Talking, 

 

I always want to talk about my Embodied Language (EL) because I know I can do it when most other people really can't. Continuing to research my EL has allowed me to learn things that could not have been revealed in any other way. When I first noticed the difference between my Disembodied Language (DL) and my EL, I had no idea where my EL was going to take me. I was amazed at the undeniable fact that my DL had suddenly ceased and that I had apparently somehow brought this about. Moreover, I proved to be able to continue with my EL untrained, effortlessly and confidently.

 

EL is the ability to speak in complete peace and quiet. No one with DL could ever realize that it is possible and pleasant to speak from a sense of supreme sensitivity. It is then a matter of surrender, since you are no longer focused on what you say, but how you say it. And the meaning of what you say is determined by how you sound. There is no threat in EL and you feel completely at ease. To speak without fear is to say what makes you happy. That can be anything and that is why it is very important to say everything that can be said. If we want to continue with EL, we set ourselves the task of also speaking about what we don't know.

       

Talking without knowing what we are going to talk about is a big taboo, as no one is in charge and the conversation develops naturally. Our habitual way of speaking is mechanical because, before we open our mouths, we already know what we are going to say and because what we all pretend is what we say is the most important thing. The discomfort and stress of pretending is why we can recognize our DL. For example, when we begin to listen to ourselves - which is something we don't do in DL - we realize that we are speaking with a voice that we actually dislike. We continue to hold judgments about ourselves because we hardly speak with a sound that expresses our well-being.

 

In EL, we find out that it is very important to sound the way we want to sound while talking to each other, but during DL we don't listen to each other because we don't even listen to ourselves. The so-called great importance of true listening is discussed repeatedly, but we only talk about listening to others and never about listening to ourselves. Listening to ourselves, however, is much more important than listening to others, because listening to ourselves enables us to listen to others.

 

Obedience is not only the compulsive listening

 to attention-demanding speakers, but also the 

obligatory forgetting to listen to ourselves. 

Regardless of what culture we grew up in, we 

are all conditioned to have DL, in which we 

must listen to some authority outside of ourselves. 

So, eventually, when we begin to pay attention 

to listening to ourselves, we tend to punish 

ourselves because we have been taught – implicitly – 

that doing so is immoral. Also, it becomes clear

 to us that in DL we have remained unconscious

 and ignorant of ourselves because, during our

 normal speech, the speaker is supposedly more

 important than the listener.

 

When we have EL and thus talk to ourselves, the same phenomenon still occurs that the so-called speaker in us seems to be more important than the so-called listener in us. There is, of course, no speaker in us who speaks or a listener in us who listens, therefore in EL we can speak listening, because our speaking and our listening are synchronized. In other words, in EL we are freed from the illogical and therefore very problematic reasoning that listening to ourselves is meaningless. In EL our own intelligence unfolds, which I call Language Enlightenment (LE). Our own logic is at odds with what is socially expected of us.

 

Moral or morality is what we see as good behavior and that means that we don't kill anyone, but we also don't steal or hurt anyone intentionally. In DL, speakers pretend that listeners should keep listening and thus never become speakers. Also, DL- speakers pretend that they cannot or should not listen to themselves and that others should listen to them. Even though the listener is not literally killed, he or she is not given a chance to speak in DL. So speakers and preachers with DL are immoral, because DL is behavior in which we continue to short-change ourselves and each other.