Liberated,
I feel liberated
from the heavy duty, which I had, unknowingly, taken on myself, to change the
world, because I can express my Language Enlightenment (LE) with my Embodied
Language (EL). People who, unconsciously,
mainly engage in unnatural, blunt, superficial, troublesome, Disembodied Language
(DL) aren’t interested in LE or its natural, effortless expression: EL. They
will do what people with DL have always done, they create conflict and chaos.
When people
claim to be liberated, they usually have DL, but this is not the case with me. Those
who are most vocal about their so-called freedom, aren’t free at all, because they
don’t know the difference between DL and EL. People have been imprisoned or
enslaved by each other and, then, presumably, at some point, they were
liberated, but they never got out of their self-imposed language-prison with
DL.
There is no other
freedom than LE and the language of freedom is EL. Obviously, both our EL and
our LE are very personal matters. This is why each person is truly unique. In
DL, however, everyone tries so hard, to be special and get the attention from
others, but it is more of the same mediocre, boring, repetitive language. Indeed,
without EL, there is no originality.
People have forever
tried, to become liberated from what was socially or culturally enforced on
them by their societies, but they have never managed to free themselves from
the language, which, of course, has conditioned them. Surely, without de-conditioning
of our coercive DL and re-conditioning with EL, the idea of liberation or
freedom is only a pipe-dream.
As long as we
remain exposed to threatening stimuli, we cannot and will not be liberated. Due
to our DL, we remain on guard, even if the coast is clear. We remain busy with
each other or outward oriented, even if there is no need for it, out of habit. We
can only be liberated by the flow of EL, which reveals our LE, in which we are and
stay with ourselves.
Although
nobody wants to believe this or seriously consider this, we can only be liberated
from all the complete nonsense, we have come to believe with our forceful DL,
by radically stopping our DL and by prolonging our engagement in EL. Each time,
we can have EL instead of DL, we feel liberated, but unless we have ongoing EL,
our LE remains out of sight. Actually, unless we have ongoing EL, we don’t hear
our LE and if we can’t hear it, we become oblivious of it, even if we have recognized
it, when we noticed the immense difference between our DL and our EL.
When we hear
the horrendous stories from the liberated hostages and see the enormous relief
of the family members and friends, who were worried crazy about their wellbeing,
we get a bit of a sense of how wonderful
and necessary it is, to feel safe and cared for. Although Holland and Europe
was liberated by the allied forces – which, we tend to forget, also consisted
of Russians – it didn’t result in the consolidation of the language of individualism.
A lot of
attention has gone to shaping the narrative, in determining, what others should
or shouldn’t talk about, but nobody is staying true to what they want to talk
about with themselves. Moreover, if we really listen, to what we say to
ourselves, we are not predetermining what we are saying. We are not having
scripted, pretentious, phony, coarse, pushy, automatic, manipulative, defensive,
domineering, intimidating DL, but we are engaging in intelligent, spontaneous, lively, humoristic, useful EL. We
are liberated – this is our LE – and capable of saying who we really are, only when
our EL can continue. Our EL is the verbal expression of our wellbeing.
No comments:
Post a Comment