Writing,
While I was
studying psychology, the thing I enjoyed most, was writing papers. I never saw the
need for quoting what someone else had said or written, as I always wanted to write
about my own language. As anyone who reads my writing can tell, I only write
about who I turned out to be, with my Embodied Language (EL). I am no longer
interested in who I was, due to my conditioning with Disembodied Language (DL),
because I can now fully understand why I was that way. Yes, I am self-realized,
and my writing has played an important
role in describing and establishing my Language Enlightenment (LE).
When I
discovered, in my early twenties, the great difference between my DL and EL, I only wanted
to speak about it with others, so that people could hear it and have it. Many
people suggested, I should write a book about it, but to me, such suggestions indicated, they weren’t interested in experiencing
EL. I was and I still am aware, people appreciate the written word, more than
the spoken word. I am so glad, I have continued with the spoken version of my
EL. This writing is the consequence of that fact.
Whenever
someone has EL, he or she is listening to him or herself, while he or she
speaks and he or she is saying, what he or she is saying, to him or herself. Although
I know, others can read and understand it, I write this for myself. People who don’t
know about the difference between DL and EL, don’t know and cannot know, that all
the writing, that was done by others, was based on DL. This writing or the
writing of my dear Dutch friend AnnaMieke – who, like me, finds talking out
loud with herself and listening to her voice and, thus, experiencing her own ongoing
EL, more productive, than talking with others and, inevitably, being exposed to
or getting involved in DL – is the only writing, which is based on EL. You can
only read about our EL and LE on our blogs.
Whenever we are
obediently, unconsciously and effortfully listening, to a handful of, presumably,
important, knowledgeable, distinguished speakers – without realizing, we never even
get the chance, to say something ourselves – we don’t realize, these eloquent, prominent,
persuasive speakers – who, of course, only succeed in getting all the attention,
by dominating, by determining and by, in one way or another, forcing the so-called
conversation – only say what they or others have written. Their speech is
scripted, pre-determined, acted and phony.
When I went
to college and took a speech class, I was infuriated and totally disappointed, to
find out, that I was taught and expected, to write my speech, before I could, supposedly,
say what wanted to say, in a most convincing – manipulative – way. It really goes
against everything I stand for. It goes without saying, I did very badly in that
class, because I didn’t want to do, what I was supposed to do. However, it was
an eye-opener, to find out that, unfortunately, all public speaking, is always
based on writing about what is said. And, this is why practically every public
person has written a book, which perpetuates the already existing detrimental notion,
that the written word, is more important than the spoken word.
Before I
enrolled in the Psychology program of Palo Alto University, I was promised, I would
be able to determine my own research topic. However, after I had successfully completed
all my course work and was accruing my clinical hours, by giving therapy to
severely mentally ill and traumatized people, I was told in a forceful manner, by
the mean and arrogant director, that with regard to writing my dissertation, I
had to follow the research of my supervisor and that I could write about whatever
I wanted, after I had achieved the Ph.D. This was a total betrayal. I hope they
read this and give me my money back. I withdrew from the program, because I had
wanted to write about, what I am writing about on my blog.
I am glad, I
didn’t become a psychologist. With my master's degree I became a psychology
instructor at Butte College, where one of the assignments, to all my students,
was to write a one-page paper, which started with the sentence: when I speak
alone with myself and listen to the sound of my voice, then… They would experience,
what it is like, to speak with and listen to themselves and then write about
that. It was so revealing and so beautiful, what they were writing. I still consider
receiving all these wonderful papers as
my biggest accomplishment, as a teacher.
Certainly, this
writing or anyone’s writing about EL, will let you know, that EL really exists,
but you will only be able to experience it, if you begin to talk out loud with
yourself and listen to your voice. Reading someone else’s writing isn’t
changing our behavior, as it distracts us from paying attention to our EL, our
own language, with which we instruct ourselves, to be happy and to behave as we
want to. Yet, reading our own writing is a different matter, especially, if it
is about our EL. By writing and reading about my EL, I have turned the corner
on my conditioning history with DL and have become stabilized in my LE. I was against
writing about EL in the beginning, because I intuitively didn’t want to be
burdened with writing, which must have derived from people their inability to acknowledge
the existence of EL, let alone, of the continuation of EL, which would reveal
their LE.
No comments:
Post a Comment