Religion,

 

Those who have the courage, to explore the great difference between Disembodied Language (DL) and Embodied Language (EL), will have to admit, that all of religion is complete nonsense. It is because of our unconscious involvement in DL, that we keep giving a free pass to religion, which has created – which continuous to create – gigantic problems for human beings. People talk about climate change, injustice or the need for diversity, equity and inclusion, but nobody objects to the stupidity and human tragedy, which is maintained by our belief in a higher power.

 

The future of mankind is not in religion, but in the sense of individuality, which will forever abandon prayer, as the hallucination of talking with unseen others. EL is the language of individualism, but DL is based on our fear of social retaliation, that is, we behave as we do, because others, in one way or another, force us to behave a certain way. DL is group-behavior, which makes it seem, as if there is no need for EL. DL has always judged, ridiculed, disrespected and rejected any attempt at EL and mankind is where it is today, because, to my knowledge, only two people - me and my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke - have investigated and experienced, what it is like to continue with EL.  

 

Astonishingly, only two people, in the whole wide world, are able to speak and write about their Language Enlightenment (LE), because they possess the skill, that is necessary to continue with EL, but this skill has nothing to do with religion. In fact, all religion has made us literally believe, everything will be okay without this skill, and this is precisely, why we are ignorant about our EL and, inadvertently, engage in superstitious, grandiose, ineffective DL. As I was talking with someone this morning, I received the common feed-back, anyone who criticizes religion is bound to get. Supposedly, we have to be respectful of a person’s religion. Of course, it makes no sense to get ourselves in trouble, by opposing those, by exposing those or by arguing with those, who believe in a none-existent deity, which, supposedly, is more important than their own existence. While the person was willing to talk with me, he accused me of being negative towards people with religion.

 

Anyone who, like me, has become aware – with his or her EL – about his or her LE, anyone whose own language has revealed his or her own true nature, will have, what can perhaps best be described as positive negativity. Of course, I describe it this way, so that the reader, who unknowingly engages in DL, begins to understand, I am against all religion, as I am in favor of EL. I am not against DL, however, but I am against the products of DL, which can only be prevented if our DL is stopped. Being against DL has prevented us from becoming conscious about how we interact with each other. I cannot stop your DL, since you must do this yourself and you will never be able to experience the positive outcomes of your EL, if you refuse to acknowledge and then stop your own DL. Religion basically gives you another excuse, to go on with your unintelligent, dull, coercive DL.

 

Obviously, the imaginary conversation with some non-existent deity has always distracted people from having EL with each other, but if we look at religion more closely, there is no denying, it wasn’t this so-called higher power, which prevented us from EL, but other people. Actually, anyone who really goes into exploring, what it is like to have continuous EL, cannot avoid the realization, that it isn’t others, who were preventing us from EL, but it is we, ourselves. In other words, it is our identity or who we believe ourselves to be, which prevents us from having EL and once we have ongoing EL, our belief in who we believed to be dissolves. Therefore, our false belief in a mystical higher power – like our belief in a fabricated, behavior-causing, inner self or a mind – evaporates the moment we begin to value talking with ourselves, as more important than talking with others. Stated differently, others always are the so-called identity-priests, who both instill as well as reinforce our belief in who we appear to be.

 

Who we are is not a religion. It is only in absence of our EL, that we conjure constructs about ourselves, which are absolutely wrong. We are in denial of our mortality and still imagine, that we have an eternal soul, which lives on, after death or which is reborn in a different form. All of this is merely to maintain the notion of some sort of immortality. Surely, it is with DL, that we remain fearful of death and hang on to these superstitions. Presumably, the test of religion is its effect on conduct, but this is putting the horse behind the wagon. Once we focus on our conduct, on how we deal with our language, we discover that religion, as well as, an inner self or a mind, are constructs, which came about because we were forced to have DL and were never able to discover, acknowledge, explore and enjoy our EL, which reveals our LE.

 

 

Match,

 

When you discover – for yourself – the difference between your Disembodied Language (DL) and your Embodied Language (EL), you are faced with a great challenge. Although it is instantly clear to you, that you prefer your EL over your DL, your history of conditioning with DL can only be dismantled, to the extent, that you will be able to continue your EL. In order to continue your EL, you will have to stop your DL and to be able to accomplish this, you have to be upfront with yourself about behaviors, which are a match with your DL and those behaviors that match with your EL. Unless you correctly instruct yourself, to let go of those self-defeating behaviors, which were created and maintained by your DL, you will not be able to continue your EL and the whole behavioral repertoire, which matches with your EL.

