about how you deal with yourself. It is no problem for me, to say to you, that you are full of shit, but I know for sure, it is a problem to you, to admit, what a pretender you are.

 

My writing is not about what I want to say to you, but about what you – if you were honest – would say to yourself. You still have that opportunity, as long as you are alive, so let’s hear it and show us what you’ve got. We have only heard you say what you believed you were supposed to say, but we haven’t heard anything authentic. Of course, you too could say something new, but, in order to do so, you would have to stop repeating your old program.

 

You are used to not being contradicted, as you can’t stand any opposition to your idiotic fabrications, but in this writing, you can’t miss, there is another way of viewing things, than your forceful ideas. I don’t live by your standards and since my concepts of DL and EL make more sense than your superficial,  political, cookie-cutter nonsense, you are a merely a revengeful loser, who wishes to ignore someone like me, whose knowledge is actually better than yours.

 

You may have been able, to avoid and deny, up till now, anything that goes against your moronic belief, but there can be no doubt, that this writing sets the record straight. You are not the intelligent, assertive, important, powerful, untouchable, superior person, you have imagined yourself to be. To the contrary, you are unconscious, unnatural and mediocre. It is about time, you read words such as these, which will straighten you out, which will call your bluff and which will make fun of your stupidity and total bias.

 

Ultimately, how you deal with your language is, of course, a scientific matter. Ask yourself the obvious question: what percentage of the population is engaged in DL or EL? Is the proportion 90:10, 95:5, 99:1 or 99.9:0.1? You get the picture. DL is going on everywhere, twenty-four-seven. The reality of how we actually talk with each other is so grim, that you shiver to admit it. There is no research, as it is just too embarrassing and unpopular, to acknowledge  that we still don’t know anything about ongoing EL.

 

It should upset you a great deal, when push comes to shove, you don’t know anything about how to talk with your so-called significant other, with your children or with your family or your friends. This expression – when push comes to shove – says it all. It is the definition of dumb DL. How much more explicit do you need to be, before you understand, that in EL, in genuine human interaction, there is no such thing, as push coming to shove. All this pushing and shoving is out of the question in EL, period.

 

You are my enemy, if you refuse to admit, that EL is not about domination, manipulation, exploitation, distraction or fear. I have no problem admitting that I hate your guts and I am not a racist for hating you, because I am a humanist. If you try to accuse me, I will confront you with the horrific consequences of callous, coercive, phony, insensitive way of talking. I declare you to be the enemy of mankind, with your superstitious, superficial, sanctimonious, sordid DL.    

 

Problems,  

 

When I first noticed, I was enlightened, it was a big surprise. Until that shocking moment, I had always believed and hoped – if it would happen – I would be without any problems. I don’t know, how I could have been, for so long, so sure about that, yet, at the turbulent time of my self-realization, I was having so many problems, that my desperate search for some relief, naturally resulted in the assumption that my enlightenment would be the end of all my problems. However, this was not at all the case.

 

I know this may sound strange, but it really is how it happened or how I experienced my enlightenment, back then. Immediately, I was harshly confronted with the seemingly impossible challenge of how to communicate with others about my transformation. Since I had discovered enlightenment while talking out loud with myself, I wanted nothing else, then to talk with others, in the same way, as I was talking with myself. However, others weren’t inclined to talk with themselves and to listen to themselves, like I was and during the many years of exploring how to change that, it was only me, who got better and better, in talking with himself and listening to himself, as others became less and less important.

 

Nowadays, we hear a lot about men, who come out as women or about women, who come out as men. Currently, transgenderism is, so to speak, the talk of the town. I view this new social trend, as another failed attempt, at addressing and changing the way in which we talk. Our usual unenlightened way of talking is disembodied, that is, we forget about our body while we speak. In Embodied Language (EL), however, we can precisely, calmly and thoroughly express our own experience. My EL made me hear and recognize my Language Enlightenment (LE), but  the way in which I was conditioned to deal with my language, which I call Disembodied Language (DL), could never have done that. Surely, no matter how much I wanted to, initially, I felt totally incapable of coming out with my LE, as I was still having DL, out of my old habit. Each time I tried to talk about EL, I was having DL and I only created more problems for myself. Eventually, I gave up trying convey to others what happened to me, some forty-five years ago.

