March
28, 2016
Written
by Maximus Peperkamp, M.S. Verbal Engineer
Dear Reader,
The question why religious
behavior is so stable obfuscates the role our way of talking plays in this
process. In “Religion as
Schedule-Induced Behavior” (2009) Strand explains “At first glance, stability
in the context of shifting reinforcement contingencies may seem contrary to the
socially mediated reinforcement hypothesis; but it is not. That is because,
according to this view, malleability occurs primarily in childhood, after which
beliefs become fixed as contingency-based behavior gives way to rule-governed
behavior.”
Whether we end up having more
Sound Verbal Behavior (SVB) or Noxious Verbal Behavior (NVB) depends how others
talk with us. Likewise, whether we end up having a Christian, Jewish or Hindu
belief is determined by the fact that others speak with us. However, what keeps
escaping even most behaviorists is that it makes a great difference to what
extent our religious behavior was taught with either SVB or NVB. The person who
was taught Christianity with a lot of SVB, but with little NVB is very different
from the Christian who was taught with a lot of NVB, but with little SVB.
As we all know, there are very
loving, but are also very hateful Christians. A person’s love has nothing to do
with his or her religion, but has everything to do with the extent to which he
or she was talked at or talked with, while he or she
was growing up. The former is an example
of NVB and the latter is an example of SVB. The Jew who grew up experiencing and
enjoying a lot of SVB will be entirely different from the Jew who was mostly involved
in NVB.
No comments:
Post a Comment