 

Once you have admitted – to yourself – the great difference between your negative DL and your positive EL, you know very well, it is not up to you, to arrange a match between your own problematic behavior and your DL or between your liberating behavior and your EL. You either accept it, as it is, or you reject it. Most likely, you will do the latter. Due to your history of conditioning with DL, you will inevitably pretend, defend, believe and assert, all kinds of total nonsense, but the troubling reality of the rigid match between your supposedly normal behavior and your DL cannot be avoided. However, when you consider the match between your EL and the behaviors, which belong to it, you can’t help but feel uncertain, overwhelmed and confused, as you have never consciously paid attention, to those behaviors, which you absolutely need to be happy.

 

The only way in which you are going to be able, to match your EL with the behaviors, which fit with the language of your individuality, is if you surrender to the unfolding of your own EL, but this isn’t anything you have ever experienced before with your DL. As a matter of fact, you can only have EL, when your DL is completely stopped – as often as it takes – by you. Sometimes you may succeed, but often times you just can’t seem to do it, since you don’t know why you continue with your DL, as you haven’t talked enough about it with yourself. It makes no sense simply guessing, which behaviors fit with your EL and trying to have EL doesn’t work either.

 

During EL it is self-evident, what you should do or shouldn’t do, to have it. Obviously, you shouldn’t have DL and as you begin to hear and listen to your own self-instructions with your EL, you will actually begin to do all the things you have said to yourself, you would do. You will be so amazed and delighted, that you can follow through and that you achieve many positive consequences, which you have never experienced before. Although there will, of course, be setbacks, as you keep falling back into your habit of having DL again, this is necessary, because it makes you aware about the behaviors which match with your DL and the behaviors which match with your EL. You will be surprised about the behaviors which match with your EL, because they steer you into your aloneness, independence and freedom.

 

You will, in due course, discover this by yourself, your EL is not about your stress, anxiety, sadness, jealousy, frustration, fear, anger, confusion or lies, but about your wellbeing, relaxation, understanding, truth and happiness. All your dreadful, problematic, arrogant, automatic, insensitive, unnatural, dumb, superficial, meaningless behavior is a match with your stubborn DL. Neither I nor you made it so, this is a fact of life, which with EL you finally accept, say and hear. Moreover, you like to hear your EL, but of course, you don’t like to hear your DL and that is why you continue your EL and stop your DL. Why would you continue with DL, if it keeps so many of your ineffective troublesome behaviors going, which you no longer want to be involved in?

 

There is no way around it, when you begin to listen to your voice while you speak, you either notice the match or the mismatch between your language and your behavior. The former is your EL, the latter is your DL. Stated differently, you like and enjoy how you behave in EL, but you dislike and dread it, when you engage in DL. You never noticed this before, as you didn’t do the experiment, in which you listen to yourself while you speak and determine for yourself what is DL and EL. Look up cymatics, the science which investigates how sound waves create patterns in matter. Your voice is your sound, which creates all the behavioral patterns of your life. After you have stopped your DL and can continue with your EL, because you truly enjoy what you hear and when you allow yourself, to do what you like, you will experience your Language Enlightenment (LE).

 

The behaviors, which match and, therefore, support your EL and reveal your LE, have never occurred, because they are always new. In other words, your speaking voice is a vibration, which creates new behavioral patterns. However, this only occurs, if you speak with yourself and if you keep listening to how you sound and say what you say, so that you remain attuned to the frequency, which renews you.  EL is a match made in heaven, because you live in extasy, due to your sound and your behavior. At a practical level, you tell yourself what it is like to be enlightened and how to behave like an enlightened human being. You predict what you say and do, as you now listen to the previously missing frequency. You were conditioned to listen to others and, thus, you have never continuously listened to yourself.