 

It is hilarious, to look back and realize, that I myself just couldn’t believe it, that it had really happened. I wondered, how could someone like me, who had so many problems, be enlightened? I set out to prove to myself, that I had just been exaggerating, as I had been doing all along, from a young age. As a child, I was always lying. I couldn’t believe or understand, why I was doing that again and again, as I always got caught lying red-faced. I was punished for it so many times and yet, somehow, I ended up lying again.

 

I have always been a terrible liar. I felt, I was cursed, as with me, people immediately seemed to notice, if I was lying. Whenever I lie, it is, so to speak, written all over my face. I probably kept doing it, to get some attention. Only now it is clear to me, why I couldn’t stop myself from lying. I have always been willing to give people what they wanted to hear. I knew, that as long as I did that, they would at least tolerate me and not send me away, as they did, so many times. In other words, I knew how others wanted me to behave, but every time I forgot to lie, I got myself in trouble. It seemed so unfair, others always got away with their lies, while I never did.

 

At some point, after the fifth-millionth time feeling rejected for my EL, by people with DL, I knew, that for myself, I wasn’t lying about my enlightenment, but, to get any kind of response from others, I had to weave some kind of story around it. Basically, I have in vain tried to water down my enlightenment, as I noticed, again and again, others simply couldn’t handle it. My problems didn’t go away, as after my enlightenment, they increased even more. At this point in my life, I don’t care that much about others anymore, as I have come into my own. Besides, to me, others are always what I make them out to be.

 

Although I have been accused of it many times, I am happy to say, I never felt like being a guru or having a following of disciples. While I studied psychology and philosophy of science for many years, I am so glad, I never became a psychologist. I feel relieved, I am no longer teaching at the college and have left academia. Yes, I did have the urge to talk about my enlightenment, as I knew, that it was possible to talk with people, in the exact same way I was capable of talking with myself. After I left teaching psychology, I also left teaching about my EL and EL. In retrospect, it all became clear to me, that, in my lying-teaching, I had unknowingly continued my own DL, although, paradoxically, I was and I still am enlightened.

 

These days, I can’t help but admit, all my so-called problems were just exaggerations, not to get some attention, but to distract myself from my own DL. Since I can now give myself the attention I want, I no longer crave the attention of others, which, mostly, is a kind of attention, I don’t want anyway. My skill, to verbally take care of myself, could only develop,  as I became capable of continuing my own EL. In the meantime, I’ve also learned to play the ukulele and I can now accompany my songs with my instrument.

 

Who could have known, that I would develop this musical ability, which gives me such great pleasure, as it symbolizes a sense of completion. All my songs are about my DL, EL and my LE. I never get tired of creating and singing them. Sometimes, I sing a song I haven’t sung for a while. When I sing it, it makes me feel so accomplished, grateful and satisfied.

 

I believe it was Wednesday, I suddenly noticed, it doesn’t make any difference for me anymore, if I sing or not. It doesn’t matter, what I do or where I am, as I am always myself, I am enlightened. Even now, I am still amazed by my enlightenment, which began so many years ago and stimulated me to stop my DL, so that I could have EL. Anyone who comes to know about the difference between DL and EL, arrives at the same conclusion: DL is only stopped by having faith, not in your so-called higher power, not in your higher self, but in your LE, that is, in your natural self, which doesn’t lie and, thus, wants you to do that. Your EL goes on beautifully, by itself, as it reveals your LE, in spite of all your problems, which disappear, often without you even noticing it.                        

