Continuously,

 

After you have discovered the immense difference between your Disembodied Language (DL) and your Embodied Language (EL), you can’t miss, that from now, you can continuously have EL. While it is certainly true, your conditioning history with DL isn’t immediately finished, you know it is possible to return to EL, no matter how often you forget. Each time, you talk again with yourself and listen again to yourself, you effortlessly find back your EL, which basically continues exactly from where you left it.

 

This going back, to where your language began to separate you from your experience, isn’t a going back to the last time you had EL, but it is a going back – all the way – to when you were still a baby, who hadn’t yet learned how to speak. Yes, in this pre-verbal state, there was only experience, but no language. EL is listening to yourself while you speak, which means, experiencing yourself while you speak. This experience makes a new understanding possible, which is expressed by you as your EL.  

 

Everybody wants to be happy, but the reason, we want to be happy, is because we are not happy. If we are happy, we don’t want to be happy. We only want to be happy, when we are unhappy. Why are we unhappy? Are we unhappy, because we can’t be happy or is there something, that keeps diminishing our happiness? Of course, we can be happy, but we have never acknowledged, our language doesn’t allow us to be happy. We can only be happy, if our language fits with our happiness. Those moments we were happy, our language matched with our experience of happiness, or we were so happy, that we were speechless, that language wasn’t needed.

 

The so-called problem of one and the many, has been discussed continuously by philosophers. I am not a philosopher and to me, there is no problem, because I have EL continuously. Philosophers, who endlessly talk about this matter, obviously repeat something, they are unable to figure out, because they unconsciously, continuously engage in DL. They can’t find the one thing or reality that underlies the diversity and complexity of the universe, because they never listen to themselves while they speak.

 

Anyone who engages in EL, continuously hears him or herself, while he or she speaks. This attention for our own sound, makes us experience the speaker as his or her own listener. In other words, the speaker and the listener – who is the speaker – are always experienced as one in EL. By contrast, during DL – in which we don’t listen to ourselves while we speak – we, unknowingly, experience a separation between the speaker and the listener, who speaks. Therefore, DL is the language of duality, in which we imagine we have a mind, but EL is the language of oneness. When we, in EL, as speakers, experience ourselves, as one with the listener, it is clear to us, when we speak with others, that they, as listeners, are also one with us, because we always perceive the speaker and the listener as one. Also, when others talk, we, as listeners, are always one with them, because in EL the speaker is the listener. In effect, when we hear others talk – in EL – we hear ourselves talk, because we listen to others in the same way as we listen to ourselves, and we talk with others in the same way as we talk with ourselves.

 

Our ability to engage in EL, continuously, is a skill which can only be acquired if we stop our own DL. The continuation of our EL signifies our Language Enlightenment (LE), which is just another way of saying, we are always one with reality. We don’t experience, as in DL, as if we are separate from the world, but we are one with it, because that is our reality. Thus, our EL always expresses our LE and that is why, it can go on continuously. Surely, in DL, due to the way we use our language, we imagine to be separate from reality. DL is simply the incorrect way of using language and EL is the correct way.

 

Only after we have discovered the great difference between our DL and EL, do we begin to admit and acknowledge and comprehend, how much we are actually troubled by our conditioning history with DL. Although we definitely begin to become capable of arranging instances in which can experience our EL, instead of DL, we are painfully aware, about the fact that we don’t have EL continuously. First of all, there is no one else, to have EL with us, because no one realizes, that listening to ourselves while we speak and engaging in EL, reveals our LE. Those rare individuals, who continuously pursue blissful EL, continuously feed off of each other, as they are the only ones, who are capable of doing this. Of course, it would be great, if we would all be doing this.