 

Although you did not know this, DL is no match for you. With DL, you are not listening to the sound of your own wellbeing and as a result of that, you speak with a voice, which isn’t yours. Yes, you will speak with a different voice in EL and that voice is the sound of your LE. Everything will fall into place and there is no longer any need for you to match, because you are experiencing the flow of your EL. While all of this is beautiful and fascinating, you will only meet your match with someone, who, like you, has ongoing EL. Sadly, except myself and my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke, there isn’t anyone else around, who knows about EL and LE. So, this means - although you can talk with us and have a lot of fun with us - you will need to come to terms with your aloneness or your own death, as everything dissolves in your EL. Ultimately, EL matches with your LE, which, in turn, matches with your nothingness.                  

 

You can hear me talk, sing and play my ukulele and recorder on my You Tube channel. Just type in my name Maximus Peperkamp and you will find me. 

 

Here is another beautiful text – I translated it for you from Dutch to English – from my dear friend AnnaMieke, with whom I speak every week with Embodied Language (ELT) about our Language Enlightenment (LE)... please, also check out her beautiful blog, where she writes fantastically about all her discoveries with EL.

 

https://klompanna2.blogspot.com/

 

Naturalness.

 

The resilience it can have, because of the logical consequence that the enlightenment has come to my parts, which I have been looking for for a long time. Unnoticed from all the writing, something has arisen, which has come to resemble an enlightenment and can now also experience that the decisiveness it had has flowed through to the wide ocean, where the drops have started to divide into more, in which I myself also stood. Where the brilliance that I could feel has now been confirmed in the action it has, in the breadth of discovering that I share my enlightenment. And I want to investigate which plane of encounter was still missing. And the little man on my shoulder who often passed judgment on not daring to speak about the enlightenment that I possess. Unknowingly, I have always known that my specialness in speaking and writing has shaped me into who I am and will be called, just as I know my name, like the dikes have been reinforced, like the wall has now fallen, in which I see a width that in its natural origin has placed me in the future of the present. I no longer wonder whether that is the intention, but simply my language points in that direction can indicate to unfold as it comes. Daring to be natural and being able to listen to one's own sound, where the core of an enlightenment can unfold, without an opposing voice. Without judging myself, but it is decisive in everything ordinary, which ultimately remains very special. Unnoticed as in a vision, the work that I show is flooded with my own writing as intended. I no longer wonder in the possibility of writing whether what I am doing is right, but let me go with the surrender that I feel I surrender to what can arise, which has remained my drive unnoticed, because I can now understand myself. Not only my words want to go to the light, but also all my parts on my blog. Awakening to who I really am to dare to be, which is known as enlightenment in being able to notice what it is like to be truly enlightened.

That is where my words fall short, where experiencing becomes more important, where the energy becomes so different in describing my language. Where the emotion has come closer, in the tears that can overwhelmingly tell me that this is the enlightenment in which I stand. Daring to stand by my own naturalness, to experience who I am, which has arisen in my writing.

Natuurlijkheid.

Hier is nog weer een prachtige tekst van mijn dierbare vriendin AnnaMieke, waarmee ik iedere week,  met Belichaamde Taal (BT) over onze Taal Verlichting (TV) spreek... lees ook maar eens haar blog waarop zij fantastisch schrijft over al haar ontdekkingen. 

https://klompanna2.blogspot.com/

 

Natuurlijkheid.