 

Probably,

 

You probably cannot believe, that in my extensive writing, I am revealing, that I have written these words solely and exclusively for myself. Perhaps you wonder in amazement, why do I keep talking about you again and again, when I only talk with  myself? While it is of course a question, that you will have to answer for yourself – if you have the guts to ask yourself that question at all – I am very happy to answer that question, which is extremely relevant, as far as I am concerned. I am writing to encourage you, to finally take courage, to really talk to yourself and really listen to yourself.

 

Of course, you can only really listen to yourself, if you really speak to yourself. That is why it is best to start with this reading and understanding of what must be done. I use that word, must, because there are certain conditions, that need to be met, in order for you to really talk to yourself, so that you actually connect and start listening to yourself.

 

I've already done my homework and know what I'm talking about. You can easily understand what you are reading, for it deals, in a clear way, with what you have been struggling with for many years. It's about time you acknowledged for yourself, that what you've been trying to change about yourself hasn't worked at all and that you've only made things harder for yourself, instead of easier.

 

Perhaps it is a comfort to you to realize, that everyone is, more or less, doing the same as you and only creating more, rather than less, problems. It may be a relief to you, to begin by acknowledging, you are just like any other human being in this. Everyone is always busy to change themselves or others and to achieve, in one way or another, more optimal results, but no one seems to want to realize or admit, that they are completely stuck in the illusion of who they believe themselves to be.

 

Generally speaking, most people prefer to escape  themselves, to forget themselves in their work, in their family, in their studies, in their faith, in their sports, in their distractions or in their so-called passion. However, when this begins to be talked about, only then an improving change takes place, because only then could a different sound be heard.

 

A different sound can finally be produced by each of us, the moment we let ourselves know, that we have had enough of the martyrdom that we, because of our language, have imposed on ourselves. So, at the same time, we are masochists, since we continue to identify with our own toil and suffering, which are supposedly necessary to achieve what we want, but on the other hand, we are sadists, as we are proud on our ability to put ourselves over our feelings, so that we can continue to control ourselves.

 

Why are you trapped, in what you keep calling your thinking or your mind, when, of course, you could always talk or write about it, with yourself? You create your own illusion, because you simply cannot do otherwise, with your current understanding of your language. That understanding, of course, comes from previous experiences, which you have never honestly discussed with yourself before.

 

Nothing just suddenly happens by itself, as far as your handling of your language is concerned. It is not in human nature, to be able to walk, speak or read immediately after birth. The same gradual development takes place with your language. Also being honest and having the courage to admit that you are, to put it bluntly, a chaos and are constantly defined by all your conflicts, obsessions, fears and tensions, is something that can only manifest itself if you have really become wiser through your own  experience.

 

As long as we have not spoken at length, with full attention, repeatedly to ourselves—rather than to others—we are doomed to repeat what we have done so many times before. No matter how harmful what we have continued to do out of habit, it only stops when we give ourselves the right instructions.

 

I have experienced all this myself and you too could agree with all this, if you could stick to your own experience, because of your own language. It doesn't matter at all what you call it for yourself. I call it Embodied Language (EL), which liberates us, and Disembodied Language (DL), when we talk about unconscious, automatic, reactive, primitive, insensitive, unintelligent, conditioned behavior.

 

I have determined for myself – without any approval from others – that the progress of my EL makes, for me, my Language Enlightenment (LE) known. I have also let myself know, that I really know this, even though hardly anyone actually wants to talk about it and learn something about it. I know, however, others cannot know this until they have spoken to themselves in their own language.

 

This writing is for me an even further release from others, who, as they read this, may come to realize that they are - even only for a brief moment - really with themselves, but have normally always been preoccupied with others. I couldn’t seem to write or say this until now, and yet I'm sure it came from my ignorance. Wonderful, how my ignorance produces knowledge, while that knowledge always remains limited and, therefore, is not experienced, by me, as a prison. On the contrary, my limited knowledge, which is really true, is my liberation, because my language can continue to adjust to the experiences I am having right now, which I couldn’t have before. My language, so to speak, is up to date or rather, timeless, because everything dissolves in my LE.