June
6, 2016
Written
by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Engineer
Dear Reader,
The question “What do you do if
your usual procedures aren’t working?” is answered by the president of the
Skinner Foundation, Julie Vargas with a statement by her father. He described
science “first of all as an attitude. It is a disposition to deal with the
facts, rather than what one has said about them.”
Julie asks “What are “facts?” She
answers “Facts are descriptions about how the world works”. I think about
Skinner’s words. According to him, what we say about the facts is not as
important as what we do with them.
If we take into consideration the sad
fact that most spoken communication in academia is Noxious Verbal Behavior
(NVB), it is understandable Skinner didn’t care very much for what people said
about the facts.
Dealing with the facts of behavior
was more important to him than talking about it in a Noxious
Verbal Behavior manner which ignores the facts, which shuts us up and which makes
environmental variables inaudible.
Skinner pretty much felt that his involvement
in NVB was a total waste of time. It is important that we now finally learn to recognize
NVB as an unscientific way of talking. It is only in Sound Verbal Behavior
(SVB) that we can talk about and thus acknowledge the facts.
We can only have scientific
conversation as long as we engage in SVB and adhere to the facts about speaking
and listening. Each time the speaker aversively affects the listener, our communication
breaks down. NVB is NOT communication, but coercion, separation, alienation, domination, exploitation, alienation and
dissociation.
The most important fact about our spoken
communication is that it can only occur in an environment which is free of aversive
stimulation. So-called communication or NVB, which goes on in aversive environments,
has been accepted as normal as we don’t know how to create and maintain the
environment in which SVB can occur.
No comments:
Post a Comment