De veerkracht die het kan hebben, door het logisch gevolg, dat in mijn delen de verlichting is gekomen, waar ik al een hele tijd naar zocht .
Ongemerkt vanuit het vele schrijven is er iets ontstaan, wat op een verlichting is gaan lijken en nu ook kan ervaren, dat de daadkracht die het had, is door gegleden naar de wijde oceaan,waar de druppels tot meer is gaan verdelen, waarin ikzelf ook stond.Waar de schittering die ik kon voelen nu is bevestigd in de handeling die het heeft,in de wijdte van het ontdekken dat ik mijn verlichting deel.En wil gaan onderzoeken welk een vlak van ontmoetten er nog ontbrak.En het mannetje op mijn schouder die vaak een oordeel gaf, om niet te durven spreken over de verlichting die ik bezit.Ongemerkt heb ik eigenlijk altijd al geweten dat mijn bijzonderheid in het spreken en schrijven mij heeft gevormd in wie ik ben en zal heten zoals ik mijn naam ook ken,zoals de dijken zijn verstevigd,zoals de muur nu omgevallen is,waarin ik zie een wijdte die in haar natuurlijk oorsprongelijkheid mij neer heeft gezet in de toekomst van het heden Mij niet meer af vraag of dat de bedoeling is ,maar gewoon mijn taal die richting aan kan geven om te ontvouwen zoals het komt.
Het natuurlijk durven zijn en kunnen luisteren naar eigen klank,daar waar de kern van een verlichting kan ontvouwen,zonder een tegengeluid.Zonder een oordeel naar mijzelf ,maar de doorslag krijgt in al het gewone, wat uiteindelijk heel bijzonder blijft.
Ongemerkt als in een visie, is mijn werk die ik laat zien, overspoeld met eigen schrijven zoals bedoeld.Ik vraag mij niet meer af in de mogelijkheid van schrijven of het goed is wat ik doe,maar laat mij meegaan in de overgave die ik voel.Ik geef mij over aan wat er kan ontstaan,wat ongemerkt mijn drive is gebleven, omdat ik mijzelf nu kan verstaan.Niet alleen mijn woorden naar het licht willen gaan,maar ook al mijn delen op mijn blog.Het ontwaken in wie ik werkelijk durf te zijn,dat een verlichting weet te noemen in het opgemerkt kunnen beleven hoe het is om echt verlicht te kunnen zijn.
Daar schieten mijn woorden in tekort,waarin het ervaren belangrijker wordt,waar de energie zo anders wordt in het beschrijven van mijn taal.Waar de ontroering dichterbij is gaan staan,in de tranen die mij overweldigend kunnen vertellen, dat dit de verlichting is waarin ik sta.Bij mijn eigen natuurlijkheid durven te staan,te ervaren in  wie ik ben, zo in mijn schrijven is ontstaan.

 

Dictator,

 

It has never been said like this before, but it was of course inevitable, that this would come up: anyone who is involved in Disembodied Language (DL) is in fact a dictator. Dictators are always talked about as if they were some sort of especially bad person, but if we have Embodied Language (EL), we know for sure, that everyone who has DL, is trying, in one way or another, to force others, with their way of talking, which remains out of reach, because it is always supposedly about some important belief, theory or political ideology. Someone who claims that his or her ideas are better or more important than others, is always trying to change the other person's behavior with his or her language.

 

Changing the behavior of others - which, with DL, always goes hand in hand with denying one's own behavior - is only successful to the extent, that one can put pressure on the other person and to the extent, the other person feels so intimidated and fearful, that he or she does as he or she is told to do.  Although people with their unconscious DL – which has never been discussed before – will continue to claim that I would force them to stop their DL, this is absolutely not true. I can't stop your DL, because only you can do that yourself. I can only write about it here and you can voluntarily read it, understand it and verify whether, what I say is true, for you.

 

A dictator cannot live without a constant show of power and you, whether you want to admit it or not, from the deep-rooted inferiority complex that always occurs in DL, are trying to pretend, you are superior to others. You do this by placing yourself above others and, if that fails, by withdrawing into your lonely, miserable, dissatisfied way of life. You, supposedly, get along with, and even appreciate other dictators and deal with them in a businesslike manner, because it benefits you, but you avoid and condemn all the dictators, who do not want to be ass-kissed, boot-licked or bedeviled by you.

 

Nothing I say or write has to do with the coercion you are used to with insidious DL. So it is true, you do not want to believe me, as I do not manifest myself as a dictator. Only if I present myself as an authority - and assert myself as an author, as an intellectual, as a teacher, as a philosopher, as a politician, as a spiritual leader or as someone, who has studied psychology - will you subordinate yourself to me, because I know, how to impress or amuse you with my knowledge, which is power.

 

You always look up to the dictator, whom you consider as your leader, example or your ideal. He or she is hierarchically above you and that is why you – in turn – place yourself above others who should look up to you. The social status, on the so-called social ladder, which I am talking about here, consists of all kinds of people, who try to have power over others. Someone like me, who continues with EL, is not concerned with that, because all he or she is busy with is shaping his or her Language Enlightenment (LE) with his or her EL. He or she does this not because of, but in spite of, others.

 

I'm not going to continue with my pleasant, clear and revealing EL to convince you of it, but because I want to, even though hardly anyone else wants to know anything about it. In DL, it is always the speaker, who demands the listener's attention with the sound of his or her voice. However, if there is no other listener present than the speaker him or herself, then that DL speaker - without realizing it - will force him or herself with his or her unnatural sounding phony voice, to do all sort of things, he or she does not even want to do, if he or she would have EL. Also, in DL, the self-experience-denying speaker, because of the nasty, tiring, coercive sound of his or her voice, refuses to do things that he or she would consider necessary, beneficial or healthy, if he or she had EL.

