Liberation,
In
this writing, I write about May 5th, which in my country origin,
Holland, is celebrated, every year, as Liberation Day. It was due to the Allied Forces,
consisting of brave, young American, Canadian and British troops, that the Dutch, who were almost starving to death, in what was known in the Netherlands as the Hunger Winter of 1945, were
freed from the Germans or the Nazies. My father, who as a boy grew up in this horrible period, went through many traumatic
experiences. While I was silently walking – myself as a boy – with him and hundreds
of other people, on May Fifth, along the war memorial at the Waalsdorper Vlakte,
where, in the beautiful Dunes, many people had been executed, I felt so very close
to my father…
I
use the Second World War as a metaphor to refer to Disembodied Language (DL)
and the liberation from the brutal oppression, as a way to talk about Embodied
Language (EL). During the occupation, you were still concerned with your DL,
but shortly after the liberation, shortly after you finally noticed the immense
difference between your DL and your EL, you were set free - by yourself - and you
could finally enjoy your Language Enlightenment (LE) – who you really are – with
your EL. You need some time, to recover from your captivity and from the torture
and turmoil you have endured, but all that suffering and chaos is now
completely behind you.
DL
was never properly addressed and spoken about with EL. Radicalization of
students at universities always takes place because of our DL, which is still,
although nobody takes any note of it, the language of instruction everywhere.
Something like this could never, ever have happened if we had EL together. And,
this is a realistic, but not an idealistic view. We do it, or we don't do it
and we can do it, or we can't do it yet and that's the beginning of our
journey.
With
our unconscious DL, of course, nobody is ever going to be de-radicalized, as
everything only keeps getting worse. The process by which a person or group
increasingly develops views, that are at odds with, or totally opposed to, the
democratic legal order, whether we want to believe it or not, has to do with
our usual way of speaking. As a person or as a group, we attach – with DL – fewer
and fewer consequences to our behavior, especially to our oral and written
expressions. This is also encouraged by the anonymity provided by so-called
social media.
Whenever
we talk about polarization, extremism or terrorism, we are, unconsciously,
talking about a way of speaking that produces and maintains those phenomena. We
do not yet know anything about the difference between DL and EL and that is why
we are completely unaware that the DL, which we deal with and are involved in every
day, is the cause of everything, that is escalating over time, every time.
In EL,
there is neither polarization nor escalation, as we are no longer running wild
over and over again with our ridiculous belief in inner language, or in what we
call us-them thinking . The so-called high level of tension between groups,
happens because we, as participants of these groups, have lost our way with
ourselves. When we can experience the transition from our DL to our EL, we
experience, for the first time in our lives, the liberation from group behavior
and, thus, our individual freedom. It is not polarization that led to
radicalization, but it was DL.
Another
feature of DL is extremism, in which a person or group knowingly breaks the law
in order to presumably remain true to his or her identity or ideals. Extremism clearly
involves breaking the law and constitutes a criminal offense. If we look at and
listen to the origins from which these criminal acts come about, it has nothing
to do with - as is often claimed - some writing, some theory, some dogma, but
with how we speak and spoke with each other. As with polarization, extremism is
the result of our common, never properly addressed, insensitive DL.
We will have to realize, at some
point in our lives,
that the
justification and underlying
promise of DL, is a direct
reference to the so-called
liberation, that polarization,
extremism or radicalization
would supposedly give to us.
This is of course a total lie,
which DL has perpetuated,
because it gave hope for
something better, which
was always in the future.
The present moment, in
which we have always
continued to struggle with
our DL, was always sacrificed
for the future, which never
produced EL. However, anyone
who speaks about DL with his
or her EL, inevitably comes
to the conclusion, that the
possibility of our liberation
was only a pipe dream,
because genuine liberation
- of the individual - can
only take place, if he or
she knows how to use
his or her own language,
in such a way, that his
or her own experience
is expressed correctly
and satisfyingly.
Radicalization
is the consequence of our DL, our unconscious, conditioned, effortful language,
in which we, as individual speakers, do not listen to ourselves and are only
concerned with always listening to others or trying to get them to listen to us,
in some way. Naturally, radicalization is always a process in which years of
compulsive DL have come to determine what our so-called sense of reality is. There
is a recognizable pattern in which extremism, radicalization and polarization will come
about.
Simply
put, everyone in DL, wants to get attention and everyone does whatever he or
she can do to get the attention. It doesn't matter if commanding the attention
from others happens with a pitiful victim role or with our grandiosity and
arrogance, the fact remains, that in our ordinary way of speaking, there is
always a struggle going on for attention, which must escalate, so it can become
clear, who is the presumed winner and who is the presumed loser, who has the
power - who is allowed to threaten others - and who must follow politely,
obediently - who is apparently unimportant or unworthy and who has nothing to
say, to whom no one listens. No conscious attention has ever before been given
– with our ongoing EL – to the DL, which maintains the hierarchy or power-structure
in every society. When we do that, immediate liberation takes place, because we
no longer look up or down to others.
Our liberation from DL is
only discernable to the
extent that we are still
getting used to our EL,
because as soon as our
EL starts to flow, we find
our EL normal, but we
then find our DL abnormal.
Our LE, which initially, as
EL continues, is something
very wonderful and special,
eventually becomes our
everyday experience, where
every trigger for our DL,
immediately effortlessly catches
our attention and makes us
tune into EL again. However,
we are constantly aware, that
our liberation from our DL, is
achieved by us, by us alone,
and that feels so good.
So,
our liberation is celebrated not just once a year, on Liberation Day, but every
day with EL. It is also of great importance, for those who automatically, out
of conditioning, habitually carried on with their fear-based DL, to recognize
that they - without ever being able to understand this before – spent all that
time in hiding and were able to survive in that way. When they have EL, instead
of DL, they come out of their hiding timidly and cautiously. Liberation with EL is
overwhelming and almost unbelievable at first, but it is true. We are slowly,
happily, getting used to it.
No comments:
Post a Comment