 

People say that we are either our own best friend or our own worst enemy, but I have never heard of anyone being their own most bombastic, arrogant, petty, vengeful, sadistic dictator. Why is it like that? With DL, we continue to maintain friendly relations with preferred dictators, as they ensure there is some kind of order in our otherwise utterly chaotic, fragmented and meaningless existence. Real order, however, never arises through force, but through our effortless language and sound, which represents our well-being and intelligence. We are not trying to have EL or to sound this way or that way, but we have EL and we enjoy our sound, because we are able to do so, because we no longer listen to some dictator, but because we finally, in full surrender, freedom and peace, are listening to ourselves.

 

In DL, it is the same whether a speaker demands the listener's attention with his or her superiority or with his or her inferiority, because in both cases, the listener is forced to pay attention to the speaker's negative, domineering actions. Although it seems obvious that speakers with positive feelings never manipulate or demand the listener's attention, because of our conditioning history, we regard DL as normal. Of course, we are only able to dominate each other, to keep each other small, to humiliate and silence each other with our negative feelings. It is strange that this has never been fully recognized. This is why we hear DL everywhere, but rarely do we hear any EL. If by any chance there is a moment of EL, it is already gone, before we have identified it as such, because we don't know how it works.

 

There is nothing to force on anyone with our positive feelings and when, with EL something is explained and understood, there is no fear or tension. Understanding itself is, of course, also something positive. Curiously, because we all, unknowingly, still want to have EL, we are unconsciously trying to interact with each other in the most positive way possible, but this is why our  DL has continued. EL is not a matter of doing it as often as possible. We either have EL or DL and to continue with EL, our DL has to stop. This means, that every speaker, by listening to him or herself, prevents him or herself from being a dictator.

 

To begin with – with EL – we 

no longer demand that others

 listen to us, because we 

listen to ourselves and 

we realize that we did 

not do this when we had

 DL. But we also discovered

 that we were not only 

a dictator to others, but

 also to ourselves. Thus,

 in EL, we are no longer 

trying to force ourselves,

 to do something and we

 are recovering from all

 those times we have done

 that. We have done ourselves

 a disservice by convincing

 ourselves, that all kinds 

of things would be good 

for us, but which, with our 

EL, turn out to be undermining. 

What we claimed to be was 

not true and we have lived 

a very twisted and difficult 

life with our DL for a 

very long time.

 

With EL, we can dispel the persistent myth that dictators – somehow miraculously – can come into power and that we can supposedly prevent this with our democratic governments. The transition from DL to EL is always immediate and refers to the functioning of our nervous system. We have DL as long as we feel threatened and when this is no longer the case, only then, our EL is possible. There is no doubt whatsoever, when we have EL, about how dictators come to power or how fascism, like some kind of virus, spreads. All of this is based on the language of fear, which I call DL, but which has never been mapped with EL, because we have continued to obsess over and get all riled up about those few individual dictators, these ruthless and oppressive rulers, who we believe are supposedly the cause are of all human misery. What a sick joke.

 

We are all equally responsible for the existence of all the dictators and all the dictatorships, because with our DL, we have accepted fear as the basis from which we have continued to communicate and live our lives. Anyone with DL is a dictator, who wants to get rid of dissidents who, like me, have EL. You don't want to talk to me, because that would mean the end of your conditioning with DL. If you have EL, your language of dictatorship is over.

 

Dictator,

 

Het is nog niet eerder zo gezegd, maar het kon natuurlijk niet uitblijven, dat dit ter sprake zou gaan komen: iedereen die zich met Ontlichaamde Taal (OT) bezig houdt, is in feite een dictator. Er wordt altijd over dictators gesproken, alsof zij een heel apart sort van slecht mens zouden zijn, maar als wij Belichaamde Taal (BT) hebben, dan weten wij, dat iedereen, die OT heeft, op de een of andere manier, probeert, om anderen te dwingen, met zijn of haar manier van praten, die buiten schot blijft, omdat het altijd zogenaamd over een of ander geloof, theorie of politieke ideologie gaat. Iemand die beweert, dat zijn of haar overtuiging beter of belangrijker is dan anderen, is altijd bezig, om te proberen het gedrag van die ander te veranderen met zijn of haar taal.

 

Het veranderen van het gedrag van anderen – wat, met OT, altijd samengaat met het ontkennen van het eigen gedrag – lukt alleen, in zoverre men die ander onder druk kan zetten en in zoverre die ander, omdat hij of zij zich geintimideerd voelt, angstig doet zoals hij of zij wordt bevolen om te doen. Ook al zullen mensen met hun onbewuste OT – die nog nooit eerder is besproken – blijven beweren, dat ik hen zou dwingen, om hun OT te stoppen, dit is absoluut niet waar. Ik kan jou OT niet stoppen, omdat alleen jijzelf dat kan doen. Ik kan er hier alleen over schrijven en jij kunt dit vrijwillig lezen, begrijpen en verifieren of het waar is, voor jou.

 

Een dictator kan niet leven zonder machtsvertoon en jij bent, of je het nou wil toegeven of niet, vanuit het zich altijd in OT voordoende, diepgewortelde minderwaardigheids complex, aan het proberen om te doen alsof je superieur zou zijn aan anderen. Je doet dit zowel, door je boven anderen te plaatsen, maar, als dat niet niet lukt, door je terug te trekken, in je eenzame, miserabele, ontevreden manier van leven. Jij vindt andere dictators zogenaamd goed en  gaat zakelijk met hen om, omdat jij er je voordeel bij doet, maar je vermijdt en veroordeeld alle dictators, die zich door jou geen oor willen laten aannaaien.

 

Niets van wat ik zeg of schrijf heeft te maken met de dwang, waaraan jij gewend bent met OT. Het is dus zo, dat je mij niet wilt geloven, omdat ik mij niet als dictator manifesteer. Alleen indien ik mij voordoe, als authoriteit – en daarbij op mijn strepen ga staan als auteur, als intellectueel, als leraar, als philosoof, als politicus, als geestelijk leider of als iemand die psychologie heeft gestudeerd – wil jij je aan mij ondergeschikt maken, omdat ik jou met mijn kennis, die macht is, weet te imponeren of amuseren.

 

Je kijkt altijd op tegen de dictator, die jij beschouwd als jou leider, als jou voorbeeld of als jou ideaal. Hij of zij staat hierarchies gezien boven jou en daarom plaats ook jij jezelf – op jou beurt – weer boven anderen, die naar jou op zouden moeten kijken. Het sociale aanzien, de zogenaamde maatschappelijke ladder, waar ik het hier over heb, bestaat dus uit allerlei mensen, die macht over anderen proberen te hebben. Iemand zoals ik, die verder gaat met BT, houdt zich daar niet mee bezig, omdat het enige wat hem of haar interesseert, is het met BT gestalte geven aan zijn of haar Taal Verlichting (TV). Hij of zij doet dit niet vanwege, maar juist ondanks anderen.

 

Ik ga niet verder met mijn genoegelijke, duidelijke en onthullende BT, om jou daarvan te overtuigen, maar omdat ik het zelf wil, ook al wil verder bijna niemand er iets van weten. In OT, is het altijd de spreker, die met de klank van zijn of haar stem, de luisteraar’s aandacht eist. Wanneer er echter geen andere luister aanwezig is, dan de spreker zelf, dan zal die OT-spreker – zonder daar erg in te hebben – zichzelf dwingen met zijn of haar stemgeluid, om allerlei dingen te doen, die hij of zij niet eens wil doen, als hij of zij BT heeft. Ook weigert de, in OT, eigen-ervaring-ontkennende spreker, vanwege de   nare, vermoeiende, onnatuurlijke klank van zijn of haar stem, om dingen te doen, die als noodzakelijk  worden beschouwt, als hij of zij BT zou hebben.

 

Men zegt wel eens, dat we, ofwel onze eigen beste vriend zijn, ofwel dat we onze eigen grootste vijand zijn, maar ik heb nog nooit gehoord, dat iemand zijn eigen meest bombastische, arrogante, kleinzielige, wraakzuchtige, sadistische dictator is. Waarom is dat zo? Met OT blijven wij vriendschappelijke betrekkingen onderhouden met bepaalde dictators, omdat zij ervoor zorgen, dat er een soort van orde is, in ons chaotische en gefragmenteerde bestaan. Werkelijke orde echter, ontstaat nooit met dwang, maar met moeiteloze taal en klank, die ons welzijn vertegenwoordigd. Wij proberen dus niet, om BT te hebben of om zus of zo te klinken, maar wij hebben BT en genieten van onze klank, omdat wij daartoe in staat zijn, omdat wij niet meer luisteren naar de een of andere dictator, maar omdat wij eindelijk, in volle overgave, vrijheid en rust, luisteren naar onszelf.

 

In OT, komt het op hetzelfde neer of een spreker de aandacht eist van de luisteraar met zijn of haar superioriteit of met zijn of haar inferioriteit, want in beide gevallen wordt de luisteraar gedwongen, om aandacht te geven aan de spreker’s negatieve wijze van handelen. Ofschoon het eigenlijk voor de hand ligt, dat sprekers met positieve gevoelens nooit de aandacht van de luisteraar manipuleren of eisen, beschouwen wij vanwege onze conditionering OT als gewoon en normaal. Uiteraard zijn wij alleen maar in staat, om elkaar te domineren, om elkaar klein te houden, om elkaar de mond te snoeren, met onze negatieve gevoelens. Het is vreemd, dat dit nog nooit volledig is onderkend. Dit is waarom we overal OT horen, maar zelden BT. En, als er even toevallig een momentje van BT is, dan is het al weer verdwenen, want we weten niet hoe het werkt.

 

Er valt niets te dwingen met positieve gevoelens en als er met BT iets wordt uitgelegd en begrepen, dan is er geen angst of spanning. Ook het begrijpen zelf, is natuurlijk iets positiefs. Merkwaardigerwijs zijn wij, omdat we BT willen, onbewust bezig, om op een zo positief mogelijke manier met elkaar om te gaan, maar dit heeft tot gevolg, dat OT bleef voort gaan. BT is geen kwestie is, van het zo vaak mogelijk doen. We hebben OT of BT en om met BT verder te gaan, dient onze OT op te houden. Dit houdt in, dat iedere spreker, door naar zichzelf te luisteren, zichzelf ervan weerhoudt, om een dictator te zijn.

 

Om te beginnen – met BT – eisen we niet meer van anderen, dat zij naar ons luisteren, omdat wij naar onszelf luisteren en ons realiseren, dat wij dit niet deden, toen wij OT hadden. Maar, we kwamen er eveneens achter, dat wij niet alleen een dictator waren naar anderen, maar ook naar onszelf. In BT, zijn wij dus niet meer bezig, om onszelf tot iets te dwingen en herstellen wij van al die keren, dat wij dat wel deden. We hebben onszelf tekort gedaan, door onszelf te overtuigen, dat allerlei dingen goed voor ons zouden zijn, die evenwel met onze BT ondermijnend blijken te zijn. Wat wij beweerden te zijn, was niet waar en we hebben lange tijd met OT een heel onnatuurlijk en moeizaam leven geleid.

 

Met BT ontzenuwen we de nog altijd bestaande mythe, dat dictators aan de macht zouden kunnen komen en dat we dit met democratische regeringen zouden kunnen voorkomen. De overgang van OT naar BT is onmiddelijk en refereert aan de werking van ons zenuwgestel. Wij hebben OT zolang als wij ons bedreigd voelen en wanneer dit niet langer het geval is, alleen dan is BT mogelijk. Er bestaat geen enkele twijfel vanuit BT, over hoe dictators aan de macht komen of hoe het fascisme, als een soort van virus, zich verspreidt. Dit alles is gebaseerd op de taal van angst, die ik OT noem, maar die nog nooit met BT in kaart is gebracht, omdat wij ons zijn blijven stukstaren op en opwinden over, die paar afzonderlijke dictatoriale machthebbers, die volgens ons zogenaamd de oorzaak zouden zijn van alle ellende. Wij zijn dus allemaal verantwoordelijk voor het bestaan van alle dictators en dictaturen, omdat wij met onze OT angst hebben geaccepteerd als de basis, vanwaaruit wij zijn blijven communiceren en leven. Iedereen met OT is een dictator, die zich wil ontdoen van dissidenten, die, zoals ik, BT hebben. Je wilt niet met mij praten, omdat dat het einde zou inhouden voor je conditionering met OT. Als je BT hebt, is het gedaan met jou taal van de dictatuur.